The experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of different level of roasted pigeon pea seed meal inclusion in diet of growing Cockereal Koekoek chicken. The compeletely randomized design was used to evaluate four dietary treatments. The roasted Pigeon Pea meal was included at levels of diet 0% (T1), 25% (T2), 30% (T3) and 35% (T4) in dietary treatments. Each treatment contained 8 chickens, totaling 128 chickens in the whole experiment. The study was conducted for for 84 days. The major factors studied were body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR). The results showed that both daily feed intake in T1 and T2 (74.89±12.78 g vs 73.09±13.4 g) and as well as T3 and T4 (71.70±14.2 g vs 69.16±14.43 g) were not statistically significant (P>0.05). On the other hand, there was a significantly lower (P<0.05) in daily body weight gain of chicken was observed in T4 (19.45±0.53 g) compared to the other treatments. There was no significant differences (P>0.05) among T1 (23.94±1.4 g), T2 (21.97±1.16 g) and T3 (21.6±0.6 g) in daily weight gain gram per bird. Significantly (P<0.05) lower FCR was observed in T1 (3.03± 0.54) compared to the rest treatments. However, were no significant differences in FCR T2 (3.33±0.61), T3 (3.31±0.67) and T4 (3.56 ±0.74). The selling price of cockerels chickens at end of experiment period chicken in T1 (Birr 271.67±5.77), T2 (Birr 257.67±17.04) and T3 (Birr 238.67±16.17) did not significantly differ (P>0.05). Similarly, the selling price of chickens in T3 (Birr 238.67±16.17) and T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78) also did not significantly differ (P>0.05). Whereas, there was a significant difference chickens selling price between the T1 (271.67±5.77) and T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78), and T2 (Birr257.67±17.04) T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78). From this study, net incomes of Birr 148.74, 138.25, 102.7 and 74.37 were obtained from T2, T1, T3 and T4, through selling chickens respectively. Generally, from the biological and economical point of view, the inclusion 25% of pigeon pea meal was recommended in diet cockerels’ koekoek chicken.
Published in | Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 13, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12 |
Page(s) | 98-103 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pigeon Pea Meal, Feed Offered, Feed Intake, Feed Conversion, Growth Performance
Ingredients | T1 (Commercial) | T2 | T3 | T4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pigeon pea | 25.00 | 30.00 | 35.00 | |
Noug cake | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | |
Maize | 51.00 | 51.00 | 51.00 | |
Wheat bran | 12.00 | 9.00 | 4.00 | |
Salt | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
Limestone | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
Premixes | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
TR | DM | Ash | OM | CF | CP | NDF | ADF | ME (kcal/kg DM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 94.75 | 5.6 | 89.15 | 5.0 | 18.00 | 22.56 | 11.49 | 2950 |
2 | 94.77 | 5.5 | 89.27 | 6.5 | 18.50 | 23.08 | 11.46 | 2946 |
3 | 93.97 | 3.9 | 90.07 | 10.5 | 19.00 | 23.62 | 10.65 | 2943 |
4 | 94.72 | 7.4 | 87.32 | 11.0 | 19.50 | 25.87 | 10.61 | 2942 |
Parameters | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial body weight (kg/bird) | 0.35±0.03 | 0.32±0.16 | 0.33±0.02 | 0.33±0.03 |
Mean daily feed intake (g/bird) | 74.89±12.78a | 73.09±13.47a | 71.7±14.2b | 69.16±14.43b |
Mean total feed intake (g/bird) | 6291±12.78a | 6139.56±13.47a | 6022.8±14.2b | 5848.92±12.8b |
Mean daily weight gain (g/bird) | 23.94±1.4a | 21.97±1.16a | 21.6±0.6a | 19.45±0.53b |
Mean total weight gain (g/bird) | 2350±12.14a | 2150±16.11a | 2110±10.06a | 1910±14.05b |
Final body weight (Kg/bird) | 2.70±0.11a | 2.48±0.11b | 2.45±0.40b | 2.24±0.02c |
FCR (feed: gain) | 3.03± 0.54b | 3.33±0.61a | 3.31±0.67a | 3.56 ±0.74a |
Partial budget cost | T1 | T 2 | T3 | T 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Feed consumed (kg/Chicken) | 6.291 | 6.139 | 6.022 | 5.85 |
Day old chicken purchase (ETB) | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
Feed purchase (ETB) | 74.42 | 49.93 | 76.97 | 84.3 |
Medification and Sanitation (ETB) | 24.00 | 24.00 | 24.00 | 24.00 |
Pen construction (ETB) | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 |
Total variable cost (TVC) (ETB) | 133.42 | 108.93 | 135.97 | 143.3 |
Cockerel Selling Price (GR)(ETB | 271.67±5.77a | 257.67±17.04ab | 238.67±16.17abc | 217.67±10.78c |
NR (GR-TVC) | 138.25 | 148.74 | 102.70 | 74.37 |
FCR | Feed Conversion Rate |
GR | Gross Return |
ETB | Ethiopian Birr |
[1] | Ahmed, B. H, Abdel, K. A, Ati and ElawadS. W. 2006. Effect of feeding different level of soaked pigeon pea (Cajanuscajan) seeds on broiler chickens performance and profitability. J. of animal veterinary science, (1): 1-4. |
[2] | Akande, k. E, Abubakar M M, Adegbola T A, Bogoro S. E and Doma U D. 2010. Chemical Evaluation of the Nutritive Quality of Pigeon Pea Cajanuscajan (L.) Millsp.]. International Journal of Poultry Science 9(1): 63-65, 2010. |
[3] | Amaefule, K. U and obioha F. 2005. Performance of pullet chicks fed raw or processed pigeon pea (Cajanuscajan) seed meal diets. Livestock Research for Rural Development 17(3) 2005. |
[4] | Amaefule, K. U, Ironkwe M. C. and Ojewola G. S. 2006. Pigeon Pea (Cajanuscajan) Seed Meal as Protein Source for Pullets: Performance of Grower Pullets Fed Raw or Processed Pigeon Pea Seed Meal Diets. International Journal of Poultry Science 5(1): 60-64, 2006. |
[5] | Amaefule, K. U and Onwudike O C. 2000. Comparative evaluation of the processing methods of pigeon pea seeds (Cajanuscajan) as protein source for broilers. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment. 1: 134-136. |
[6] | AOAC (Association of official Analytical chemist) (1990). 15th ed. AOAC Arlington, vergina, USA. CIMMT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An economics training manual. CIMMT, DF, Mexico. |
[7] | ATARC (Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center). (2020). Adami Tulu Agricultural Research center Metrological data Report. |
[8] | CIMMT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An economics training manual. CIMMT, DF, Mexico. |
[9] | Etuk, E. B and Ubedibie, A. B. I. 2003. Effect of cooked pigeon pea (Cajanuscajan) seed meal on the performance of Broiler chickens. JASR. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003. |
[10] | Girmand, P. 1988. The pigeon pea A possible Alternative for traditional pig and Poultry farming in New Caledonia, Medicine veterinary d-e Nouvelle Caledonia, 11: 29-36. |
[11] | Khadiga Abbas Abdelati1, Hashim Abdel Rahman Mohammed1 and Mohamed Elamin Ahmed. 2009. Influence of Feeding Processed Pigeon Pea (Cajanuscajan) Seeds on Broiler Chick Performance. International Journal of Poultry Science 8(10): 971-975, 2009. |
[12] | Krás, R V. Kessler A M. Ribeiro, A M L. Henn, JDi. Santos II dos. Halfen DP. Bockor L. 2013. Effect of dietary fiber and genetic strain on the performance and energy balance of broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science [online]. 2013, v. 15, n. 1 [Accessed 26 August 2021], pp. 15-19. Available from: Epub 12 Apr 2013. ISSN 1806-9061. |
[13] | Martens Siriwan D, TiemannTassilo T, BindelleJérôme Peters Michael, Lascano Carlos E. 2012. Alternative plant protein sources for pigs and chickens in the tropics – nutritional value andconstraints: a review. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics Vol. 113 No. 2(2012) 101-123. |
[14] | MelesseA. 2007. poultry production and management in the tropics: Teaching material Hawassa university College of Agriculture. Hawassa Ethiopia, P, 30, 195, 206, 241, 242. |
[15] | Mukhtar A, Mukhtar Atif E and Amal O. 2013. Rsponse of broiler chicks fed on diets containing graded levels of pigeon pea (cajanuscajan) seeds supplemented with essential caraway oil. Journal of current research in science (ISSN 2322-5009) 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp: 109- 112. Available at |
[16] | Muzi M, Ginindza, Jones Ng`ambi, David Norris. 2017. Effect of dietary crude fiber level on intake, digestibility and productivity of slow-growing indigenous Venda chickens aged one to 91 days. February 2017 Indian Journal of Animal Research 51(OF) |
[17] | Rajesh Jha and Pravin Mishra. 2021. Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 12, Article number: 51(2021). |
[18] | Saeed, M. S., Khadiga A. Abdel Ati. 2007. Inclusion of Pigeon Pea (Cajanuscajan) Seed on Broiler Chick's Diet. Research Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2: 1-4, 2007, INSI net Publication. |
[19] | Salami, R. I. and Odunsi, A. A. 2017. Effect of varying dietary fiber and energy levels in multi-fibre source-based diets on growth performance of broiler finisher chickens. Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 2017(2): 72-82. |
[20] | SAS. (2001). SAS user`s Guide: statistics, Release 8.2. SAS Inst., carry. Nc. |
[21] | Singh, S. K. 1977. Food legumes: distribution, adaptability and biology of yield P. 1-102. In: FAO plant production and protection paper 3. FAO, Rome WPAS (World poultry Association). 2013. Feed resources and chicken production in Ethiopia. Journal of World poultry Association, 2013. |
[22] | Smith JA (2001). The tropical Agriculturalist. Poultry. Macmillan Education Ltd 1990, 2001. |
[23] | Tesfa Geleta and Usman Abdulkadir. 2018. Production performance evaluation of Koekoek chickens at Adami Tulu research center. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 13(35), pp. 1852- 1856, 30 August, 2018. |
[24] | Yisa, A. G. Edache, J. A. Oyawoye, E. O. Diarra, S. S. Yakubu, B. 2010. The effect of graded levels of boiled and dried pigeon pea seed meal on the carcass of cockerels. Journal of Environmental Issues and Agriculture in Developing Countries, Volume 2 Numbers 2 & 3, 2010. |
[25] | Zakaria HA and Shammout MW. 2018. Duckweed in Irrigation Water as a Replacement of Soybean Meal in the Laying Hens’ Diet. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, ISSN 1516-635X / v. 20 / n. 3 / 573-582. |
APA Style
Abdulkadir, U., Geleta, T. (2025). Evaluating Different Levels of Roasted Pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan) Meal on Growth Performance of Cockereal Koekoek Chicken Under Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center, Oromia, Ethiopa. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 13(4), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12
ACS Style
Abdulkadir, U.; Geleta, T. Evaluating Different Levels of Roasted Pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan) Meal on Growth Performance of Cockereal Koekoek Chicken Under Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center, Oromia, Ethiopa. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2025, 13(4), 98-103. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12
AMA Style
Abdulkadir U, Geleta T. Evaluating Different Levels of Roasted Pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan) Meal on Growth Performance of Cockereal Koekoek Chicken Under Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center, Oromia, Ethiopa. Anim Vet Sci. 2025;13(4):98-103. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12
@article{10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12, author = {Usman Abdulkadir and Tesfa Geleta}, title = {Evaluating Different Levels of Roasted Pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan) Meal on Growth Performance of Cockereal Koekoek Chicken Under Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center, Oromia, Ethiopa }, journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences}, volume = {13}, number = {4}, pages = {98-103}, doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20251304.12}, abstract = {The experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of different level of roasted pigeon pea seed meal inclusion in diet of growing Cockereal Koekoek chicken. The compeletely randomized design was used to evaluate four dietary treatments. The roasted Pigeon Pea meal was included at levels of diet 0% (T1), 25% (T2), 30% (T3) and 35% (T4) in dietary treatments. Each treatment contained 8 chickens, totaling 128 chickens in the whole experiment. The study was conducted for for 84 days. The major factors studied were body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR). The results showed that both daily feed intake in T1 and T2 (74.89±12.78 g vs 73.09±13.4 g) and as well as T3 and T4 (71.70±14.2 g vs 69.16±14.43 g) were not statistically significant (P>0.05). On the other hand, there was a significantly lower (P0.05) among T1 (23.94±1.4 g), T2 (21.97±1.16 g) and T3 (21.6±0.6 g) in daily weight gain gram per bird. Significantly (P0.05). Similarly, the selling price of chickens in T3 (Birr 238.67±16.17) and T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78) also did not significantly differ (P>0.05). Whereas, there was a significant difference chickens selling price between the T1 (271.67±5.77) and T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78), and T2 (Birr257.67±17.04) T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78). From this study, net incomes of Birr 148.74, 138.25, 102.7 and 74.37 were obtained from T2, T1, T3 and T4, through selling chickens respectively. Generally, from the biological and economical point of view, the inclusion 25% of pigeon pea meal was recommended in diet cockerels’ koekoek chicken.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating Different Levels of Roasted Pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan) Meal on Growth Performance of Cockereal Koekoek Chicken Under Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center, Oromia, Ethiopa AU - Usman Abdulkadir AU - Tesfa Geleta Y1 - 2025/07/24 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12 DO - 10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12 T2 - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JF - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JO - Animal and Veterinary Sciences SP - 98 EP - 103 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5850 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251304.12 AB - The experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of different level of roasted pigeon pea seed meal inclusion in diet of growing Cockereal Koekoek chicken. The compeletely randomized design was used to evaluate four dietary treatments. The roasted Pigeon Pea meal was included at levels of diet 0% (T1), 25% (T2), 30% (T3) and 35% (T4) in dietary treatments. Each treatment contained 8 chickens, totaling 128 chickens in the whole experiment. The study was conducted for for 84 days. The major factors studied were body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR). The results showed that both daily feed intake in T1 and T2 (74.89±12.78 g vs 73.09±13.4 g) and as well as T3 and T4 (71.70±14.2 g vs 69.16±14.43 g) were not statistically significant (P>0.05). On the other hand, there was a significantly lower (P0.05) among T1 (23.94±1.4 g), T2 (21.97±1.16 g) and T3 (21.6±0.6 g) in daily weight gain gram per bird. Significantly (P0.05). Similarly, the selling price of chickens in T3 (Birr 238.67±16.17) and T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78) also did not significantly differ (P>0.05). Whereas, there was a significant difference chickens selling price between the T1 (271.67±5.77) and T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78), and T2 (Birr257.67±17.04) T4 (Birr 217.67±10.78). From this study, net incomes of Birr 148.74, 138.25, 102.7 and 74.37 were obtained from T2, T1, T3 and T4, through selling chickens respectively. Generally, from the biological and economical point of view, the inclusion 25% of pigeon pea meal was recommended in diet cockerels’ koekoek chicken. VL - 13 IS - 4 ER -