Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Impacts of Traditional Stone Line /Kabi Line/, Crop Types, Crop Patterns and Fertilizer Applications on Soil Properties at Ifabas /Jarra/ Community Watershed, Tullo Woreda, West Harareghe, Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 21 July 2025     Accepted: 19 August 2025     Published: 29 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study was entitled with: the impacts of traditional stone lines/kabi lines/ in association of soil management practices of agronomic erosion controls on soil physico-chemical properties at Ifabas / Jarra/ community watershed, Tullo Weroda west Harareghe zone Oromia Regional National State Ethiopia. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of TSLs with fertilizers application, crop types and crop patterns on soil physico-chemical properties of CFLS with TSL in comparison to NCFLS and to observe their correlations existed between them; and to investigate the variations of C/N ratios between CFLS with TSL and \NCFLS. CRBD was purposefully used in provided an equal chances of statistical probability distribution of EUs, SPs, and OUs. The total of 54 CSSs were collected from the three sub-watersheds of Ifabas community watershed for laboratory analysis. Moreover, the total of 54 disturbed soil samples were collected in separate to determine soil BD and soil MC. Soil samples were collected at 0-15 cm soil depth by used local available and prepared auger from metal pipe. Its volume is 396.312 cm3. Soil samples were replicated three times to approach the accuracy. Laboratory analyzed output of soil data were subjected to EXCEL2013 software and multiple ANOVA following the GLM of Multivariate procedures of SPSS version 23. The study were observed the variations of ST, SOC, TSN, ASP, and soil pH, SOM, MC and BD and C/N ratios available between CFLS and NCFLS. The results of the study in B-I had showed that, the average values of the soil BD, soil MC, silt and, sand soil, TSN, SOC, SOM and soil pH were the higher inside CFLS with TSL (0.24g/cm3, 39.76%, 31.13%, 31.82%, 0.20%, 2.29%, 3.94% and 6.72 ratio) than NCFLS (0.16g/cm3, 26.96%, 24.21%, 27.38%, 0.19%, 1.24%, 2.13% and 6.61 ratio). The findings of the study in B-II had revealed that, the average values of soil BD, soil MC, soil pH and clay soil were the lower under CFLS with TSL (0.12g/cm3, 24.5%, 6.93 ratio and 32.58%) than in NCFLS (0.24g/cm3, 30.62%, 6.72 ratio and 38.35%). The results of the study in B-III had indicated that, the average values of the soil MC, sand soil, SOC, SOM, TSN, and ASP were the higher under CFLS with TSL (30.76%, 39.40%, 1.71%, 2.95%, 0.33% and 24.56ppm) than NCFLS (19.32%, 38.19%, 1.13%, 1.95%, 0.18% and 13.57ppm), In general the study results had showed that TSL structures, CFS and CGPS have the positive effects on improving of soil physical and chemical properties as comparted to NCFLS.

Published in American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 11, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12
Page(s) 165-189
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

TSL/kabi Line, TRS, ASMPs, Crop Types, Crop Patterns, FL, SPCP, EUs, BLS, CSSs, SD, R and WS

References
[1] Abdu-Abdulkadir, et al. (2016). Effects of graded stone bunds on selected soil properties in the central highlands of Ethiopia. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, vol. 1, no. 2. 2016, pp. 42-50.
[2] Abera, et al. (2003). Factors influencing the adoption of soil conservation practices in northwestern Ethiopia. Discussion papers, no. 37, Institute of Rural Development University of Gottingen, pp. 1-82.
[3] Afful A. et al. (2011). Nutrient and bulk density characteristics of soil profiles in six land use systems along topo-sequences in inland valley watersheds of Ashanti region, Ghana. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 50, no. 5, Ashanti Ghana, pp. 649-463.
[4] Alemu B., etal, (2021). Indigenous Knowledge and Practices on Soil and Water Conservation in Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17 (2), west Ethiopia p76.
[5] Ambrust etal. (1986). Soil physical properties as influenced by cropping and residue management. Soil science society of American journals, salinity and sodcity, a global challenge to food security, environmental quality and soil resilience, vol. 50, issue 2, soil and water management and conservation, contribution from the USDA-ARS, in cooperation with the Dep. of agronomy, Kansas state University and garden city branch station, kansa agricultural experiment station. kansas agricultural experiment station, Kansas pp. 85-99.
[6] Amisalu M. M. (2018). The role of agronomic practices on soil and water conservation in ethiopia; implication for climate change adaptation. A review journal of agricultural science, vol. 10, no. 6, Canadian center of science and education, School of Natural Resource Management and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University Ethiopia, pp. 1916-9760.
[7] Anteneh A. (2011). Review on the role of soil and water conservation practices on soil properties improvement in Ethiopia. International journal of agricultural science and food technology, Woldia University, Department of Soil Resources and Watershed Management, College of Agriculture, Woldia Ethiopia, p226.
[8] Antony Jiju (2003). Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. ISBN: 0750647094 • Publisher: Elsevier Science & Technology Books, pp. 1-3.
[9] Bai ZG, et al. (2008). Global assessment of land degradation and improvement. Identification by remote sensing. Report 2008/01, ISRIC –World soil information, GLADA Report 5, FAO of the United Nations Wageningen the Netherlands, pp. 9-53.
[10] Blanco H. and Lal, R. (2008). Principles of soil conservation and management. Kansas State University Western Agricultural Research Center-Hays 1232 240th Avenue Hays, KS 67 601, USA, America, pp9-16.
[11] Berg, M. G. and Gardner E. H. (1978). Methods of soil analysis used in the soil testing laboratory at Oregon State University, S. 105, E55, no. 321, rev. 1978, cop. 2, Oregon State University, Oregon, pp. 29-32.
[12] Bock E. and Easton ZM. (2016). Soil and soil water relationships. Virginia cooperative extension, college of agriculture and life science Virginia Tech., Virginia State University, Petersburg, pp1-9.
[13] Bouyoucos, G. J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Introductory soil science Lab 6 soil texture, bulk and particle density no., 201, vol. 8 address.
[14] Brady Nyle C. and Weil Ray R. (1999). The nature and properties of soils (12th edu.). Library of congress, catalog in publication data, United States of America, p134.
[15] Burely, J. and Wood, J. P. (1991). A tree for all reasons. The introduction and evaluation of multipurpose trees for agroforestry, science and practice of agroforestry, International kindie paper white, international center for research I agroforestry, no. 5, United Nations Avenue, P. O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya pp3-84.
[16] Cherent M. etal. (2022). Effect of soil management practices on soil physico-chemical properties: A case of Wera Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia. Hindawi applied and environmental soil science, vol. 2022, Article ID no. 5370477, Hawassa, Ethiopia pp. 1-9.
[17] Chimdessa D. (2019). Phosphorus calibration study under soil test based maize response in Bedele Woreda of Oromia, west Ethiopia. Forestry research and engineering: international journal, vol. 3, Issue 4, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia, pp. 154-155.
[18] Cushman A. S. (2021). Effects of land use and climate change on functional and phylogenetic diversity of terrestrial vertebrates in a Himalayan biodiversity hotspot. Journal of diversity and distribution, no. 10, vol. 1111, available on line, 1–13.
[19] Dereje D. K. (2013). Characterization of soils of Habro area, west Harareghe zone of Oromia region, eastern Ethiopia. A Thesis for MSc, School of Natural Resources Management and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia, pp1-46.
[20] Evanylo G. and McGuinn R. (2009). Agricultural management practices and soil quality: measuring, assessing, and comparing laboratory and field test kit indicators of soil quality attributes. Virginia cooperative extension, extension specialist and former research associate, respectively, crop and soil environmental sciences, Virginia Tech, Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universit, pp. 3-8.
[21] FAO (1995). Ethiopian food and agricultural organization of the United Nations. Soil and water resources, agriculture in Ethiopia address.
[22] FAO (2000). Simple soil, water and plant testing techniques for soil resource management. international institute of tropical agriculture food and agriculture organization of the united nations, proceedings of a training course held in Ibadan, Nigeria, 16-27 September 1996, Land and Water Development Division, vol. 00100, Rome, Italy, pp. 19-26.
[23] FAO (2008). Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Fertilizer and plant nutrition Bulletin no. 19, vol. 219 Rome Italy, available on line
[24] Hinkelmann K. and Kempthorne O. (2005). Design and analysis of experiments. Advanced experimental design, v. 2, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., publication, Hoboken, New Jersey, p1.
[25] Hinkelman, K. and Kempthorne, O. (2007). Design and Analysis of Experiments (2nd Ed.). Introduction to Experimental Design, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, pp29-60.
[26] Hubbs M. (2001). Guidelines for soil quality assessment in conservation planning. USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room no. 326-, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, Washington DC, United States department of agriculture natural resources conservation service soil quality institute, America, pp. 3-20.
[27] Kapalanga S. T. and Kiekebusch E, (2009). A Review of land degradation assessment & monitoring methods. 13th Namibian rangeland forum conference: The role of biodiversity in rangeland management and policy, Neudamm Agricultural College, Windhoek, pp. 4-21.
[28] Limbalia, R. N. and Kebebew, K. (2016). Climate change on land suitability for rain fed production in Lake Haramaya watershed, eastern Ethiopia. Journal of earth science and climate change. Development Universities Hohenheim, Institute of soil science and land evaluation, no. (310) Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 1-16.
[29] Morgan C. R. P. (2005). Soil erosion and conservation (3rd edu.). National soil resources Institute, Cranfield University, pp. iX-66.
[30] Negash, M. (2017). The needs for the meteorological information to plan agroforestry on steep slopes in Ethiopia. Land use planning department, Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Available on
[31] Oliver, L. (2005). Vegetation description and analysis. Forest soils laboratory notebook, (Rev.), UAF – Natural Resources, Bio1475-06-Lab. no. 06.
[32] Reij C. (2016). Indigenous soil and water conservation in Africa. Centre for development of cooperative services, Vrije University, Van DER Boechorstraat vol. 7, no. 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 1-4.
[33] Raiph J. (2000). Mindatorg and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are available © OpenStreetMap contributors, pp. 1993-2025.
[34] Schulte, E. E. (1979). Recommended soil organic matter tests. North Central Region soil testing labs. No. 13: pp. 52-60. address.
[35] SMWHZ (2017). History climate baseline statistics for east and west Harareghe Ethiopia. Available on:
[36] Sullivan P. (2004). Sustainable Soil Management. National sustainable agricultural service, NCAT agriculture specialist skip navigation, and available online through website.
[37] Taddeo R. (2017). Good practices for soil fertility and management. Discover the world's research’s, soil fertility and management notes for agribusiness students, Nkumba University, Entebbe Uganda, The need for a soil management system (SMS), pp. 1-35.
[38] Taffa, T. (2002). Soil and water conservation for sustainable agriculture. Mega publishing enterprise, technical centre for agricultural (CTA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 1-37.
[39] Teklu E., and Gezahegn A. (2003). Indigenous knowledge and practices for soil and water management in East Wollega, Ethiopia. Conference on international agricultural research for development, conference on international agricultural research for development universities Hohenheim, institute of soil science and land evaluation, no. (310) stuttgart, Germany, pp. 1-16.
[40] Teklu E., and Gezahegn A. (2016). Indigenous knowledge and practices for soil and water management in east Wollega, Ethiopia. Conference on international agricultural research for development, conference on international agricultural research for development universities hohenheim, institute of soil science and land evaluation, (310) stuttgart, Germany pp. 1-12.
[41] UNDP (2002). Ethiopia: assessment of field trip to east and west Harareghe zone. Ethiopian weather and climate zone, national safaris Ethiopia highlights where they are and how to visit them. Available on line:
[42] Wolka K. etal. (2014). Effects of level soil bunds and stone bunds on soil properties and its implications for crop production: the case of Bokole watershed, Dawuro zone, Southern Ethiopia. Agricultural science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 360-361.
[43] WRDDIRD, (2009). Laboratory testing procedure for soil & water sample analysis. Water resources department, directorate of irrigation research & development, no., 01, SSD/GL.01 Government of Maharashtra, Pune, pp. 3-84.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ibro, M. A. (2025). Impacts of Traditional Stone Line /Kabi Line/, Crop Types, Crop Patterns and Fertilizer Applications on Soil Properties at Ifabas /Jarra/ Community Watershed, Tullo Woreda, West Harareghe, Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 11(4), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ibro, M. A. Impacts of Traditional Stone Line /Kabi Line/, Crop Types, Crop Patterns and Fertilizer Applications on Soil Properties at Ifabas /Jarra/ Community Watershed, Tullo Woreda, West Harareghe, Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2025, 11(4), 165-189. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ibro MA. Impacts of Traditional Stone Line /Kabi Line/, Crop Types, Crop Patterns and Fertilizer Applications on Soil Properties at Ifabas /Jarra/ Community Watershed, Tullo Woreda, West Harareghe, Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2025;11(4):165-189. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12,
      author = {Mussa Abdula Ibro},
      title = {Impacts of Traditional Stone Line /Kabi Line/, Crop Types, Crop Patterns and Fertilizer Applications on Soil Properties at Ifabas /Jarra/ Community Watershed, Tullo Woreda, West Harareghe, Oromia, Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
      volume = {11},
      number = {4},
      pages = {165-189},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20251104.12},
      abstract = {This study was entitled with: the impacts of traditional stone lines/kabi lines/ in association of soil management practices of agronomic erosion controls on soil physico-chemical properties at Ifabas / Jarra/ community watershed, Tullo Weroda west Harareghe zone Oromia Regional National State Ethiopia. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of TSLs with fertilizers application, crop types and crop patterns on soil physico-chemical properties of CFLS with TSL in comparison to NCFLS and to observe their correlations existed between them; and to investigate the variations of C/N ratios between CFLS with TSL and \NCFLS. CRBD was purposefully used in provided an equal chances of statistical probability distribution of EUs, SPs, and OUs. The total of 54 CSSs were collected from the three sub-watersheds of Ifabas community watershed for laboratory analysis. Moreover, the total of 54 disturbed soil samples were collected in separate to determine soil BD and soil MC. Soil samples were collected at 0-15 cm soil depth by used local available and prepared auger from metal pipe. Its volume is 396.312 cm3. Soil samples were replicated three times to approach the accuracy. Laboratory analyzed output of soil data were subjected to EXCEL2013 software and multiple ANOVA following the GLM of Multivariate procedures of SPSS version 23. The study were observed the variations of ST, SOC, TSN, ASP, and soil pH, SOM, MC and BD and C/N ratios available between CFLS and NCFLS. The results of the study in B-I had showed that, the average values of the soil BD, soil MC, silt and, sand soil, TSN, SOC, SOM and soil pH were the higher inside CFLS with TSL (0.24g/cm3, 39.76%, 31.13%, 31.82%, 0.20%, 2.29%, 3.94% and 6.72 ratio) than NCFLS (0.16g/cm3, 26.96%, 24.21%, 27.38%, 0.19%, 1.24%, 2.13% and 6.61 ratio). The findings of the study in B-II had revealed that, the average values of soil BD, soil MC, soil pH and clay soil were the lower under CFLS with TSL (0.12g/cm3, 24.5%, 6.93 ratio and 32.58%) than in NCFLS (0.24g/cm3, 30.62%, 6.72 ratio and 38.35%). The results of the study in B-III had indicated that, the average values of the soil MC, sand soil, SOC, SOM, TSN, and ASP were the higher under CFLS with TSL (30.76%, 39.40%, 1.71%, 2.95%, 0.33% and 24.56ppm) than NCFLS (19.32%, 38.19%, 1.13%, 1.95%, 0.18% and 13.57ppm), In general the study results had showed that TSL structures, CFS and CGPS have the positive effects on improving of soil physical and chemical properties as comparted to NCFLS.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Impacts of Traditional Stone Line /Kabi Line/, Crop Types, Crop Patterns and Fertilizer Applications on Soil Properties at Ifabas /Jarra/ Community Watershed, Tullo Woreda, West Harareghe, Oromia, Ethiopia
    AU  - Mussa Abdula Ibro
    Y1  - 2025/12/29
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12
    T2  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    JF  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    JO  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    SP  - 165
    EP  - 189
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-979X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251104.12
    AB  - This study was entitled with: the impacts of traditional stone lines/kabi lines/ in association of soil management practices of agronomic erosion controls on soil physico-chemical properties at Ifabas / Jarra/ community watershed, Tullo Weroda west Harareghe zone Oromia Regional National State Ethiopia. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of TSLs with fertilizers application, crop types and crop patterns on soil physico-chemical properties of CFLS with TSL in comparison to NCFLS and to observe their correlations existed between them; and to investigate the variations of C/N ratios between CFLS with TSL and \NCFLS. CRBD was purposefully used in provided an equal chances of statistical probability distribution of EUs, SPs, and OUs. The total of 54 CSSs were collected from the three sub-watersheds of Ifabas community watershed for laboratory analysis. Moreover, the total of 54 disturbed soil samples were collected in separate to determine soil BD and soil MC. Soil samples were collected at 0-15 cm soil depth by used local available and prepared auger from metal pipe. Its volume is 396.312 cm3. Soil samples were replicated three times to approach the accuracy. Laboratory analyzed output of soil data were subjected to EXCEL2013 software and multiple ANOVA following the GLM of Multivariate procedures of SPSS version 23. The study were observed the variations of ST, SOC, TSN, ASP, and soil pH, SOM, MC and BD and C/N ratios available between CFLS and NCFLS. The results of the study in B-I had showed that, the average values of the soil BD, soil MC, silt and, sand soil, TSN, SOC, SOM and soil pH were the higher inside CFLS with TSL (0.24g/cm3, 39.76%, 31.13%, 31.82%, 0.20%, 2.29%, 3.94% and 6.72 ratio) than NCFLS (0.16g/cm3, 26.96%, 24.21%, 27.38%, 0.19%, 1.24%, 2.13% and 6.61 ratio). The findings of the study in B-II had revealed that, the average values of soil BD, soil MC, soil pH and clay soil were the lower under CFLS with TSL (0.12g/cm3, 24.5%, 6.93 ratio and 32.58%) than in NCFLS (0.24g/cm3, 30.62%, 6.72 ratio and 38.35%). The results of the study in B-III had indicated that, the average values of the soil MC, sand soil, SOC, SOM, TSN, and ASP were the higher under CFLS with TSL (30.76%, 39.40%, 1.71%, 2.95%, 0.33% and 24.56ppm) than NCFLS (19.32%, 38.19%, 1.13%, 1.95%, 0.18% and 13.57ppm), In general the study results had showed that TSL structures, CFS and CGPS have the positive effects on improving of soil physical and chemical properties as comparted to NCFLS.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Soil Resource and Watershed Management, Oda Bultum University, Chiro, Ethiopia

  • Sections