Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

How to Devise Effective Teaching Strategies for Engaging Level Four Undergraduate Students and Enhancing Knowledge Retention

Received: 1 October 2025     Accepted: 11 October 2025     Published: 3 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The life sciences cover subject areas such as biochemistry, anatomy, physiology, biology, and genetics. In their first year of study, undergraduate students undertake a comprehensive study of these areas of specialisation, imbibing the basic concepts of life processes. In broad terms, level 4 of the study curriculum in the life sciences is a mix of theoretical and practical laboratory skill development, which is a preparatory ground for higher academic exercise in research and future career pursuits in healthcare, biotechnology, or research in the life sciences. Most of the student participants in this class setting are populated by young adult international students who are in their first year of study in the life sciences. They are sociable and exuberant, as well as enthusiastic about learning. Because the class is mostly populated by students from diverse social-cultural backgrounds, it suggests that they will exhibit a broad worldwide view and traits for the multidisciplinary nature of the life sciences. They have prior knowledge of basic science subjects, and therefore, the students are expected to integrate and apply their prior knowledge of the basic science subjects in solving problems related to more complex and specific topics in life sciences at the undergraduate level of study. By their nature, the categories of students at this level of study are sociable and enthusiastic. Therefore, the students are expected to thrive in their academic activities through group discussions and collaborative learning where they are encouraged to share their diverse perspectives on working through the module topics and problem-solving skills. By incorporating interactive teaching methods, scaffolding instruction, and retrieval practices, educators can create a supportive learning environment and enhance student engagement and knowledge retention.

Published in Research and Innovation (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12
Page(s) 10-14
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Knowledge Retention, Innovative/Active Teaching and Learning Strategies, Undergraduate Students

References
[1] Arnold, W. W. (2019) ‘Improving engagement in a lecture course by increasing relevance to student needs and interest’, Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 12(3), pp. 49-74.
[2] Bachelor, R. L., Vaughan, P. M. and Wall, C. M. (2012) Exploring the effects of active learning on retaining essential concepts in secondary and junior high classrooms. An Action Research Project for the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching and Leadership, Saint Xavier University, Chicago, Illinois. Available at:
[3] Bligh, D. A. (2000) What’s the use of lectures? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[4] Bowen, P. W., Rajasinghe, D., Evans, I., Rose, R. and Pilkington, A. (2018) ‘A qualitative study of student retention: the university academic’s perspective’, International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 2(10), pp. 19-28.
[5] Farley, J. Y., Risko, E. F. and Kingstone, A. (2013) ‘Everyday attention and lecture retention: the effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering’, Frontiers in Psychology, 4(619), pp. 1-9.
[6] Fisher, J. S. and Radvansky, G. A. (2018) ‘Patterns of forgetting’, Journal of Memory and Language, 102, pp. 130-141.
[7] World Government Summit (2016) Gamification and the future of education. Available at:
[8] Glynn, S. M., Duit, R. and Thiele, R. B. (1995) ‘Teaching science with analogies: A strategy for constructing knowledge’, in Glynn, S. M. and Duit, R. (eds.) Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 247-273.
[9] Jeong, S., Clyburn, J., Bhatia, N. S., McCourt, J. and Lemons, P. P. (2022) ‘Student thinking in the professional development of college biology instructors: An analysis through the lens of sociocultural theory’, CBE-Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar30.
[10] Jiwane, A. (2019) ‘Enhancing the retention of lectured information for higher education students through note-taking skills’, International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 9(5), pp. 80-92.
[11] Kiewra, K. A. (2002) ‘How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn’, Theory into Practice, 41(2), pp. 71-80.
[12] Kinsella, G. K., Mahon, C. and Lillis, S. (2017) ‘Using pre-lecture activities to enhance learner engagement in a large group setting’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), pp. 231-242.
[13] Kumar, J. V. and Revathy, A. (2023) ‘Project-based learning: A catalyst for student engagement and holistic learning’, Journal of Project Management, 1, pp. 1-10.
[14] MIT Teaching + Learning Lab (no date). How to teach: Help students retain, organise and integrate knowledge. Available at:
[15] Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N. and O’Dowd, D. K. (2010) ‘Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class’, CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9, pp. 473-481.
[16] Postdoc Academic Chat (2020) Designing and delivering effective lectures. Available at:
[17] Roediger, H. L. and Butler, A. C. (2011) ‘The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), pp. 20-27.
[18] Shah, M. and Cheng, M. (2019) ‘Exploring factors impacting student engagement in open access courses’, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(2), pp. 187-202.
[19] Subheesh, N. P. and Sethy, S. S. (2020) ‘Learning through assessment and feedback practices: Critical review of engineering education settings’, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), em1829.
[20] Suhirman, S. and Ghazali, I. (2022) ‘Exploring students’ critical thinking and curiosity: A study on problem-based learning with character development and naturalist intelligence’, International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), pp. 95-107.
[21] Tight, M. (2018) Student retention and engagement in higher education. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University. Available at:
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Chikezie, P. C. (2025). How to Devise Effective Teaching Strategies for Engaging Level Four Undergraduate Students and Enhancing Knowledge Retention. Research and Innovation, 1(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Chikezie, P. C. How to Devise Effective Teaching Strategies for Engaging Level Four Undergraduate Students and Enhancing Knowledge Retention. Res. Innovation 2025, 1(1), 10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Chikezie PC. How to Devise Effective Teaching Strategies for Engaging Level Four Undergraduate Students and Enhancing Knowledge Retention. Res Innovation. 2025;1(1):10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12,
      author = {Paul Chidoka Chikezie},
      title = {How to Devise Effective Teaching Strategies for Engaging Level Four Undergraduate Students and Enhancing Knowledge Retention
    },
      journal = {Research and Innovation},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {10-14},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ri.20250101.12},
      abstract = {The life sciences cover subject areas such as biochemistry, anatomy, physiology, biology, and genetics. In their first year of study, undergraduate students undertake a comprehensive study of these areas of specialisation, imbibing the basic concepts of life processes. In broad terms, level 4 of the study curriculum in the life sciences is a mix of theoretical and practical laboratory skill development, which is a preparatory ground for higher academic exercise in research and future career pursuits in healthcare, biotechnology, or research in the life sciences. Most of the student participants in this class setting are populated by young adult international students who are in their first year of study in the life sciences. They are sociable and exuberant, as well as enthusiastic about learning. Because the class is mostly populated by students from diverse social-cultural backgrounds, it suggests that they will exhibit a broad worldwide view and traits for the multidisciplinary nature of the life sciences. They have prior knowledge of basic science subjects, and therefore, the students are expected to integrate and apply their prior knowledge of the basic science subjects in solving problems related to more complex and specific topics in life sciences at the undergraduate level of study. By their nature, the categories of students at this level of study are sociable and enthusiastic. Therefore, the students are expected to thrive in their academic activities through group discussions and collaborative learning where they are encouraged to share their diverse perspectives on working through the module topics and problem-solving skills. By incorporating interactive teaching methods, scaffolding instruction, and retrieval practices, educators can create a supportive learning environment and enhance student engagement and knowledge retention.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - How to Devise Effective Teaching Strategies for Engaging Level Four Undergraduate Students and Enhancing Knowledge Retention
    
    AU  - Paul Chidoka Chikezie
    Y1  - 2025/12/03
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12
    T2  - Research and Innovation
    JF  - Research and Innovation
    JO  - Research and Innovation
    SP  - 10
    EP  - 14
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.12
    AB  - The life sciences cover subject areas such as biochemistry, anatomy, physiology, biology, and genetics. In their first year of study, undergraduate students undertake a comprehensive study of these areas of specialisation, imbibing the basic concepts of life processes. In broad terms, level 4 of the study curriculum in the life sciences is a mix of theoretical and practical laboratory skill development, which is a preparatory ground for higher academic exercise in research and future career pursuits in healthcare, biotechnology, or research in the life sciences. Most of the student participants in this class setting are populated by young adult international students who are in their first year of study in the life sciences. They are sociable and exuberant, as well as enthusiastic about learning. Because the class is mostly populated by students from diverse social-cultural backgrounds, it suggests that they will exhibit a broad worldwide view and traits for the multidisciplinary nature of the life sciences. They have prior knowledge of basic science subjects, and therefore, the students are expected to integrate and apply their prior knowledge of the basic science subjects in solving problems related to more complex and specific topics in life sciences at the undergraduate level of study. By their nature, the categories of students at this level of study are sociable and enthusiastic. Therefore, the students are expected to thrive in their academic activities through group discussions and collaborative learning where they are encouraged to share their diverse perspectives on working through the module topics and problem-solving skills. By incorporating interactive teaching methods, scaffolding instruction, and retrieval practices, educators can create a supportive learning environment and enhance student engagement and knowledge retention.
    
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections