Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Serological and PCR-based Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto

Received: 12 November 2025     Accepted: 4 October 2026     Published: 29 October 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infections are the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infections recognized globally. Infection is associated with increased risk of sequelae in women, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal subfertility. Molecular methods such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) are considered as gold standard and highly specific diagnostic test for its detection. This study aimed at comparing both C. trachomatis specific IgM and IgG antibody detection by ELISA with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to see the practicability of using only serological methods for routine screening and diagnosis especially in low and middle income countries. Method: Three hundred and twenty-five women of reproductive age group who were attending gynecological clinic of Usmanu Danfodiyo university Teaching Hospital Sokoto were enrolled in the study. Patients were administered questionnaires requesting information on biomedical and sociodemographic data. Endocervical specimens were collected, subjected to DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers from Inqaba Biotechnical industries, South Africa. Blood samples were also collected for indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for detection of IgG and IgM antibodies specific to C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Data collected were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: The overall results showed that C. trachomatis specific IgM antibody was detected in 7 (7/325) 2.2%, C. trachomatis specific IgG antibody was also detected in 5 (5/325) 1.5% using ELISA, while the rate of C. trachomatis infection confirmed by PCR was 12 (12/325) 3.7%. Using PCR as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 73.3% and 100% respectively. While the positive predictive value, negative predictive value was 100% and 1.3% respectively. Conclusion: C. trachomatis specific IgM and IgG antibody detection by ELISA gave comparable results in more than 70% of true positive samples detected by PCR. Thus, it suggests that they are practicable and cheaper alternatives to the molecular techniques for routine screening and diagnosis especially in low and middle income countries.

Published in American Journal of Laboratory Medicine (Volume 11, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11
Page(s) 72-80
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chlamydia Trachomatis, Nigeria, Seroprevalence, Reproductive Age‑group, Women, Sokoto

References
[1] Asaboro N, Omo-Aghoja LO, Adeyinka A: Association of Chlamydia Trachomatis Sero-Positivity with Male Infertility in the Niger-Delta Region of Nigeria: A Case-Control Study. 2024.
[2] Schwebke JR, Nyirjesy P, Dsouza M, Getman D: Vaginitis and risk of sexually transmitted infections: results of a multi-center US clinical study using STI nucleic acid amplification testing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2024, 62: e00816-24.
[3] Cuffe KM, Newton-Levinson A, Gift TL, McFarlane M, Leichliter JS: Sexually transmitted infection testing among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health 2016, 58: 512-9.
[4] Rodrigues R, Silva AR, Sousa C, Vale N: Addressing challenges in Chlamydia trachomatis detection: a comparative review of diagnostic methods. Medicina 2024, 60: 1236.
[5] Mazzulli T: Laboratory diagnosis of infection due to viruses, Chlamydia, Chlamydophila, and Mycoplasma. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Disease 2020: 1352.
[6] Omer HMH, Khalid KE, Miskeen EI, Taha MY, Saleh EY, Ahmed EA, Abdelwahid OH, Hassan MA, Abakar AD: Cytological and molecular screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in infertile women attending a maternity teaching hospital in Gezira State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study. F1000Research 2023, 9: 589.
[7] Waters MB, Hybiske K, Ikeda R, Kaltenboeck B, Manhart LE, Kreisel KM, Khosropour CM: Chlamydia trachomatis seroassays used in epidemiologic research: a narrative review and practical considerations. The Journal of infectious diseases 2024, 230: 250-62.
[8] Welford E, Martin TC, Martin NK, Tilghman W, Little SJ: Relative Cost and Infectious Days Averted Associated With Rapid Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men. Sexually transmitted diseases 2024, 51: 388-92.
[9] Audu O, Musa BOP, Usman A, Adekunle OO, Opaluwa SA, El-Fulaty AA, Olayemi B, Okwubenata OL, Ega B, Yaqub Y: Comparative assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis pathogen prevalence, and the determination of host gyneco-epidemiological and immunological associated risk factors in female infertility. Cytokine 2025, 185: 156819.
[10] Brunham RC, Rey-Ladino J: Immunology of Chlamydia infection: implications for a Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine. Nature reviews immunology 2005, 5: 149-61.
[11] Reitano JR, Coers J: Restriction and evasion: a review of IFNγ-mediated cell-autonomous defense pathways during genital Chlamydia infection. Pathogens and disease 2024, 82: ftae019.
[12] Darougar S: The humoral immune response to chlamydial infection in humans. Reviews of infectious diseases 1985, 7: 726-30.
[13] Araoye MO: Research methodology with statistics for health and social sciences. Ilorin: Nathadex Publisher 2003, 115: 25-120.
[14] Ige O, Ige S, Olayinka A: Prevalence of Chlamydia Trachomatis infection among women of reproductive age group in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Annals of Tropical Pathology 2018, 9: 17-21.
[15] Bandea CI, Debattista J, Joseph K, Igietseme J, Timms P, Black CM: Chlamydia trachomatis serovars among strains isolated from members of rural indigenous communities and urban populations in Australia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2008, 46: 355-6.
[16] Gwyn S, Cooley G, Goodhew B, Kohlhoff S, Banniettis N, Wiegand R, Martin DL: Comparison of platforms for testing antibody responses against the Chlamydia trachomatis antigen Pgp3. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2017, 97: 1662.
[17] Rostami MN, Rashidi BH, Aghsaghloo F, Nazari R: Comparison of clinical performance of antigen based-enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and major outer membrane protein (MOMP)-PCR for detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine 2016, 14: 411.
[18] Mania-Pramanik J, Donde U, Maitra A: Use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in cervical swab samples. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 2001, 67: 246.
[19] Rahman KS, Darville T, Russell AN, O'Connell CM, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Lee DAE, Kaltenboeck B: Comprehensive molecular serology of human Chlamydia trachomatis infections by peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Msphere 2018, 3:
[20] Ajani TA, Anaedobe C, Oluwasola T, Ajani M, Fayemiwo S, Bakare R: Polymerase chain reaction versus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among gynaecological patients in southwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology 2018, 19: 76-83.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Babazhitsu, M., Oladehinde, O. A., Abubakar, P. A., Alhaji, B. M., Boaz, A. (2026). Comparative Serological and PCR-based Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto. American Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 11(4), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Babazhitsu, M.; Oladehinde, O. A.; Abubakar, P. A.; Alhaji, B. M.; Boaz, A. Comparative Serological and PCR-based Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto. Am. J. Lab. Med. 2026, 11(4), 72-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Babazhitsu M, Oladehinde OA, Abubakar PA, Alhaji BM, Boaz A. Comparative Serological and PCR-based Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto. Am J Lab Med. 2026;11(4):72-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11,
      author = {Makun Babazhitsu and Onipede Anthony Oladehinde and Panti Abubakar Abubakar and Bello Mohammed Alhaji and Adegboro Boaz},
      title = {Comparative Serological and PCR-based Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto},
      journal = {American Journal of Laboratory Medicine},
      volume = {11},
      number = {4},
      pages = {72-80},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajlm.20261104.11},
      abstract = {Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infections are the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infections recognized globally. Infection is associated with increased risk of sequelae in women, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal subfertility. Molecular methods such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) are considered as gold standard and highly specific diagnostic test for its detection. This study aimed at comparing both C. trachomatis specific IgM and IgG antibody detection by ELISA with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to see the practicability of using only serological methods for routine screening and diagnosis especially in low and middle income countries. Method: Three hundred and twenty-five women of reproductive age group who were attending gynecological clinic of Usmanu Danfodiyo university Teaching Hospital Sokoto were enrolled in the study. Patients were administered questionnaires requesting information on biomedical and sociodemographic data. Endocervical specimens were collected, subjected to DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers from Inqaba Biotechnical industries, South Africa. Blood samples were also collected for indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for detection of IgG and IgM antibodies specific to C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Data collected were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: The overall results showed that C. trachomatis specific IgM antibody was detected in 7 (7/325) 2.2%, C. trachomatis specific IgG antibody was also detected in 5 (5/325) 1.5% using ELISA, while the rate of C. trachomatis infection confirmed by PCR was 12 (12/325) 3.7%. Using PCR as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 73.3% and 100% respectively. While the positive predictive value, negative predictive value was 100% and 1.3% respectively. Conclusion: C. trachomatis specific IgM and IgG antibody detection by ELISA gave comparable results in more than 70% of true positive samples detected by PCR. Thus, it suggests that they are practicable and cheaper alternatives to the molecular techniques for routine screening and diagnosis especially in low and middle income countries.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Comparative Serological and PCR-based Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection Among Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto
    AU  - Makun Babazhitsu
    AU  - Onipede Anthony Oladehinde
    AU  - Panti Abubakar Abubakar
    AU  - Bello Mohammed Alhaji
    AU  - Adegboro Boaz
    Y1  - 2026/10/29
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11
    T2  - American Journal of Laboratory Medicine
    JF  - American Journal of Laboratory Medicine
    JO  - American Journal of Laboratory Medicine
    SP  - 72
    EP  - 80
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-386X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajlm.20261104.11
    AB  - Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infections are the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infections recognized globally. Infection is associated with increased risk of sequelae in women, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal subfertility. Molecular methods such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) are considered as gold standard and highly specific diagnostic test for its detection. This study aimed at comparing both C. trachomatis specific IgM and IgG antibody detection by ELISA with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to see the practicability of using only serological methods for routine screening and diagnosis especially in low and middle income countries. Method: Three hundred and twenty-five women of reproductive age group who were attending gynecological clinic of Usmanu Danfodiyo university Teaching Hospital Sokoto were enrolled in the study. Patients were administered questionnaires requesting information on biomedical and sociodemographic data. Endocervical specimens were collected, subjected to DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers from Inqaba Biotechnical industries, South Africa. Blood samples were also collected for indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for detection of IgG and IgM antibodies specific to C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Data collected were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: The overall results showed that C. trachomatis specific IgM antibody was detected in 7 (7/325) 2.2%, C. trachomatis specific IgG antibody was also detected in 5 (5/325) 1.5% using ELISA, while the rate of C. trachomatis infection confirmed by PCR was 12 (12/325) 3.7%. Using PCR as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 73.3% and 100% respectively. While the positive predictive value, negative predictive value was 100% and 1.3% respectively. Conclusion: C. trachomatis specific IgM and IgG antibody detection by ELISA gave comparable results in more than 70% of true positive samples detected by PCR. Thus, it suggests that they are practicable and cheaper alternatives to the molecular techniques for routine screening and diagnosis especially in low and middle income countries.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Sokoto State, Nigeria

  • Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile -Ife, Nigeria

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal Medical Centre, Gusau, Nigeria

  • Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria

  • Sections