The 4009BIO is a Year-1 second/third-semester module that covers cellular structure and communication. The assessment tasks are four mandatory case study scenarios, each with background information and questions related to numerical/data analyses and brief essays. The students receive feedback in the form of formative feedback, which is usually provided through face-to-face/virtual classroom setting, as well as written summative feedback. The students are encouraged to seek additional feedback through one-on-one meetings with the teaching team or virtually using the Teams platform. The students enrolled in the module are predominantly international students who contribute diverse perspectives and experiences to the learning environment. An overview of this student cohort shows that they are sociable and enthusiastic to learn and are likely to engage in group discussions and collaborative learning. My assessment and feedback practice are designed to provide a targeted support to guide students through a step-by-step process of understanding the assessment tasks, to improve their comprehension and foster higher levels of engagement, as well as enable the students to complete the assessment tasks with confidence and effectiveness. The assessment design aligns with the module's learning outcomes, and low-stake practice opportunities are incorporated. Feedback practice involves prompt, non-judgmental feedback, and regular review of feedback templates.
| Published in | Research and Innovation (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13 |
| Page(s) | 15-19 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Case Study, Feedback, Module
| [1] | Arnold, L. and Croxford, J. (2024) ‘Is it time to stop talking about authentic assessment?’ Teaching in Higher Education. |
| [2] | Attali, Y. (2016) ‘Effort in low-stakes assessments: What does it take to perform as well as in a high-stakes setting?’ Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), pp. 1045-1058. |
| [3] | Boud, D. (2017) ‘Standards-based assessment for an era of increasing transparency’, in Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chan, C. and Glofcheski, R. (eds.) Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education: The enabling power of assessment. Vol. 5. Singapore: Springer. |
| [4] |
Cambridge Centre for Teaching & Learning (CCTL) (2022) ‘Aligning assessment with teaching and learning’. Available at:
https://www.cctl.cam.ac.uk/files/foundations_for_assessment_paper_2.pdf |
| [5] | Cioca, I. and Gifford, J. (2022) ‘Performance feedback: An evidence review. Practice summary and recommendations’. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. |
| [6] | CQSD (2023) ‘Empowering learning through formative assessment & feedback’. University of Reading. Available at: |
| [7] | CQSD (2024) ‘Developing and using assessment criteria and rubrics’. University of Reading. Available at: |
| [8] |
Elkington, S. (n.d.) ‘Enhancing student assessment literacy. Future Facing Learning. LTE Bites Series’, No. 1. Teesside University. Available at:
https://blogs.tees.ac.uk/lteonline/files/2019/11/LTE-Bites-04-Assessment-Literacy.pdf |
| [9] | Gallagher, G. (2017) ‘Aligning for learning: Including feedback in the constructive alignment model’, All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), pp. 3011-3023. Available at: |
| [10] | Gedye, S. (2010) ‘Formative assessment and feedback: A review’, Planet, 23(1), pp. 40-45. |
| [11] | Hack, C. (2013) ‘Using rubrics to improve marking reliability and to clarify good performance’, 2013 STEM Annual Conference. Available at: |
| [12] | Hawe, E., Dixon, H. and Hamilton, R. (2021) ‘Why and how educators use exemplars’, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(3), pp. 1-15. Available at: |
| [13] | Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J. and Thorpe, L. (2011) ‘Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review’, Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), pp. 117-127. |
| [14] |
Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D. and Smith, B. (2014) Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy. Available at:
https://www.enhancingfeedback.ed.ac.uk/documents/id353_senlef_guide.pdf |
| [15] | Lindner, M. A. (2020) ‘Representational and decorative pictures in science and mathematics tests: Do they make a difference?’ Learning and Instruction, 68, 101345. |
| [16] | Magne, V., Mace, R. and Vince, S. (2023) ‘Using reflection to increase student engagement with feedback’, New Vistas, 9(1). |
| [17] | Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N. and O'Dowd, D. K. (2010) ‘Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class’, CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), pp. 473-481. |
| [18] | Sun, Q., Chen, F. and Yin, S. (2023) ‘The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1070618. |
| [19] | Teaching Excellence & Innovation (TE&I) (2014) Aligning assessment to learning outcomes. Available at: |
| [20] | Traboco, L., Pandian, H., Nikiphorou, E. and Gupta, L. (2022) ‘Designing infographics: Visual representations for enhancing education, communication, and scientific research’, Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(27), e214. |
| [21] |
Winstone, N. E. and Nash, R. A. (2016) ‘The Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit (DEFT)’. York: Higher Education Academy. Available at:
https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-10/deft-16-19.pdf |
| [22] | Yan, Z. and Carless, D. (2022) ‘Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), pp. 1116-1128. |
APA Style
Chikezie, P. C. (2025). Critical Evaluation of Effectiveness of Assessment and Feedback Practice Using the 4009BIO Module as a Case Study. Research and Innovation, 1(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13
ACS Style
Chikezie, P. C. Critical Evaluation of Effectiveness of Assessment and Feedback Practice Using the 4009BIO Module as a Case Study. Res. Innovation 2025, 1(1), 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13
@article{10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13,
author = {Paul Chidoka Chikezie},
title = {Critical Evaluation of Effectiveness of Assessment and Feedback Practice Using the 4009BIO Module as a Case Study
},
journal = {Research and Innovation},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {15-19},
doi = {10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ri.20250101.13},
abstract = {The 4009BIO is a Year-1 second/third-semester module that covers cellular structure and communication. The assessment tasks are four mandatory case study scenarios, each with background information and questions related to numerical/data analyses and brief essays. The students receive feedback in the form of formative feedback, which is usually provided through face-to-face/virtual classroom setting, as well as written summative feedback. The students are encouraged to seek additional feedback through one-on-one meetings with the teaching team or virtually using the Teams platform. The students enrolled in the module are predominantly international students who contribute diverse perspectives and experiences to the learning environment. An overview of this student cohort shows that they are sociable and enthusiastic to learn and are likely to engage in group discussions and collaborative learning. My assessment and feedback practice are designed to provide a targeted support to guide students through a step-by-step process of understanding the assessment tasks, to improve their comprehension and foster higher levels of engagement, as well as enable the students to complete the assessment tasks with confidence and effectiveness. The assessment design aligns with the module's learning outcomes, and low-stake practice opportunities are incorporated. Feedback practice involves prompt, non-judgmental feedback, and regular review of feedback templates.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Critical Evaluation of Effectiveness of Assessment and Feedback Practice Using the 4009BIO Module as a Case Study AU - Paul Chidoka Chikezie Y1 - 2025/12/03 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13 T2 - Research and Innovation JF - Research and Innovation JO - Research and Innovation SP - 15 EP - 19 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.13 AB - The 4009BIO is a Year-1 second/third-semester module that covers cellular structure and communication. The assessment tasks are four mandatory case study scenarios, each with background information and questions related to numerical/data analyses and brief essays. The students receive feedback in the form of formative feedback, which is usually provided through face-to-face/virtual classroom setting, as well as written summative feedback. The students are encouraged to seek additional feedback through one-on-one meetings with the teaching team or virtually using the Teams platform. The students enrolled in the module are predominantly international students who contribute diverse perspectives and experiences to the learning environment. An overview of this student cohort shows that they are sociable and enthusiastic to learn and are likely to engage in group discussions and collaborative learning. My assessment and feedback practice are designed to provide a targeted support to guide students through a step-by-step process of understanding the assessment tasks, to improve their comprehension and foster higher levels of engagement, as well as enable the students to complete the assessment tasks with confidence and effectiveness. The assessment design aligns with the module's learning outcomes, and low-stake practice opportunities are incorporated. Feedback practice involves prompt, non-judgmental feedback, and regular review of feedback templates. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -