Venturi tubes serve as critical components in various engineering fields. This work focused on investigating the pressure distribution and velocity magnitude from inlet to outlet of the venturi tube, as well as the determination of its performance in terms of coefficient of discharge (CV) using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool Ansys Fluent and experimental tests. The study was conducted in different water fluid actual mass flow rates from 0.1662 to 1.0272 kg/sec. The results show that increasing the inlet flow rate yields an increase in pressure drop, velocity magnitude, and a minor rise in the coefficient of discharge. The study also focused on the inlet/out and throat diameter ratio from 0.207 to 0.586, and the coefficient of discharge increased from 0.11 to 0.96, respectively. The performance is higher in the lowest diameter ratio. On the other hand, the flow separation gradually developed in the divergent section when the diameter ratio decreased. There was a small variation between the CFD results and the experimental test results. The CV was the main performance evaluation of the venturi tube and have 1.95% and 8.01% a maximum difference between the numerical simulation and experimental study results at various inlet flow rates, respectively. Similarly, the coefficient of discharge result difference between the numerical simulation and experimental test is 1.12%.
| Published in | American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13 |
| Page(s) | 116-127 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Venturi Tube, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Coefficient of Discharge, Pressure Drop, Mass Flow Rate
| [1] | Ghassemi, H. and H. F. Fasih, Application of small size cavitating venturi as flow controller and flow meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2011. 22(5): p. 406-412. |
| [2] | Bermejo, D., X. Escaler, and R. Ruíz-Mansilla, Experimental investigation of a cavitating Venturi and its application to flow metering. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2021. 78: p. 101868. |
| [3] | Wang, C., G. Wang, and H. Ding, Thermal effect on body temperature distribution of the critical flow Venturi nozzle. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016. 79: p. 187-194. |
| [4] | Zhang, X., et al., Study of mechanical choked Venturi nozzles used for liquid flow controlling. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2019. 65: p. 158-165. |
| [5] | Yuan, C., et al., Experimental investigation of wet gas over reading in Venturi. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015. 66: p. 63-71. |
| [6] | Olaru, I. A Study of a Fluid Flow in the Jet Ejector System Used in Industrial Applications. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021. IOP Publishing. |
| [7] | Uthale, S., et al., Design and analysis of Venturi turbine to recover waste air energy in industrial applications. Journal of Optoelectronics Laser, 2023. 42(4): p. 18-29. |
| [8] | Chang, D. S., et al., A Venturi microregulator array module for distributed pressure control. Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2010. 9: p. 671-680. |
| [9] | Shankar, V., et al., Flow induced venturi cavitation to improve energy efficiency in pulp production. Journal of Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (JFFHMT), 2018. 5(1): p. 10-17. |
| [10] | Hong, S. B., H. S. Yun, and M. K. Cho, Application of the Bernoulli Effect for Improving Smoke Exhaust Efficiency in Tunnel Fires. IEEE Access, 2023. |
| [11] | Bhola, D. R., CFD analysis of flow through venturi of carburetor. 2011. |
| [12] | Zhang, L., et al., Study on the Influence and Optimization of the Venturi Effect on the Natural Ventilation of Buildings in the Xichang Area. Energies, 2021. 14(16): p. 5053. |
| [13] | Levi, E., A fluidic vortex device for water treatment processes. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1983. 21(1): p. 17-31. |
| [14] | Wells, K. and A. Sharifian, Design of short Venturi flow meters for incompressible and isothermal flow applications. Heliyon, 2024. 10(7): p. e29311. |
| [15] | Reader-Harris, M., Orifice plates and venturi tubes. 2015: Springer. |
| [16] | Perumal, K. and J. Krishnan, A CFD study of the effect of venturi geometry on high pressure wet gas metering. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 2013. 6(5): p. 549-566. |
| [17] | Vijay, P. H. and V. Subrahmanyam, CFD simulation on different geometries of venturimeter. Momentum, 2014. 1(A2v2): p. 4. |
| [18] | Yanagihara, S., et al., Variable area venturi-type exhaust gas flow meter. JSAE review, 1999. 20(2): p. 265-267. |
| [19] | Khan, Z. A., N. Jain, and S. Anbu Kumar, Optimization of convergent angle of the Venturi meter for best coefficient of discharge. Water Supply, 2022. 22(12): p. 9023-9040. |
| [20] | Nithin, T., N. Jain, and A. Hiriyannaiah. Optimization of venturi flow meter model for the angle of divergence with minimal pressure drop by computational fluid dynamics method. in International Conference on Challenges and Opportunities in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management Studies. 2012. |
| [21] | Zhang, J., Analysis on the effect of venturi tube structural parameters on fluid flow. AIP Advances, 2017. 7(6). |
| [22] | Haynes, W. M., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 97th ed. ed. 2015, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. |
| [23] | Morris, A. S., Measurement and instrumentation principles. Measurement Science and Technology, 2001. 12(10): p. 1743-1744. |
| [24] | Wang, Z., et al., High-speed photography and particle image velocimetry of cavitation in a Venturi tube. Physics of Fluids, 2024. 36(4). |
| [25] | Hutagalung, S. S. Estimation optimal value of discharge coefficient in a Venturi tubes. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. IOP Publishing. |
| [26] | Tukimin, A., M. Zuber, and K. A. Ahmad, CFD analysis of flow through Venturi tube and its discharge coefficient. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016. 152(1): p. 012062. |
APA Style
Endaylalu, S. A. (2025). A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Fluid Flow Through a Venturi Tube. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 10(6), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13
ACS Style
Endaylalu, S. A. A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Fluid Flow Through a Venturi Tube. Am. J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2025, 10(6), 116-127. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13,
author = {Sintayehu Assefa Endaylalu},
title = {A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Fluid Flow Through a Venturi Tube},
journal = {American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering},
volume = {10},
number = {6},
pages = {116-127},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmie.20251006.13},
abstract = {Venturi tubes serve as critical components in various engineering fields. This work focused on investigating the pressure distribution and velocity magnitude from inlet to outlet of the venturi tube, as well as the determination of its performance in terms of coefficient of discharge (CV) using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool Ansys Fluent and experimental tests. The study was conducted in different water fluid actual mass flow rates from 0.1662 to 1.0272 kg/sec. The results show that increasing the inlet flow rate yields an increase in pressure drop, velocity magnitude, and a minor rise in the coefficient of discharge. The study also focused on the inlet/out and throat diameter ratio from 0.207 to 0.586, and the coefficient of discharge increased from 0.11 to 0.96, respectively. The performance is higher in the lowest diameter ratio. On the other hand, the flow separation gradually developed in the divergent section when the diameter ratio decreased. There was a small variation between the CFD results and the experimental test results. The CV was the main performance evaluation of the venturi tube and have 1.95% and 8.01% a maximum difference between the numerical simulation and experimental study results at various inlet flow rates, respectively. Similarly, the coefficient of discharge result difference between the numerical simulation and experimental test is 1.12%.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Fluid Flow Through a Venturi Tube AU - Sintayehu Assefa Endaylalu Y1 - 2025/12/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13 T2 - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering JF - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering JO - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering SP - 116 EP - 127 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-6060 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20251006.13 AB - Venturi tubes serve as critical components in various engineering fields. This work focused on investigating the pressure distribution and velocity magnitude from inlet to outlet of the venturi tube, as well as the determination of its performance in terms of coefficient of discharge (CV) using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool Ansys Fluent and experimental tests. The study was conducted in different water fluid actual mass flow rates from 0.1662 to 1.0272 kg/sec. The results show that increasing the inlet flow rate yields an increase in pressure drop, velocity magnitude, and a minor rise in the coefficient of discharge. The study also focused on the inlet/out and throat diameter ratio from 0.207 to 0.586, and the coefficient of discharge increased from 0.11 to 0.96, respectively. The performance is higher in the lowest diameter ratio. On the other hand, the flow separation gradually developed in the divergent section when the diameter ratio decreased. There was a small variation between the CFD results and the experimental test results. The CV was the main performance evaluation of the venturi tube and have 1.95% and 8.01% a maximum difference between the numerical simulation and experimental study results at various inlet flow rates, respectively. Similarly, the coefficient of discharge result difference between the numerical simulation and experimental test is 1.12%. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -