Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018

Wu Haosheng; Yu Xiaoyang; Li Weishan; Peng Yan; Chen Weifeng; Liao Qingxiang; Zhang Wen; You Jie; Xia Wei

doi:doi:

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018

Wu Haosheng, Yu Xiaoyang, Li Weishan, Peng Yan, Chen Weifeng, Liao Qingxiang, Zhang Wen, You Jie, Xia Wei

Published in Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science (Volume 1, Issue 1)

Received: 16 August 2019 Accepted: 23 September 2019 Published: 9 October 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objective To survey the hygiene condition of teaching and living environment of public and private primary and secondary schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen, and to compare the differences between public and private schools, so as to provide scientific reference for further improvement of school health environment. Methods During 2005-2018, 82 schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen City were monitored according to School Health Work Regulations and Comprehensive Evaluation of School Health GB/T 18205-2012, including 60 public schools and 22 private schools. Results 2976 classrooms, 457 libraries and 63 gymnasiums were monitored during 2005-2018. Among them, the qualified rate of average classroom area per capita, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard reflection ratio, back wall reflection ratio, blackboard surface illumination, environmental noise in all schools were relatively low. There are significant differences between public schools and private schools in classroom per capita area, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard size, window-to-floor ratio, back wall reflection ratio, classroom lighting, and environmental noise and toilet hygiene indicators. Conclusion There are some shortcomings in classroom sanitation and toilet allocation in schools of Luohu District, and they perform well in public places and dormitories. There are significant differences in the health environment between public and private schools in many aspects, especially in the classroom health environment. Comparatively, the teaching and living environment of public schools is better than that of private schools.

Published in	Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science (Volume 1, Issue 1)
Page(s)	14-19
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Hygienic Monitoring, Teaching Environment, Public Schools, Private School

References

[1]	季成叶，陶芳标，武丽杰.儿童少年卫生学[M].第七版.北京:人民卫生出版社，2012,285-288。
[2]	学校卫生工作条例[J].中国学校卫生.1990,(3)：1-6。
[3]	中国国家标准化管理委员会.学校卫生综合评价GB/T 18205-2012[S].北京：中国标准出版社,2014。
[4]	马秀云,王红雨.急性上呼吸道感染与教室人均面积关系研究[J].中国校医,2007,21(1):93-93。
[5]	陶晓燕，李馥宣，周丽，林应和，董营国，刘宗干.深圳市2008～2011年学校教学环境卫生监督综合评价结果分析[J].中国卫生监督杂志，2012，19(06):551-554。
[6]	文翕箫,吴吟涓,林达云，等.2010-2015年深圳市宝安区某公立学校教学与生活环境卫生现状调查[J].中国校医,2019,33(5):335-336,389。
[7]	陈伟泉.中小学生课桌椅合理配置探讨[J].中国教育技术装备,2017,(17):15-16,19。
[8]	古丽加那提·吾马，武杰.学校课桌椅的高度对青少年生长发育的影响[J].才智，2015,(5):26-27,29。
[9]	吴浩生,陈佳林,陈伟峰，等.2005-2016年深圳市罗湖区中小学课桌椅监测与整改效果分析[J].实用预防医学,2017,24(7):868-871。
[10]	邓淑珍，黄达峰，杨帆，等.云南省部分地市中小学校2018年教学环境卫生状况[J].中国学校卫生,2019,40(4):619-622。
[11]	陈荣凯，江海棠，钟苑芳，等.2015、2016年深圳市宝安区沙井街道中小学校教学环境卫生监测综合评价[J].预防医学论坛,2017,23(5):332-334。
[12]	吕若然，滕立新，孙颖，等.北京市2009-2013年中小学校教学环境卫生状况评价[J].中国学校卫生,2015,36(3):468-469。
[13]	应享频，黄晓明，张美辩.浦江县2013-2015年中小学生视力不良率监测分析[J].实用预防医学,2016,23(6):740-742。
[14]	林应和，周丽，吴小敏，等.深圳市2010年学校教学与生活环境卫生监测结果分析[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(2):239-240。
[15]	黄坚，张奕梅，郑向洪.深圳市部分学校卫生监督监测结果分析[J].中国公共卫生,2004(06):109-110。
[16]	中国国家标准化管理委员会.学校课桌椅功能尺寸及技术要求GB/T 3976-2014[S].北京：中国标准出版社,2014。

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wu Haosheng, Yu Xiaoyang, Li Weishan, Peng Yan, Chen Weifeng, et al. (2019). Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science, 1(1), 14-19.

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wu Haosheng; Yu Xiaoyang; Li Weishan; Peng Yan; Chen Weifeng, et al. Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018. Asia-Pac. J. Health Sci. 2019, 1(1), 14-19.

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wu Haosheng, Yu Xiaoyang, Li Weishan, Peng Yan, Chen Weifeng, et al. Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018. Asia-Pac J Health Sci. 2019;1(1):14-19.

Copy | Download

@article{10042345,
  author = {Wu Haosheng and Yu Xiaoyang and Li Weishan and Peng Yan and Chen Weifeng and Liao Qingxiang and Zhang Wen and You Jie and Xia Wei},
  title = {Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018},
  journal = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {14-19},
  url = {https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10042345},
  abstract = {Objective To survey the hygiene condition of teaching and living environment of public and private primary and secondary schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen, and to compare the differences between public and private schools, so as to provide scientific reference for further improvement of school health environment. Methods During 2005-2018, 82 schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen City were monitored according to School Health Work Regulations and Comprehensive Evaluation of School Health GB/T 18205-2012, including 60 public schools and 22 private schools. Results 2976 classrooms, 457 libraries and 63 gymnasiums were monitored during 2005-2018. Among them, the qualified rate of average classroom area per capita, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard reflection ratio, back wall reflection ratio, blackboard surface illumination, environmental noise in all schools were relatively low. There are significant differences between public schools and private schools in classroom per capita area, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard size, window-to-floor ratio, back wall reflection ratio, classroom lighting, and environmental noise and toilet hygiene indicators. Conclusion There are some shortcomings in classroom sanitation and toilet allocation in schools of Luohu District, and they perform well in public places and dormitories. There are significant differences in the health environment between public and private schools in many aspects, especially in the classroom health environment. Comparatively, the teaching and living environment of public schools is better than that of private schools.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018
AU  - Wu Haosheng
AU  - Yu Xiaoyang
AU  - Li Weishan
AU  - Peng Yan
AU  - Chen Weifeng
AU  - Liao Qingxiang
AU  - Zhang Wen
AU  - You Jie
AU  - Xia Wei
Y1  - 2019/10/09
PY  - 2019
T2  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science
JF  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science
JO  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science
SP  - 14
EP  - 19
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - http://www.sciencepg.com/article/10042345
AB  - Objective To survey the hygiene condition of teaching and living environment of public and private primary and secondary schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen, and to compare the differences between public and private schools, so as to provide scientific reference for further improvement of school health environment. Methods During 2005-2018, 82 schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen City were monitored according to School Health Work Regulations and Comprehensive Evaluation of School Health GB/T 18205-2012, including 60 public schools and 22 private schools. Results 2976 classrooms, 457 libraries and 63 gymnasiums were monitored during 2005-2018. Among them, the qualified rate of average classroom area per capita, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard reflection ratio, back wall reflection ratio, blackboard surface illumination, environmental noise in all schools were relatively low. There are significant differences between public schools and private schools in classroom per capita area, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard size, window-to-floor ratio, back wall reflection ratio, classroom lighting, and environmental noise and toilet hygiene indicators. Conclusion There are some shortcomings in classroom sanitation and toilet allocation in schools of Luohu District, and they perform well in public places and dormitories. There are significant differences in the health environment between public and private schools in many aspects, especially in the classroom health environment. Comparatively, the teaching and living environment of public schools is better than that of private schools.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wu Haosheng

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
Yu Xiaoyang

School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Li Weishan

Luohu Bureau of Education, Shenzhen, China
Peng Yan

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
Chen Weifeng

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
Liao Qingxiang

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
Zhang Wen

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
You Jie

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
Xia Wei

Luohu District Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wu Haosheng, Yu Xiaoyang, Li Weishan, Peng Yan, Chen Weifeng, et al. (2019). Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science, 1(1), 14-19.

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wu Haosheng; Yu Xiaoyang; Li Weishan; Peng Yan; Chen Weifeng, et al. Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018. Asia-Pac. J. Health Sci. 2019, 1(1), 14-19.

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wu Haosheng, Yu Xiaoyang, Li Weishan, Peng Yan, Chen Weifeng, et al. Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018. Asia-Pac J Health Sci. 2019;1(1):14-19.

Copy | Download

@article{10042345,
  author = {Wu Haosheng and Yu Xiaoyang and Li Weishan and Peng Yan and Chen Weifeng and Liao Qingxiang and Zhang Wen and You Jie and Xia Wei},
  title = {Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018},
  journal = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {14-19},
  url = {https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10042345},
  abstract = {Objective To survey the hygiene condition of teaching and living environment of public and private primary and secondary schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen, and to compare the differences between public and private schools, so as to provide scientific reference for further improvement of school health environment. Methods During 2005-2018, 82 schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen City were monitored according to School Health Work Regulations and Comprehensive Evaluation of School Health GB/T 18205-2012, including 60 public schools and 22 private schools. Results 2976 classrooms, 457 libraries and 63 gymnasiums were monitored during 2005-2018. Among them, the qualified rate of average classroom area per capita, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard reflection ratio, back wall reflection ratio, blackboard surface illumination, environmental noise in all schools were relatively low. There are significant differences between public schools and private schools in classroom per capita area, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard size, window-to-floor ratio, back wall reflection ratio, classroom lighting, and environmental noise and toilet hygiene indicators. Conclusion There are some shortcomings in classroom sanitation and toilet allocation in schools of Luohu District, and they perform well in public places and dormitories. There are significant differences in the health environment between public and private schools in many aspects, especially in the classroom health environment. Comparatively, the teaching and living environment of public schools is better than that of private schools.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparisons of Teaching and Living Environment Monitoring Results Between Public and Private Schools in Luohu District in 2005-2018
AU  - Wu Haosheng
AU  - Yu Xiaoyang
AU  - Li Weishan
AU  - Peng Yan
AU  - Chen Weifeng
AU  - Liao Qingxiang
AU  - Zhang Wen
AU  - You Jie
AU  - Xia Wei
Y1  - 2019/10/09
PY  - 2019
T2  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science
JF  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science
JO  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Health Science
SP  - 14
EP  - 19
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - http://www.sciencepg.com/article/10042345
AB  - Objective To survey the hygiene condition of teaching and living environment of public and private primary and secondary schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen, and to compare the differences between public and private schools, so as to provide scientific reference for further improvement of school health environment. Methods During 2005-2018, 82 schools in Luohu District of Shenzhen City were monitored according to School Health Work Regulations and Comprehensive Evaluation of School Health GB/T 18205-2012, including 60 public schools and 22 private schools. Results 2976 classrooms, 457 libraries and 63 gymnasiums were monitored during 2005-2018. Among them, the qualified rate of average classroom area per capita, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard reflection ratio, back wall reflection ratio, blackboard surface illumination, environmental noise in all schools were relatively low. There are significant differences between public schools and private schools in classroom per capita area, distance between blackboard and front desk, desk and chair configuration, blackboard size, window-to-floor ratio, back wall reflection ratio, classroom lighting, and environmental noise and toilet hygiene indicators. Conclusion There are some shortcomings in classroom sanitation and toilet allocation in schools of Luohu District, and they perform well in public places and dormitories. There are significant differences in the health environment between public and private schools in many aspects, especially in the classroom health environment. Comparatively, the teaching and living environment of public schools is better than that of private schools.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download