The study was undertaken at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research center (ATARC) with the objectives to evaluate the effect of cultivars, seeding rates and row spacing on yield and yield components of alfalfa. Six alfalfa cultivars (Magna-801, Hunter-river (Check), FG-10-09, Magna-788, FG-09-09 and Alfalfa-Italy), three row spacing (20 cm, 35 cm and 50 cm) and three seeding rates (10, 15 and 20 kg ha1-) were arranged in split-split plot design with three replications. The results indicated that different cultivars influenced significantly the DM yield (P<0.01), leaf to stem ratio (P<0.01) and seed yield (P<0.001) parameters. Comparable DM yield were obtained from FG-10-09, Magna-788, FG-09-09 and Hunter river -(Check) cultivars with values of 1.22, 1.18, 1.09 and 1.08 t/ha respectively. Cultivar FG-09-09 was produced the highest seed yield (21.9 kg ha-1) and it performed well in all other tested parameters. Significantly the highest seed (16.9 kg ha-1) followed by (15.5 kg/ha) were recorded respectively from row spacing of 50 and 35cm. Hence, by considering all agronomic and yield performances, FG-09-09 was selected as best performing cultivar in the study area. Although the highest forage DM yield was produced by the highest seeding rate (20 kg ha-1), since there are no significant differences between seeding rate of 15 kg ha-1 and seeding rate of 20 kg ha-1, it is logical to recommend the intermediate seeding rate (15 kg ha-1) with row spacing of 35cm to be the optimal for alfalfa forage production. Thus, it can be concluded that alfalfa cultivar FG-09-09 with intermediate seeding rate of 15 kg ha-1under row spacing of 35 cm proved to be superior with respect to dry matter yield. However, if the target is for seed production, row spacing of 35cm wide with the lowest (10 kg ha-1) seeding rate should be used under Adami Tulu ecological conditions.
Published in | Advances in Applied Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11 |
Page(s) | 38-44 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Alfalfa, Cultivars, Dry Matter Yield, Seed Yield
Source of variation | Df | PV | NTPP | PH | LSR | DMY | SY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rep | 2 | 74.82 | 16.33 | 85.3 | 0.104 | 0.113 | 2083.5* |
Cultivar (Cu) | 5 | 347.87* | 35.76* | 1039.05*** | 0.448** | 0.446** | 2151.5*** |
Row spacing (RS) | 2 | 427.92* | 3.73 | 10.96 | 0.196 | 0.247 | 757.79* |
Seeding rate (SR) | 2 | 271.86 | 19.13 | 205.32 | 0.128 | 0.294* | 111.8 |
Cu*RS * SR | 44 | 155.86 | 17.47 | 97.48 | 0.089 | 0.078 | 163.07 |
Error | 106 | 204.87 | 20.44 | 168.13 | 0.121 | 0.155 | 271.8 |
Total | 161 | - |
Treatments | Parameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PV (%) | NTPP | PH (cm) | LSR | DM yield (t ha-1) | SY (kg ha-1) | |
Alfalfa cultivars | ||||||
Magna-801 | 64.44b | 11.91b | 36.77c | 0.88c | 0.91b | 10.4d |
Hunter river -(Check) | 65.92b | 13.35ab | 51.32a | 0.86c | 1.08ab | 14.8bc |
FG-10-09 | 69.63ab | 12.14b | 49.57ab | 1.16a | 1.22a | 15.5bc |
Magna-788 | 74.81a | 14.73 a | 50.55a | 0.96bc | 1.18a | 12.3cd |
FG-09-09 | 68.14ab | 12.43ab | 53.06a | 1.09ab | 1.09ab | 21.9a |
Alfalfa Italy | 68.14ab | 11.70b | 43.28b | 0.86c | 0.91b | 17.1b |
Mean | 68.5 | 12.7 | 47.4 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 15.4 |
LSD (0.05) | 7.46 | 2.36 | 6.48 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 3.96 |
Row spacing | ||||||
20 | 65.92b | 12.95 | 47.15 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 13.6b |
35 | 68.15ab | 12.43 | 47.21 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 15.5ab |
50 | 71.48a | 12.76 | 47.91 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 16.9a |
Mean | 68.5 | 12.7 | 47.4 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 15.3 |
LSD (0.05) | 5.31 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 3.06 |
Seeding rates | ||||||
10 | 71.11 | 13.39 | 47.17 | 0.99 | 0.98b | 15.9 |
15 | 67.04 | 12.47 | 45.23 | 1.0 | 1.08ab | 14.6 |
20 | 67.41 | 12.27 | 45.87 | 0.92 | 1.13a | 15.5 |
Mean | 68.5 | 12.7 | 46.09 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 15.3 |
LSD (0.05) | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.14 | NS |
CV | 20.7 | 30.1 | 27.2 | 30.2 | 28.3 | 29.7 |
ADF | Acid Detergent Fiber |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
DM | Dry Matter |
CP | Crude Protein |
CV | Coefficient Variation |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fiber |
[1] | CSA, 2017/18. Agricultural Sample Survey Volume II: report on livestock and livestock characteristics (Private peasant holdings). Central Statistics Authority (CSA), Statistical Bulletin 100. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[2] | Yayneshet, T., Eik, L. & Moe, S, 2009. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition and dry matter degradability of exclosure forages in the semi-arid region of Northern Ethiopia. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 148, 12-33. |
[3] | Deribe, G., Hassen, A., Kocho, T., Tesfu, T. H., Bassa, Z. &Jimma, A. 2013. Chemical composition and digestibility of major feed resources in mixed farming system of southern Ethiopia. World Applied SciencesJournal, 26, 267-275. |
[4] | Mekonnen, K., Gerhard, G. & Monika, S, 2009. Assessments of Fodder Values of three Indigenous and three Exotic Woody plant species in the Highlands of Central Ethiopia. International Mountain Society (IMS), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp 135-142. |
[5] | Zewdie, Wondatir and Yoseph Mekasha, 2014. Feed Resources Availability and Livestock Production in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Academic Journals: International Journal of Livestock Production, 5(2): 30-36. |
[6] | Atif Elsadig Idris, Alaaaldin Idris H. khairy and Yassin, Mohamed Ibrahim, 2012. Evaluation of Intercropping of Rhodes Grass with Alfalfa under Irrigation at Shambat, Sudan. Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(1): 100-102. |
[7] | Elfatih Mohamed Abdel-Rahman and Awad Osman Abu Suwar, 2012. Effect of Seeding Rate on Growth and Yield of Two Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) Cultivars. International Journal of Sudan Research, Vol. 2 No. 2. |
[8] | MajidRashidi, BehnamZandand SaeedAbbassi, 2010. Seeding Rate Effect on Seed Yield and Yield Components of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa). ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. VOL. 5, NO. 3, 1990-6145. |
[9] | Dawit Abate, 2012. Forage Seed Research and Production in Oromia Agricultural Research Institute.. In proceedings of Forage Seed Research and Development in Ethiopia. Eds. GetnetAssefa, MesfinDejene, Jean Hanson, GetachewAnemut, Solomon Mengistu&AlemayehuMengistu, May, 2011. Addis Ababa Ethiopia. |
[10] | KidanieDessalegn, 2012. Forage Seed Research and Development in Irrigated Areas. In proceedings of Forage Seed Research and Development in Ethiopia. Eds. GetnetAssefa, MesfinDejene, Jean Hanson, GetachewAnemut, Solomon Mengistu&AlemayehuMengistu. May, 2011. Addis Ababa Ethiopia. |
[11] | Worku Jima, Tekleyohannes Berhanu, Dagnachew Worku, Solomon Bogale, Teshome Abate, Dawit Abate, and Bekele Mechalu 2008. 15 YEARS ACHIEVEMENTS (1993-2007). Eds. Kedir Nefo, Tilahun Geleto, Allo Aman. Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Sinana Agricultural Research Center. |
[12] | Abule E, Gremew E, Aliye H 1999. Adami Tulu Agricultural research Center, Bulletin No.1, Oromia Agricultural Development Bureau. Fifnfine, Ethiopia. |
[13] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2002. User’s Guide: version 9.1.3 SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC. |
[14] | Sengul S., 2002. Yield components, morphology and forage quality of native alfalfa ecotypes. Journal of Biological Sciences 2: 49-498. |
[15] | Ullah F, A Alam, S Yamamot o, N Khan, T Honna, 2009. Screening for agronomic performance of six indigenous cultivars of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) at Karina northern areas of Pakistan. Electronic journal of environmental, agricultural and food chemistry, 8: 950-968. |
[16] | Shahzad M A, Din W U, Sahi ST, Khan Ehsanullah MM, and Ahmad M., 2007. Effect of sowing dates and seed treatment on grain yield and quality of wheat. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science, 44 (4), 581-583. |
[17] | Julier, B., Huyghe, C. and Ecalle, C., 2000. Within and a mong-cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa. Crop Science, 40(2): 365-369. |
[18] | Sheaffer, C. C., Martin, N. P., Lamb, J. F. S., Cuomo, G. R., Je wett, J. G. and Quering, S. R., 2000. Leaf and stem properties of alfalfa entries. Agronomy Journal, 92(4): 733-739. |
[19] | McGuire, W. S., 1983, “The influence of seeding rates on quality of alfalfa in Oregon’s Willamette valley”, Herbage Abstract, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 387. |
[20] | Monirifar H., 2011. Path analysis of yield and quality traits in Alfalfa. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 39: 190-195. |
[21] | Sun Y, Yang Q, Kang J, GuoW, Zhang T, Li Y, 2011. Yield evaluation of seventeen Lucerne cultivars in the Beijing area of China. Journal of Agricultural Science 3: |
[22] | Dunbier, M. W.; Wynn-Williams, R. B.; Purves, R. G., 1983. Lucerne seed production in New Zealand. Achievement and potential. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 44: 30-35. |
[23] | Askarian, M. 1993. Seed production studies in lucerne (MedicagosativaL.) cv. Grasslands Oranga. Unpubl. PhD thesis, Massey University, New Zealand. |
[24] | Bolanos -Aguilar, E. D., Huyghe, C., Ecalle, C., Hacquet, J. Julier B., 2002. Effect of Cultivar and Environment on Seed Yield in Alfalfa. Crop science, 42, 45-50. |
[25] | Abadouz, G., Gorttapeh, A. H., Rahnema, A. A. and Behradfar, A., 2010. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on yield component and seed yield of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). NotulaeScientiaBiologicae, 2(1), pp. 74-80. |
[26] | Askarian, M., J. G. Hampton and M. J. Hill, 1995. Effect of row spacing and sowing rate on seed production of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) cv. Grasslands Orange. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 38: 289-295. |
[27] | Rashidi, M., Zand, B., Gholami, M., 2009. Effect of different seeding rates on seed yield and some seed yield components of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11(6): 779-782. |
[28] | Mustafa Avci, RüştüHatipoğlu, SelehattinÇinarAndCelalYücel, 2016. Effect of Row Spacing and Sowing Rate on Seed Yield of Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) Under Mediterranean Conditions. Turkish Journal of Field crops. 22(1), 54-62. |
APA Style
Wana, D., Abate, D., Diriba, L., Shenkute, B., Nemera, F., et al. (2025). Effect of Cultivars, Row Spacing and Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Alfalfa (Medicagosativa). Advances in Applied Sciences, 10(3), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11
ACS Style
Wana, D.; Abate, D.; Diriba, L.; Shenkute, B.; Nemera, F., et al. Effect of Cultivars, Row Spacing and Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Alfalfa (Medicagosativa). Adv. Appl. Sci. 2025, 10(3), 38-44. doi: 10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11
@article{10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11, author = {Daniel Wana and Dawit Abate and Lalisa Diriba and Belete Shenkute and Fiqadu Nemera and Nebi Husein and Meseret Tilahun}, title = {Effect of Cultivars, Row Spacing and Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Alfalfa (Medicagosativa) }, journal = {Advances in Applied Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {38-44}, doi = {10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aas.20251003.11}, abstract = {The study was undertaken at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research center (ATARC) with the objectives to evaluate the effect of cultivars, seeding rates and row spacing on yield and yield components of alfalfa. Six alfalfa cultivars (Magna-801, Hunter-river (Check), FG-10-09, Magna-788, FG-09-09 and Alfalfa-Italy), three row spacing (20 cm, 35 cm and 50 cm) and three seeding rates (10, 15 and 20 kg ha1-) were arranged in split-split plot design with three replications. The results indicated that different cultivars influenced significantly the DM yield (P-1) and it performed well in all other tested parameters. Significantly the highest seed (16.9 kg ha-1) followed by (15.5 kg/ha) were recorded respectively from row spacing of 50 and 35cm. Hence, by considering all agronomic and yield performances, FG-09-09 was selected as best performing cultivar in the study area. Although the highest forage DM yield was produced by the highest seeding rate (20 kg ha-1), since there are no significant differences between seeding rate of 15 kg ha-1 and seeding rate of 20 kg ha-1, it is logical to recommend the intermediate seeding rate (15 kg ha-1) with row spacing of 35cm to be the optimal for alfalfa forage production. Thus, it can be concluded that alfalfa cultivar FG-09-09 with intermediate seeding rate of 15 kg ha-1under row spacing of 35 cm proved to be superior with respect to dry matter yield. However, if the target is for seed production, row spacing of 35cm wide with the lowest (10 kg ha-1) seeding rate should be used under Adami Tulu ecological conditions.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Cultivars, Row Spacing and Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Alfalfa (Medicagosativa) AU - Daniel Wana AU - Dawit Abate AU - Lalisa Diriba AU - Belete Shenkute AU - Fiqadu Nemera AU - Nebi Husein AU - Meseret Tilahun Y1 - 2025/07/21 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11 DO - 10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11 T2 - Advances in Applied Sciences JF - Advances in Applied Sciences JO - Advances in Applied Sciences SP - 38 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1514 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20251003.11 AB - The study was undertaken at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research center (ATARC) with the objectives to evaluate the effect of cultivars, seeding rates and row spacing on yield and yield components of alfalfa. Six alfalfa cultivars (Magna-801, Hunter-river (Check), FG-10-09, Magna-788, FG-09-09 and Alfalfa-Italy), three row spacing (20 cm, 35 cm and 50 cm) and three seeding rates (10, 15 and 20 kg ha1-) were arranged in split-split plot design with three replications. The results indicated that different cultivars influenced significantly the DM yield (P-1) and it performed well in all other tested parameters. Significantly the highest seed (16.9 kg ha-1) followed by (15.5 kg/ha) were recorded respectively from row spacing of 50 and 35cm. Hence, by considering all agronomic and yield performances, FG-09-09 was selected as best performing cultivar in the study area. Although the highest forage DM yield was produced by the highest seeding rate (20 kg ha-1), since there are no significant differences between seeding rate of 15 kg ha-1 and seeding rate of 20 kg ha-1, it is logical to recommend the intermediate seeding rate (15 kg ha-1) with row spacing of 35cm to be the optimal for alfalfa forage production. Thus, it can be concluded that alfalfa cultivar FG-09-09 with intermediate seeding rate of 15 kg ha-1under row spacing of 35 cm proved to be superior with respect to dry matter yield. However, if the target is for seed production, row spacing of 35cm wide with the lowest (10 kg ha-1) seeding rate should be used under Adami Tulu ecological conditions. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -