Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties

Mostafa Mohamed Selim

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties

Mostafa Mohamed Selim

Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 4)

Received: 10 October 2019 Accepted: 15 November 2019 Published: 6 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Alleviation of poverty and achieving food security are a significant challenge facing planner worldwide. A way of improving agronomic practices, mainly which has drastic effect on crop growth and yield potential is necessary and acceptable. In this domain, fertilization management has high priority, due to the expensive fertilizers, recently became the costlier input in agriculture. So, rationalization the use of chemical fertilizers is considerable. Replacement a part of chemical fertilizers by organic manure through a simple technique of using minimum effective dose of sufficient and balanced quantities of organic and inorganic fertilizers in combination with specific microorganisms, called INM are a bright solution. Not only for improving and building up of soil fertility but also for increasing the efficiency of chemical fertilizers and make fertilizers more available and most effective for maintaining higher yield without exposing soil native nutrients, ensuring environment and underground water with minimum risks and guaranteeing high profitability. Accordingly, integrated use of chemical fertilizer with organic manure became the quite promising practice not only for maintaining higher productivity but also for greater stability to crop production. Also, (INM) acts as a source of energy for the growth of soil microbes, improvement physical properties of soil, organic carbon and available nitrogen. Additionally, due to their slow realize have great residual effect on subsequent crops. The potential role of INM has been well documented by several investigators, despite some researchers have that, the effects of organic manures are not always have positive contribution and some fields have poor response to organic manures. Such conflicting effect may be due to the presence of high levels of phytotoxins and high C/N ratio, particularly in immature manures. So, the key component of INM goal is reaching to most effective and homogeneous combination could get a good fertilization program and effective target of the fertilizers, sufficient, balanced use of their quantity and quality, and straightforwardly uptake by plants for higher yield without jeopardizing soil native nutrients or polluting the environment. Conclusion, INM is a tool, that can offer good options and economic choices to supply plants with sufficient amount of most macro and micronutrients, and also can reduce the dose of chemical fertilizer, create favorable soil physiochemical conditions, healthy environment, eliminate the constraints, safety soil nutrient balance in long run, to an optimum level for sustaining the desired crop productivity and finding safe methods to get rid of agriculture wastes.

Published in	Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
Page(s)	139-150
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Organic-inorganic Fertilizers, Bio-fertilizer, Integrated Nutrients, Nutrients Balance, Nutrient Management

References

[1]	T. Wheller and J. Braun (2013). Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341, 508–513.
[2]	Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, (2012). FAOSTAT. FAO Database—Statistics Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. On line at http://faostat.fao.org/
[3]	Adeoye, P. A., S. E. Adebayo, and J. J. Musa (2011). Growth and yield response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to poultry and cattle manure as amendments on sandy loam soil plot. Agric. J. 6 (5): 218-221.
[4]	Siavoshi, M., A. Nasiri and S. L. Laware (2011). Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Yield Components in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), J. Agric. Sci. Doi: 10.5539/jas.v3n3p217.
[5]	Rahmann, G., M. R. Ardakani, P. Bàrberi, H. Böhm, S. Canal, M. Chander, M. David, L. Dengel, J. W. Erisman, A. C. Galvis-Martinez, U. Hamm, J. Kahl, U. Köpke, S. Kühne, S. B. Lee, A. K. Loes, J. H. Moos, D. Neuhoff, J. J. Nuutila, R. Oppermann, et al. (2016). Organic Agriculture 3.0 is innovation with research. Organic Agriculture. DOI 10.1007/ s13165-016-0171-5.
[6]	M. M. Selim, and A. Al-Owied, Al-Jawhara (2017). Genotypic responses of pearl millet to integrated nutrient management. BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, 14 (2): 156-169.
[7]	M. M. Selim, (2018). Potential Role of Cropping System and Integrated Nutrient Management on Nutrients Uptake and Utilization by Maize Grown in Calcareous Soil. Egypt. J. Agron. Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 297-312.
[8]	Z. Shah et al. 2003. Crop residue and fertilizer N effects on nitrogen fixation and yields of legume-cereal rotations and soil organic fertility. Field Crops Res., 83, 1-11.
[9]	Z. Shah, and M. I. Ahmad (2006). Effect of Integrated Use of Farm Yard Manure and Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Uptake of Wheat. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 1, 60-65.
[10]	Khoshgoftarmanesh, A. H, R. Schulin, R. L. Chaney, B. Daneshbakhsh, and M. Afyuni (2010). Micronutrient efficient genotypes for crop yield and nutritional quality in sustainable agriculture, A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30: 83-107.
[11]	Craft, C. M. and E. B. Nelson (1996). Microbial properties of composts that suppress damping-off and root rot of creeping bent grass caused by Pythium graminicola. Appl. Environ Microbiol 62: 1550–1557.
[12]	M. de Bertoldi (2010). Production and utilization of suppressive compost: environmental, food and health benefits. In: Insam H, Franke-Whittle IH, Goberna M (eds) Microbes at work. From wastes to resources. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 153–170.
[13]	A. C. Gaur and G. Singh (1995). Recycling of rural and urban wastes through conventional and vermicomposting. In: Tandon H. L. S., Ed., Recycling of Crop, Animal, Human and Industrial Wastes in Agriculture, FDCO, New Delhi, India, pp. 31-35.
[14]	R. A. Abdel-Aziz, and F. N. Al-Barakah (2005). Composting technology and impact of compost on soil biochemical properties. Arab Gulf J. Scientific Research. 23, (2): 80-91.
[15]	Garbeva, P., J. D. van Elsas, and J. A. van Veen (2008). Rhizosphere microbial community and its response to plant species and soil history. Plant Soil 302: 19–32.
[16]	Zingore, S., P. Tittonell, M. Corbeels, M. T. Van Wijk and K. E. Giller (2011). Managing soilfertility diversity to enhance resource use efficiencies in smallholder farming systems: a case from Murewa District, Zimbabwe. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 90, 87–103.
[17]	Zhang, F., Z. Cui, X. Chen, X. Ju, J. Shen, Q. Chen, X. Liu, W. Zhang, G. Mi, M. Fan, R. Jiang (2012). Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Adv. Agron. 116, 1–40.
[18]	Samreen, S., S. Zahir and M. Wisal (2014). Residual effect of organic wastes and chemical fertilizers on wheat yield under wheat-maize cropping sequence. Soil Environ. 33 (2): 88-95.
[19]	Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (2009). Declaration of the World Summit on Food Security, Rome, 16–18 November 2009. (www.fao.org/wsfs/ world-summit/en/).
[20]	Ali, A. M., M. R. Alam, M. S. H. Molla, and F. Islam (2010). Crop productivity as affected by fertilizer management options in Boro-T. cropping pattern at farmer's fields. Bangladesh J. Agri. Res. 35 (2): 287–296.
[21]	B. Kacar, and A. Katkat (2009). Plant nutrition /Nobel publication No. 843/ Science and Biology Publication Series No. 29-Ankara, Turkey- 424-533.
[22]	Yolcu, H., H. Şeker, M. K. Gullap, A. Lithourgidis, and A. Güneş (2011). Application of cattle manure, zeolite and leonardite improves hay yield and quality of nnual ryegrass (Lolium ultiflorum Lam.) under semiarid conditions. AJCS 5: 926–931.
[23]	Suge, J. K., M. E. Omoniyi, and E. N. Omani (2011). Effect of organic and inorganic sources of fertilizer on growth, yield and fruit quality of eggplant (Solanum melongena), Achieves of Applied Science Research, 3 (6): 470-479.
[24]	I. A. S. Gudugi (2013). Effects of cow dung and variety on the growth and yield of Okra (Abelmuschus esculentus L.), European Journal on Experimental Biology, 3 (2): 495-498.
[25]	Recep İrfan, N., K. Alpaslan, İlker, İnald and T. Veyis (2015). Effects of different organic materials on forage yield and nutrient uptake of silage maize (Zea mays L.) Journal of Plant Nutrition, V (39), 912-921.
[26]	Ghulam, R., J. W. Anwar, N. Muhammad, and A. R. Momna (2015). Determination and Evaluation of the Effect of Different Doses of Humic Acid on the Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.). IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 8 (2), Ver. I: 05-07.
[27]	Nawab, K., P. Amanullah Shah, A. Rab, M. Arif, M. Azim Khan, A. Mateen, and F. Munsif (2011). Impact of integrated nutrient management on growth and grain yield of wheat under irrigated cropping system. Pakistan J Bot 43 (4): 1943–1947.
[28]	Malika, M., M. R. Islam, M. R. Karim, A. Huda and M. Jahiruddin (2015). Organic and inorganic fertilizers influence the nutrient use efficiency and yield of a rice variety BINA dhan 7. Acad. Res. J AgrilSci Res 3 (7): 192–200.
[29]	A. R. M. Solaimam, and M. G. Rabbani (2006). Effects of NPKS and Cow dung on growth and yield of Tomato, Bulletin of the Institute of Tropical Agriculture, 29 (1): 31-37.
[30]	O. E. Omotayo and K. S. Chukwuka (2009). Soil fertility restoration techniques in Sub-sahran Africa using organic resources, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4 (3): 144-150.
[31]	Tonfack, L. B., A. Bernadac, E. Youmbi, V. P. Mbouapouognigni, M. Ngueguim, and A. Akoa (2009). Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on tomato vigor, yield and fruit composition under tropical andosol soil conditions. Fruits, Vol. 64 (4), 1-11.
[32]	Yadav, R. L., B. S. Dwivedi, K. Prasad, O. K. Tomar, N. J. Shurpali, and P. S. Pandey (2000). Yield trends, and changes in soil Organic-C and available NPK in a long-term rice–wheat system under integrated use of manures and fertilizers. Field Crops Research 68, 219–246.
[33]	Bhadoria, P. B. S, and Y. S. Prakash (2003). Relative influence of organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizer in improving rice productivity of lateritic soil. J. sustainable Agric., 23 (1): 77-87.
[34]	Regmi, A. P., J. K. Ladha, H. Pathak, E. Pasuquin, C. Bueno, D. Dawe, P. R. Hobbs, D. Joshy, S. L. Maskey and S. P. Pandey (2002). Yield and soil fertility trends in a 20-year rice-rice-wheat experiment in Nepal. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 857–867.
[35]	Sarkar, S., S. R. Singh, and R. P. Singh (2003). The effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil physical condition and the productivity of a rice-lentil cropping sequence in India. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 140, 419–425.
[36]	Yadvinder, S., S. Bijay, J. K. Ladha, C. S. Khind, R. K. Gupta, O. P. Meelu, and E. Pasuquin (2004). Long-term effects of organic inputs on yield and soil fertilityin the rice–wheat rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 845–853.
[37]	Jiang, D., H. Hengsduk, T. B. Dal, W. De Boer, J. QI, and W. X. Cao (2006). Long-term effects of manure and inorganic fertilizers on yield and soil fertility for a winter wheat–maize system in Jiangsu, China. Pedosphere 16, 25–32.
[38]	W. A. J. M. De Costa and U. R. Sangakkara (2006). Agronomic regeneration of soil fertility in tropical Asian smallholder uplands for sustainable food production. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 111–133.
[39]	Taylor, B. R., D. Younie, S. Matheson, M. Coutts, C. Mayer, C. A. Watson and R. L. Walker (2006). Output and sustainability of organic ley/arable crop rotations at two sites in northern Scotland. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144-435447.
[40]	S. Hossein and F. Ghooshchi (2013). Response of growth and yield of maize to biofertilizers in organic and conventional cropping systems. Intl J Agri Crop Sci., 5 (7): 797-801.
[41]	Chen, X. P., Z. L. Cui, P. M. Vitousek, K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, J. S. Bai, Q. F. Meng, P. Hou, S. C. Yue, V. Ro¨mheld, and F. S. Zhang (2011). Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6399–6404.
[42]	W. Wu. and B. Ma (2015). Integrated nutrient management (INM) for sustaining crop productivity and reducing environmental impact: A review. Sci. Total Environ, 512–513, 415–427.
[43]	A. B. Ghosh (1980). Soil fertility dynamics under different cropping systems. Fertilizer News 26 (9): 64-70.
[44]	Prasad, P., V. Satyanarayana, V., Murthy and K. J. Boote (2002). Maximizing yields in rice–groundnut cropping sequence through integrated nutrient management. Field Crop Res. 75, 9–21.
[45]	V. Ramamurthy and K. Shivashankar (1996). Residual effect of organic matter and phosphorus on growth, yield and quality of maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy 41 (2): 247-251.
[46]	Goyal, S., K. Chander, M. C. Mundra, and K. K. Kapoor (1999). Influence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 29, 196-200.
[47]	V. Kumar and I. P. S. Ahlawat (2004). Carry-over effect of bio-fertilizers and nitrogen applied to wheat (Triticumaestivum) and direct applied N in maize (Zea mays) in wheat maize cropping systems. Indian J. Agronomy, 49 (4): 233–236.
[48]	Alam, S. M., S. A. Shah, S. Ali, and M. M. Iqbal (2005). Yield and phosphorus uptake by crops as influenced by chemical fertilizer and integrated use of industrial by-products. Songkla J. Sci. Tech. 27: 9-16.
[49]	Zingore, S., R. J. Delve, J. Nyamangara and K. E. Giller (2008). Multiple benefits of manure: the key to maintenance of soil fertility and restoration of depleted sandy soils onAfrican smallholder farms. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 80, 267–282.
[50]	Schulin, R., A. Khoshgoftarmanesh, M. Afyuni, B. Nowack and E. Frossard (2009). Effect of soil management on zinc uptake and its bioavailability in plants. In: Development and Uses of Biofortified Agricultural Products. G. S. Ban uelos and Z. Lin (eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
[51]	Marschner, P. ed. (2012). Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Waltham, MA, USA: Academic Press.
[52]	G. Ghosh, and S. C. Poi (1998). Response of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhiza organism on some legume crops. Environ. Ecol., 16: 607–10.
[53]	Ashmita, B., K. B. Kushal, P. Bhattacharyya, and D. Gorh (2017). Integrated nutrient management in wheat grown in a northeast India soil: Impacts on soil organic carbon fractions in relation to grain yield, Soil & Tillage Research 168, 81–91.
[54]	Iqbal Muhammad, A. K., H. Anwar-Ul, M. Waseem Razaza and A. Muhammad (2012). Soil organic carbon, nitrate contents, physical properties and maize growth as influenced by dairy manure and nitrogen rates. Int. J. Agric. Biol., (14), 1, 20-28.
[55]	Rahman, M. H., M. R. Islam, M. Jahiruddin, M. Y. Rafii, M. M. Hanafi, and M. A. Malek (2013). Integrated nutrient management in maize-legume-rice cropping pattern and its impact on soil fertility. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol. 11 (1): 648- 652.
[56]	Chuan, L. M., P. He, M. F. Pampolino, A. Johnston, J. Y. Jin, X. P., Xu et al., (2013). Establishing a scientific basis for fertilizer recommendations for wheat in China: yield response and agronomic efficiency. Field Crops Res.; 140: 1–8.
[57]	Paul, F., F. Brentrup, T. BruuIsema, F. Garcia, R. Norton and S. Zingore (2014). Nutrient/fertilizer use efficiency: measurement, current situation and trends. IFA, IWMI, IPNI and IPI.
[58]	Zingore, S., H. K. Murwira, R. J. Delve and K. E. Giller (2007). Soil type, management history and current resource allocation: three dimensions regulating variability in crop productivity on African smallholder farms. Field Crops Res. 101, 296–305.
[59]	Zhang, F., Z. Cui, M. Fan, W. Zhang, X. Chen and R. Jiang (2011). Integrated soil–crop system management: reducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. J. Environ. Qual. 40, 1051–1057.
[60]	Zhang, H., R. Lal, X. Zhao, J. Xue, and F. Chen (2014). Opportunities and challenges of soil carbon sequestration by conservation agriculture in China. Adv. Agron. 124, 1–36.
[61]	Roy, R. N., A. Finck, G. J. Blair and H. L. S. Tandon (2006). Plant Nutrition for Food Security. FAO, Rome.
[62]	Tirol-Padre, A., J. K. Ladha, A. P. Regmi, A. L. Bhandari, and K. Inubushi (2007). Organic amendment affects soil parameters in two long-term rice–wheat experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71: 442–52.
[63]	Yu, Y. L., L. H. Xue and L. Z. Yang (2014). Winter legumes in rice crop rotations reduces nitrogen loss, and improves rice yield and soil nitrogen supply. Agron. Sustain Dev. 34, 633–40.
[64]	B. H. Janssen (1993). Integrated nutrient management: the use of organic and mineral fertilizers. In: van Reuler, H., Prins, W. H. (Eds.), The Role of Plant Nutrients for Sustainable Crop Production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ponsen and Looijen, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 89–105.
[65]	R. Parkinson (2013). System based integrated nutrient management. Soil Use Manag. 29, 608.
[66]	Ramachandrappa, B. K., A. Sathish, G. N. Dhanapal and P. N. Babu (2014). Nutrient management strategies for enhancing productivity of dryland crops in Alfisols. Indian J. Dryl. Agric. Res. Dev., 29, 49–55.
[67]	Bhattacharyya, P., K., Chakrabarti, and A. Chakraborty (2005). Microbial biomass and enzyme activities in submerged rice soil amended with municipal solid waste compost and decomposed cow manure. Chemosphere 60, 310–318.
[68]	R. L. Yadav and M. C. Meena (2009). Available micronutrient status and their relation with soil properties of Degana soil series of Rajasthan. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci, 57 (1): 90-92.
[69]	Gruhn, P., F. Goletti and M. Yudelman (2000). Integrated Nutrient Management, Soil Fertility and Sustainable Agriculture: Current Issues and Future Challenges. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
[70]	Wu. Wei and Ma. Baoluo (2015). Integrated nutrient management (INM) for sustaining crop productivity and reducing environmental impact: A review. Science of the Total Environment 512–513, 415–427.
[71]	Ryan, J., R. Sommer and H. Ibrikci (2012). Fertilizer best management practices: A perspective from the dryland West Asia-North Africa region. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 198, 57–67.
[72]	Mgonja, M., P. Audi, A. P. Mgonja, E. Manyasa and H. Ojulong (2013). Integrated blast and weed management and micro-dosing in finger millet. A HOPE Project Manual for Increasing Finger Millet Productivity; International crops research institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
[73]	S. Hemalatha and S. Chellamuthu (2013). Impacts of long term fertilization on soil nutritional quality under finger millet: Maize cropping sequence. J. Environ. Res. Dev., 7, 1571–1576.
[74]	Akram, M., M. A., Qazi and N. Ahmad (2007). Integrated nutrient management for wheat by municipal solid waste manure in rice–wheat and cotton–wheat cropping systems. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 16, 495–503.
[75]	Chukwuka, K. S. and E. O. Omotayo (2008). Effects of Tithonia green manure and water hyacinth compost application on nutrient depleted soil in South-Western Nigeria Int. J. Soil Sci. 3 (2): 69-74.
[76]	Nath, D. J., B. Ozah, R. Baruah, R. C. Barooah and Borah, D. K. (2011). Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil enzymes, microbial biomass carbon and bacterial populations under rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) sequence. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 81, 1143–1148.
[77]	Garai, T. K., J. K. Datta, and N. K. Mondal (2014). Evaluation of integrated nutrient management on boro rice in alluvial soil and its impacts upon growth, yield attributes, yield and soil nutrient status. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 60, 1–14.
[78]	Marimuthu, S., U. Surendran and P. Subbian (2014). Productivity, nutrient uptake and post-harvest soil fertility as influenced by cotton-based cropping system with integrated nutrient management practices in semi-arid tropics. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 60, 87–101.
[79]	Bairwa, V., Dahiya, R., Kumar, P., and V. K. Phogat (2013). Effect of long term integrated nutrient management on soil properties, soil fertility, nutrient uptake and crop yields under pearl millet–wheat cropping system. Res. Crops 14, 762–768.
[80]	Peng, S., J. Huang, X. Zhong, J. Yang, G. Wang, Y. Zou, F. Zhang, Q. Zhu, R. Buresh, and C. Witt (2002). Challenge and opportunity in improving fertilizer–nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Agric. Sci. China 1, 776–785.
[81]	Mueller, N., J. Gerber, M. Johnston, D. Ray, N., Ramankutty and J. Foley (2012). Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257.
[82]	Davidson, E., J. Galloway, N. Millar and A. Leach (2014). N-related greenhouse gases in North America: innovations for a sustainable future. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 9–10, 1–8.
[83]	Dawe, D., A. Dobermann, J. K. Ladha, R. L. Yadav, B. Lin, R. K. Gupta, P. Lal, G. Panaullah, O. Sariam, Y. Singh, A. Swarup and Q. X. Zhen (2003). Do organic amendments improve yield trends and profitability in intensive rice systems? Field Crops Research 83, 191–213.
[84]	M. M. Wahba (2007). Influence of compost on morphological and chemical properties of sandy soils, Egypt. J Appl. Sci Res 3: 1490–1493.
[85]	L. Van-Camp et al., (2004). Reports of the technical working groups established under the thematic strategy for soil protection. EUR21319 EN/3. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
[86]	Zhao, P., J. Li. Wang, Y. Chen, X. Ying and S. Liu (2009). The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat-maize cropping system. Mogotsi. In: Brink, M. & Belay, G. (Editors). PROTA 1: Cereals andpulses/Céréalesetlégumessecs. PROTA, Wageningen, Netherlands. 2006.
[87]	Mohammad, W., S. M. Shah, S. Shehzadi and S. A. Shah (2012). Effect of tillage, rotation and crop residues on wheat crop productivity, fertilizer nitrogen and water use efficiency and soil organic carbon status in dry area (rainfed) of north-west Pakistan. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr, 12 (4), 715-727.
[88]	Sönmez, I., M. Kaplan and S. Sönmez (2008). Effect of chemical fertilizers on environmental pollution and its prevention methods. Batı Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Derim Dergisi 25: 24–34 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
[89]	Haigang, Li., S. Jianbo and F. Zhang (2010). Phosphorus uptake and rhizosphere properties of intercropped and monocropped maize, faba bean, and white lupin in acidic soil. Biol Fertil Soils, 46: 79–91.
[90]	Sarwar, G., N. Hussain, H. Schmeisky, S. Muhammad, M. Ibrahim and E. Safdar (2008). Improvement of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties with Compost Application in rice-wheat Cropping System. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40 (1): 275-282.
[91]	Esilaba, A. O., J. B. Byalebeka, R. J. Delve, J. R. Okalebo, D. Ssenyange, M. Mbalule, and H. Ssali (2004). On farm testing of integrated nutrient management strategies in eastern Uganda. Agric. Syst. 86, 144–165.
[92]	N. C. Brady and R. R. Weil (2005). The nature and properties of soil. 13th ed. New York, NY, USA: MacMillan Publishing Co.
[93]	Yang, X. Y., W. D. Ren, B. H. Sun and S. L. Zhang (2012). Effects of contrasting soil management regimes on total and labile soil organic carbon fractions in loess soil in China. Geoderma 177–178, 49–56.
[94]	Behera, U. K., A. R. Sharma, and H. N. Pandey (2007). Sustaining productivity of wheat–soybean cropping system through integrated nutrient management practices on the Verticals of central India. Plant Soil 297, 185–199.
[95]	Mavi, M. S. and D. K. Benbi (2008). Potassium Dynamics under Integrated Nutrient Management in rice–wheat system. Agrochemical 52, 83–91.
[96]	Camara K. M, W. A. Payne and R. A. Rasmussen (2003). Long term effect of tillage, nitrogen and rainfall on winter wheat yield in the Pacific Northwest. Agron. J., 95, 828-835.
[97]	K. M. Hati et al., (2006). Effect of inorganic fertilizer and farmyard manure on soil physical properties, root distribution, and water use efficiency of soybean in vertisols of central India. Bioresour. Technol., 97 (16), 2182-2188.
[98]	Deksissa, T., I. Short and J. Allen (2008). Effect of soil amendment with compost on growth and water use efficiency of Amaranth. In: Proceedings of the UCOWR/NIWR Annual Conference, International Water Research Challenges for the 21st Century and Water Resources Education, July 22-24, 2008, Durham, NC, USA.
[99]	Cheuk, W., K. V. Lo, R. M. R. Branion and B. Fraser (2003). Benefits of sustainable waste management in the vegetable greenhouse industry. J. Environ. Sci. Health, 38, 855-863.
[100]	Sarwar, G., N. Hussain, H. Schmeisky and S. Muhammad (2007). Use of compost an environment friendly technology for enhancing rice-wheat production in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39 (5): 1553-1558.
[101]	Abedi, T., A. Alemzadeh, and S. A. Kazemeini (2010). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on grain yield and protein building pattern of wheat. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 4 (6), 384-389.
[102]	S. Ghosh et al. (2010). Management of soil quality and carbon sequestration with long-term application of organic amendments. In: Proceedings of 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, August, 1-6, 2010, Brisbane, Australia, 146-149.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mostafa Mohamed Selim. (2021). Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties. Journal of Plant Sciences, 9(4), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mostafa Mohamed Selim. Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 9(4), 139-150. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mostafa Mohamed Selim. Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties. J Plant Sci. 2021;9(4):139-150. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13,
  author = {Mostafa Mohamed Selim},
  title = {Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties},
  journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {139-150},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20210904.13},
  abstract = {Alleviation of poverty and achieving food security are a significant challenge facing planner worldwide. A way of improving agronomic practices, mainly which has drastic effect on crop growth and yield potential is necessary and acceptable. In this domain, fertilization management has high priority, due to the expensive fertilizers, recently became the costlier input in agriculture. So, rationalization the use of chemical fertilizers is considerable. Replacement a part of chemical fertilizers by organic manure through a simple technique of using minimum effective dose of sufficient and balanced quantities of organic and inorganic fertilizers in combination with specific microorganisms, called INM are a bright solution. Not only for improving and building up of soil fertility but also for increasing the efficiency of chemical fertilizers and make fertilizers more available and most effective for maintaining higher yield without exposing soil native nutrients, ensuring environment and underground water with minimum risks and guaranteeing high profitability. Accordingly, integrated use of chemical fertilizer with organic manure became the quite promising practice not only for maintaining higher productivity but also for greater stability to crop production. Also, (INM) acts as a source of energy for the growth of soil microbes, improvement physical properties of soil, organic carbon and available nitrogen. Additionally, due to their slow realize have great residual effect on subsequent crops. The potential role of INM has been well documented by several investigators, despite some researchers have that, the effects of organic manures are not always have positive contribution and some fields have poor response to organic manures. Such conflicting effect may be due to the presence of high levels of phytotoxins and high C/N ratio, particularly in immature manures. So, the key component of INM goal is reaching to most effective and homogeneous combination could get a good fertilization program and effective target of the fertilizers, sufficient, balanced use of their quantity and quality, and straightforwardly uptake by plants for higher yield without jeopardizing soil native nutrients or polluting the environment. Conclusion, INM is a tool, that can offer good options and economic choices to supply plants with sufficient amount of most macro and micronutrients, and also can reduce the dose of chemical fertilizer, create favorable soil physiochemical conditions, healthy environment, eliminate the constraints, safety soil nutrient balance in long run, to an optimum level for sustaining the desired crop productivity and finding safe methods to get rid of agriculture wastes.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties
AU  - Mostafa Mohamed Selim
Y1  - 2021/08/06
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
SP  - 139
EP  - 150
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0731
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
AB  - Alleviation of poverty and achieving food security are a significant challenge facing planner worldwide. A way of improving agronomic practices, mainly which has drastic effect on crop growth and yield potential is necessary and acceptable. In this domain, fertilization management has high priority, due to the expensive fertilizers, recently became the costlier input in agriculture. So, rationalization the use of chemical fertilizers is considerable. Replacement a part of chemical fertilizers by organic manure through a simple technique of using minimum effective dose of sufficient and balanced quantities of organic and inorganic fertilizers in combination with specific microorganisms, called INM are a bright solution. Not only for improving and building up of soil fertility but also for increasing the efficiency of chemical fertilizers and make fertilizers more available and most effective for maintaining higher yield without exposing soil native nutrients, ensuring environment and underground water with minimum risks and guaranteeing high profitability. Accordingly, integrated use of chemical fertilizer with organic manure became the quite promising practice not only for maintaining higher productivity but also for greater stability to crop production. Also, (INM) acts as a source of energy for the growth of soil microbes, improvement physical properties of soil, organic carbon and available nitrogen. Additionally, due to their slow realize have great residual effect on subsequent crops. The potential role of INM has been well documented by several investigators, despite some researchers have that, the effects of organic manures are not always have positive contribution and some fields have poor response to organic manures. Such conflicting effect may be due to the presence of high levels of phytotoxins and high C/N ratio, particularly in immature manures. So, the key component of INM goal is reaching to most effective and homogeneous combination could get a good fertilization program and effective target of the fertilizers, sufficient, balanced use of their quantity and quality, and straightforwardly uptake by plants for higher yield without jeopardizing soil native nutrients or polluting the environment. Conclusion, INM is a tool, that can offer good options and economic choices to supply plants with sufficient amount of most macro and micronutrients, and also can reduce the dose of chemical fertilizer, create favorable soil physiochemical conditions, healthy environment, eliminate the constraints, safety soil nutrient balance in long run, to an optimum level for sustaining the desired crop productivity and finding safe methods to get rid of agriculture wastes.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mostafa Mohamed Selim

Department of Field Crops Research, Agricultural Division, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mostafa Mohamed Selim. (2021). Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties. Journal of Plant Sciences, 9(4), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mostafa Mohamed Selim. Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 9(4), 139-150. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mostafa Mohamed Selim. Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties. J Plant Sci. 2021;9(4):139-150. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13,
  author = {Mostafa Mohamed Selim},
  title = {Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties},
  journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {139-150},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20210904.13},
  abstract = {Alleviation of poverty and achieving food security are a significant challenge facing planner worldwide. A way of improving agronomic practices, mainly which has drastic effect on crop growth and yield potential is necessary and acceptable. In this domain, fertilization management has high priority, due to the expensive fertilizers, recently became the costlier input in agriculture. So, rationalization the use of chemical fertilizers is considerable. Replacement a part of chemical fertilizers by organic manure through a simple technique of using minimum effective dose of sufficient and balanced quantities of organic and inorganic fertilizers in combination with specific microorganisms, called INM are a bright solution. Not only for improving and building up of soil fertility but also for increasing the efficiency of chemical fertilizers and make fertilizers more available and most effective for maintaining higher yield without exposing soil native nutrients, ensuring environment and underground water with minimum risks and guaranteeing high profitability. Accordingly, integrated use of chemical fertilizer with organic manure became the quite promising practice not only for maintaining higher productivity but also for greater stability to crop production. Also, (INM) acts as a source of energy for the growth of soil microbes, improvement physical properties of soil, organic carbon and available nitrogen. Additionally, due to their slow realize have great residual effect on subsequent crops. The potential role of INM has been well documented by several investigators, despite some researchers have that, the effects of organic manures are not always have positive contribution and some fields have poor response to organic manures. Such conflicting effect may be due to the presence of high levels of phytotoxins and high C/N ratio, particularly in immature manures. So, the key component of INM goal is reaching to most effective and homogeneous combination could get a good fertilization program and effective target of the fertilizers, sufficient, balanced use of their quantity and quality, and straightforwardly uptake by plants for higher yield without jeopardizing soil native nutrients or polluting the environment. Conclusion, INM is a tool, that can offer good options and economic choices to supply plants with sufficient amount of most macro and micronutrients, and also can reduce the dose of chemical fertilizer, create favorable soil physiochemical conditions, healthy environment, eliminate the constraints, safety soil nutrient balance in long run, to an optimum level for sustaining the desired crop productivity and finding safe methods to get rid of agriculture wastes.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Introduction to the Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies, and Contribution on Yield and Soil Properties
AU  - Mostafa Mohamed Selim
Y1  - 2021/08/06
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
SP  - 139
EP  - 150
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0731
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20210904.13
AB  - Alleviation of poverty and achieving food security are a significant challenge facing planner worldwide. A way of improving agronomic practices, mainly which has drastic effect on crop growth and yield potential is necessary and acceptable. In this domain, fertilization management has high priority, due to the expensive fertilizers, recently became the costlier input in agriculture. So, rationalization the use of chemical fertilizers is considerable. Replacement a part of chemical fertilizers by organic manure through a simple technique of using minimum effective dose of sufficient and balanced quantities of organic and inorganic fertilizers in combination with specific microorganisms, called INM are a bright solution. Not only for improving and building up of soil fertility but also for increasing the efficiency of chemical fertilizers and make fertilizers more available and most effective for maintaining higher yield without exposing soil native nutrients, ensuring environment and underground water with minimum risks and guaranteeing high profitability. Accordingly, integrated use of chemical fertilizer with organic manure became the quite promising practice not only for maintaining higher productivity but also for greater stability to crop production. Also, (INM) acts as a source of energy for the growth of soil microbes, improvement physical properties of soil, organic carbon and available nitrogen. Additionally, due to their slow realize have great residual effect on subsequent crops. The potential role of INM has been well documented by several investigators, despite some researchers have that, the effects of organic manures are not always have positive contribution and some fields have poor response to organic manures. Such conflicting effect may be due to the presence of high levels of phytotoxins and high C/N ratio, particularly in immature manures. So, the key component of INM goal is reaching to most effective and homogeneous combination could get a good fertilization program and effective target of the fertilizers, sufficient, balanced use of their quantity and quality, and straightforwardly uptake by plants for higher yield without jeopardizing soil native nutrients or polluting the environment. Conclusion, INM is a tool, that can offer good options and economic choices to supply plants with sufficient amount of most macro and micronutrients, and also can reduce the dose of chemical fertilizer, create favorable soil physiochemical conditions, healthy environment, eliminate the constraints, safety soil nutrient balance in long run, to an optimum level for sustaining the desired crop productivity and finding safe methods to get rid of agriculture wastes.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download