Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Optimization of the Synthetic Procedure for Functionalizing Activated Carbon Produced from Canarium Ovatum with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Toward Effective Adsorption Using a Central Full Factorial Design

Received: 30 June 2025     Accepted: 29 July 2025     Published: 13 August 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This work concerns the determination of conditions for optimizing the synthesis of a composite material consisting of activated carbon and iron (III) oxide nanoparticles in order to improve adsorptions properties such as adsorption yield and enthalpy of adsorption of malachite green. A three-point central full factorial design was used for this purpose to evaluate impact of optimal synthesis parameters namely the concentration of iron nitrate, the annealing temperature, the synthesis pH and the citric acid/iron nitrate molar ratio. The existence of interaction between the synthesis parameters increases the effects of the latter on the properties of the composite material obtained. The increase in the concentration and the decrease in the annealing temperature favors an increase in the adsorption yield from 60% to 76%. There is also an increase in the adsorption enthalpy up to values greater than or equal to 40 kJ.mol-1 when there is an increase in the synthesis pH and the iron nitrate concentration simultaneously with the drop in the molar ratio citric acid/iron nitrate and the annealing temperature. Composite material obtained following the optimal conditions: annealing temperature at 400°C, with an ionic iron concentration of 0.150 mol.L-1 at pH 5 and a molar ratio close to 0.250 exhibited an adsorption yield of ~80%, higher than pristine activated carbon (~70%) and an increase in the variation of enthalpy (from -12.010 kJ.mol-1 to 52.612 kJ.mol-1). The results of this work provide a basis from which to effectively functionalize an adsorbent with iron oxide nanoparticles with the aim of having more improved adsorbent properties.

Published in Science Journal of Chemistry (Volume 13, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13
Page(s) 122-139
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Nanoparticles, Optimization, Full Factorial Design, Adsorption Yield, Enthalpy

1. Introduction
Due to their exceptional properties resulting from their size and the impact of the surface to volume ratio, nanoparticles are increasingly used in varied fields of application . Many studies show that these nanoparticles can be used in water treatment as a dopant to improve the adsorbent properties of filter materials . Their effectiveness in this use depends on the synthesis conditions taking into account the parameters namely the synthesis pH which will influence the type of iron species obtained; the precursor concentration which has an impact on the size of particles and the quantity of nanoparticles obtained; the use of an organic compound which act as a chelating agent and consequently the chelating agent/metal precursor molar ratio (MR) which influences both the shape and size of nanoparticles obtained. The chelating agent allows the reduction of the agglomeration phenomenon of metal ions which could lead to metal oxide particles with large diameter . Obtention of metal oxide nanoparticles also depend on annealing temperature on which the oxide phase obtained depends . All this has an influence on the textural properties and the surface chemistry of the composite material obtained, which directly impacts its adsorbent properties.
Some studies show that nanoparticles of copper oxide, aluminum and iron impregnated on activated carbon are already used for the elimination of pollutants in water . Researches have shown that magnetite, maghemite and hematite nanoparticles have a significant potential for adsorption of organic pollutants .
In this work, composite materials consisting of activated carbon and iron (III) oxide nanoparticles have been synthesized. Iron was obtained from inexpensive precursors and the synergism or antagonism with the high adsorbing properties of activated carbon evaluated. Central full factorial design (CFD) provides a useful tool for experimental design of interacting variables for optimization of performance of an adsorbing material . However, most of the studies focus on the use of CFD for optimization of the environmental conditions of adsorption dye, such as initial dye concentration, solution pH, reaction/sonication time, adsorbent dosage, and temperature for maximum pollutant removal efficiencies . To the best of our knowledge, experimental design is used here to study conditions of synthesis of best adsorbent before use for depollution. Hence, composite materials of activated carbon and iron (III) oxide nanoparticles in the current study are applied in adsorption studies particularly for the evaluation of the adsorption yield and adsorption heat.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The precursor of the activated carbon was the kernels of black fruits (Canarium Ovatum) harvested in Batcham locality of west Cameroon (10°12 longitude east and 5°30 latitude north). These nuclei were ground to powder using an industrial grinder and sieved through a 250 µm sieve. Phosphoric acid 85% (H3PO4), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and hydrochloric acid 36% (HCl) were supplied by JHD Laboratories; malachite green (C23H25ClN2) was supplied by Trust chemical eco laboratories. The hexa-hydrated iron nitrate used as a metal precursor, citric acid which acts as a chelating agent and sodium chloride are obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Ethanol of 85% purity is provided by Panreac laboratories.
2.2. Equipment
The study of the crystalline or amorphous character and the mineralogical composition of the composite material and the activated carbon was carried out using X Ray Diffraction analysis (XRD). The peaks were elucidated through Profex 5.1.1 software. Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Alpha IR (100 FT-IR) spectrophotometer to study the surface functional groups of materials. The determination of the specific surface area and pore width distribution was performed by using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda method (BET/BJH). An adsorption-desorption isotherm of dinitrogen (N2) at 77 K at different relative pressures allowed the determination of the total surface area. The plot of the variation in volume based on pore width allowed to determine the porous nature of materials. Scanning Electronic Microscopy coupled to Energy–dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX) was used to complement the morphology and the detection of elemental atomic composition of materials. Thermal characteristics of the samples were investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
3. Methods
3.1. Methodology
3.1.1. Experimental Design
The synthesis was carried out by a sol-gel method, to which the experimental design method was applied through the central full factorial design (CFD) at two levels with four factors (synthesis pH; metal precursor concentration; citric acid/iron nitrate molar ratio (MR) and annealing temperature) and three points in the centre using MINITAB software. This allowed the evaluation of the relationships between the synthesis factors and determined the optimal conditions for the synthesis of a composite material with maximized performance for the adsorption of malachite green. The number of experiments is given by the equation .
N=2K+ N0(1)
Where:
N: is the number of experiments performed.
K: the number of factors equal to Four factors.
N0: the number of points in the center which is three.
Table 1 represents the different independent factors values of the high levels and low levels.
Table 1. Independent factors.

Factors

Variables

Units

values of levels

Hight level

Center

Low level

Iron nitrate concentration

X1

mol.L-1

0.050

0.100

0.150

Annealing temperature

X2

°C

400

450

500

Synthesis pH

X3

-

1

3

5

Citric acid/iron nitrate molar ratio

X4

-

0.250

1.125

2

The responses studied were the variation of enthalpy (ΔH), and the adsorption yield of malachite green.
3.1.2. Evaluation of Adsorption Properties
The removal yield of malachite green (MG) was determined by performing adsorption in a batch mode of a mass of 0.050g of adsorbents in a volume of 30 mL of a solution of malachite green at a concentration of 55 mg.L-1 at different times (5min; 15min; 25min; 35min; 45min and 55min). That was done to determine the maximum adsorption time and finding the adsorption yield at that time using Equation (2).
Yield =(Ci-Cf)Ci×100(2)
Where:
Yield: Adsorption yield at each time
Ci (mg.L-1): Initial concentration of malachite green
Cf (mg.L-1): Residual concentration of malachite green
The variation of enthalpy was determined by performing the thermodynamic study at temperatures varying from 30°C to 85°C. The variation of enthalpy was found with the equation (3) .
Ln (kc)=ΔSR-ΔHRT(3)
kc=1000kd(4)
kd=QeCe(5)
Where:
Qe: Quantity adsorbed at each temperature (mg.g-1)
Ce: residual concentration of malachite green at each temperature (mg.L-1)
R: perfect gas constant (8.314 J.mol-1.K-1)
T: Temperature (K)
ΔS: Variation of entropy (kJ.mol-1.K-1).
ΔH: Variation of enthalpy (kJ.mol-1).
ΔG: Variation of free energy (kJ.mol-1).
ΔG= -RTln(QeCe)(6)
The most ΔS is high, the most there is disorder at the solution/ adsorbent interface.
A variation of enthalpy lower than 40 kJ.mol-1 traduce a physical adsorption with weak interaction . A negative value of ΔH means an exothermic process while a positive value translates an endothermic process.
A negative value of ΔG means a spontaneous and favorable process .
3.1.3. Matrix of Experiments
The CFD matrix of experiments chosen is represented in Table 2.
Table 2. Matrix of experiments.

Run order

Concentration (mol.L-1)

Temperature (°C)

pH

MR

Yield (%)

ΔH (kJ.mol-1)

1

0.100

450

3

1.125

68.650

13.380

2

0.050

500

1

2.000

55.290

10.280

3

0.050

500

1

0.250

58.780

11.390

4

0.150

400

5

0.250

78.350

64.925

5

0.050

400

1

2.000

65.420

6.800

6

0.150

500

5

2.000

56.960

13.260

7

0.150

400

1

0.250

69.690

42.088

8

0.050

500

5

0.250

63.720

12.470

9

0.050

400

5

2.000

60.860

21.991

10

0.150

400

5

2.000

69.350

44.300

11

0.150

500

1

2.000

57.720

14.730

12

0.150

500

1

0.250

57.640

27.056

13

0.150

400

1

2.000

68.610

27.558

14

0.100

450

3

1.125

67.230

13.410

15

0.050

400

5

0.250

67.750

34.560

16

0.100

450

3

1.125

66.670

13.400

17

0.050

400

1

0.250

64.260

13.400

18

0.150

500

5

0.250

62.120

20.709

19

0.050

500

5

2.000

54.270

11.510

3.1.4. Statistical Analysis
Analysis of variances
The analysis of variances (ANOVA) makes it possible to determine whether the chosen model is statistically significant and can predict the outcomes. The relationship between the responses and the factors is statistically significant if the p-value is less than 0.050 .
Analysis of residues
The residuals are the difference between the calculated value of the response and its value predicted by the model . Residual analysis consists of analyzing this difference. The experimental values of the adsorption yield and the variation of enthalpy should be close to the predicted values for a reliable model.
Assessment of the level of explanation of the model
The suitability and degree of explanation of the model concerning the experimental data was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2) values.
3.2. Preparation of Adsorbents
3.2.1. Synthesis of Activated Carbon
Activated carbon was obtained by chemical activation of black fruit powder with phosphoric acid 85%. A mass of 20g of the powder was mixed with phosphoric acid to mass ratio powder /acid of 1/3. After complete drying at a temperature of 110°C for 48 hours, the whole was calcined at a temperature of 450°C with a temperature rise rate of 5°C.min-1 and a holding time of 1 hour. The product obtained was washed with distilled water until the pH of the effluent was close to 7. Finally, the activated carbon washed product was dried at a temperature of 110°C for a duration of 48 hours and labelled AC before being preserved for subsequent steps.
3.2.2. Synthesis of Iron Oxide-Activated Carbon Composite
A mass of iron nitrate corresponding to the predefined concentrations was introduced into a 50mL volume of a mixture of ethanol/water solvent (40/60 v/v). Then, a weighted mass of citric acid was added according to the previously fixed molar ratio. The pH of the solution was adjusted using hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide to reach the desired pH and left under a stirring environment for 2 hours at 70°C. Subsequently, a mass of 15g of activated carbon was introduced into the gel formed and stirred for 1 hour for homogenization. The resulting product was dried for 48 hours at a temperature of 80°C before being calcined at the different temperatures set in the experimental design at a temperature rise rate of 5°C.min-1 for 1 hour. The composite material obtained following optimal conditions given by the design has been named ACNPS.
4. Results and Discussion
Analysis of the CFD Model Predicted Responses and Postulated Mathematical Model
Table 3. Predicted responses and residuals values.

Run order

Yield Experimental

ΔH Experimental

Yield predicted

ΔH predicted

Yield Residual

ΔH Residual

1

68.650

13.380

67.536

13.392

1.113

-0.012

2

55.290

10.280

56.613

11.450

-1.323

-1.170

3

58.780

11.390

57.445

10.984

1.335

-0.406

4

75.350

64.925

76.333

63.118

2.016

1.806

5

65.420

6.800

63.168

5.030

2.251

1.770

6

56.960

13.260

55.827

13.390

1.132

-0.130

7

69.690

42.088

70.939

44.158

-1.249

-2.070

8

63.720

12.470

62.838

11.301

0.881

1.168

9

60.860

21.991

61.772

23.990

-0.912

-1.999

10

69.350

44.300

68.712

45.330

0.637

-1.030

11

57.720

14.730

57.223

14.790

0.496

-0.060

12

57.640

27.056

58.054

24.458

-0.414

2.597

13

68.610

27.558

70.108

26.370

-1.498

1.188

14

67.230

13.410

67.536

13.392

-0.306

0.017

15

67.750

34.560

69.393

33.361

-1.643

1.198

16

66.670

13.400

67.536

13.392

-0.866

0.007

17

64.260

13.400

63.999

14.401

0.260

-1.001

18

62.120

20.709

63.448

23.058

-1.328

-2.349

19

54.270

11.510

55.217

10.050

-0.947

1.460

The predicted values of responses and residuals values are grouped in Table 3.
The experimental responses vary between 54.270% and 75.350% for the removal yield and 6.800 and 64.925 kJ.mol-1 for the variation of the enthalpy while the predicted removal yield varies between 55.218% and 76.334% and the predicted variation of enthalpy is between 10.984 kJ.mol-1 and 63.119 kJ.mol-1. Mathematical models generated by the Minitab software version 19 are:
Yield = 59.59 + 670 X1– 0.034 X2+ 1.591 X3– 0.495 X4–1737 X12– 0.633 X1X2– 0.970 X3X4(7)
ΔH=764 + 1029.600 X1– 3.548 X2+ 25.100 X3– 21.51 X4+ 0.004 X22– 1.800 X1X2– 48.100 X1X4
– 0.051 X2X3+ 0.046 X2X4(8)
Interactions with non-significant effects were systematically eliminated .
4.1. ANOVA Analysis
The values of the statistical constants of the model provided are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Statistical constants of the model.

Responses

Ftabulated

Fpredicted

P-values

R2

R2 adjusted

Yield

3.220

11.310

0.000

0.960

0.961

Δ H

3.010

8.610

0.001

0.991

0.991

The F-values for the chosen model shown in Table 4 are higher than those provided in Fisher's table. This is an indication that this model is suitable for this study . Moreover, the p-values obtained are less than 0.050. Thus, a statistically significant relationship between studied variables and responses . The values of the coefficients of determination ranging from 0.960 to 0.991 show that the chosen variables describe only 96% of the variation of the MG adsorption yield while they make it possible to explain 99% of the variation of enthalpy . However, the values of adjusted coefficients of determination obtained range from 96% and 99% this proves that the mathematical models provided by Minitab make it possible to have results which agree at 96% with the values experimental results obtained for removal yield and at 99% with those obtained for enthalpy .
4.2. Examination of Residuals
Figure 1 below shows the spatial distribution of residuals for each response.
Figure 1. Distribution of residues for Yield response (A); ΔH (B).
The random distribution of the residuals on either side of the zero as well for the response of adsorption yield (figure 1A) as for the response of enthalpy variation (figure 1B) shows that residuals do not depend on predicted responses. It contributes to confirming the consistency between the variation of the responses and the predicted model .
4.3. Effects of Variables and Interactions
Case of yield response
Figure 2A and B show the effects of variables and their interactions on the adsorption yield.
The results of the individual effects of variables and interactions indicate that the removal yield increases with concentration and pH whereas citric acid/iron (III) nitrate molar ratio (MR) and temperature have a negative effect on the response. An increase of concentration of the metallic precursor can lead to an increase of the iron species on activated carbon since for the same solution volume, increasing iron precursor concentration involves an increase in iron precursor mass and therefore an increase in the amount of iron species which are noticeable to be formed. Amines coordinate with iron species to form complexes with increased removal yield . Chelation of metallic ions depends on the pH of the solution, it has been shown that at a pH higher than 1 all the metallic ions can be chelated and conducted to nanoparticles with a reduce size, iron oxide nanoparticles with a size between 5 and 25 nm at pH equal to 5 has been previously reported . The more a nanoparticle has a small size, the more atoms there are on its surface which improves its reactivity and contributes to the adsorption capacity . Some results in the literature explain that in an acid medium, a large amount of chelating agent would favor quick precipitation which would limit obtaining small-size nanoparticles . The increase in annealing temperature results in the formation of an external support-iron system which could easily be subject to leaching thus reducing the adsorption capacity .
Case of variation of enthalpy response
Figure 3A and B show the effects of variables and their interactions on ΔH.
Figure 2. Effect of variables (A) and interactions (B) on yield.
Figure 3. Effect of variables (A) and interactions (B) on ΔH.
With respect to the results observed in Figure 3, the variation of enthalpy of adsorption increases with the concentration of the metallic precursor and the synthesis pH while temperature and MR have a negative effect. In the adsorption field, the high values of enthalpy express a chemisorption involving a strong binding formation between the adsorbent and the pollutant . It was explained with the removal yield, that the formation of complexes between amine functional groups contained in malachite green and the iron species contained in iron oxide of the composite material is favored by the increasing of concentration and pH. That formation of complexes involves the formation of a strong bond between malachite green and composite material and is traduced by high enthalpy while a high temperature can contribute easily to a break of the system support-iron which makes the system support-iron oxide-malachite green weak and impact negatively in the value of enthalpy.
The observation of contour plots shows which are the domains of variation of the variables for which we can obtain better results.
Case of yield response
Figure 4 illustrates the 3-D response surface and contour plots of the removal yield.
Figure 4. Responses surfaces and Contour plot of yield as a function of the variables studied.
The interaction X1X2 between temperature and concentration is the one on which the optimum range of the removal yield has been achieved. A removal yield higher than 70% is obtained with an iron concentration from approximately 0.125 to 0.15 mol.L-1 and a temperature from 400°C to 420°C.
Case of variation of enthalpy response
Figure 5 illustrates the 3-D response surface and contour plots of the enthalpy variation.
The optimum range of the enthalpy variation is achieved with the interactions X1X2 of concentration-temperature and X2X3 of temperature-pH. An enthalpy variation from 40 to 50 kJ.mol-1 can be obtained with an iron (III) nitrate concentration between 0.13 mol.L-1 and 0.15 mol.L-1 and a temperature close to 400°C also with a pH close to 5.
Optimal conditions
The optimal values of the different factors studied are illustrated at Figure 6.
Figure 5. Responses surfaces and Contour plots of ΔH according to the studied variables.
The composite material with an adsorption capacity equal to 76.310% and an enthalpy of adsorption equal to 63.105 kJ.mol-1 are obtained with a desirability upper to 0.900 at the following conditions: iron nitrate concentration of 0.150 mol.L-1; annealing temperature of 400°C; pH of 5 and molar ratio of 0.250.
Figure 6. Optimal conditions.
5. Characterization of Activated Carbon and Composite Material
Activated carbon on which are deposited iron oxide nanoparticles and the composite material synthesized according to the optimal conditions obtained with design model have been characterized.
FT-IR
The FT-IR spectra of the two adsorbents are shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7. FT-IR spectra of AC and ACNP.
A broad peak around 3709cm-1 could be attributed to the stretching vibration of the OH groups of the oxygenated functions (carboxylic acids; alcohol; aldehydes, ester etc.) and adsorbed water molecules. This peak is wider for AC compared to ACNPS which could mean that the AC surface is richer in OH alcohol groups probably due to the dehydration during the annealing operation of ACNPS. The peak observed at 2923 cm-1 corresponds to the CH vibrations of aldehydes; ketones or carboxylic acids aliphatic . The peak at 1600 cm-1 may be assigned to a combination of C=C stretching vibration of the aromatic ring structures or attributed to systems diketone, ketoester and quinone . Others peaks visible between 1046 cm-1 and 1181 cm-1 can be attributed to the stretching C-O vibration of alcohol, carboxylate and ether structures . The low intensity of these peaks for ACNPS against AC denote a decrease in C-O functions on the surface of ACNPS; these functions could be also the C-O bonds of alcohol which were broken by dehydration. The peak at 634cm-1 on FT-IR of ACNPS probably can be assigned to the crystalline mode vibrations of the Fe-O bond characteristic of iron oxide particles .
XRD
Figure 8, shows the different crystalline phases which have been grouped together in Table 5.
Figure 8. Diffractogram of material.
Table 5. Crystalline phases and Miller indices.

Materials

diffraction Angle (°)

cristallines Phases

Miller Indice

AC

22.943

NaAlSi3O8

(1-11)

23.957

P2O6

(002)

ACNPS

16.203

Acide benzoïque

(20-1)

20.381

Mg2P2O7

(10-2)

24.205; 33.100; 35.768; 57.539

Hématite

(1-12); (1-1-4); (2-10); (42-1)

26.591

Graphite

(003)

In general, in Figure 8, two peaks which are present on the two adsorbent materials at positions 22.943° and 23.957° correspond respectively to the planes (002) and (1-11) for P2O6 and NaAlSi3O8 in table 5; these peaks could result from the process of activating the plant material with phosphoric acid and the calcination undergone by the silica contained in that plant material. The shape of the diffractogram of AC reveals a low crystallinity and a much more amorphous character which is an advantageous property for adsorption . The diffractogram of ACNPS exhibited a visible peak at 26.591° corresponding to the plane (003) characteristic of graphite and could result from the rearrangement of amorphous carbon during the thermal treatment. The ACNPS diffractogram also shows four visible peaks at 24.207°; 33.099°; 35.773° and 57.539° corresponding respectively to the planes (112); (114); (210) and (42-1) characteristics of hematite . These results confirm the presence of Fe-O groups of hematite phase. The use of Profex software shows that the size of hematite crystallites varies from 25 to 37nm.
BET/BJH
Figure 9 regroups the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and the distribution pore width.
Figure 9. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pores size distribution.
The specific area, pores width and volume are resume in table 6.
Table 6. Pore distribution of AC and ACNPS.

Specific area (m2.g-1)

Median pore with (Å)

Total volume (cm3.g-1)

AC

312

32.797

0.202

ACNPS

282

24.603

0.199

The adsorption isotherms on adsorption-desorption graphs of AC and ACNPS are type II which involves multilayer adsorption with favorable interactions between particles and the materials surfaces. The hysteresis between adsorption isotherm and desorption isotherms on the two graphs denote the presence of mesopores . The total surface area for adsorption given by BET analysis is 312 m2.g-1 for AC and 282 m2.g-1 for ACNPS, it reflects a reduction of the adsorption surface which is explained by the deposition of iron oxide nanoparticles on the activated carbon. The deposition of nanoparticles on the surface of the activated carbon results in the blockage of certain pores and the reduction of the width of others. Table 6 shows a reduction of pores widths on the ACNPS surface which confirms deposition of iron oxide nanoparticles on pore openings of activated carbon. AC contains micropores (pore width< 20 Å), mesopores (20 Å <pore width>500 Å) and macropores (pore width>500 Å) while ACNPS only contains micropores and mesopores . However, ACNPS is mostly mesoporous
whereas AC is meso and macroporous due to the high concentration of points at values greater than 50 Å on the BJH graphs of AC and ACNPS.
SEM/EDX Analysis of Materials
Figure 10 shows the morphology and the atomic composition of the different materials.
Figure 10. SEM and EDX results of AC (A) and ACNPS (B).
Micrographs show that the pores present at the AC surface are free while there are particles in the pores of ACNPS. This can be associated with the reduction of surface area for the composite material. The main common components of the two materials are carbon, oxygen and phosphorus. EDX analysis shows that ACNPS is also composed of iron (0.9%) obtained from the iron oxide nanoparticles. The percentage of oxygen has increased (from 15% to 20%) due to the addition of iron oxide whereas the carbon percentage has been reduced (from 80% to 74%) due to the double calcination. This increase in oxygen percentage and the percentage of iron on ACNPS confirm the presence of iron oxide.
DSC Analysis
Figure 11 shows the thermic behavior of adsorbents.
Figure 11. DSC curves of AC and ACNPS.
The DSC curve of AC does not present any endothermic or exothermic peak which expresses its amorphous character. This means that there is not any thermal transformation on the AC since the temperature of reorganization of amorphous carbon to the graphite structure which is an exothermic process has not been reached. Endothermic and exothermic peaks visible on the DSC curve of ACNPS attest to its semicrystalline character due to the deposition of iron oxide nanoparticles . The endothermic peak can be due to the melting of crystalline hematite deposited on activated carbon. The existence of a low exothermic peak would mean that there are small amounts of noncrystalline ionic iron species on the ACNPS that would have undergone crystallization during thermal analysis.
ATG Analysis
Figure 12 below shows mass loss within the adsorbents according to temperature.
Figure 12. Thermogravimetric pot of AC and ACNPS.
Mass loss within the two materials occurs in four stages. The first mass loss happening around 100°C is 0.769% for AC and 1.376% for ACNPS; this mass loss is attributed to dehydration of these materials. The mass loss in this area of temperature being higher for ACNPS than AC already proves a modification to the AC structure and denotes the more hydrophilic character of ACNPS due to the fact of the great affinity between the nanoparticles of iron species and water molecules. The second mass loss is observed between 200°C and 250°C for AC and ACNPS. This area of temperature corresponds to the decomposition temperature interval of carboxylic acid groups . That mass loss observed for AC (0.970%) is less than that observed for ACNPS (1.127%); this could traduce the existence of citric acid residues used as chelating during the ACNPS synthesis process or decomposition of iron citrate residues from the chelation of iron contained in iron (III) nitrate by citric acid, literature places this decomposition between 200 and 300°C because the decomposition of iron nitrate occurs at a temperature below 200°C . The third mass loss is in the temperature range ranging from 500°C to 700°C for both adsorbents and could correspond to the decomposition of lactones, phenols and anhydride groups . This mass loss is more important for ACNPS (18.076%) than AC (17.193%) which means that it could also correspond to the transformation of some forms of iron hydroxides and iron oxides on the surface of ACNPS . The fourth mass loss occurs in the area of temperature between 800°C and 900°C. For this last range of temperature, mass loss is higher for AC (15.202%) compared to ACNPS (12.828%). This temperature area corresponds to the decomposition temperature interval of carbonyls, ethers and quinone groups. AC would be richer in these groups compared to ACNPS .
6. Evaluation of Adsorption Properties
Evaluation of removal yield
Figure 13 represents the evolution of the removal yield of MG with time for the two adsorbents.
Figure 13. Evolution of the removal yield.
The adsorption on the two adsorbents surfaces takes place in three stages: the first step which is the fastest is shorter in AC (from 5 to 15 min) compared to ACNPS (from 5 to 25 min), the second stage in which we observe a reduction of the adsorption rate is however longer in AC (from 15 min to 50 min) compared to ACNPS (from 25 min to 50 min) and the third stage of 50 minutes to 60 minutes for the two adsorbents, during which we observe a bearing.
The first rapid step of adsorption on both materials is due to the presence of active sites available on the surface of the latter; however, the fact that it is even faster for AC than for ACNPS could mean that the attachment of MG molecules to the surface of ACNPS is a slow process characteristic of the establishment of strong bonds, including coordination bonds between the iron atom contained in the oxide nanoparticles and the nitrogen atom contained in the pollutant molecule. The maximum percentage of adsorption obtained in this phase is 50% for AC while it is 60% for ACNPS this could be Contribute to confirming the increase in the density of active sites on the surface of ACNPS following the deposition of iron oxide nanoparticles on the surface.
The second step corresponds to the migration of MG molecules to the internal adsorbent sites through macropores and mesopores.
The last step where a bearing is observed for the two adsorbents symbolizes the stabilization of the adsorption process reflecting the saturation of all adsorption sites.
The total removal yield of the ACNPS is 80% while it is 70% for the AC. It means that the experimentation of optimal conditions determined with this design has allowed an increase of adsorption percentage by 10%.
Evaluation of thermodynamics parameters
Figure 14 shows the regression lines allowing thermodynamics parameters to be determined.
Figure 14. Thermodynamic regression linear.
The thermodynamics parameters have been grouped into Table 7.
Table 7. Thermodynamics parameters of AC and ACNPS.

Temperature (K)

ΔG (kJ.mol-1)

ΔH (kJ.mol-1)

ΔS (kJ.mol-1.K-1)

AC

303

-0.307

-12.010

0.033

313

-0.198

328

-0.572

343

-0.703

358

-0.457

ACNPS

303

0.349

52.602

0.026

313

0.581

328

-0.818

343

-3.132

358

-6.171

The free energy of AC is negative for all the temperature values which correspond to a spontaneous and favourable adsorption. The negative values of the free energy for high temperatures for ACNPS imply that the spontaneity of the adsorption is ameliorated by temperature rise . The variation of enthalpy increased after the deposition of the nanoparticles from -12.010 kJ.mol-1 for AC to 52.602 kJ.mol-1 for ACNPS. An increase in the variation of enthalpy suggests a formation of strong interaction between the material and the malachite green; in fact, a variation of enthalpy above 40 kJ.mol-1 signify a chemisorption which involves strong interaction between pollutant and adsorbent such as coordination bonds or covalent bonds . Adsorption is exothermic for AC due to its negative enthalpy value while it is endothermic for ACNPS due to its positive enthalpy value. The variation of entropy of the AC is greater than the one of ACNPS which denotes a more accentuated disorder at the AC interface than at the ACNPS interface .
7. Conclusion
It was question in this study to determine the optimal conditions that would allow us to synthesize a composite material formed of activated carbon and nanoparticles having an optimized adsorption properties. The results showed that the best adsorbent composite material would be obtained at an annealing temperature equal to 400°C, an ionic iron concentration of 0.150 mol.L-1, a synthesis pH equal to 5 and a molar ratio of 0.250. The composite material ACNPS (282 m2.g-1) synthesized following the conditions given by design contains a hematite phase and has a specific surface area reduced compared to that of activated carbon AC (312 m2.g-1) but the two adsorbents are micro and mesoporous. The synthesis conditions of composite material also allowed an increase in the adsorption yield of 10% and an increase in the variation of enthalpy thereby enabling from exothermic physical adsorption for AC (variation of enthalpy equal to -12 kJ.mol-1) to endothermic chemical adsorption for ACNPS (variation of enthalpy equal to 52.6 kJ.mol-1).
Abbreviations

AC

Activated Carbon

ACNPS

Activated Carbon with Nano Particles

ANOVA

Analysis of Variance

BET/BJH

Brunauer-Emmet-Teller and Barrett-Joyner-Hallenda

CFD

Central Full Design

DSC

Differential Scanning Calorimetric

FT-IR

Fourier Transform Infrared

MG

Malachite Green

MR

Molar Ratio Chelating Agent/Metal Precursor

SEM/EDX

Scanning Electronic Microscopy Coupled Energy Dispersive X Ray

TGA

Thermogravimetric Analysis

XRD

X Ray Diffraction

∆ G

Free Enthalpy Variation

∆ H

Enthalpy Variation

∆ S

Entropy Variation

Author Contributions
Nintedem Magapgie Lincold: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft
Mabou Leuna Jules: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing
Ngassa Piegang Guy: Formal Analysis, Software, Validation
Mbouombouo Bomiko Jacques: Investigation, Methodology, Validation
Victor Shikuku: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Tchieta Pierre Gerard: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] El Gaidoumi A., Doña-Rodrıguez J. M., Pulido Melian E. and al., “Mesoporous pyrophyllite-titania nanocomposites: synthesis and activity in phenol photocatalytic degradation.” Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 333–353, 2018.
[2] Xu P., Zeng G. M., Huang D. L., Feng C. L., Hu S., Zhao M. H., Lai C., Wei Z., Huang C., Xie G. X., Liu Z. F.,”Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: a review, Science of The Total Environment.” vol. 424, pp. 1-10, 2012.
[3] Yang S., Xu Y., Sun Y., Zhang G., Gao D., “Size-controlled synthesis, magnetic property, and photocatalytic property of uniform α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles via a facile additive free hydrothermal route.” Cryst Eng Comm, 2012.
[4] Guo S., Zhang G., Guo Y., Yu J. C., “Graphene oxide–Fe2O3 hybrid material as highly efficient heterogeneous catalyst for degradation of organic contaminants.” Carbon, vol. 60, pp. 437-444, 2013.
[5] Chen Y. H., Lin C. C., “Effect of nano-hematite morphology on photocatalytic activity.” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 41(10), pp. 727-736, 2014.
[6] Atabaev T. S., “Facile hydrothermal synthesis of flower-like hematite microstructure with high photocatalytic properties.” Journal of Advanced Ceramics, vol. 4(1), pp. 61-64, 2015.
[7] Liang H., Chen W., Wang R., Qi Z., Mi J., Wang Z., “X-shaped hollow α-FeOOH penetration twins and their conversion to α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals bound by high-index facets with enhanced photocatalytic activity.” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 274, pp. 224-230, 2015.
[8] Bencheikh I., Mabrouki J., Azoulay K., Moufti A., El Hajaji S., “Predictive Analytics and Optimization of Wastewater Treatment Efficiency Using Statistic Approach Big Data and Networks Technologies.”
[9] Khan Y., Durrani S. K., Siddique M. and Mehmood M. “Hydrothermal synthesis of alpha Fe2O3 nanoparticles capped by Tween-80.”, Materials Letters, vol. 14, pp. 2224-2227, 2011.
[10] Cuong N. D., Hoa T. T., Khieu D. Q., Hoa N. D. and Hieu N. V., “Gas sensor based on nanoporous hematite nanoparticles: effect of synthesis pathways on morphology and gas sensing properties.”, Current Applied Physics, vol. 5, pp. 1355-1360, 2012.
[11] Vuong D. D., Phuoc L. H., Hien V. X., Chien N. D., Mater. Sci. Simecon. Proc. Vol. 107, pp. 104861, 2020.
[12] Chekem C. T., Richardson Y., Drobek M., Plantard G., Blin J., Goetz V. “Efective coupling of phenol adsorption and photodegradation at the surface of micro-and mesoporous TiO2-pmactivated carbon materials.” Reac Kinet Mech Cat., vol. 122(2), pp. 1297–1321.
[13] Al-Saad K. A., Amr M., Hadi D. T., Arar R. S., AL-Sulaiti M. M., Abdulmalik T. A., Alsahamary N. M., Kwak J. C., “Iron oxide nanoparticles: applicability for heavy metal removal from contaminated water.” Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, vol. 45(2), pp. 335-346, 2012.
[14] Karami H., “Heavy metal removal from water by magnetite nanorods.” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 219, pp. 209-216, 2013.
[15] Shipley H. J., Engates K. E., Grover V. A., “Removal of Pb (II), Cd (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) by hematite nanoparticles: effect of sorbent concentration, pH, temperature, and exhaustion.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20(3), pp. 1727-1736, 2013.
[16] Akhbarizadeh R., Shayestefar M. R., Darezereshki E., “Competitive removal of metals from wastewater by maghemite nanoparticles: a comparison between simulated wastewater and AMD.” Mine Water and the Environment, vol. 33(1), pp. 89-96, 2014.
[17] Azari A., Nabizadeh R., Hossein A. M, Nasseri S., “Magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes loaded alginate for treatment of industrial dye manufacturing effluent: adsorption modelling and process optimisation by central composite face-central design.” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2021.
[18] Shan C., Ma Z., Tong M., “Efficient removal of trace antimony (III) through adsorption by hematite modified magnetic nanoparticles.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 268, pp. 229-236, 2014.
[19] Kumari M., Pittman J. R., C. U., Mohan D., “Heavy metals [chromium (VI) and lead (II)] removal from water using mesoporous magnetite (Fe3O4) nanospheres, Journal of colloid and interface science.” vol. 442, pp. 120-132, 2015.
[20] Aydin H., Murat K., Cheshmeh S. R., Alireza K. and Semra K., "Optimization of the adsorption of a textile dye onto nanoclay using a central composite design." Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 4, Article 3.
[21] Ahlam F., Abdelali E. G., Youssef M., Rabea E. M., Anissa L. “Pineapple bark performance in dyes adsorption: optimization by the central composite design.” Hindawi Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2019, pp. 1, 2019.
[22] Asfaram A., Ghaedi M., Agarwalb S., Tyagib I. and Gupta VK. “Removal of basic dye Auramine-O by ZnS: Cu nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon Optimization of parameters using response surface methodology with central composite design.” RSC Adv. Vol. 5, pp. 18438-18450, 2015.
[23] Imane B. S. D. “Optimisation of operative conditions for elimination of dye «Methylene blue» by biosorption: Application of experimental design method.” University A. M. Oulhadj – Bouira, 2020.
[24] Luttah I., Onunga D. O., Shikuku V. O., Otieno B. and Kowenje C. O. “Removal of endosulfan from water by municipal waste incineration fy ash-based geopolymers: Adsorption kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamics.” Front Environ Chem 4.
[25] Belkacem B. and Aicha Y. “Elimination of acids colorants in aqueous solution by bentonite and kaolin.” C. R. Chimie, vol. 12, 2009.
[26] Nsami N. J. “Textural properties and adsorption characteristics of activated carbon prepared from cola (c. acuminata) nut shells: Application for the elimination of methylene blue from aqueous solution.” University of Yaounde I, pp. 54-55, 2014.
[27] Genç N., Durna E., and Gengeç E. “Heterogeneous Activation of Persulfate by Graphene Oxide-TiO2 Nanosheet for Oxidation of Diclofenac Optimization by Central Composite Design.”, water air soil poll. pp. 229-330, 2018.
[28] Elmoubarki R., Taoufik M., Moufti A., Tounsadi H., Mahjoubi F. Z., Bouabi Y., Qourzal S., Abdennouri M. and Barka N. “Box-Behnken experimental design for the optimization of methylene blue adsorption onto Aleppo pine cones.”, J. Mater. Environ. Sci. Vol. 6, pp, 2184-2191, 2017.
[29] Dagnelie P. “Experimentation principles: Planification of experiences and analysis of their results.” Agronomics Edition Press of Grenoble, A. S. B. L, 2012.
[30] Yahiaoui I. “Experience planes and the analysis of factorials design with two levels and centrals composites design.” course, university of Bejaia, 2015.
[31] Ali I., Sabrina C., Jean-Claude B., Lazhar B., Ammar T., Abdelkrim B., Atef El J., Aymen A., Abdeltif A., and Lotfi M., “Zeolite Waste Characterization and Use as Low-Cost, Ecofriendly, and Sustainable Material for Malachite Green and Methylene Blue Dyes Removal: Box–Behnken Design, Kinetics, and Thermodynamics” Appl. Sci.,
[32] Long A., Zhang H., Lei Y., “Surfactant flushing remediation of toluene contaminated soil: optimization with response surface methodology and surfactant recovery by selective oxidation with sulfate radicals.” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 118, pp. 612–619, 2013.
[33] Dil E. A., Ghaedi M., Asfaram A., Goudarzi A., Hajati S. and Gupta V. K. “Modeling of quaternary dyes adsorption onto ZnO-NR-AC artificial neural network: Analysis by derivative spectrophotometry.”, J and eng chem, vol. 34, pp. 186-197, 2016.
[34] Charmot A. “News strategies of insertion of iron oxides particles in organised meso structures, characterization et catalytic activity.” Catalysis. University of Poitiers, p. 23-32, 2006.
[35] Auffan M. “Metallic oxides nanoparticles: relations between surface reactivity and biological responses.”, Physique [physics]. University Paul Cezanne - Aix-Marseille III, p. 18, 2007.
[36] Mourad M., Rachida H., Frédéric V., and Abdelkader B. “Kinetics and thermodynamics adsorption of phenolic compounds on organic-inorganic hybrid mesoporous material.” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies ISSN 2028‐9324 Vol. 3, pp. 1116‐1124, 2013.
[37] Belaid, K. D. and Kacha, S., “Kinetic and thermodynamic study of the adsorption of a basic colorant on the sawdust.” Water science review / Journal of Water Science, 24(2), p. 131–144, 2011.
[38] Mbaye G. “Development of activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass for application in water treatment”, Intrnational institut of water and environment, 2015.
[39] Torrellas S. A., Lovera R. G., Escalona N., Sepúlveda C., Sotelo J. L. and García J. “Chemical-activated carbons from peach stones for the adsorption of emerging contaminants in aqueous solutions.”, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 279, p. 788–798, 2015.
[40] Idohou E. A., Fatomb J. K., Ossen A. S., Agan I., Neumeyer D., Verelst M., Robert Mauricotc R. and Aminoub T. “Preparation of activated carbon/chitosan/Carica papaya seeds composite for efficient adsorption of cationic dye from aqueous solution.” Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 21, 2020.
[41] Ndongo G. K., Ndi J. N. and Ketcha J. M. “Ferromagnetic activated carbon from cassava (Manihot dulcit) peels activated by iron (III) chloride: Synthesis and characterization.” Bioressource, vol. 15, pp. 20133-20146, 2020.
[42] Tayebeh M., Abbas A., Mazaher A. and Hasan B. “Removal of some cationic dyes from aqueous solutions using magnetic-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 196, p. 109–114, 2011.
[43] Fouda M. R., El-Kholy M. B., Moustafa S. A., Hussien A. I., Wahba M. A. and El-Shahat M. F., “Synthesis and characterization of nanosized Fe2O3 pigments.” International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2012.
[44] Karima A., Imane B., Ahmed M., Abdelmalek D., Jamal M. and Souad E. “comparative study between static and dynamic adsorption efficiency of dyes by the mixture of palm waste using the central composite design”, Chemical Data Collections,
[45] Lamia B. “Macroscopic and spectroscopic study of ions phosphate fixation on iron oxyhydroxides- Application on aquatics sediments.” University of Mentoury, Thesis p. 36, 2017.
[46] Dolasa H., Sahinb O., Sakac C., Demirb H., “A new method on producing high surface area activated carbon: The effect of salton the surface area and the pore size distribution of activated carbon prepared from pistachio shell.”, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 166: p. 191–197, 2011.
[47] Hadoun H., Sadaoui Z., Souami N., Sahel D. and Toumert I. “Characterization of mesoporous carbon prepared from date stems by H3PO4 chemical activation.” Appl Surf Sci., vol. 13, pp. 745– 749.
[48] Zhang X., Ningyum S., Baojian W., Yi L., Tianzheng G. and Wei W. “Physical characterisation of lansoprazole/PVP solid dispersion porepared by fluid-bed coating technique.” science direct, vol. 182, p. 480-485, 2008.
[49] Aarfane A., Salhi A., El Krati M., Tahiri S., Monkade M., Lhadi E. K. and Bensitel M. “Kinetic and thermodynamic study of the adsorption of Red195 and Methylene blue dyes on fly ash and bottom ash in aqueous medium”, J. Mater. Environ. Sci. pp. 1927-1939, 2014.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lincold, N. M., Jules, M. L., Guy, N. P., Jacques, M. B., Shikuku, V., et al. (2025). Optimization of the Synthetic Procedure for Functionalizing Activated Carbon Produced from Canarium Ovatum with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Toward Effective Adsorption Using a Central Full Factorial Design. Science Journal of Chemistry, 13(4), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lincold, N. M.; Jules, M. L.; Guy, N. P.; Jacques, M. B.; Shikuku, V., et al. Optimization of the Synthetic Procedure for Functionalizing Activated Carbon Produced from Canarium Ovatum with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Toward Effective Adsorption Using a Central Full Factorial Design. Sci. J. Chem. 2025, 13(4), 122-139. doi: 10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lincold NM, Jules ML, Guy NP, Jacques MB, Shikuku V, et al. Optimization of the Synthetic Procedure for Functionalizing Activated Carbon Produced from Canarium Ovatum with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Toward Effective Adsorption Using a Central Full Factorial Design. Sci J Chem. 2025;13(4):122-139. doi: 10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13,
      author = {Nintedem Magapgie Lincold and Mabou Leuna Jules and Ngassa Piegang Guy and Mbouombouo Bomiko Jacques and Victor Shikuku and Gerard Pierre Tchieta},
      title = {Optimization of the Synthetic Procedure for Functionalizing Activated Carbon Produced from Canarium Ovatum with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Toward Effective Adsorption Using a Central Full Factorial Design
    },
      journal = {Science Journal of Chemistry},
      volume = {13},
      number = {4},
      pages = {122-139},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjc.20251304.13},
      abstract = {This work concerns the determination of conditions for optimizing the synthesis of a composite material consisting of activated carbon and iron (III) oxide nanoparticles in order to improve adsorptions properties such as adsorption yield and enthalpy of adsorption of malachite green. A three-point central full factorial design was used for this purpose to evaluate impact of optimal synthesis parameters namely the concentration of iron nitrate, the annealing temperature, the synthesis pH and the citric acid/iron nitrate molar ratio. The existence of interaction between the synthesis parameters increases the effects of the latter on the properties of the composite material obtained. The increase in the concentration and the decrease in the annealing temperature favors an increase in the adsorption yield from 60% to 76%. There is also an increase in the adsorption enthalpy up to values greater than or equal to 40 kJ.mol-1 when there is an increase in the synthesis pH and the iron nitrate concentration simultaneously with the drop in the molar ratio citric acid/iron nitrate and the annealing temperature. Composite material obtained following the optimal conditions: annealing temperature at 400°C, with an ionic iron concentration of 0.150 mol.L-1 at pH 5 and a molar ratio close to 0.250 exhibited an adsorption yield of ~80%, higher than pristine activated carbon (~70%) and an increase in the variation of enthalpy (from -12.010 kJ.mol-1 to 52.612 kJ.mol-1). The results of this work provide a basis from which to effectively functionalize an adsorbent with iron oxide nanoparticles with the aim of having more improved adsorbent properties.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Optimization of the Synthetic Procedure for Functionalizing Activated Carbon Produced from Canarium Ovatum with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Toward Effective Adsorption Using a Central Full Factorial Design
    
    AU  - Nintedem Magapgie Lincold
    AU  - Mabou Leuna Jules
    AU  - Ngassa Piegang Guy
    AU  - Mbouombouo Bomiko Jacques
    AU  - Victor Shikuku
    AU  - Gerard Pierre Tchieta
    Y1  - 2025/08/13
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13
    T2  - Science Journal of Chemistry
    JF  - Science Journal of Chemistry
    JO  - Science Journal of Chemistry
    SP  - 122
    EP  - 139
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-099X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251304.13
    AB  - This work concerns the determination of conditions for optimizing the synthesis of a composite material consisting of activated carbon and iron (III) oxide nanoparticles in order to improve adsorptions properties such as adsorption yield and enthalpy of adsorption of malachite green. A three-point central full factorial design was used for this purpose to evaluate impact of optimal synthesis parameters namely the concentration of iron nitrate, the annealing temperature, the synthesis pH and the citric acid/iron nitrate molar ratio. The existence of interaction between the synthesis parameters increases the effects of the latter on the properties of the composite material obtained. The increase in the concentration and the decrease in the annealing temperature favors an increase in the adsorption yield from 60% to 76%. There is also an increase in the adsorption enthalpy up to values greater than or equal to 40 kJ.mol-1 when there is an increase in the synthesis pH and the iron nitrate concentration simultaneously with the drop in the molar ratio citric acid/iron nitrate and the annealing temperature. Composite material obtained following the optimal conditions: annealing temperature at 400°C, with an ionic iron concentration of 0.150 mol.L-1 at pH 5 and a molar ratio close to 0.250 exhibited an adsorption yield of ~80%, higher than pristine activated carbon (~70%) and an increase in the variation of enthalpy (from -12.010 kJ.mol-1 to 52.612 kJ.mol-1). The results of this work provide a basis from which to effectively functionalize an adsorbent with iron oxide nanoparticles with the aim of having more improved adsorbent properties.
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

  • Department of Physical Sciences, Kaimosi Friends University, Kaimosi, Kenya

  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon