| Peer-Reviewed

Pre Extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 10 August 2021    Accepted: 21 August 2021    Published: 6 September 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Midland area of Guji zone was potential for tef production. However, the productivity of the crop is below its potential at farm level due to lack of improved varieties. To solve this problem demonstration of improved tef varieties were initiated to evaluate yield performance, evaluate profitability of the improved tef technologies and assess farmers’ feedbacks for further development of tef production during 2018/19 and 2019/20 years. Three potential districts were selected based on their tef potential production. From each district two kebeles were selected. 32 experimental farmers were used for this demonstration. Dagim and Tesfa improved varieties were demonstrated with standard check on 10mx10m area. A seed rate of 10kg/ha by a spacing of 20cm between rows, drilling of tef in the line of rows and 121kg/ha of NPS fertilizer was used. Descriptive statistics, one way ANOVA, General Linear Model, qualitative and cost benefit analysis were used to analyze the data. Higher yield (19.06 qt/ha) was obtained from Dagim variety while Tesfa generated 14.09 qt/ha. Lower yield (8.9 qt/ha) was harvested from the standard check. The result of one way ANOVA showed that there was a significance difference in Tesfa variety production at the three districts. The result of the Tukey test indicated that there was a significant difference between Shakiso and Adola district (p=0.012) with Shakiso experimental farmers harvested on average 2.77 quintals of Tesfa more than Adola experimental farmers. The cost benefit analysis result showed that 38,042, 24,464 and 8,058 ETB/ha was obtained from Dagim, Tesfa and Tseday varieties respectively. Early mature, market demand and high yield of tef variety was preferred by farmers in the study area. Farmers selected Tesfa and Tseday as they were slightly early mature variety than Dagim. Tesfa and Tseday varieties were lower yield than Dagim variety. Based on the preference of the farmers, grain yield obtained and returns Dagim and Tesfa varieties were recommended for scaling up in the study area and similar agro-ecologies.

Published in International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science (Volume 6, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11
Page(s) 116-121
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Dagim, Demonstration, Guji, Tef, Tesfa, Variety

References
[1] Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) (2019). Transforming Ethiopian Agriculture: Power Point Presentation, Briefing for Agricultural Scholar Consultative Forum, April 2019, Addis Ababa.
[2] Demeke M, Marcantonio D (2013). Analysis of incentives and disincentives for tef in Ethiopia. MAFAP, SPAAA.
[3] Fikadu, Asmiro A, Wedu, Tsega D, Derseh, Endalew A. (2018) Review on Economics of Teff in Ethiopia. Open AccBiostat Bioinform. 2 (3). OABB. 000539. 2019. DOI: 10.31031/OABB.2018.02.000539
[4] Zhu F. Chemical composition and food uses of teff (Eragrostis tef). Food Chem 2018; 239: 402-15. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.101] [PMID: 28873585].
[5] Abraham R. Achieving food security in Ethiopia by promoting productivity of future world food tef: (2015) A review. Adv Plants Agric Res; 2 (2): 00045.
[6] Cheng A, Mayes S, Dalle G, Demissew S, Massawe F (2017) Diversifying crops for food and nutrition security. A case of teff. Biol Rev Camb PhilosSoc; 92 (1): 188-98. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12225.
[7] FAO. Analysis of price incentives for Teff in Ethiopia (2015) Technical notes series, MAFAP, by Assefa B. Demeke M., Lanos B, 2015 Rome.
[8] Solomon Chanyalew, Kebebew Assefa, Mitiku Asfaw, Yazachew Genet, KidistTolossa, Worku Kebede, Tsion Fikre, Nigussu Hussen, HabteJifar, Atinkut Fentahun, Kidu Gebremeskel, Girma Chemeda and Tegegn Belete (2017) Tef (Eragrostis tef) Variety "Dagim" Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci. 27 (2) 131-135.
[9] Basha Kebede and Dembi Korji (2017). Demonstration of improved teff varieties at selected midland districts of Guji zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7 (7), 131-135.
[10] Kebede B, Teshome G, Assefa K, Chimdessa O, Alemu S, et al. (2018) Participatory Evaluation and Selection of Improved Tef Varieties in Agro pastoral areas of Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. J AgriSci Food Res 9: 213.
[11] Basha Kebede, Dembi Korji, Girma Amare and Belachew Dabalo 2018 On Farm Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Chickpea Varieties at Adola Rede, Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Innovative Techniques in Agriculture 2.6 (2018): 531-537.
[12] Girma Amare, Basha Kebede and Dembi Korji, “Pre-Extension Demonstration of Selected Lablab Varieties at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia.”, International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 7 (7), 2020, pp. 08-12.
[13] Basha, K., Dembi, K., Girma, A., 2021. Pre extension demonstration of improved potato at midland districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Scientific Journal of Crop Science, 10 (2), 457-463.
[14] Basha Kebede, Dembi Korji and Girma Amare. “Pre-Scaling Up of Improved Tef Varieties at Adola Rede District, Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia". EC Agriculture 5.4 (2019): 178-183.
[15] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2019). The federal democratic republic of Ethiopia central statistical agency agricultural sample survey, vol. 1, report on area and production of major crops, 589th statistical bulletin.
[16] Basha Kebede, Dembi Korji, Girma Amare. Pre Extension Demonstration of Adapted Oat Varieties at Midland Areas of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia International Journal of Animal Science and Technology. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021, pp. 42-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20210502.13.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kebede Basha, Amare Girma, Korji Dembi. (2021). Pre Extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science, 6(5), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kebede Basha; Amare Girma; Korji Dembi. Pre Extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 6(5), 116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kebede Basha, Amare Girma, Korji Dembi. Pre Extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Energy Environ Sci. 2021;6(5):116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11,
      author = {Kebede Basha and Amare Girma and Korji Dembi},
      title = {Pre Extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science},
      volume = {6},
      number = {5},
      pages = {116-121},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijees.20210605.11},
      abstract = {Midland area of Guji zone was potential for tef production. However, the productivity of the crop is below its potential at farm level due to lack of improved varieties. To solve this problem demonstration of improved tef varieties were initiated to evaluate yield performance, evaluate profitability of the improved tef technologies and assess farmers’ feedbacks for further development of tef production during 2018/19 and 2019/20 years. Three potential districts were selected based on their tef potential production. From each district two kebeles were selected. 32 experimental farmers were used for this demonstration. Dagim and Tesfa improved varieties were demonstrated with standard check on 10mx10m area. A seed rate of 10kg/ha by a spacing of 20cm between rows, drilling of tef in the line of rows and 121kg/ha of NPS fertilizer was used. Descriptive statistics, one way ANOVA, General Linear Model, qualitative and cost benefit analysis were used to analyze the data. Higher yield (19.06 qt/ha) was obtained from Dagim variety while Tesfa generated 14.09 qt/ha. Lower yield (8.9 qt/ha) was harvested from the standard check. The result of one way ANOVA showed that there was a significance difference in Tesfa variety production at the three districts. The result of the Tukey test indicated that there was a significant difference between Shakiso and Adola district (p=0.012) with Shakiso experimental farmers harvested on average 2.77 quintals of Tesfa more than Adola experimental farmers. The cost benefit analysis result showed that 38,042, 24,464 and 8,058 ETB/ha was obtained from Dagim, Tesfa and Tseday varieties respectively. Early mature, market demand and high yield of tef variety was preferred by farmers in the study area. Farmers selected Tesfa and Tseday as they were slightly early mature variety than Dagim. Tesfa and Tseday varieties were lower yield than Dagim variety. Based on the preference of the farmers, grain yield obtained and returns Dagim and Tesfa varieties were recommended for scaling up in the study area and similar agro-ecologies.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Pre Extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia
    AU  - Kebede Basha
    AU  - Amare Girma
    AU  - Korji Dembi
    Y1  - 2021/09/06
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11
    T2  - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
    JF  - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
    JO  - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
    SP  - 116
    EP  - 121
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-9546
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11
    AB  - Midland area of Guji zone was potential for tef production. However, the productivity of the crop is below its potential at farm level due to lack of improved varieties. To solve this problem demonstration of improved tef varieties were initiated to evaluate yield performance, evaluate profitability of the improved tef technologies and assess farmers’ feedbacks for further development of tef production during 2018/19 and 2019/20 years. Three potential districts were selected based on their tef potential production. From each district two kebeles were selected. 32 experimental farmers were used for this demonstration. Dagim and Tesfa improved varieties were demonstrated with standard check on 10mx10m area. A seed rate of 10kg/ha by a spacing of 20cm between rows, drilling of tef in the line of rows and 121kg/ha of NPS fertilizer was used. Descriptive statistics, one way ANOVA, General Linear Model, qualitative and cost benefit analysis were used to analyze the data. Higher yield (19.06 qt/ha) was obtained from Dagim variety while Tesfa generated 14.09 qt/ha. Lower yield (8.9 qt/ha) was harvested from the standard check. The result of one way ANOVA showed that there was a significance difference in Tesfa variety production at the three districts. The result of the Tukey test indicated that there was a significant difference between Shakiso and Adola district (p=0.012) with Shakiso experimental farmers harvested on average 2.77 quintals of Tesfa more than Adola experimental farmers. The cost benefit analysis result showed that 38,042, 24,464 and 8,058 ETB/ha was obtained from Dagim, Tesfa and Tseday varieties respectively. Early mature, market demand and high yield of tef variety was preferred by farmers in the study area. Farmers selected Tesfa and Tseday as they were slightly early mature variety than Dagim. Tesfa and Tseday varieties were lower yield than Dagim variety. Based on the preference of the farmers, grain yield obtained and returns Dagim and Tesfa varieties were recommended for scaling up in the study area and similar agro-ecologies.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Bore Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Extension Team, Bore, Ethiopia

  • Department of Rural Development, Haramaya University, Dire Dewa, Ethiopia

  • Bore Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Extension Team, Bore, Ethiopia

  • Sections