In the Bale zone, the farmers dominantly rely on the monoculture of wheat, which currently imposes its detrimental consequences on the depletion of soil fertility and has a high risk of low crop production. Therefore, an on-farm experiment was conducted to determine the importance of rotating fenugreek with bread wheat there; to determine the effects of fenugreek rotation with bread wheat on the yield components and yield of bread wheat varieties at Bale; and to study the compatibility and productivity of the fenugreek and bread wheat rotation system under the Bale highlands and mid-altitudes of East Bale. The growth and agronomic traits of fenugreek and bread wheat were affected by rotations. The highest plant height of fenugreek (50.67 cm) was recorded from the Burqa variety when grown, followed by the Senate variety of bread wheat. The highest bread wheat plant height (108.0 cm) was recorded when the Senate variety was grown, followed by the Hundaol variety. The number of primary branches per plant in fenugreek was observed to be high when it was planted after bread wheat. The maximum number of pods per plant (21.80) was obtained when Hundaol planted the following Senate variety. The maximum spike length (6.50 cm) was recorded when the Galan variety was planted after the Hundaol varieties of fenugreek, and the highest number of seeds per pod (12.87) was obtained from the Burqa variety of fenugreek when grown with the Senate variety of bread wheat. The highest number of seeds per spike (53.70) was obtained when wheat grew after a wheat-fenugreek-wheat rotation. The maximum seed yield of fenugreek (1647 kg ha⁻1) was recorded when it grew after wheat. On the other hand, the maximum grain yield (6232 kg ha⁻1) in wheat was gained when Senate grew after fenugreek. The minimum seed yield of fenugreek and wheat grain yield was obtained from monocropping. This experiment revealed that the first wheat following a fenugreek precursor crop in rotation resulted in superior grain yields of bread wheat. Low grain yields were obtained from the continuous wheat rotations at Bale. The result indicates the need to encourage the adoption of appropriate wheat rotations by farmers in the highlands of the Bale zone and similar agroecologies.
| Published in | American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19 |
| Page(s) | 113-119 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Rotation, Fenugreek, Bread Wheat, Primary Branches, Spike
S. N | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Burqa | Burqa | Burqa |
2 | Hundaol | Hundaol | Hundaol |
3 | Gelan | Gelan | Gelan |
4 | Sanate | Sanate | Sanate |
5 | Burqa | Gelan | Burqa |
6 | Burqa | Sanate | Burqa |
7 | Hundaol | Sanate | Hundaol |
8 | Hundaol | Gelan | Hundaol |
9 | Gelan | Burqa | Gelan |
10 | Gelan | Hundaol | Gelan |
11 | Sanate | Hundaol | Sanate |
12 | Sanate | Burqa | Sanate |
Sinana | Gololcha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Properties | Result | Rating | Result | Rating | References |
Physical properties | |||||
Sand (%) | 22 | 20 | |||
Silt (%) | 26 | 25 | |||
Clay (%) | 51 | 55 | |||
Textural Class | Clay | Clay | |||
Chemical properties | |||||
pH (1: 2.5 H2O) | 6.82 | Neutral | 6.01 | Neutral | [15] |
Organic Carbon /OC/ (%) | 1.18 | Low | 1.22 | Medium | [15] |
Total nitrogen /TN/ (%) | 0.16 | Medium | 0.11 | Low | [15] |
Available phosphorus /P/ (ppm) | 10.23 | Medium | 12.8 | Medium | [16] |
Sinana | Gololcha | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatments | pH | OC | TN | P | pH | OC | TN | P | ||||
Rotation | Y-2 | Y-3 | Y-2 | Y-3 | Y-2 | Y-3 | Y-2 | Y-3 | Y-2 | Y-2 | Y-2 | Y-2 |
F1-F1-F1 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.56 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 11.86 | 11.86 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 12.8 |
F2-F2-F2 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.56 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 11.86 | 11.86 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 12.8 |
W1-W1-W1 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 12.42 | 12.42 | 6.01 | 1.22 | 0.25 | 13.0 |
W2-W2-W2 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 12.42 | 12.42 | 6.01 | 1.22 | 0.25 | 13.0 |
F1-W1-F1 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.62 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
F1-W2-F1 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.62 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
F2-W1-F2 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.62 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
F2-W2-F2 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.62 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
W1-F1-W1 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.51 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
W1-F2-W1 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.51 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
W2-F1-W2 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.51 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
W2-F2-W2 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 1.18 | 1.51 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 12.55 | 12.55 | 6.01 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 13.0 |
Treatment | PH (cm) | NPB/TPP | N Pod plant-1 / SL (cm) | N seed Pod-1/ N seed spike-1 | Seed/Grain yield (kg ha-1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
F1F1F1 | 48.73 | 48.07 | 48.67 | 3.60 | 3.55 | 3.50 | 20.20 | 20.10 | 20.00 | 12.40 | 12.20 | 12.00 | 1569 | 1556 | 1550 |
F2F2F2 | 48.27 | 47.40 | 48.20 | 3.60 | 3.40 | 3.00 | 20.30 | 20.20 | 20.10 | 12.67 | 12.53 | 11.47 | 1594 | 1550 | 1538 |
F1W1F2 | 48.00 | 102.60 | 48.48 | 3.87 | 3.93 | 3.90 | 20.40 | 5.93 | 20.60 | 12.00 | 49.73 | 12.67 | 1592 | 6170 | 1663 |
F1W2F2 | 48.67 | 105.80 | 49.04 | 3.47 | 3.73 | 3.60 | 20.93 | 5.93 | 21.80 | 11.93 | 45.93 | 12.77 | 1545 | 6232 | 1585 |
F2W2F1 | 48.13 | 98.73 | 50.67 | 3.53 | 3.73 | 4.30 | 20.07 | 5.80 | 20.30 | 11.93 | 42.00 | 12.87 | 1588 | 6124 | 1638 |
F2W1F1 | 47.67 | 101.93 | 49.56 | 4.00 | 3.67 | 3.80 | 20.80 | 6.40 | 21.20 | 11.67 | 46.60 | 11.80 | 1560 | 6158 | 1647 |
W1W1W1 | 98.13 | 98.00 | 97.56 | 3.40 | 3.20 | 3.10 | 4.27 | 4.20 | 4.10 | 50.80 | 47.87 | 44.87 | 5600 | 5558 | 5354 |
W2W2W2 | 100.80 | 98.33 | 98.23 | 3.83 | 3.60 | 3.30 | 5.60 | 5.33 | 5.20 | 45.80 | 43.80 | 40.87 | 6015 | 5880 | 5697 |
W1F2W2 | 98.60 | 46.40 | 108.00 | 3.00 | 3.07 | 3.20 | 5.60 | 20.27 | 5.80 | 50.67 | 12.73 | 45.07 | 5948 | 1590 | 6014 |
W1F1W2 | 98.40 | 46.33 | 107.00 | 3.23 | 3.80 | 3.60 | 5.67 | 20.80 | 6.40 | 45.80 | 12.67 | 47.27 | 6015 | 1553 | 6190 |
W2F1W1 | 99.13 | 43.93 | 104.00 | 3.60 | 3.40 | 3.76 | 5.53 | 20.80 | 5.60 | 50.80 | 12.33 | 53.70 | 5962 | 1533 | 6109 |
W2F2W1 | 99.27 | 48.60 | 105.00 | 3.13 | 3.20 | 3.80 | 5.75 | 21.67 | 6.50 | 50.47 | 12.27 | 53.40 | 5984 | 1564 | 6193 |
Treatment | PH (cm) | NPb/TPP | N Pod plant-1 / SL (cm) | N seed Pod-1/ N Seed spike-1 | Seed yield (kg ha-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |
F1F1 | 35.53 | 40.87 | 3.93 | 3.73 | 13.33 | 10.73 | 11.87 | 12.73 | 1505 | 1533 |
F2F2 | 37.07 | 35.20 | 3.53 | 4.47 | 13.67 | 13.13 | 12.07 | 12.40 | 1580 | 1554 |
F1W1 | 34.33 | 80.27 | 3.27 | 1.80 | 12.33 | 6.73 | 12.60 | 30.60 | 1573 | 4524 |
F1W2 | 34.60 | 72.80 | 3.47 | 1.87 | 12.53 | 5.067 | 11.67 | 32.07 | 1527 | 5258 |
F2W2 | 35.07 | 73.20 | 3.20 | 1.93 | 13.80 | 5.00 | 11.93 | 33.53 | 1545 | 4978 |
F2W1 | 35.00 | 78.27 | 3.60 | 1.73 | 12.93 | 6.67 | 12.33 | 34.20 | 1569 | 4986 |
W1W1 | 87.13 | 79.13 | 3.40 | 2.00 | 5.40 | 7.73 | 43.53 | 33.07 | 5508 | 4876 |
W2W2 | 82.87 | 73.87 | 3.47 | 1.67 | 5.73 | 5.33 | 48.40 | 35.13 | 5521 | 4940 |
W1F2 | 88.27 | 40.33 | 2.87 | 4.60 | 5.40 | 14.53 | 43.27 | 13.00 | 5480 | 1654 |
W1F1 | 82.80 | 39.13 | 3.33 | 3.80 | 5.33 | 14.33 | 42.53 | 11.80 | 5445 | 1685 |
W2F1 | 82.80 | 40.40 | 3.00 | 3.80 | 5.40 | 12.93 | 44.00 | 12.27 | 5410 | 1584 |
W2F2 | 84.80 | 40.40 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 5.40 | 9.60 | 47.93 | 11.20 | 5584 | 1689 |
RCBD | Randomized Complete Block Design |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
SNNPR | Southern Nations Nationalities and People Representatives |
ISVCDOSP | Inclusive and Sustainable Value Chains Development in Oromia, Sidama and SNNPR Project |
OC | Organic Carbon |
OM | Organic Matter |
Kg ha-1 | Kilogram Per Hectare |
m.a.s.l | Meter Above Sea Level |
km | Kilometer |
m | Meter |
cm | Centimeter |
% | Percentage |
| [1] | Engles, J. M., J. G. Hauwkes and MelakuWorede, 1991. Plant Genetic Resources of Ethiopia. Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University. |
| [2] | Khiriya, K. D., Singh, B. P. and Taneja, K. D. 2003. Effect of farm yard manure and phosphorus levels on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by fenugreek. Forage Research, 28(4): 210-214. |
| [3] | Petropoulos G. A., Kouloumbis P. 2002 Botany, in: G. A. Petropoulos (Ed.), Fenugreek - The genus Trigonella, Taylor and Francis, London and New York. pp. 9-17. |
| [4] | Myaka, F. M., W. D. Sakala, J. J. Adu-Gyamfi, D. Kamalongo, A. Ngwira, R. Odgaard, N. E. 2006. |
| [5] | Rochester IJ, Peoples MB, Hulugalle NR, Gault RR, Constable GA. Using legumes to enhance nitrogen fertility and improve soil conditions in cotton cropping systems. Field Crops Research. 2001; 70: 27-41. |
| [6] | McCallum MH, Kirkegaard JA, Green T, Cresswell HP, Davies SL, Angus JF. Improved subsoil macro-porosity following perennial pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2004, 44, 299-307. |
| [7] | Kirkegaard JA, Christen O, Krupinsky J, Layzell DB. Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Res., 2008; 107: 185-195. |
| [8] | Osborne CA, Peoples MB, Janssen PH. Detection of a reproducible, single-member shift in soil bacterial communities exposed to low levels of hydrogen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010; 76: 1471-1479. |
| [9] | Patrick, M. C., J. C. Gardner, B. G. Schatz, S. W. Zwinger and S. J. Guldan (1995). Grain yield and weed biomass of a wheat-lentil intercrop. Agron. J., 87(3): 574-579. |
| [10] | GenStat. 2013. GenStat Procedure Library Release. 16th edition. VSN International Ltd. |
| [11] | Cuvardic M., Tveitnes S., Krogstad T., Lombnæs P. 2004. Long-term effects of crop rotation and different fertilization systems on soil fertility and productivity. Acta Agr. Scand. B - S P, 54(4): 193-201. |
| [12] |
Blecharczyk A., Piechota T., Małecka I. 2005b. Changes of effect chemical soil properties under long term cropping systems and fertilization. Fragm. Agron., 2(86): 30-38. (in Polish)
https://pta.up.poznan.pl/pdf/Fragm.%20Agron.%20vol.%2022%20(2005)/22(2)%202005.pdf |
| [13] | Degu M., Melese A., Tena W. 2019. Effects of soil conservation practice and crop rotation on selected soil physicochemical properties: The case of Dembecha District, Northwestern Ethiopia. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci, 2019. |
| [14] | Woźniak A., Kawecka-Radomska M. 2016. Crop management effect on chemical and biological properties of soil. Int. J. Plant Prod., 10(3): 391-402. |
| [15] | Tekalign Tadesse. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer animal manure and compost anlysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa. |
| [16] | Roy. R. N., Finck, A., Blair, G. J. and Tandon, H. L. S. 2006. Plant nutrition for food security. A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO. Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 16. |
| [17] | Admasu, A., Shimels, F., Debela, D., Debele, T. (2020). Sustainable wheat based crop rotation system in tropical. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 5: 000253. |
APA Style
Gutema, C. (2026). Comparative Effects of Fenugreek Rotation with Bread Wheat to Enhancing Wheat Productivity at Highland and Mid-altitudes of Bale, South-eastern Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Biology, 11(3), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19
ACS Style
Gutema, C. Comparative Effects of Fenugreek Rotation with Bread Wheat to Enhancing Wheat Productivity at Highland and Mid-altitudes of Bale, South-eastern Ethiopia. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2026, 11(3), 113-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19
@article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19,
author = {Chala Gutema},
title = {Comparative Effects of Fenugreek Rotation with Bread Wheat to Enhancing Wheat Productivity at Highland and Mid-altitudes of Bale, South-eastern Ethiopia},
journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
volume = {11},
number = {3},
pages = {113-119},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20261103.19},
abstract = {In the Bale zone, the farmers dominantly rely on the monoculture of wheat, which currently imposes its detrimental consequences on the depletion of soil fertility and has a high risk of low crop production. Therefore, an on-farm experiment was conducted to determine the importance of rotating fenugreek with bread wheat there; to determine the effects of fenugreek rotation with bread wheat on the yield components and yield of bread wheat varieties at Bale; and to study the compatibility and productivity of the fenugreek and bread wheat rotation system under the Bale highlands and mid-altitudes of East Bale. The growth and agronomic traits of fenugreek and bread wheat were affected by rotations. The highest plant height of fenugreek (50.67 cm) was recorded from the Burqa variety when grown, followed by the Senate variety of bread wheat. The highest bread wheat plant height (108.0 cm) was recorded when the Senate variety was grown, followed by the Hundaol variety. The number of primary branches per plant in fenugreek was observed to be high when it was planted after bread wheat. The maximum number of pods per plant (21.80) was obtained when Hundaol planted the following Senate variety. The maximum spike length (6.50 cm) was recorded when the Galan variety was planted after the Hundaol varieties of fenugreek, and the highest number of seeds per pod (12.87) was obtained from the Burqa variety of fenugreek when grown with the Senate variety of bread wheat. The highest number of seeds per spike (53.70) was obtained when wheat grew after a wheat-fenugreek-wheat rotation. The maximum seed yield of fenugreek (1647 kg ha⁻1) was recorded when it grew after wheat. On the other hand, the maximum grain yield (6232 kg ha⁻1) in wheat was gained when Senate grew after fenugreek. The minimum seed yield of fenugreek and wheat grain yield was obtained from monocropping. This experiment revealed that the first wheat following a fenugreek precursor crop in rotation resulted in superior grain yields of bread wheat. Low grain yields were obtained from the continuous wheat rotations at Bale. The result indicates the need to encourage the adoption of appropriate wheat rotations by farmers in the highlands of the Bale zone and similar agroecologies.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Effects of Fenugreek Rotation with Bread Wheat to Enhancing Wheat Productivity at Highland and Mid-altitudes of Bale, South-eastern Ethiopia AU - Chala Gutema Y1 - 2026/08/11 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19 T2 - American Journal of Plant Biology JF - American Journal of Plant Biology JO - American Journal of Plant Biology SP - 113 EP - 119 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8337 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20261103.19 AB - In the Bale zone, the farmers dominantly rely on the monoculture of wheat, which currently imposes its detrimental consequences on the depletion of soil fertility and has a high risk of low crop production. Therefore, an on-farm experiment was conducted to determine the importance of rotating fenugreek with bread wheat there; to determine the effects of fenugreek rotation with bread wheat on the yield components and yield of bread wheat varieties at Bale; and to study the compatibility and productivity of the fenugreek and bread wheat rotation system under the Bale highlands and mid-altitudes of East Bale. The growth and agronomic traits of fenugreek and bread wheat were affected by rotations. The highest plant height of fenugreek (50.67 cm) was recorded from the Burqa variety when grown, followed by the Senate variety of bread wheat. The highest bread wheat plant height (108.0 cm) was recorded when the Senate variety was grown, followed by the Hundaol variety. The number of primary branches per plant in fenugreek was observed to be high when it was planted after bread wheat. The maximum number of pods per plant (21.80) was obtained when Hundaol planted the following Senate variety. The maximum spike length (6.50 cm) was recorded when the Galan variety was planted after the Hundaol varieties of fenugreek, and the highest number of seeds per pod (12.87) was obtained from the Burqa variety of fenugreek when grown with the Senate variety of bread wheat. The highest number of seeds per spike (53.70) was obtained when wheat grew after a wheat-fenugreek-wheat rotation. The maximum seed yield of fenugreek (1647 kg ha⁻1) was recorded when it grew after wheat. On the other hand, the maximum grain yield (6232 kg ha⁻1) in wheat was gained when Senate grew after fenugreek. The minimum seed yield of fenugreek and wheat grain yield was obtained from monocropping. This experiment revealed that the first wheat following a fenugreek precursor crop in rotation resulted in superior grain yields of bread wheat. Low grain yields were obtained from the continuous wheat rotations at Bale. The result indicates the need to encourage the adoption of appropriate wheat rotations by farmers in the highlands of the Bale zone and similar agroecologies. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -