Background. African startups operate amid acute capital scarcity and fragmented institutions, which complicates credible quality revelation to investors. Purpose. Focusing on the venture as the unit of analysis, this study investigates how milestones pursued inside university-affiliated accelerators function as signals of venture quality under scarcity, and how entrepreneurial behaviors shape the clarity and credibility of those signals. Design/methodology/approach. We track 17 technology ventures across East- and West-African university accelerators over 185 venture-quarters, combining venture-level panel regressions, event-study analysis, and fuzzy-set QCA. Two composite measures—the Governance-Readiness Index and the Signal-Portfolio Index—capture internal capability building and externally legible signals. Findings. Ventures graduating from university-affiliated accelerators secured roughly three times more equity than matched non-accelerated peers, with heterogeneity explained by milestone attainment and the breadth/strength of signal portfolios. We articulate a signal–noise paradox: effectuation/bricolage behaviors enable survival and progress under constraint yet can appear ambiguous to investors, attenuating signal clarity unless paired with governance readiness and externally validated milestones. Originality/value. The paper elevates signaling theory as the primary lens for early-stage ventures in emerging-market contexts, treats effectuation/bricolage as behavioral mechanisms, and situates staged financing as process logic and triple-helix/institutional-voids as contextual moderators. In doing so, it refines entrepreneurial signaling theory for scarcity contexts and offers actionable diagnostics for accelerators and policymakers designing inclusive, quality-assuring programs.
| Published in | Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 13, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12 |
| Page(s) | 236-258 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
African Startup Ecosystems, University Accelerators, Entrepreneurial Signalling, Institutional Voids, Effectuation and Bricolage, Staged Financing, Venture Capital
| [1] | African Development Bank Group (AfDB). (2022). Institutional intermediaries and entrepreneurship in emerging markets. (Kenan Institute Workshop Brief by Q. Chen). Abidjan: AfDB. |
| [2] | African Union. (n. d.). African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). |
| [3] | Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. |
| [4] |
Baltazar, G. (2018). Do accelerators really help entrepreneurs raise? Invest Impactly. Retrieved from
https://investimpactly.org/2018/05/31/how-much-do-accelerators-help-entrepreneurs-raise/ |
| [5] | Browne, O., Cumming, D. J., Hutchinson, M. C., Kirshner, S. N., & O’Reilly, P. (2024). Why avoid participating in an accelerator? Countersignalling by high-quality FinTech ventures. British Journal of Management, 35(4), 1822–1842. |
| [6] |
CB Insights. (2023). State of Venture 2022: Global trends in VC.
https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/venture-trends-2022/ |
| [7] | Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. |
| [8] | Ecosystem. build. (2023). Startup Acts in Africa: Map and country status. |
| [9] | Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. |
| [10] |
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, Causation, and Bricolage: A Behavioral Comparison of Emerging Theories in Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019-1051.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x (Original work published 2012) |
| [11] |
GALI. (2017). Accelerating startups in emerging markets: Insights from 43 programs. Global Accelerator Learning Initiative.
https://www.galidata.org/publications/accelerating-startups-in-emerging-markets/ |
| [12] | González-Uribe, J., & Leatherbee, M. (2018). The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(4), 1566–1603. |
| [13] | Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B. (2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organization Science, 31(2), 378–414. |
| [14] | Hogrebe, F., & Lutz, E. (2024). The sunk cost fallacy in venture capital staging: Decision-making dynamics for follow-on investment rounds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 86(C). Advance online publication. |
| [15] | International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022, March 14). Start-Up Chile. IEA. |
| [16] | i4Policy. (2020). Entrepreneurship Policy Benchmark: Africa regional results. |
| [17] | Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press. |
| [18] | Lawton Smith, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges. Triple Helix (pp. 1–13). Retrieved from |
| [19] | Manishimwe, T., Frazier, D. P. & Yusuf, H. (2024). Frugal innovation and entrepreneurial university: a case study of African first development university in Africa. Discov Educ 3, 190. |
| [20] | Meroño-Cerdán, Á. L., & Segarra-Ciprés, M. (2024). Accelerator-mediated access to investors among early-stage ventures. Annals of Operations Research. Advance online publication. |
| [21] |
Njanja, A., & Kene-Okafor, T. (2024). How African startups raised funding in 2023. TechCrunch. Retrieved from
https://techcrunch.com/2024/01/23/2023-vc-funding-in-africa/ |
| [22] | North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. |
| [23] |
Partech Partners. (2023, January 24). 2022 Partech Africa Report: Resilient African Tech Ecosystem Still Growing with US $6.5 Billion Raised in 2022. Partech Partners. Retrieved from Partech Partners website
https://www.partechpartners.com/africa-reports/2022-africa-tech-venture-capital-report/ |
| [24] | Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296. |
| [25] | Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81. |
| [26] | Roberts, P., & Kempner, R. (2017, October 2). Startup accelerators have become more popular in emerging markets — and they’re working. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from |
| [27] |
Roberts, P. W., Edens, G., Davidson, A., Thomas, E., Chao, C., Heidkamp, K., & Yeo, J.-H. (2017). Accelerating startups in emerging markets: Insights from 43 programs. Social Enterprise @ Goizueta, Emory University. Retrieved from
https://www.galidata.org/assets/report/pdf/Accelerating%20Startups%20in%20Emerging%20Markets.pdf |
| [28] | Saad, M., & Zawdie, G. (2008). Bridging the divide in innovation systems between advanced and developing countries: Triple helix and the role of industry, government and universities in the process of social capital building. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 649–652. |
| [29] | Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. |
| [30] | Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. |
APA Style
Mukasa, S., Sangwa, S. (2025). African Startup Accelerators: How University Partnerships Signal Venture Quality and Drive Funding Growth Amid Capital Scarcity. Science Journal of Business and Management, 13(4), 236-258. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12
ACS Style
Mukasa, S.; Sangwa, S. African Startup Accelerators: How University Partnerships Signal Venture Quality and Drive Funding Growth Amid Capital Scarcity. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2025, 13(4), 236-258. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12,
author = {Stanley Mukasa and Sixbert Sangwa},
title = {African Startup Accelerators: How University Partnerships Signal Venture Quality and Drive Funding Growth Amid Capital Scarcity
},
journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
volume = {13},
number = {4},
pages = {236-258},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20251304.12},
abstract = {Background. African startups operate amid acute capital scarcity and fragmented institutions, which complicates credible quality revelation to investors. Purpose. Focusing on the venture as the unit of analysis, this study investigates how milestones pursued inside university-affiliated accelerators function as signals of venture quality under scarcity, and how entrepreneurial behaviors shape the clarity and credibility of those signals. Design/methodology/approach. We track 17 technology ventures across East- and West-African university accelerators over 185 venture-quarters, combining venture-level panel regressions, event-study analysis, and fuzzy-set QCA. Two composite measures—the Governance-Readiness Index and the Signal-Portfolio Index—capture internal capability building and externally legible signals. Findings. Ventures graduating from university-affiliated accelerators secured roughly three times more equity than matched non-accelerated peers, with heterogeneity explained by milestone attainment and the breadth/strength of signal portfolios. We articulate a signal–noise paradox: effectuation/bricolage behaviors enable survival and progress under constraint yet can appear ambiguous to investors, attenuating signal clarity unless paired with governance readiness and externally validated milestones. Originality/value. The paper elevates signaling theory as the primary lens for early-stage ventures in emerging-market contexts, treats effectuation/bricolage as behavioral mechanisms, and situates staged financing as process logic and triple-helix/institutional-voids as contextual moderators. In doing so, it refines entrepreneurial signaling theory for scarcity contexts and offers actionable diagnostics for accelerators and policymakers designing inclusive, quality-assuring programs.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - African Startup Accelerators: How University Partnerships Signal Venture Quality and Drive Funding Growth Amid Capital Scarcity AU - Stanley Mukasa AU - Sixbert Sangwa Y1 - 2025/10/31 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12 T2 - Science Journal of Business and Management JF - Science Journal of Business and Management JO - Science Journal of Business and Management SP - 236 EP - 258 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0634 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20251304.12 AB - Background. African startups operate amid acute capital scarcity and fragmented institutions, which complicates credible quality revelation to investors. Purpose. Focusing on the venture as the unit of analysis, this study investigates how milestones pursued inside university-affiliated accelerators function as signals of venture quality under scarcity, and how entrepreneurial behaviors shape the clarity and credibility of those signals. Design/methodology/approach. We track 17 technology ventures across East- and West-African university accelerators over 185 venture-quarters, combining venture-level panel regressions, event-study analysis, and fuzzy-set QCA. Two composite measures—the Governance-Readiness Index and the Signal-Portfolio Index—capture internal capability building and externally legible signals. Findings. Ventures graduating from university-affiliated accelerators secured roughly three times more equity than matched non-accelerated peers, with heterogeneity explained by milestone attainment and the breadth/strength of signal portfolios. We articulate a signal–noise paradox: effectuation/bricolage behaviors enable survival and progress under constraint yet can appear ambiguous to investors, attenuating signal clarity unless paired with governance readiness and externally validated milestones. Originality/value. The paper elevates signaling theory as the primary lens for early-stage ventures in emerging-market contexts, treats effectuation/bricolage as behavioral mechanisms, and situates staged financing as process logic and triple-helix/institutional-voids as contextual moderators. In doing so, it refines entrepreneurial signaling theory for scarcity contexts and offers actionable diagnostics for accelerators and policymakers designing inclusive, quality-assuring programs. VL - 13 IS - 4 ER -
Office of Entrepreneurship, Carnegie Mellon University Africa, Kigali, Rwanda
Department of International Business and Trade, African Leadership University, Kigali, Rwanda
Information