Goats play a crucial role in mitigating environmental risks due to their unique adaptation to arid and semi-arid environments. This study was aimed to generate organized information based on household survey and flock monitoring to assess goat husbandry practices and evaluate goats’ milk yield respectively. About 180 households of goat owner were selected and interviewed. A total of 266 lactating goats with different parity were monitored to evaluate milk yield. The main purpose of raising goats in the study area was primarily to generate cash for purchasing food items to fulfill immediate family needs. The selection of breeding males was largely done by considering the characters like body size, pedigree, and growth rate and coat color. The overall goat milk yields on average were 0.37 ± 0.01 L/day. The average milk yields of goats were higher (0.57 ± 0.01L/day) during kidding the wet season than those were kidded during the dry season (0.24 ± 0.01L/day). The indigenous goats have indeed a lower milk yield than the improved goat breeds. Therefore, more emphasis on improvement of the feeding practice and breeding program needs to be placed on the improvement of the productive and reproductive performance of goats.
Published in | American Journal of Zoology (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14 |
Page(s) | 43-49 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Husbandry, Borana, Goat, Milk, Production Performance
Categories | Variables | Frequency (%) |
---|---|---|
Sex | Male | 154 (85.6) |
Female | 26 (14.4) | |
Total | 180 (100.0) | |
Marital status | Married | 163 (90.6) |
Unmarried | 17 (9.4) | |
Total | 180 (100.0) | |
Farming activity | Pastoral | 139 (77.2) |
Agropastoral | 41 (22.8) | |
Total | 180 (100) | |
Districts | Yabello | 36 (20) |
Elwaye | 34 (18.9) | |
Dubuluk | 32 (17.8) | |
Dhas | 30 (16.7) | |
Arero | 20 (11.1) | |
Dilo | 28 (15.6) | |
Total | 180 (100) | |
Kebele | Dharito | 18 (10) |
Hiddi Ale | 17 (9.4) | |
Did Yabello | 18 (10) | |
Gayo | 30 (16.7) | |
Lafto | 32 (17.8) | |
Qaxile | 28 (15.6) | |
E/Magaala | 17 (9.4) | |
Fuldohaa | 10 (5.6) | |
Alona | 10 (5.6) | |
Total | 180 (100) |
Parameters | Mean + St. Dev. |
---|---|
Number of cattle owned | 1.8 + 2.59 |
Number of goats owned | 9.2 + 4.82 |
Number of camel owned | 0.39 + 1.19 |
Number of donkey owned | 0.78 + 0.84 |
Number of female goat | 6.8 + 2.4 |
Number of male goat | 3.47 + 3.42 |
Number of dead goat | 0.21 + 0.67 |
Number of sheep owned | 4.8 + 9.46 |
Number of female sheep | 1.5 + 8.15 |
Number of male sheep | 1.21 + 1.82 |
Household size | 5.77 + 1.95 |
Experience in shoat rearing (years) | 14.68 |
Purpose of keeping goats | Index | Rank |
---|---|---|
Milk | 0.22 | 2 |
Meat | 0.18 | 3 |
Income source | 0.55 | 1 |
Ceremony (Jila) | 0.05 | 4 |
Manure | 0.00 | 5 |
Parameters | Variables | Frequency (Percentage) |
---|---|---|
Types of goat house | In the House with Family | 29 (16.1) |
Open Yard (Dhoqoba) | 151 (83.9) | |
Total | 180 (100.0) | |
Housed with other animals | Yes | 144 (80) |
No | 36 (20) | |
Total | 180 (100) | |
Cleaning practice | Daily | 98 (54.4) |
Once/Week | 52 (28.9) | |
Three Times/Week | 30 (16.7) | |
Total | 180 (100.0) |
Feed source | Index | Rank |
---|---|---|
Crop residues | 0.081 | 4 |
Tree branches | 0.232 | 2 |
Shrub | 0.243 | 1 |
Mineral | 0.065 | 5 |
Pods | 0.060 | 7 |
Concentrate | 0.063 | 6 |
Pasture | 0.20 | 3 |
Feed source in dry season | Index | Rank |
---|---|---|
Crop residues | 0.190 | 3 |
Tree branches | 0.250 | 1 |
Shrub | 0.002 | 7 |
Mineral | 0.100 | 5 |
Pods | 0.221 | 2 |
Concentrate | 0.134 | 4 |
Pasture | 0.066 | 6 |
Different Parameters | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|
Number of breeding buck/households | 3.38 | 1.861 |
Number of Lactating goat/households | 5.45 | 2.349 |
Lactation length of goats (months) | 2.77 | 1.101 |
One buck serving (years) | 3.58 | 1.617 |
Selection criteria | Female | Male | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Rank | Index | Rank | |
Color | 0.234 | 2 | 0.237 | 1 |
Adaptability | 0.079 | 5 | 0.145 | 4 |
Pedigree | 0.065 | 7 | 0.094 | 6 |
Body conformation | 0.302 | 1 | 0.184 | 3 |
Kidding interval | 0.090 | 4 | 0 | Not valued |
Milk yield | 0.161 | 3 | 0 | Not valued |
Growth rate | 0.068 | 6 | 0.117 | 5 |
Sexual desire | 0 | Not valued | 0.223 | 2 |
Factors | Categories | Frequency (%) |
---|---|---|
Culling practice | Yes | 142 (78.89) |
No | 38 (21.11) | |
Traits of culling s | Poor body condition | 24 (13.33) |
Old age | 80 (44.44) | |
Adaptability | 12 (6.67) | |
Unwanted color (black) | 24 (13.33) | |
Infertility | 112 (62.22) | |
Disease susceptibility | 12 (6.67) | |
Culling methods | Slaughtering | 15 (60) |
Selling | 23 (82) | |
Both | 12 (38) | |
Age of castration (years) | 1-2 | 18 (10.0) |
2-3 | 70 (38.9) | |
>3 | 92 (51.1) |
Variables | Number | Mean | Std. Err |
---|---|---|---|
Milk yield (L/day) | 266 | 0.37 | 0.011 |
Districts | *** | ||
Dubuluk | 78 | 0.32b | 0.02 |
Elweye | 95 | 0.38b | 0.02 |
Yabello | 93 | 0.42a | 0.02 |
Season | *** | ||
Wet | 106 | 0.57a | 0.01 |
Dry | 160 | 0.24b | 0.01 |
Parity | NS | ||
1 | 71 | 0.35 | 0.02 |
2 | 65 | 0.39 | 0.02 |
3 | 43 | 0.41 | 0.03 |
4 | 87 | 0.36 | 0.02 |
>5 | - | - | - |
DMY | Dry Matter Yield |
GLM | General Linear Model |
SD | Standard Deviation |
SPSS | Statistical Package for Social Study |
[1] | Tibbo, M., 2006. Productivity and health of indigenous sheep breeds and crossbreds in the central Ethiopia highlands. PhD dissertation. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden. 74p. |
[2] | Tsedey A., Zelalem Yi., Ajebu N and Haile W. 2015. Utilization and quality of goat milk in Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia. |
[3] | Tsedeke Kocho, 2007. Production and marketing systems of sheep and goats in Alaba, Southern Ethiopia. An MSc Thesis, Hawasa University, Ethiopia. |
[4] | Dereje T, Mengistu U, Getachew A and Yoseph M, 2015. A review of productive and reproductive characteristics of indigenous goats in Ethiopia. |
[5] | Coppock, D. L. 1994. The Borana plateau of southern Ethiopia: synthesis of pastoral research development and changes, 1980-90. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[6] | ILCA (International Livestock Center for Africa). 1990. ILCA annual report andprogram highlights. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[7] | H. D. Wodajo, B. A. Gemeda, W. Kinati, A. A. Mulem, A. van Eerdewijk, B. Wieland, Contribution of small ruminants to food security for Ethiopian smallholder Farmers, Small Rumin. Res. (2020) Pp1–10, |
[8] | S. Oumer, A. Kefyalew, H. Aynalem, Morphological characterization of Arab and Oromo goats in northwestern Ethiopia: implications for community-based breeding programs, East African Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 10 (2021) 49. |
[9] | Hagos Abraham, Solomon Gizaw, and Mengistu Urge. 2017. Livestock Research for Rural Development 29 (12) 2017 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter Citation of this paper. Livestock research for rural development. Vol. 29(12). |
[10] | Tesfaye, A. and Tamir, B., 2015. Assessment of goat production and marketing practices, constraints and opportunities in Yabello District of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 4(11), pp. 2278-0211. |
[11] | Carnicella et al., 2008, D. Carnicella, M. Dario, M. C. C. Ayres, V. Laudadio, C. DarioShort communication: The effect of diet, parity, year and number of kids on milk yield and milk composition in Maltese goat. |
[12] | Abdel-Rahman, I., H. Dirar and M. Osman, 2009. Microbiological and biochemicalchanges and sensory evaluation of camel milk fermented by selective bacterial starter cultures. African Journal of food Science, 10 (6): 398-405. |
APA Style
Hussien, B., Kumbe, A., Onate, A., Bekele, B. (2025). Assessment of Goat Husbandry Practices and Milk Production Performance in Borana Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Zoology, 8(2), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14
ACS Style
Hussien, B.; Kumbe, A.; Onate, A.; Bekele, B. Assessment of Goat Husbandry Practices and Milk Production Performance in Borana Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Zool. 2025, 8(2), 43-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14, author = {Beshir Hussien and Adem Kumbe and Anaf Onate and Birhanu Bekele}, title = {Assessment of Goat Husbandry Practices and Milk Production Performance in Borana Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia }, journal = {American Journal of Zoology}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, pages = {43-49}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20250802.14}, abstract = {Goats play a crucial role in mitigating environmental risks due to their unique adaptation to arid and semi-arid environments. This study was aimed to generate organized information based on household survey and flock monitoring to assess goat husbandry practices and evaluate goats’ milk yield respectively. About 180 households of goat owner were selected and interviewed. A total of 266 lactating goats with different parity were monitored to evaluate milk yield. The main purpose of raising goats in the study area was primarily to generate cash for purchasing food items to fulfill immediate family needs. The selection of breeding males was largely done by considering the characters like body size, pedigree, and growth rate and coat color. The overall goat milk yields on average were 0.37 ± 0.01 L/day. The average milk yields of goats were higher (0.57 ± 0.01L/day) during kidding the wet season than those were kidded during the dry season (0.24 ± 0.01L/day). The indigenous goats have indeed a lower milk yield than the improved goat breeds. Therefore, more emphasis on improvement of the feeding practice and breeding program needs to be placed on the improvement of the productive and reproductive performance of goats. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Goat Husbandry Practices and Milk Production Performance in Borana Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Beshir Hussien AU - Adem Kumbe AU - Anaf Onate AU - Birhanu Bekele Y1 - 2025/06/25 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14 T2 - American Journal of Zoology JF - American Journal of Zoology JO - American Journal of Zoology SP - 43 EP - 49 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.14 AB - Goats play a crucial role in mitigating environmental risks due to their unique adaptation to arid and semi-arid environments. This study was aimed to generate organized information based on household survey and flock monitoring to assess goat husbandry practices and evaluate goats’ milk yield respectively. About 180 households of goat owner were selected and interviewed. A total of 266 lactating goats with different parity were monitored to evaluate milk yield. The main purpose of raising goats in the study area was primarily to generate cash for purchasing food items to fulfill immediate family needs. The selection of breeding males was largely done by considering the characters like body size, pedigree, and growth rate and coat color. The overall goat milk yields on average were 0.37 ± 0.01 L/day. The average milk yields of goats were higher (0.57 ± 0.01L/day) during kidding the wet season than those were kidded during the dry season (0.24 ± 0.01L/day). The indigenous goats have indeed a lower milk yield than the improved goat breeds. Therefore, more emphasis on improvement of the feeding practice and breeding program needs to be placed on the improvement of the productive and reproductive performance of goats. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -