This study aimed to quantify and characterize fecal sludge (FS) from on-site sanitation systems and make it available to public services. This study employed two methods: one based on the demand for mechanical emptying, and the other based on a count of the number of trucks deposited on the site. The sludge samples were then taken from the pits, followed by physicochemical, bacteriological and parasitic analyses. The results showed that all 660 households surveyed had a commode, with 73% traditional latrines, 21% modern toilets with a septic tank, 4% flush toilets, 1% VIP latrines and 1% pipe latrines. The annual volume of FS discharged at the treatment plant is estimated at 2,880 m3/year using the truck count and 40,310 m3/year based on mechanical emptying demand. In addition, the FS characteristics showed great variability, with average values of pH (6.6), Salinity (2.7 ‰), Conductivity (4.7 mS/cm), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS: 0.555 g/L), Ammonium ion (1.914 g/L), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5: 2.858 g/L), Total volatile solids (TVS: 78.1%) and Dry Matter (DM: 12.4%). The analyses also revealed high bacterial and parasitic load with fecal coliforms concentration of 8.5 x 106 ± 0.6 x 106 CFU/100mL, fecal streptococci concentration of 3 x 106 ± 1.7 x 106 CFU/100 mL and 6767 ± 1782 helminth eggs. The findings from this study will provide the scientific basis for improving the feasibility of establishing a FS treatment plant in Bafoussam.
Published in | American Journal of Environmental Protection (Volume 14, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11 |
Page(s) | 122-135 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fecal Sludge Management, Fecal Sludge Quantification, Fecal Sludge Characterization, On-site Sanitation System, Treatment Plants
Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Housing occupancy status | ||
Owners | 481.8 | 73 % |
Tenants | 178.2 | 27 % |
Place of residence | ||
Urban area | 488.4 | 74 % |
Rural area | 171.6 | 26 % |
Topographical position | ||
Mid-slope | 415.8 | 63 % |
Above the ridges | 151.8 | 23 % |
In the shallows | 92.4 | 14% |
Home building materials | ||
Semi-solid without barrier | 323.4 | 49 % |
Batted earth | 178.4 | 27 % |
Solid or semi-solid with barrier | 158.4 | 24 % |
Respondent's household status | ||
Household women | 277.2 | 42 % |
Household managers | 217.8 | 33 % |
Household children | 158.4 | 24 % |
Other | 6.6 | 1 % |
Level of education of head of household | ||
High school level | 336.6 | 51 % |
Primary education | 198 | 30 % |
Top level | 66 | 10 % |
No level | 33 | 5 % |
Not known | 26.4 | 4% |
Household size (person) | ||
[1-5] | 198 | 30 % |
[5-10] | 389.4 | 59 % |
[10-15] | 52.8 | 8 % |
[15-+∞] | 19.8 | 3 % |
Types of household excreta collection systems | ||
Traditional latrines | 481.8 | 73 % |
Modern toilet with septic tank | 138.6 | 21 % |
Manual flush latrines | 26.4 | 4 % |
VIP latrines | 6.6 | 1 % |
Cannon latrines | 6.6 | 1 % |
Level of sanitation facilities | ||
Medium-sized devices | 396 | 60 % |
Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
Well-designed features | 145.2 | 22 % |
Undeveloped devices | 118.2 | 18 % |
Construction materials for superstructure walls | ||
Concrete/brick/baked brick | 448.8 | 68 % |
Metal Sheet | 85.8 | 13 % |
Batted earth | 39.6 | 6 % |
Mats/leaves/plastic paper | 33 | 5 % |
Planks/carabot | 26.4 | 4 % |
Others | 26.4 | 4 % |
Slab construction materials and pit depths | ||
Concrete | 607.2 | 92% |
Wood | 39.9 | 6% |
Stones | 6.6 | 1% |
Others | 6.6 | 1% |
Depth of pits (m) | ||
Between 5 and 10 m | 198 | 30 % |
Depth ˂ 5 m | 26.4 | 4 % |
Between 10 and 15 m | 145.2 | 22 % |
More than 15 m | 46.2 | 7 % |
No information | 244.2 | 37 % |
Latrine operation | ||
Households not using water to flush excreta | 389.6 | 59 % |
Households using water to flush excreta | 270.6 | 41 % |
Solutions envisaged if the latrines are full | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Traditional and VIP latrines | ||
Construction of a new latrine | 429 | 65 % |
Emptying | 231 | 35 % |
Modern flush toilets and septic tanks | ||
Construction of a new latrine | 211.2 | 32 % |
Emptying | 448.8 | 68 % |
Criteria for choosing an emptying service | ||
Quality of service | 323.4 | 49% |
Accessibility | 237.6 | 36% |
Cost | 66 | 10 % |
Other | 33 | 5 % |
Responsible for manual emptying of latrines | ||
Mechanical emptying when filling pits | 633.6 | 96 % |
Manual emptying when filling pits | 26.4 | 4 % |
Emptying frequency (4%n) | ||
One oil change | 21.648 | 82 % |
Two oil changes | 1.848 | 7 % |
Several oil changes (between 3 and 5 times) | 1.06 | 4% |
Other | 1.848 | 7 % |
Periodicity of draining | ||
Emptying 3 years ago | 303.6 | 46 % |
Emptying 2 years ago | 46.2 | 7 % |
Emptying 1 year ago | 191.4 | 29 % |
Emptying 6 months ago | 118.8 | 18 % |
Cost to households of emptying their excreta disposal system | ||
<10000 | 59.4 | 9% |
[10000-20000] | 59.4 | 9 % |
[20000-50000] | 118.8 | 18 % |
>50000 | 422.4 | 64 % |
Reuse potential | ||
Types of organic fertilizer used by farmers | ||
Poultry manure | 460 | 70 % |
Beef Bursaries | 6.6 | 1 % |
Household waste compost | 26.4 | 3 % |
Sanitary sewage sludge | 6.6 | 1 % |
People's readiness to use treated FS in agriculture | ||
Favourable opinion on the use of fertilizers from FS | 508.2 | 77 % |
Unfavourable opinion on the use of fertilizers from FS | 151.8 | 23 % |
Amounts that could be disbursed for the purchase of 50 kg of fertilizer from FS (XAF) | ||
[1000-2000] | 283.8 | 43 % |
> 2000 | 85.8 | 13 % |
[500-1000] | 171.6 | 26 % |
<500 | 66 | 10 % |
Other | 52.8 | 8 % |
Parameters | Dry toilets | Water based toilets | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of on-site wastewater treatment facilities (N) | 51,787 | 18,195 | 69,983 |
Frequency of emptying (%) | 35.0 | 68.0 | / |
Average frequency between two emptying operations (year) | 10 | 8 | / |
Volume of works (m3) | 10 | 10 | / |
η (rotation/work) | 1 | 1 | / |
Quantity of sludge emptied annually (m3) | 21,751 | 18,559 | 40,310 |
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Number of trucks | 2 |
Volume of trucks (m3) | 10 |
Number of weekly dumping/trucks | 3 |
Weekly volume (m3) | 60 |
Monthly volume (m3) | 240 |
Annual volume (m3) | 2,880 |
Methods | Parameters | Estimation (m3) | |
---|---|---|---|
TS (%) | quantity of sludge (m3) | ||
Demand for mechanical drainage | 12.4 | 3,000 | 372 |
Count of trucks discharging at the site | 12.4 | 40,310 | 4,998.44 |
Parameters | Number of samples | Mean | Variances | Max | Min |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 10 | 6.6 | 0.5 | 7.8 | 5.7 |
Sal (‰) | 10 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 1.2 |
Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) | 10 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 8.0 | 2.3 |
TDS (g/L) | 10 | 0.555 | 0.803 | 2.192 | 0.003 |
NH4⁺ (g/L) | 10 | 1.914 | 0.227 | 5.25 | 0.362 |
PO43-(g/L) | 10 | 0.029 | 0.028 | 0.036 | 0.024 |
NO3- (g/L) | 10 | 0.436 | 0.112 | 0.558 | 0.3 |
COD (gO2/L) | 10 | 10.545 | 1.066 | 15.025 | 7.34 |
BOD₅ (gO2/L) | 10 | 2.858 | 0.408 | 3.720 | 1.5 |
TVS (%) | 10 | 78.1 | 10.8 | 88.4 | 55.1 |
TS (%) | 10 | 12.4 | 9.1 | 17.3 | 7.2 |
Fecal coliform (CFU/100 mL) | 10 | 8.5*106 | 0.4*106 | 12 x 106 | 1 x 106 |
Fecal streptococci (CFU/100 mL) | 10 | 3*106 | 3*106 | 7 x 106 | 1 x 105 |
Parasite names | Mean number per liter | Standard deviation |
---|---|---|
Tenia sp. | 3,000.1 | 1,964.6 |
Ascaris lumbricoides | 2,301.4 | 581.3 |
Strongyloides stercolaris | 1,150.4 | 774.3 |
Hymenelopis nana | 38.4 | 83.2 |
Trichuris trichiura | 225.7 | 214.7 |
Trichostrongylus ovum | 51.4 | 83.2 |
TOTAL | 6,767.4 | 1,781.6 |
Parameters | Bafoussam | Bangkok [22, 23] | Domestic wastewater [25] | Yaounde [26] | Bangangte [27] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 6.6 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.904 | 7.7 | 7.23 |
Conductivity (mS/cm) | 4.7 | / | / | 1589 | 3.96 | |
Salinity (‰) | 2.7 | / | / | 0.798 | / | |
TDS (g/L) | 0.555 | / | / | 1.017 | / | |
MES (g/L) | 8.74 | |||||
DBO5 (g/L) | 2.858 | 2.8 | 0.6 – 1.5 | 0.666 | 15.135 | 2.392 |
TS (%) | 124 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 15 | 10.5 |
TVS (%) | 78.1 | 69 | 60 | / | / | 66.45 |
PO43-(g/L) | 0.029 | 0.127 | ||||
NO3- (g/L) | 0.436 | 0.081 | ||||
NH4+(g/L) | 1.914 | / | / | 0.03-0.07 | 0.61 | 1.935 |
BEA Medium | Bile Esculin Agar Medium |
BOD5 | Biochemical Oxygen Demand |
COD | Chemical Oxygen Demand |
EC | Electrical Conductivity |
FS | Fecal Sludge |
FSM | Fecal Sludge Management |
Sal | Salinity |
SDG | Sustainable Development Goals |
TDS | Total Dissolved Solids |
TS | Total Solids |
TTC Medium | 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium Chloride Medium |
TVS | Total Volatile Solids |
[1] | World Bank (2020). Urban water sector project. In: National Program for Sanitation of Wastewater and Excreta (PN-AEUE) 2016-2030. Implementation Completion and Results Report (IDA-H482 and IDA-H997). |
[2] | Saleem, M., Teresa, B., and Vanessa, He. (2019). Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: a systematic review. |
[3] | Kundan, S., Sanjib, M., Benu, G. M., Sasmita, S., Sarith, S., Bhawna, P., Sandipan, S. (2022). Design of faecal sludge treatment plant (FSTP) and availability of its treatment technologies. Elsevier, 7. 100091. |
[4] | UN (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, 42809, 1-13. |
[5] | Ronteltap, M., Dodane, PH., Bassan, M. (2004). Faecal Sludge Management Systems Approach for Implementation and Operation, pp. 97–122. |
[6] | Samal, K., Dash, R. R., Bhunia, P. (2017). Treatment of wastewater by vermifiltration integrated with macrophyte filter: a review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5 2274–2289. |
[7] | Blackett, I., Hawkins, P., Heymans, C. (2014). The missing link in sanitation service delivery: a review of fecal sludge management in 12 cities. Water and Sanitation Program- World Bank Research Brief, Washington DC. |
[8] | Strande, L., Ronteltap, M. and Brdjanovic, D. (2014) Faecal Sludge Management; Systems Approach for Implementation and Operation. IWA Publishing, London. |
[9] | Samal L, Naushin Y, Priya K (2020) Challenges in the implementation of phyto fuel system (PFS) for wastewater treatment and harnessing bio-energy, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8.04388, |
[10] | Gouws, F., Burgess, J. E., Ramcharan-Kotze, C., Woolley, S. (2025). Sludge Management: A Research Strategy Towards Innovative and Sustainable Practices and Technologies. Report: TT 946/24 ISBN 978-0-6392-0673-8. Pretoria, South Africa. Water Research Commission |
[11] | Defo, C., Fonkou, T., Mabou, P. B., Nana, P., Manjeli, Y. (2015). Collecte et évacuation des boues de vidange dans la ville de Bafoussam, Cameroun (Afrique centrale). VertigO-la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 15 (1): 1-26. |
[12] | Odagiri, M., Thomas, A., Listyasari, M., Mills, F., Bain, R. E. S., Muhammad, Z. (2021). Safely managed on-site sanitation: a national assessment of sanitation services and potential faecal exposure in Indonesia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 8204. |
[13] | Kouawa, T., Wanko, A., Beck, C., Mose, R., Maïga, A. (2015). Feasibility study of faecal sludge treatment by constructed wetlands in Sahelian context: Experiments with Oryza longistaminata and Sporobolus pyramidalis species in Ouagadougou. Ecol. Eng. 84: 390-397. |
[14] | Vijayan, V., Mallik, M., Chakravarthy, S. K. (2020). Performance Evaluation: How Faecal Sludge Treatment Plants are Performing. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment. |
[15] | Pegui, D. M., Ebenezer, S. K, Guy, V. D. W, Wilfried, A. L. N., Ginette, S. L., Christian, W., Fotso., Ives, M. K. N. (2019). Quantification and characterization of faecal sludge from a tropical urban area: the case study of Douala, Cameroon. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 13(5): 105-113. |
[16] | Mpakam, H. G. (2008). Study of vulnerability to pollution of water resources in the city of Bafoussam (West Cameroon) and socio-economic and health indices: sanitation procedures. Ph.D thesis, University of Yaounde I, 272p. |
[17] | Tchindjang, M. (1996). Central Bamiléké and its edges: regional morphology and slope dynamics, Geomorphological study, Geomorphological study. Doctorate thesis, University of Paris 7, Dénis Diderot, 355 p. |
[18] | Tsalefack, M. (1999). Climatic variability, economic crisis and agrarian dynamics in the highlands of West Cameroon. Doctorate thesis, University of Yaoundé 1, 365 p. |
[19] | Letah, N. W. A., Kengne, N. I. M., Rechenburg, A. (2016). Prevalence and diversity of intestinal helminth eggs in pit latrine sludge of a tropical urban area. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 6, 622–630. |
[20] | APHA. (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition, American Public Health Association, Water and Environment Federation Publication, Washington DC20001-3710, USA. |
[21] | Rodier, J., Legube, B., Merlet, N. (2009). Water Analysis. 9th edition. Dunod: Paris, 1579. |
[22] | Heinss, U., Larmie, S. A., Strauss, M., (1998). Solids Separation and Pond Systems for the Treatment of Faecal Sludges in the Tropics. Lessons learnt and recommendations for preliminary design. SANDEC Report No. 5/98. Second Edition. Swiss Federal. |
[23] | Koottatep, T., Surinkul, N., Polprasert, C., Kamal, A. S. M., Koné, D., Montangero, A., Heinss U, Strauss, M. (2005). Treatment of septage in constructed wetlands in tropical climate: Lessons learned from seven years of operation. Water Sci. Technol. 51(9): 119-126. |
[24] | Strauss, M., Larmie, S. A., Heinss, U. (1998). Treatment of sludges from on-site sanitation low-cost options. Water Sci. Technol. 35(6), 129–136. |
[25] | Djumyom, W. G. V. (2017). Purification performance and recovery of by-products from domestic wastewater treatment plant using planted filters Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Yaounde 1, 165p. |
[26] | Letah, W. A., Soh, E. K., Djumyom, G. V., Nguenang, A. J., Höser, C., Nbendah, P., Rechenburg, A., Kengne, I. M. N. (2019). Application of multivariate statistical methods for the assessment of the variability of on-site sanitation faecal sludge in Cameroon. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 13, 133–151. |
[27] | Wanda, C., Ebenezer, S. K., Djumyom, W. G. V., Letah, N. W. A., Pierre, N., Yvan, A. T. N., Louis Z., Ives, M. K. N. (2021). Quantification and characterisation of faecal sludge from on-site sanitation systems prior the design of a treatment plant in Bangangte, West Region of Cameroon. Jo. of Env. Chal. |
[28] | Bemmo, N., Njine, T., Nola, M., and Ngamga, G. (1998). Techniques used in the peri-urban districts of Yaoundé (Cameroon) for the evacuation of wastewater and human excreta. Proposal for appropriate systems. Final report. Research project N°4, “Drinking water supply in peri-urban neighborhoods and small centers” program”, 126p. |
[29] | Ambassa, N. A. (2005). Contribution to the characterization of fecal sludge production in the city of Yaounde. DESS dissertation thesis, University of Yaounde 1, 40p. |
[30] | Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) (2017). City-wide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS) and emphasize on Faecal Sludge Management (FSM). |
[31] | Eau Vive (2010). Study of the conditions for the dissemination of on-site sanitation facilities in rural Sahelian areas. Final report, Montreuil, France, 99 p. |
[32] | Franceys, R., Pickford, J., & Reed, R. (1992). A guide to the development of on-site sanitation. World Health Organization, Genève, Suisse, 229 p. |
[33] | Katukiza, A. Y., Ronteltap, M., Niwagaba, C. B., Foppen, J. W. A., Kansiime, F., Lens, P. N. L. (2012). Sustainable sanitation technology options for urban slums. Biotechnol. Adv. 30(5): 964-978. |
[34] | Jenkins, M., Cumming, O., Scott, B., Cairncross, S. (2014). Beyond ‘improved towards ‘safe and sustainable’ urban sanitation: Assessing the design, management and functionality of sanitation in poor communities of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. J. Water, Sanitation Hyg. Dev. 4 (1), 131–141. |
[35] | Mpakam, H. G., Kamgan, K. B. V., Kouam, K. G. R., Bemmo, N., Ekodeck, G. E (2006). Access to drinking water and sanitation in cities in developing countries (the case of Bafoussam, Cameroon). VertigO-Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol 7 n°2, Art 12, 10p. |
[36] | Mbang, M. S., Ngnikam, E., Efon, B., Meukam, P., Fokou, S; (2021); Quantification of fecal sludge from autonomous sanitation systems in the city of Yaounde, Cameroon. Env. Ing. & Dev. 85, 3-11. |
[37] | Manga, M., Bartram, J., and Evans, B. E. (2020). Economic cost analysis of low-cost sanitation technology options in informal settlement areas (case study: Soweto, Johannesburg). Int. J. Hyg. Env. Health 233 (1), 289–298. |
[38] | Berteigne B. (2012). Characterization and quantification of faecal sludge in the city of Yaounde. ENGES engineering thesis, 165 p. |
[39] | Fayé, A., Sow, O., Kandji, A., Nehrling, S., Touré, F., Mangané, P. M., Sow, B., Sonko, E. L. M., Ndiayé, M. S., Badji, G., et Mbegueré, M. (2013). Les boues de vidange: un marché porteur. In: ONAS: Magazine trimestriel du programme de boues de vidange/(magBOUES) No1: 8-9. |
[40] | Montangero, A., Strauss, M. (2002). Sewage sludge management. Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, pp. 7-8. |
[41] | Talla, A., Sezawo, R., Ngohe-Ekam, P. S. (2017). Characterization of Depoted Faecal Sludge into the Environment and Design of a Suitable Treatment System: case of Nomayos Area in Yaounde City. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 21(2): 1-12. |
[42] | Kodom, P., Koledzi, E. K., Krou, N. M., Segbeaya, K. N., Bissang, B. T. (2021). Quantification and characterization of faecal sludge produced in Kara. African Journal of Biotechnology. 20(5), pp. 194-201. |
[43] | Ato, F. M., Wilson, T., Edward, A., Johannes, A., Emmanuel, A., Justice, A., Moses, M., Kartik, C. (2022). Chemical characterization of fecal sludge in the Kumasi metropolis, Ghana. Gates Open Res. 1: 12. |
[44] | Moussa, H., (2005). Wastewater from tanneries and dye works: physico-chemical and bacteriological characteristics and impact on surface water and groundwater. Doctorate thesis, University of Bamako, Mali, 118p. |
[45] | Kengne, I. M., Akoa, A., Soh, E. K., Tsama, V., Ngoutane, M. M., Dodane, P. H., Koné, D. (2008). Effects of faecal sludge application on growth characteristics and chemical composition of Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.) Hitch. and Chase and Cyperus papyrus L. Ecol. Eng. 34, 233–242. |
[46] | Bassan, M., Koné, D., Mbéguéré, M., Holliger, C., Strande, L. (2015). Success and Failure Assessment Methodology for Wastewater and Faecal Sludge Treatment Projects in Low-Income Countries. J. Environ. Plan Manag. 58: 1690-1710. |
[47] | Appiah-Effah, E., Nyarko, K. B., Awuah, E. (2014). Characterization of Public Toilet Sludge from Peri-Urban and Rural Areas of Ashanti Region of Ghana. J. Appl. Sci. Env. Sanit. 9(3): 175–184. |
[48] | Gudda, F. O., Moturi, W. N., Omondi, S. O, Muchiri, E. (2016). Analysis of physiochemical characteristics influencing disposal of pit latrine sludge in Nakuru Municipality, Kenya. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11 (3), 139–145. |
[49] | Changara, M. C., Bangira, C., Sanyika, W. T., Misi, S. N. (2018). Characterization of pit latrine sludge from Shackleton, a peri-urban residential area of Zimbabwe. J. Wat. San. Hyg. Devel. 10p. |
[50] | Bigumandondera, P. (2014). Non-collective sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa. Doctorate thesis, University of Liège, 301p. |
[51] | Nzouebet, W. A. L., Kengne, E. S., Rechenburg, A, Ndangang, J. J. N., Noumsi, I. M. N. (2022). Fecal sludge treatment in a pilot-scale vertical-flow constructed wetland for the removal of helminth eggs. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 12: 634-646. |
APA Style
Tekamdjo, S. L. T., Nzouebet, W. A. L., Djumyum, G. V. W., Atabong, P. A., Kengne, E. S., et al. (2025). Characterization and Quantification of Fecal Sludge in a Developing Urban Center: The Case Study of Bafoussam, West Region of Cameroon. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 14(4), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11
ACS Style
Tekamdjo, S. L. T.; Nzouebet, W. A. L.; Djumyum, G. V. W.; Atabong, P. A.; Kengne, E. S., et al. Characterization and Quantification of Fecal Sludge in a Developing Urban Center: The Case Study of Bafoussam, West Region of Cameroon. Am. J. Environ. Prot. 2025, 14(4), 122-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11
AMA Style
Tekamdjo SLT, Nzouebet WAL, Djumyum GVW, Atabong PA, Kengne ES, et al. Characterization and Quantification of Fecal Sludge in a Developing Urban Center: The Case Study of Bafoussam, West Region of Cameroon. Am J Environ Prot. 2025;14(4):122-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11, author = {Stéphane Lauris Tchianzeu Tekamdjo and Wilfried Arsène Letah Nzouebet and Guy Valérie Wafo Djumyum and Paul Agendia Atabong and Ebenezer Soh Kengne and Joel Arnold Wafo Kamdem and Nguetsop Victor François and Tonfack Libert Brice}, title = {Characterization and Quantification of Fecal Sludge in a Developing Urban Center: The Case Study of Bafoussam, West Region of Cameroon }, journal = {American Journal of Environmental Protection}, volume = {14}, number = {4}, pages = {122-135}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajep.20251404.11}, abstract = {This study aimed to quantify and characterize fecal sludge (FS) from on-site sanitation systems and make it available to public services. This study employed two methods: one based on the demand for mechanical emptying, and the other based on a count of the number of trucks deposited on the site. The sludge samples were then taken from the pits, followed by physicochemical, bacteriological and parasitic analyses. The results showed that all 660 households surveyed had a commode, with 73% traditional latrines, 21% modern toilets with a septic tank, 4% flush toilets, 1% VIP latrines and 1% pipe latrines. The annual volume of FS discharged at the treatment plant is estimated at 2,880 m3/year using the truck count and 40,310 m3/year based on mechanical emptying demand. In addition, the FS characteristics showed great variability, with average values of pH (6.6), Salinity (2.7 ‰), Conductivity (4.7 mS/cm), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS: 0.555 g/L), Ammonium ion (1.914 g/L), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5: 2.858 g/L), Total volatile solids (TVS: 78.1%) and Dry Matter (DM: 12.4%). The analyses also revealed high bacterial and parasitic load with fecal coliforms concentration of 8.5 x 106 ± 0.6 x 106 CFU/100mL, fecal streptococci concentration of 3 x 106 ± 1.7 x 106 CFU/100 mL and 6767 ± 1782 helminth eggs. The findings from this study will provide the scientific basis for improving the feasibility of establishing a FS treatment plant in Bafoussam.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Characterization and Quantification of Fecal Sludge in a Developing Urban Center: The Case Study of Bafoussam, West Region of Cameroon AU - Stéphane Lauris Tchianzeu Tekamdjo AU - Wilfried Arsène Letah Nzouebet AU - Guy Valérie Wafo Djumyum AU - Paul Agendia Atabong AU - Ebenezer Soh Kengne AU - Joel Arnold Wafo Kamdem AU - Nguetsop Victor François AU - Tonfack Libert Brice Y1 - 2025/07/30 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11 T2 - American Journal of Environmental Protection JF - American Journal of Environmental Protection JO - American Journal of Environmental Protection SP - 122 EP - 135 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5699 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20251404.11 AB - This study aimed to quantify and characterize fecal sludge (FS) from on-site sanitation systems and make it available to public services. This study employed two methods: one based on the demand for mechanical emptying, and the other based on a count of the number of trucks deposited on the site. The sludge samples were then taken from the pits, followed by physicochemical, bacteriological and parasitic analyses. The results showed that all 660 households surveyed had a commode, with 73% traditional latrines, 21% modern toilets with a septic tank, 4% flush toilets, 1% VIP latrines and 1% pipe latrines. The annual volume of FS discharged at the treatment plant is estimated at 2,880 m3/year using the truck count and 40,310 m3/year based on mechanical emptying demand. In addition, the FS characteristics showed great variability, with average values of pH (6.6), Salinity (2.7 ‰), Conductivity (4.7 mS/cm), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS: 0.555 g/L), Ammonium ion (1.914 g/L), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5: 2.858 g/L), Total volatile solids (TVS: 78.1%) and Dry Matter (DM: 12.4%). The analyses also revealed high bacterial and parasitic load with fecal coliforms concentration of 8.5 x 106 ± 0.6 x 106 CFU/100mL, fecal streptococci concentration of 3 x 106 ± 1.7 x 106 CFU/100 mL and 6767 ± 1782 helminth eggs. The findings from this study will provide the scientific basis for improving the feasibility of establishing a FS treatment plant in Bafoussam. VL - 14 IS - 4 ER -