| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Integrated Use of Coffee Husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) at Haru, Ethiopia

Received: 16 November 2021    Accepted: 11 December 2021    Published: 24 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Integrated application of inorganic and organic fertilizers is the main sources for replenishing plant nutrients in agricultural soils. However, selecting the optimum combination of these resources based on soil type and crop species is necessary. In this context, field experiment was conducted at Haru research center to assess the effect of coffee husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and Yield of coffee in 2018/2019. The treatments were the different rates of both compost and NPS fertilizers laid out in randomized complete block design. The results of the study showed that combined application of coffee husk compost and NPS fertilizers were improved soil moisture and total porosity over control, while, bulk density was decreased below the control. Combined application of coffee husk compost at (7.5 t ha-1) and mineral NPS fertilizer at (50 kg ha-1) has better improved yield of coffee crop. The experimental yield of Manasibu variety for present study from the station was 1.59 t ha-1. Therefore, based on the result of the study it can be concluded that under condition of low soil pH of study area the availability of essential nutrients (e.g. P, N, K, Ca, Mg, and Mo) are critically affected. This indicates that the strong acid pH values at Haru Research sub-center require more attention. Moreover, the low levels of CEC, organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available P contents at study area soils confirm that soil fertility is among the constraints for sustainable coffee production in the Haru district. In response to this application of integrated NPS fertilizer and coffee husk compost with different rates improved soil physicochemical properties and coffee yield. The study recommended that the use of 7.5 t ha-1 coffee husk compost and 50 kg ha-1 of NPS fertilizer can be the best alternative integrated soil fertility management option in place of the sole application of inorganic fertilizers at study area tentatively. Nevertheless, in order to give conclusive recommendation further research studies are needed for more soil types and coffee crop varieties.

Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14
Page(s) 233-244
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Coffee Arabica, NPS Fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Growth, Yields

References
[1] Zelleke Gete, Getachew Agwgnehu, Dejene Abera and Shahid Rashad, 2010. Fertilizer and Soil Fertility Potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. Working Paper, International Food Policy Research Institute. http://www.Ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/Ethiopian agsectorwp_soil.pdf.
[2] IFPRI (International Food and Policy Research Institute), 2010. Fertilizer and Soil Fertility Potential in Ethiopia. Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system.
[3] Anteneh Netsere, Solomon Endris, Ashenafi Ayano and Berhanu Mulatu, 2010. Coffee Production Potentials and Constraints in Daro labu District of West Hararge Zone. Research Report 83, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Institute of Agricultural Research.
[4] Chemura, Abel, 2014. The growth response of coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) plants to organic manure, inorganic fertilizers and integrated soil fertility management under different irrigation water supply levels. International Journal Recycling Organic Waste Agriculture, 3, 1-9.
[5] Adi, A. J., Noor, Z. M., 2009. Waste recycling: Utilization of coffee grounds and kitchen waste in vermi-composting. Bio Resource Technology, 2, 1027-1030.
[6] Nguyen Anh Dzung, Tran Trung Dzung, and Voi Thi Phuong Khanh, 2012. Evaluation of Coffee Husk Compost for Improving Soil Fertility and Sustainable Coffee Production in Rural Central Highland of Vietnam, Journal of Resources and Environment, 3, 77- 82.
[7] Gezahegne Barecha, Fikre Lamessa and Mulatu Wakjira, 2011. Exploring the suitability of coffee pulp compost as growth media substitute in greenhouse production. International Journal Agriculture Research, 6, 255-267.
[8] Madeleine I., Peter S., Tim T. and Tom V., 2005. Agrodok no. 8: The preparation and use of compost. Agronomic Foundation, Wagenningen, Digigrafi, the Netherlands.
[9] Vanlauwe B, Bationo A, Chianu J, Giller K. E, Merck R, Mokwunye U, Ohiokpehai O, Pypers P, Tabo R, Smaling E, Woomer P. L. and Sanginga. N., 2010. Integrated soil fertility management: Operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Out on Agriculture, 39, 17–24.
[10] Likassa Ebisa, 2014. Effect of Dominant Shade Trees on Coffee Production in Manasibu District, West Oromia, Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 3, 18-22.
[11] Bikila Takala, 2018. Effects of Lime and Compost on acidic Soil Amelioration and Growth of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Seedlings at Haru, West Wollega. M.Sc. Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies of Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Department of Natural Resource Management.
[12] Zarihun Kebebew, 2013. Coffee Based Rehabilitation of degraded land; the case of Haru district, West Oromia, Ethiopia. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 13, 907 - 913.
[13] Abayneh Melke and Fisseha Ittana, 2015. Nutritional Requirement and Management of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Ethiopia National and Global Perspectives, College of Natural Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 5, 400 - 418.
[14] Dejen Yemane, Abebe Beyene, Hailu Taffere, Addis Waste and Azeb Gebresilassie, 2015. Effect of coffee processing plant effluent on the physicochemical properties of receiving water bodies, Jimma zone Ethiopia. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 4, 83-90.
[15] Central Coffee Research Institute, 2014. Coffee Guide; Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station: Chikm agalur District, Chikmagalur, India.
[16] Solomon Endris, 2006. Accelerated composting of coffee processing by products: an organic option for soil fertility management in the coffee based cropping system of south western Ethiopia. Proceeding of 21st International scientific conference on coffee science (ASIC), Montpelier, France, 1084-1089p.
[17] Gershuny Grace, 2011. Compost, Vermicompost, and Compost Tea: Feeding the Soil on the Organic Farm. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
[18] Cobo, J., Dercon, G. and Cadisch, G., 2010. Nutrient balances in African land use systems across different spatial scales: a review of approaches, challenges and progress. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment, 136, 1-15.
[19] Dinesh Kumar, Mahesh wari, Shrivardhan Dheeman and Mohit Agarwal, 2014. Decomposition of Organic Materials into High Value Compost for Sustainable Crop Productivity. Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar, India. Composting for Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, 4, 245-267.
[20] Tra Thi thong, 2013. Compost Effect on plant Growth. M.sc. A thesis submitted to University of Adelaide.
[21] Fekadu Sh, Brandon, M. G. Franke, I. H., Praehauser, B., Insam, H. and Fassil A., 2014. Coffee husk composting: An Investigation of the Process Using Molecular and Non-Molecular Tools. Waste Management, 34, 642–652.
[22] Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA), 2013. Status of soil resources in Ethiopia and priorities for sustainable management. Nirobi, Kenya.
[23] Anteneh Netsere, Taye Kufa and Tesfaye Shimber, 2015. Review of Arabica Coffee Nursery Management Research in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 13, 2224-3208.
[24] Daniel Capa, Javier Pérez-Esteban and Alberto Masaguer, 2015. Un-sustainability of recommended fertilization rates for coffee monoculture due to high N2O emissions. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35, 1551–1559.
[25] Sousa J. S, Neves J. C. L, Martinez H. E. P and Alvarez, V. H., 2018. Relationship between coffee leaf analysis and soil chemical analysis. Reversa Brasia science, 42, 1-14.
[26] Sahlemedhin Sertsu and Taye Bekele, 2000. Procedures for soil and plant analysis. National Soil Research Centre, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 110p.
[27] Bouyoucos, J., 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil Agronomy Journals, 5, 464-465.
[28] Survey Staff, 1999. Soil Taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Second edition. Agriculture Handbook 436. Washington, DC, USDA. 886p.
[29] Jamison, V. C., Weaver, H. H. and Reed, I. F. 1950. A hammer driven soil core sampler. Soil Science, 6, 487– 496.
[30] Rao’s, D. V. K. Nageswara Vijayakumar and K, R., 2005. Effective soil based recommendation. International Natural Rubber Conference, India.
[31] Rowell, D. L., 1994. Soil Science: Methods and application. Addison Wesley Longman, Limited, England.
[32] Reynolds, S. G., 1970. The gravimetric method of soil Moisture determination method South Pacific Regional College of Tropical Agriculture Alfua Westren Samoa. Journal of Hydrology, 11, 258-273.
[33] Page, A. L., 1982. Methods of soil analysis Part 2. Dordrecht, the Netherlands, Chemical and micro biological properties Press Publishers. 481–509p.
[34] Walkley, A. and Black, I. A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29 - 38.
[35] Jackson, M. L, 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. USA, Englewood Clifs, N. J., Prentice Hall. 498p.
[36] Bray, R. H and Kurtz, L. T., 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. American Soil Science Society, 1, 36-45.
[37] Murphy, J and Riley, J. P., 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphorus in natural waters. Analytical Chimical Acta, 27, 31-36.
[38] Warman, P. R. and Sampson, H. G., 1992. Evaluation of soil sulfate extractants and method of analysis for plant available sulfur. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 7, 793-803.
[39] Chapman, H. (1965). Cation exchange capacity by ammonium saturation. 9: Inc 891-901. Black, C., Ensminger, L and Clark, F. (Ed.), Method of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison Wisconsin, USA.
[40] Hesse, P. R., 1972. A textbook of soil chemical analysis., London, Great Britain. John Murry Limited, 470p.
[41] Champan, H. D., 1965. Cation exchange capacity by ammonium saturation. Methods of Soil Analysis. Agronomy. Part II, American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, 9, 891-901.
[42] Mclean, E. O., 1965. Aluminum in Methods of Soil Analysis. American Science Agronomy Madison, Wisconsin, 978 – 998p.
[43] Barauah, T. C. and Barthakulh, H. P., 1997. A text book of soil analyses. New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., 334p.
[44] Karltun E, Tekalign Mamo, Taye Bekele, Samuel Gameda and Selamyihun Kidanu, 2013. Towards improved fertilizer recommendations in Ethiopia nutrient indices for categorization of fertilizer blends from Ethiopian Soil Information System (Ethio-SIS) District Soil Inventory Data: A Discussion paper, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[45] Dzung, N. A., Dzung, T. and Khanh, V. T. P., 2013. Evaluation of Compost for Improving Soil Fertility and Sustainable Coffee Production in Rural Central Highland of Vietnam. Resources and Environment, 3, 77-82.
[46] Okalebo, J. R., K. W. Gathua and P. L. Womer, 2002. Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analyses. A Working Manual, 2 ed. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED nd Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
[47] SAS Institute Inc. 2013. SAS 9.3 Macro Language: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
[48] Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H., 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, 2nd Edition, Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York. Agricultural science, 1, 252.
[49] Hillel, D. (2014). Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, London, England.
[50] Hazelton, P. and Murphy, B., 2007. Interpreting soil test results, what do all the numbers mean. Victoria, CSIRO Publishing.
[51] Taye Kufa, 2011. Chemical properties of wild coffee forest soils in Ethiopia and management implications. Agricultural Science, 4, 443 - 450.
[52] Abebe Nigussie, Gebremedihin Ambaw and Endalkachew Kissi, 2013. Fertility status of eutric nitisol and fertilizer recommendation using numass in the selected areas of Jimma zone, south western Ethiopia. Tropical and Subtropical Agro ecosystems, 3, 48 - 495.
[53] Landon, J. (2014). Booker tropical soil manual: A handbook for soil Survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. Booker Tate limited, London, England.
[54] FAO (Food and Cultivated Organization),(2006). Plant Nutrition for Food Security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. Available at: access date. No. 16.
[55] Kidanu Motuma and Achalu Chimdi, 2018. Availability of Boron, Sulfur and Zinc and Status of other Selected Soil Properties under Acidic Soils of Different Land Use Types: The Case of WayuTuka District, East Wollega Zone. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 18, 17-22.
[56] Landon, J. R., 1991. Booker Tropical Soil Manual: a handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. (Ed.). New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
[57] Amini, Sh. and Mohammad Ali., 2015. Investigation the Effect of Conservation Tillage on Soil Organic Matter and Soil Organic Carbon. The review, 8, 16–24.
[58] Tesfaye Wakgari, Kibebew Kibret, Bobe Bedadi, Melesse Temesgen and Teklu Erikossa, 2018. Long Term Effects of Cultivation on Physicochemical Properties of Soils at Metahara Sugar Estate. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 18, 246-257.
[59] Brady, N. and R. Weil, 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th Edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 960p.
[60] Tesfaye Wakgari, Kibebew Kibret, Bobe Bedadi, Melesse Temesgen and Teklu Erikossa, 2020. Effects of long term sugarcane production on soils physicochemical properties at Finchaa sugar Estate. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 11, 30-40.
[61] Tamado Tana and Mitiku Woldesenbet, 2017. Effect of Combined Application of Organic and Mineral Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Grain Yield of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Kaffa Zone, South-western Ethiopia. Haramaya University, School of Plant Sciences, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science (MEJS), 2, 242-261.
[62] Islam, M. R, S. Sikder, M. M. Bahadur and. Hafiz, M. R., 2012. Effect of Different Fertilizer Management on Soil Properties and Yield of Fine Rice Cultivar. Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, 5, 239-242.
[63] Bloom, P. R., 2000. Soil pH and pH buffering. In Sumner, M. E. (eds). Handbook of Soil Science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[64] Kasongo, R. K., Verdoodt, A., Kanyankagote, P., Baert, G. and Van Ranst, E., 2011. Coffee Waste as an Alternative Fertilizer with Soil Improving Properties for Sandy Soils in Humid Tropical Environments. Soil Use and Management, 2, 94–102.
[65] Tesfaye Wakgari, Kibebew Kibret, Bobe Bedadi, Melesse Temesgen and Teklu Erikossa, 2019. Effects of Sub-soiling and Organic Amendments on Selected Soil Physicochemical Properties and Sugar Yield in Metahara Sugar Estate. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 19, 312-325.
[66] Argaw Antene, 2017. Organic and inorganic fertilizer application enhances the effect of Brady rhizobium on nodulation and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) in nutrient depleted and sandy soils of Ethiopia. International Journal Recycle Organization Waste Agriculture, 3, 219–231.
[67] Tekalign, T., Haque, I. and Aduayi, E. A., 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis manual. Plant Science Division working document, ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 13, 103.
[68] Anwar Abasanbi, 2010. Assessment of Coffee Quality and its related problems in Jimma Zone of Oromia Regional State. M.sc. Thesis in Agronomy Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicines Department of Horticulture and Plant Sciences.
[69] Nduka, B. A., Adewale, D. B., Akanbi, O. and Adejobi, K. B., 2015. Nursery soil amendments for Cashew seedling production: A Comparative analysis of coffee husk and NPK. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3, 111-122.
[70] Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., Beaton, J. D. and Havlin, J. L., 1995. Soil Fertility and Fertilizer. 5th Edition, Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, Natural resources, 1, 684.
[71] Ayodele, O. J. and Shittu, O. S., 2014. Fertilizer, Lime and Manure Amendments for Ultisols Formed on Coastal Plain Sands of Southern Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3, 481- 488.
[72] Samuel T, Werner. N, James. B, and John. H., 2000. Soil fertility and fertilizers, 5th edition, Prenticehall of India private limited, New Delhi.
[73] Asha K, C. R and Devanna. N., 2017. Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Coffee Pulp for its Potentiality as Soil Fertilizer, Journal of Agro ecology and Natural Resource Management, 5, 388-390.
[74] Samake, A., 2014. Use of locally available amendments to improve acid soil properties and maize yield in the savanna zone of Mali. Ph.D Thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi.
[75] Kasongo, R. K., A. Verdoodt, P. Kanyankogote, G. Baert, and Van Ranst E., 2013. Response of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium Multiflorum L.) to Coffee Waste Application on a Humid Tropical Sandy Soil. Soil Use and Management, 1, 22–29.
[76] Chaves A. R. M, Martins, S. C. V, Batista, K. D, Celin E. F, and Da Matta, F. M., 2012. Varying leaf-to-fruit ratios affect branch growth and dieback, with little to no effect on photosynthesis, carbohydrate or mineral pools, in different canopy positions of field-grown coffee trees, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal, 77, 207- 218.
[77] Chemura, A, Waheed, A., Hamid, F. S., Kutywayo, D. and Chingwara, V., 2010. Effect of Organic and inorganic fertilizer on growth, yield and economic performance of Coffee. International Journal Recycling Organic Waste Agriculture, 29, 11–15.
[78] Wairegi, L. W. I, van Asten P. J. A, Giller K. E and Fairhurst, T., 2014. Banana coffee system cropping guide. Africa Soil Health Consortium, Nairobi.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gemechu Chali, Tesfaye Wakgari. (2021). Effect of Integrated Use of Coffee Husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) at Haru, Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 10(6), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gemechu Chali; Tesfaye Wakgari. Effect of Integrated Use of Coffee Husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) at Haru, Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2021, 10(6), 233-244. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gemechu Chali, Tesfaye Wakgari. Effect of Integrated Use of Coffee Husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) at Haru, Ethiopia. Agric For Fish. 2021;10(6):233-244. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14,
      author = {Gemechu Chali and Tesfaye Wakgari},
      title = {Effect of Integrated Use of Coffee Husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) at Haru, Ethiopia},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {233-244},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20211006.14},
      abstract = {Integrated application of inorganic and organic fertilizers is the main sources for replenishing plant nutrients in agricultural soils. However, selecting the optimum combination of these resources based on soil type and crop species is necessary. In this context, field experiment was conducted at Haru research center to assess the effect of coffee husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and Yield of coffee in 2018/2019. The treatments were the different rates of both compost and NPS fertilizers laid out in randomized complete block design. The results of the study showed that combined application of coffee husk compost and NPS fertilizers were improved soil moisture and total porosity over control, while, bulk density was decreased below the control. Combined application of coffee husk compost at (7.5 t ha-1) and mineral NPS fertilizer at (50 kg ha-1) has better improved yield of coffee crop. The experimental yield of Manasibu variety for present study from the station was 1.59 t ha-1. Therefore, based on the result of the study it can be concluded that under condition of low soil pH of study area the availability of essential nutrients (e.g. P, N, K, Ca, Mg, and Mo) are critically affected. This indicates that the strong acid pH values at Haru Research sub-center require more attention. Moreover, the low levels of CEC, organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available P contents at study area soils confirm that soil fertility is among the constraints for sustainable coffee production in the Haru district. In response to this application of integrated NPS fertilizer and coffee husk compost with different rates improved soil physicochemical properties and coffee yield. The study recommended that the use of 7.5 t ha-1 coffee husk compost and 50 kg ha-1 of NPS fertilizer can be the best alternative integrated soil fertility management option in place of the sole application of inorganic fertilizers at study area tentatively. Nevertheless, in order to give conclusive recommendation further research studies are needed for more soil types and coffee crop varieties.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Integrated Use of Coffee Husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) at Haru, Ethiopia
    AU  - Gemechu Chali
    AU  - Tesfaye Wakgari
    Y1  - 2021/12/24
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 233
    EP  - 244
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20211006.14
    AB  - Integrated application of inorganic and organic fertilizers is the main sources for replenishing plant nutrients in agricultural soils. However, selecting the optimum combination of these resources based on soil type and crop species is necessary. In this context, field experiment was conducted at Haru research center to assess the effect of coffee husk Compost and NPS Fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and Yield of coffee in 2018/2019. The treatments were the different rates of both compost and NPS fertilizers laid out in randomized complete block design. The results of the study showed that combined application of coffee husk compost and NPS fertilizers were improved soil moisture and total porosity over control, while, bulk density was decreased below the control. Combined application of coffee husk compost at (7.5 t ha-1) and mineral NPS fertilizer at (50 kg ha-1) has better improved yield of coffee crop. The experimental yield of Manasibu variety for present study from the station was 1.59 t ha-1. Therefore, based on the result of the study it can be concluded that under condition of low soil pH of study area the availability of essential nutrients (e.g. P, N, K, Ca, Mg, and Mo) are critically affected. This indicates that the strong acid pH values at Haru Research sub-center require more attention. Moreover, the low levels of CEC, organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available P contents at study area soils confirm that soil fertility is among the constraints for sustainable coffee production in the Haru district. In response to this application of integrated NPS fertilizer and coffee husk compost with different rates improved soil physicochemical properties and coffee yield. The study recommended that the use of 7.5 t ha-1 coffee husk compost and 50 kg ha-1 of NPS fertilizer can be the best alternative integrated soil fertility management option in place of the sole application of inorganic fertilizers at study area tentatively. Nevertheless, in order to give conclusive recommendation further research studies are needed for more soil types and coffee crop varieties.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Haru Agricultural Research Center, Haru, Ethiopia

  • Department of Natural Resource Management, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Sections