Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Characterization, Classification and Mapping of Soil Resources in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of East Shewa Zone, Oromia

Received: 9 June 2025     Accepted: 26 June 2025     Published: 28 July 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A study was undertaken in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of Oromia region, Ethiopia, to investigate the site, morphological and physico-chemical characteristics, classification and mapping of soils. Fourteen soil pedons at representative sites were described and 66 disturbed and undisturbed soil samples from identified horizons were taken for laboratory analysis. The data obtained showed that the soils varied from moderate to very deep, well drained, the surface soil color at (dry) varied from light gray (10YR 7/2) to very dark brown (7.5YR 2.5/2); at moist varied from brown (10YR4/3) to black (10YR2/1), while the subsurface color varied from white (10YR 8/1) to black (7.5YR 3/1,) at dry conditions and at moist condition the color varied from light gray (7.5YR 7/2) to black (7.5YR 2.5/1), the structure in the surface layers of the pedons 1, 2, 3, 6, 14 had weak fine granular and gradually in subsurface changed to Moderate fine sub angular blocky in the same pedons; Strong fine granular at surface changed to strong fine sub angular blocky in pedon 4; Strong fine angular blocky in pedon 5 and moderate medium granular in pedon 7 and 8 at surface and subsurface without gradual change. The values of the determined soil physical characteristics revealed that sand, silt, clay, bulk density and total porosity ranged from 34 to 81.78%, 9.22 to 48%, 5 to 28%, 0.95 to 1.31 g cm-3, 50.56 to 64.15% respectively. Moreover, the soils were neutral (pH 6.7 to 7.3) to strongly alkaline (pH >8.0), salt free (< 1dsm-1) except pedon 9 and 10 near to lake Abjeta. Soil organic matter content ranged from very low to moderate in and total N ranged very low to moderate, available phosphorus ranged from very low to low respectively. Soil exchangeable Ca2+ ranged from moderate to high (5.13 to 21.8 cmol(+) kg-1), high to very high in exchangeable K (0.65 to 3.46 cmol(+) kg-1), moderate to high in Mg (1.28 to 6.7 cmol(+) kg-1), low to very high in exchangeable Na (0.13 to 10.1 cmol(+) kg-1) and, moderate to high CEC (13.13 to 38.88% cmol(+) kg-1) and moderate to very high PBS (50.92 to 97.69%), respectively. Soil of the district was classified as chromic vertisols, Luvic phaeozems, vitric andosols, Solonetz and mollic andosols.

Published in Science Development (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17
Page(s) 97-113
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Soil Characteristics, Soil Classification, Soil Mapping

1. Introduction
Soil is a slowly renewable dynamic natural resource that determines the ultimate sustainability of any agricultural system. Water movement, water quality, land use, and vegetation productivity all have relationships with soil. Soils provide food, fodder and fuel which is necessary for basic human and animal needs . However, due to the increasing rate of the population demanding for food, the nutrients have been depleted and the productive capacity of soils has diminished through changes in soil characteristics. This demands systematic evaluation of soil resources with respect to their extent, distribution, characteristics, and use potential, which is very important for developing an effective land-use system for augmenting agricultural production on a sustainable basis .
Agriculture must feed, clothe and provide energy to a rapidly increasing world population while minimizing environmental and other unwanted impacts. After long stagnation, crop production in Ethiopia started to show considerable growth only recently although a range of policies and investments have been pursued over the past four decades . Low agricultural productivity and related shortage of additional cultivable lands are also common problems to most Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries . From the many reasons suggested for the current low agricultural production and productivity in SSA, the major ones are land degradation, nutrient mining, recurrent droughts, variable rainfall and crop pest damages .
Study and understanding of soil properties and its distribution over an area are useful for the development of soil management plan for efficient utilization of limited land resources, rehabilitation of degraded lands and implementing sustainable land uses . The systematic appraisal of soil resources with respect to their extent, distribution, characteristics, behavior and use potential, is thus very important for developing an effective land use system and for augmenting agricultural production on a sustainable basis. Therefore, for developing site-specific technologies that are effective with greater impact, it is imperative to have site-specific landscape information generated through detailed biophysical resources characterization. The soil and land resource inventory at regional and larger level are providing a basis for blanket recommendation of various package of practices including fertilizers and other inputs. Fertilizer recommendations in Ethiopia deal with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) dosages only, and so far it is assumed as standard for the country disregarding the mosaic soil nature of Ethiopia .
The coupling of soil characterization, soil classification and soil mapping provides a powerful resource for the benefit of mankind especially in the area of food security and environmental sustainability. Soil characterization provides the information for our understandings of the physical, chemical, mineralogical and microbiological properties of the soils humans depend on to grow crops, sustain forests and grasslands as well as support homes and society structures . Soil classification, on the other hand, helps to organize our knowledge, facilitates the transfer of experience and technology from one place to another and helps to compare soil properties. According to some different uses of soil characterization data include to aid in the correct classification of the soil and enable other scientists place the soils in their taxonomies or classification systems and to serve as a basis for more detailed evaluation of the soil as well as gather preliminary information on nutrient, physical or other limitations needed to produce a capability class. Soil characterization study, therefore, is a major building block for understanding the soil, classifying it and getting the best understanding of the environment . Hence this study is initiated to conduct the activity for Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District with the following objectives.
Objectives
1. To characterize and classify soils of the District
2. To Map soil types of the District
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
Geographically, Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District is found in East Shewa Zone of the Oromia Regional State (Figure 1), in the Ethiopian Great Rift Valley. The geographical location of the study area lies between the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of 7°00’-8°30’ north latitude and 38°00’-39°30’ east longitude with an elevation that ranges from 1500 to 2300 m.a.s.l. The District receives annual rainfall from 500 to 900 mm and its map is indicated below.
The topography of the district is characterized by flat, level land, gently sloping, constituting plains to strongly sloping and steep slope. The area is a good representative of ecologies that experience high population pressure, soil fertility depletion and food shortages due to low production and strong crop-livestock interactions. Attributed to the long history of crop cultivation and deforestation of the soils of most parts of the area are found to be exposed to wind and water erosion at the District.
Figure 1. Location map of the study area.
2.2. Geology
The site’s geology is mainly volcanic rocks and some lacustrine and alluvial sediment. The volcanic rhyolite lava flows, basalt lava flows, ignimbrites and pumiceous pyroclastics form the volcanic massif of the Aluto Volcano and the sediments are distributed on the flat plains and depressions .
2.3. Climate and Hydrology
The agro-ecological zone of the district is semi-arid and sub-humid in which 90% of the area is lowland while the remaining 10% is intermediate . The study area is characterized by two seasons, rainy (summer) and dry (winter) seasons which fall under uni-modal rainfall pattern. The rainy and dry periods are locally known as ‘gana’ and ‘Bona’, respectively. As per the information obtained from the area, most of the time the rainfall pattern for the growing season is characterized by erratic and uncertainty both in amount and distribution and starts from April 15 (2nd decade) if it is early or in 2nd and 3rd decade of May if it is late and extending to September and the dry season covers the rest. May is the hottest month and December is the coolest month. Maximum amount of rainfall for the area is observed in the month of July followed by August. The mean minimum and maximum annual temperatures of the area are ranged from 11.4°C to 15.8°C and 25.3 to 29.3°C, respectively with average temperature 20.5°C and by having relative humidity of growing period 77%.
2.4. Site Selection, Pedon Description and Soil Sampling
1. Site Selection
Before starting the field characterization and field work, a preliminary interpretation of topographic map of the study area (1:50,000), Preliminary district boundary was delineated and temporary pedon site were identified using topographic map of the study area (1:50,000) and Digital elevation model (DEM: 30 x 30m resolution) and soil mapping units were prepared.
Figure 2. Soil mapping Units of the study area.
Site characteristic such as: land use /land cover, slope class, surface drainage and surface soil characteristic (soil color, texture) were well recorded. The topographic map was used to identify preliminary land use, slope class, drainage, agro-ecologic zones and to fix tentative sampling sites for pedons which are mostly based on slope of the study area. After office work and preparation of materials and prior to the opening of soil pedons, field physical observation and surveying were done by transect walk and with the help of the map of the area to consolidate and determine representative sampling sites of the area. Based on the heterogeneity and homogeneity of the soils, tentative soil map was prepared to determine as to which specific areas should be selected as representative sites of the study area for pedon preparation/excavation. The basis for the classification and then locating soil pedon sites were surface characteristics and slope classes.
2. Pedon Description and Soil Sampling
Fourteen representatives pedons (1.5m width and 2m length unless limited by continuous hard layer /bedrock) were opened and described on standard description sheet based on FAO soil description guidelines . Site characteristics, the morphological properties of each genetic horizon within a pedon such as:-(soil horizon, depth, boundary, soil color, texture, structure and consistence) were recorded on standard sheet. More over the geographic coordinates, altitude the pedons were recorded and georeferenced using GPS respectively.
The pedon site was georeferenced with the help of Arc GIS 10.3.1. at different slope gradient and located on the appropriate scale base map. Representative soil samples were collected from each identifiable and demarcated genetic horizon or soil layer of the pedon in each of the mapping units for characterization of their physiochemical properties that are relevant to the objectives of the study. A total of 66 disturbed and 66 undisturbed (core) soil samples were sampled depth wise from each evident genetic horizon of the representative pedon. The undisturbed (core) soil samples were for the determination of bulk density.
Morphological characteristics such as depth of solum and horizon, structure, color, horizon boundary, consistence etc. were described in the field during soil sample collection and pedon characterization. Soil depth was determined following the thickness of the loose soil from the surface to a limiting impermeable layer (for plant roots and/or percolating water). Soil color was measured both under dry and moist conditions using the Munsell Soil Color Chart (Munsell Color Company. Routine cross checks were done for accuracy of the colors. Soil structure was studied in terms of: type (shape), grade and size of aggregates whereas horizon boundaries were described in terms of depth, distinctness and topography. The soil consistence was identified at dry and wet moisture conditions. Morphological soil properties were studied based on the guidelines of .
Soil Sample Preparation and Laboratory Analysis
Soil sample preparation
The sampled soils were carefully bagged, labeled and the packed samples were transported to the laboratory for analysis. The disturbed soil samples collected from each horizon were air dried at room temperature, grounded using mortar and pestle and made to pass through 2 mm sieve in the laboratory for all the selected soil parameters except for soil OC and total N prior to analysis. For the analysis of OM and total N, the soil samples were further passed through 0.5 mm sieve. Finally, the soil samples were analyzed for selected physico-chemical properties following the standard analytical procedures.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Morphological Characteristics of Soil Pedons
1. Soil color and Soil structure and consistence
By using Munsell Color Chart, the surface soil color (dry) varied from light gray (10YR 7/2) in pedon 1 to very dark brown (7.5YR/2.5/2) in pedon 5; at moist soil color conditions varied from brown (10YR4/3) in pedon 5 to black (10YR2/1) in pedons 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 11, while the subsurface color varied from white (10YR 8/1) in pedon 2 and 3 to black (7.5YR 3/1,) in pedon 4 at dry conditions and at moist condition the color varied from light gray (7.5YR 7/2) in pedon 6 and 10 to black (7.5YR 2.5/1) in pedon 1& 4, (10YR 2/1) in pedon 3, 12, 14 respectively (Table 1 below).
There was a difference in size, grade as well as shape of soil structure within each pedon among horizons and among soil pedons of the district. Accordingly, the structure in the surface layers of the pedons 1, 2, 3, 6, 14 had weak fine granular and gradually in subsurface changed to Moderate fine sub angular blocky in the same pedons; strong fine granular at surface changed to strong fine sub angular blocky in pedon 4; Strong fine angular blocky in pedon 5 and moderate medium granular in pedon 7 and 8 at surface and subsurface without gradual change.
Results in soil consistence, characteristic outcomes in the surface layers varied from loose in pedon 9 and 10 to hard (HA) in pedon 4 and 5 when dry; when wet varied from non-sticky/ non plastic in pedon 9 and 10 to stick/plastic in pedons 2, 4, 5 and 14. In the subsurface horizons it varied from none sticky and none plastic when wet in pedons (1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 10) to sticky and plastic when wet in pedons (4, 5 and 14); but when dry, it ranges from loose in pedon 1, 2, 3 and 10 to very hard in pedon 2 and 3 (Table 1 below).
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of soil pedons of Adami Tullu Jido Kombolcha District.

Depth (cm)

Horizon bound.

Color

Structure

Consistence

D.

T.

dry

moist

Grad

Size

Shape

dry

wet

Stick

Plastic

Pedon 1

Ap

0-17

D

S

10YR7/2

10YR2/1

WE

FI

GR

SO

SST

SPL

A

17-40

D

S

7.5YR7/3

7.5YR3/1

MO

FI

SB

SHA

SST

SPL

A1

40-73

D

S

7.5YR7/1

10YR4/1

MO

FI

AB

SHA

NST

NPL

Bw1

73-120

G

S

7.5YR6/2

7.5YR2.5/1

MO

FI

GR

SHA

NST

NPL

Bw2

120+

7.5YR7/2

10YR5/3

MO

FI

GR

LO

NST

NPL

Pedon 2

Ap

0-23

D

S

10YR5/3

10YR2/1

WE

FI

GR

SO

ST

PL

A

23-54

G

S

10YR4/2

10YR2/2

MO

FI

SB

SHA

SST

SP

A1

54-107

C

S

10YR6/2

10YR4/2

WE

FI

GR

LO

NST

NPL

Bw1

107-150

C

S

10YR7/2

10YR4/3

ST

FI

SB

HA

NST

NPL

Bw2

150+

10YR8/1

10YR6/3

ST

FI

AB

VHA

NST

NST

Pedon 3

Ap

0-18

D

S

7.5YR4/3

10YR2/1

WE

FI

GR

SO

SST

SPL

A

18-40

G

S

7.5YR4/1

10YR2/1

MO

FI

SB

SO

SST

SPL

A1

40-72

G

S

5YR6/2

10YR3/2

MO

VFI

SB

SHA

SST

SPL

Bw1

72-118

C

S

10YR8/1

10YR6/3

ST

FI

SB

VHA

NST

NPL

Bw2

118+

Glay7/1

10YR6/2

WE

VFI

SB

LO

NST

NPL

Pedon 4

Ap

0-25

D

S

5YR3/1

10YR2/1

ST

FI

GR

HA

ST

PL

A

25-60

D

S

7.5YR3/1

7.5YR2.5/1

ST

FI

SB

HA

ST

PL

A1

60-90

C

S

7.5YR3/2

7.5YR2.5/2

MO

FI

SB

HA

ST

PL

A2

90-115

C

S

7.5YR6/3

2.5YR4/4

ST

FI

SB

SHA

SST

SPL

Bw1

115-160

C

S

7.5YR7/6

10YR4/4

MO

FI

AB

SHA

SST

SPL

Bw2

160+

7.5YR6/4

10YR3/6

MO

FI

AB

SHA

SST

SPL

Pedon 5

Ap

0-40

D

S

7.5YR2.5/2

10YR4/3

ST

FI

AB

HA

ST

PL

A

40-75

D

S

7.5YR4/2

10YR3/1

ST

FI

AB

HA

ST

PL

A1

75-120

D

S

10YR5/1

10YR3/1

MO

FI

SB

HA

ST

PL

Bw1

120-170

G

S

7.5YR4/2

7.5YR2.5/2

MO

FI

SB

SHA

SST

SPL

Bw2

170+

10YR6/1

7.5YR4/1

MO

FI

AB

SHA

SST

SPL

Pedon 6

Ap

0-20

C

S

10YR5/2

7.5YR2.5/2

WE

FI

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

A

20-90

G

S

10YR7/3

2.5YR5/4

MO

FI

SB

SHA

SST

SPL

A1

90+

Gley 1 8/10y

7.5YR7/2

WE

FI

GR

SO

NST

NPL

Pedon 7

Ap

0-35

C

S

10YR5/4

10YR3/3

MO

ME

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

A

35-75

C

S

10YR5/3

7.5YR3/1

MO

ME

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

Bw1

75-110

G

S

10YR7/2

7.5YR3/3

ST

ME

AB

HA

SST

SPL

Bw2

110+

10YR6/3

7.5YR3/1

ST

ME

SB

HA

SST

SPL

Pedon 8

A

0-60

D

S

7.5YR5/1

10YR2/1

MO

ME

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

A1

60-100

D

S

7.5YR5/3

10YR3/1

MO

ME

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

B

100-150

D

S

7.5YR7/1

7.5YR3/2

MS

ME

AB

HA

SST

SPL

B1

150-180+

7.5YR7/3

7.5YR4/4

ST

ME

SB

HA

SST

SPL

Pedon 9

Ap

0-10

C

S

2.5YR6/2

7.5YR3/1

MO

FI

AB

LO

NST

NPL

A

10-20

C

S

2.5Y7/3

7.5YR4/2

MO

FI

P

SHA

NST

NPL

A1

20-35

C

S

2.5Y6/1

7.5YR3/2

ST

FI

P

SHA

NST

NPL

A2

35-50

G

S

2.5Y5/3

7.5YR4/1

ST

ME

P

SHA

NST

NPL

A3

50-80

D

S

2.5Y6/2

7.5YR6/1

ST

ME

P

SHA

NST

NPL

Bw1

80-105

D

S

2.5Y6/3

10YR6/3

ST

ME

AB

HA

NST

NPL

Bw2

105-130

D

S

2.5Y5/3

10YR7/4

ST

ME

AB

HA

NST

NPL

Bt1

130+

2.5Y5/3

10YR/6/3

ST

FI

AB

HA

NST

NPL

Pedon 10

Ap

0-15

C

S

2.5Y6/2

5YR3/1

WE

VFI

AB

LO

NST

NPL

A

15-37

G

S

2.5Y7/2

7.5YR5/3

WE

VFI

P

LO

NST

NPL

A1

37-104

C

S

10YR6/2

7.5YR7/2

WE

FI

P

SHA

NST

NPL

A2

104-164

C

S

GLEY 2. 7/10

GLEY15/N

WE

VFI

P

SO

NST

NPL

Bw1

164+

2.5Y7/2

10YR6/1

WE

ME

GR

SHA

NST

NPL

Pedon 11

Ap

0-25

C

S

10YR5/3

10YR3/1

MO

ME

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

A

25-60

G

S

7.5YR4/2

10YR2/2

MO

FI

GR

SHA

SST

SPL

A1

60-110

G

S

5YR4/4

7.5YR2.5/2

MO

FI

SB

HA

SST

SPL

Bw1

110+

5YR4/4

5YR2.5/2

MO

FI

SB

HA

SST

SPL

Pedon 12

AP

0-25

D

S

10YR5/3

10YR2/2

MO

FI

AB

SO

SST

SPL

A

5-44

D

S

10YR5/3

10YR2/1

MO

FI

ABGR

SO

SST

SPL

A1

44-55

D

S

10YR5/2

10YR2.5/2

MO

FI

GR

SO

SST

SPL

A2

55-68

D

S

10YR5/2

10YR3/2

WE

FI

GR

SO

SST

SPL

Bw1

68+

10YR5/1

10YR3/3

WE

FI

SO

SST

SST

Pedon 13

Ap

0-18

C

S

10YR4/3

10YR3/3

MO

FI

AB

SHA

SST

SPL

A

18-40

G

S

10YR6/3

10YR3/3

MO

VFI

AB

SHA

SST

SPL

A1

40-60

G

S

10YR5/3

10YR2/2

WE

VFI

AB

SO

SST

SPL

Bw1

60+

10YR5/3

10YR2/2

WE

FI

AB

SO

SST

SPL

Pedon 14

Ap

0-15

D

S

10YR5/3

7.5YR2.5/2

WE

FI

GR

SHA

ST

PL

A

15-50

D

S

10YR5/3

7.5YR2.5/2

MO

FI

SB

SHA

ST

PL

Bw1

50-100

10YR5/3

10YR2/1

WE

FI

SB

SHA

ST

PL

Abbreviations and notes: structure: FI=fine, WE=weak, MWE= moderately weak, VFI= very fine, SB=sub-angular blocky, GR=granular, AB= angular blocky, Grad=grade, Sha=shape Consistence: SO= soft, SST=slightly sticky, ST= sticky, PL=plastic, SPL=slightly plastic, MOH= moderately hard, SHA= slightly hard, SST=slightly sticky, SPL= slightly plastic, Horizon boundary: D=diffuse, D. =distinctness, T. =topography, G=gradual (5-15cm), A= abrupt (0-2cm), C=clear (2-5cm), S= Smooth, W=wavy, I= irregular
2. Horizon boundary, root distribution and some pedon characteristics
The boundaries of surface and subsurface horizons in Pedons (1, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 14) were diffuse and smooth without any change and also boundaries of surface and subsurface were the same that clear and smooth in pedon 7 and 9. Pedons 2 and 3 had diffuse and smooth lower boundaries of surface horizons grading to gradual and smooth in the subsurface horizons. Pedons 6, 10, 11 and 13 had clear and smooth lower boundaries of surface horizons grading to gradual and smooth in subsurface horizons.
As all the pedons were opened in cultivated land, few fine roots of different crops, weeds and grasses were observed in the surface horizons and subsurface horizons but decreased with depth of the pedons. Similarly, the biological activity (few earthworm channels, termite mounds channels) was higher in the surface and subsurface horizons and decreased with depth of the pedons especially in pedon 11, 12 and 14.
3.2. Soil Physical Characteristics
1. Particle size distribution and soil textural class
The particle size distribution analysis result revealed that in the surface layer all pedons were being sandy loam except pedon 4 and 8 which is clay loam and pedon 9 and 10 were sandy clay loam; pedon 14 was loam; whereas in subsurface the texture of horizons of pedon 2, 3, 6, 9, 10 11 and 12 were sandy loam; the left pedons were characterized by loam, clay loam, sandy clay loam and sandy loam (Table 2).
2. Bulk and Particle Densities
The bulk density of soils in the surface horizons ranged from 0.95 to 1.18 g cm−3, in pedon 8 and 4 respectively and the corresponding values for the subsurface horizon ranged from 0.96 to 1.31 in pedon 9 and 11 respectively gcm−3 (Table 2) Following the variation in bulk density; total porosity of the soils also indicated differences within the horizons of pedon and among the pedons. Accordingly, in surface horizons it ranged from 55.47% in pedon 4 to 64.15% in pedon 8 (Table 2) while in subsurface horizons it ranged from 50.56% in pedon 11 (110+ cm) to 63.77% in pedon 9 (35-50cm) (Table 2). Nevertheless, this variation did not exhibit any consistent trend with topographic position and with soil depth in all pedons of the study area except pedon 12, 13 and which decreases down soil profiles. The higher value of total porosity in the surface horizons could be due to the effect of management, penetration of crop roots that loosen the soil as well as comparatively higher OM content of the district. This is in line with the finding of who reported decrease in total porosity with soil depth as a result of increasing compaction, decreasing of rooting effect and organic matter content.
Table 2. Physical characteristics of soil of Adami Tullu Jido Kombolcha district.

Horizon

Depth (cm)

Ρb (g/cm3)

TP (%)

Particle size (%)

Sand

Silt

Clay

Textural classes

Pedon 1

Ap

0-17

1.05

60.38

68

20

12

Sandy loam

A

17-40

1.07

59.62

36

46

18

Loam

A1

40-73

1.08

59.24

67

22

11

Sandy loam

Bw1

73-120

1.1

58.49

69

18

13

Sandy loam

Bw2

120+

1.11

58.11

55

28

17

Sandy loam

Pedon 2

Ap

0-23

1.04

60.76

73

20

7

Sandy loam

A

23-54

1.05

60.38

69

24

7

Sandy Loam

A1

54-107

1.06

60

53

36

11

Sandy loam

Bw1

107-150

1.09

58.87

51

32

17

Sandy loam

Bw2

150+

1.1

58.49

51

32

17

Sandy loam

Pedon 3

Ap

0-18

0.98

63.01

59

32

9

Sandy loam

A

18-40

1.01

61.89

67

22

11

Sandy Loam

A1

40-72

1.04

60.76

69

18

13

Sandy loam

Bw1

72-118

1.11

58.11

59

26

15

Sandy loam

Bw2

118+

1.18

55.47

55

28

17

Sandy loam

Pedon 4

Ap

0-25

1.18

55.47

44

30

26

Clay loam

A

25-60

1.26

52.45

42

30

28

Clay loam

A1

60-90

1.22

53.96

44

29

27

Clay loam

A2

90-115

1.15

56.60

56

28

16

Sandy loam

Bw1

115-160

1.04

60.76

54

30

16

Sandy loam

Bw2

160+

1.1

58.49

68

26

6

Sandy loam

Pedon 5

Ap

0-40

1.05

60.38

56

30

14

Sandy loam

A

40-75

1.07

59.62

34

48

18

Loam

A1

75-120

1.102

58.42

36

46

18

Loam

Bw1

120170

1.103

58.38

54

27

19

Sandy Loam

Bw2

170+

1.106

58.26

56

24.5

19.5

Sandy loam

Pedon 6

Ap

0-20

1.01

61.89

64

30

6

Sandy loam

A

20-90

1.02

61.51

68

24

8

Sandy loam

A1

90+

1.11

58.11

69

23

8

Sandy loam

Pedon 7

Ap

0-35

1.01

61.89

54

34

12

Sandy loam

A

35-75

1.04

60.76

48

44

8

loam

Bw1

75-110

1.08

59.25

56

32

12

Sandy loam

Bw2

110+

1.12

57.74

69

23

8

Sandy loam

Pedon 8

Ap

0-60

0.95

64.15

42

30

28

Clay loam

A

60-100

0.98

63.02

44

28

24

clay loam

B1

100-150

1.125

57.55

58

30

12

Sandy loam

B2

150-180

1.135

57.17

42

32

26

Clay loam

Pedon 9

Ap

0-10

1.03

61.13

44

28

24

Sandy Clay Loam

A

10-20

1.06

60.00

45.5

30

24.5

Sandy clay loam

A1

20-35

1.10

58.49

42

32

26

Sandy clay loam

A2

35-50

0.96

63.77

41.5

32

26.5

Sandy clay loam

A3

50-80

0.98

63.02

69

23

8

Sandy loam

Bw1

80-105

1.02

61.51

58

32

10

Sandy loam

Bw2

105-130

1.01

61.89

54

32

14

Sandy loam

Bt1

130+

1.05

60.38

59

29

12

Sandy loam

Pedon 10

Ap

0-15

1.07

59.62

70

18

12

Sandy clay loam

A

15-37

1.10

58.49

63.78

27.22

9

Sandy clay loam

A1

37-104

1.12

57.74

66

24

10

Sandy clay loam

A2

104-164

0.98

63.02

63

27

10

Sandy loam

Bw1

164+

0.98

63.02

57

30

13

Sandy loam

Pedon 11

Ap

0-25

1.15

56.60

58

36

6

Sandy loam

A

25-60

1.18

55.47

56

28

16

Sandy loam

A1

60-110

1.203

54.60

69

23

8

Sandy loam

Bw1

110+

1.31

50.56

68

24

6

Sandy loam

Pedon 12

AP

0-25

1.02

61.51

65.78

29.22

5

Sandy loam

A

25-44

1.15

56.60

63.78

29.22

7

Sandy loam

A1

44-55

1.21

54.34

61.78

29.22

9

Sandy loam

A2

55-68

1.24

53.21

69.78

21.22

9.5

Sandy loam

Bw1

68+

1.27

52.1

65.78

25.22

11

Sandy loam

Pedon 13

Ap

0-18

1.03

61.13

65.78

29.22

5

Sandy loam

A

18-40

1.08

59.25

47.78

45.22

7

Loam

A1

40-60

1.20

54.72

81.78

9.22

9

Sandy loam

Bw1

60+

1.23

53.6

53.78

35.22

11

Sandy loam

Pedon 14

Ap

0-25

1.03

61.13

49.78

45.22

5

Loam

A

25-50

1.2

54.72

48.78

45.22

6

Loam

Bw1

50-100+

1.28

51.7

47.78

45.22

7

Loam

3.3. Soil Chemical Characteristics
1. Soil pH, EC, TN, OC and Av. P
The pH-H2O values of the surface horizons of the soils ranged from 6.72 in pedon 8 to 10.2 in pedon 10, in the subsurface horizon it ranged from 6.95 in pedon 1 to 10.91 in pedon 9 (Table 3 below). The soil pedon 9 and 10 opened at the lower altitude of the district had relatively higher pH-H2O (10 & 10.2) on the surface than those of the upper pedons 4 and 8. The pH-H2O values showed a slightly increasing trend with soil depth in pedon 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and pedon 11 and 13 shows decreasing trend; whereas in pedons 4, 5, 12 and 14, it did not show any consistency with increasing depth. As per ratings of [18], most of pH-H2O range of the studied soils at surface fall under the moderately alkaline (7.4-8.0) and only two pedons (Pedon 9 & 10) falls under strongly alkaline (>8.0) soil reaction range, which is fairly optimal for availability of most nutrients and activities of microorganisms (Table 3).
Table 3. Soil chemical parameters of the district.

Horizon

depth (cm)

pH (H2O)

EC (ds/m)

TN (%)

OC (%)

Av.P (mgkg-1)

Ca

Mg

Na

k

CEC

PBS%

ESP%

cmol(+) kg-1

Pedon 1

Ap

0-17

6.92

0.16

0.13

2.3

8.25

14.2

2.84

0.47

2.63

23.13

87.07

2.33

A

17-40

6.95

0.164

0.11

2.02

8.33

15.2

2.81

0.62

1.81

23.42

87.28

3.03

A1

40-73

7.35

0.17

0.08

1.03

6.46

9.64

1.67

0.63

1.54

17.55

76.81

4.67

Bw1

73-120

7.55

0.254

0.03

0.12

5.32

7.88

1.58

0.55

1.13

15.43

72.20

4.94

Bw2

120+

7.64

0.23

0.022

0.04

4.82

7.13

1.45

0.72

1.04

13.38

77.28

6.96

Pedon 2

Ap

0-23

7.45

0.152

0.143

1.65

9.5

12.3

2.79

0.54

1.84

19.14

91.27

3.09

A

23-54

7.65

0.211

0.12

1.31

8.95

13.6

2.18

0.61

1.80

21.45

84.8

3.35

A1

54-107

7.68

0.281

0.031

0.12

8.12

12.5

2.21

0.252

1.12

17.73

90.71

1.57

Bw1

107-150

7.84

0.29

0.024

0.09

6.5

9.41

1.74

0.281

1.05

14.83

84.16

2.25

Bw2

150+

7.84

0.293

0.032

0. 04

4.5

7.12

1.71

0.32

2.13

13.84

81.50

2.84

Pedon 3

Ap

0-18

7.09

0.118

0.145

1.64

7.25

14.84

1.56

0.87

2.19

19.92

97.69

4.6

A

18-40

7.55

0.143

0.134

1.22

5.33

12.3

1.4

0.93

1.83

17.34

94.93

5.65

A1

40-72

7.64

0.174

0.084

1.13

4.46

12.7

1.28

0.35

1.93

17.44

93.23

2.15

Bw1

72-118

7.71

0.177

0.063

0.12

1.32

9.48

1.94

0.3

1.42

18.13

77.05

8.1

Bw2

118+

7.76

0.189

0.081

0.08

1.82

6.45

2.35

0.34

1.7

13.13

82.56

3.13

Pedon 4

Ap

0-25

6.8

0.116

0.141

2.62

8.83

21.8

4.3

0.68

2.34

32.78

88.83

2.34

A

25-60

7.65

0.144

0.133

2.59

8.16

21.1

6.34

0.69

1.78

32.68

91.52

2.31

A1

60-90

7.63

0.170

0.072

1.38

7.34

19.8

6.7

0.69

2.21

31.56

93.16

2.35

A2

90-115

7.52

0.187

0.061

1.33

5.13

19.2

6.5

1.31

2.14

31.13

93.64

4.49

Bw1

115-160

7.24

0.188

0.060

1.22

3.14

17.3

5.7

1.46

2.22

29.77

89.62

5.47

Bw2

160+

7.74

0.23

0.054

1.2

3.13

14.3

5.7

1.52

2.5

27.73

86.62

6.33

Pedon 5

AP

0-40

7.95

0.151

0.158

2.03

8.53

20.8

3.57

0.64

2.54

31.55

87.32

2.32

A

40-75

8.55

0.157

0.142

2.21

7.24

19.3

4.12

0.567

2.64

31.05

85.75

2.13

A1

75-120

8.65

0.17

0.085

0.07

4.52

15.3

4.82

0.621

3.01

26.21

90.62

2.61

Bw1

120-170

7.81

0.274

0.072

0.14

4.32

13.2

5.72

0.68

3.18

25.02

91.05

2.98

Bw2

170

8.04

0.268

0.045

0.11

2.36

10.2

5.75

0.78

3.21

23.73

84.03

3.91

Pedon 6

AP

0-20

7.45

0.22

0.137

2.81

9.25

17.2

4.5

1.12

1.81

27.52

89.5

4.55

A

20-90

7.85

0.251

0.084

1.34

6.66

14.1

4.32

1.31

1.78

24.84

86.6

6.09

A1

90+

7.87

0.273

0.062

1.31

6.32

12.44

3.34

1.35

1.64

19.73

95.13

7.19

Pedon 7

Ap

0-35

7.19

0.12

0.18

2.05

8.72

14.78

4.82

0.13

2.03

23.56

92.36

0.6

A

35-75

8.1

0.16

0.23

1.84

8.62

14.5

4.8

0.56

2.98

24.59

92.88

2.45

Bw1

75-110

8.14

0.19

0.11

0.63

6.46

12.54

3.7

0.84

1.15

19.48

93.58

4.61

Bw2

110+

8.22

0.21

0.06

0.42

4.41

8.23

4.12

1.16

2.17

17.21

91.12

7.4

Pedon 8

A

0-60

6.72

0.31

0.24

2.85

7.95

19.78

3.82

0.18

1.11

27.36

90.97

0.72

A1

60-100

7.65

0.39

0.21

1.94

8.12

19.23

3.91

0.66

1.08

28.57

87.08

2.65

B1

100-150

7.74

0.45

0.11

0.75

8.46

14.13

2.21

0.64

1.02

19.47

92.45

3.55

B2

150-180

7.82

0.63

0.06

0.04

5.31

9.45

2.51

1.26

0.65

14.84

93.46

9.08

Pedon 9

Ap

0-10

10

3.55

0.08

1.2

6.02

8.51

2.5

10.1

2.2

39.88

60.96

43.33

A

10-20

10

4.01

0.11

0.85

5.84

8.01

3.4

9.92

2.12

38.82

60.41

42.3

A1

20-35

10.01

4.12

0.03

0.32

3.14

7.14

3.4

9.87

2.41

37.58

59.1

43.25

A2

35-50

10.1

4.14

0.02

0.12

4.34

7.12

3.12

8.85

2.44

36.85

58.43

41.11

A3

50-80

10.41

5.05

0.1

0.06

2.12

6.5

3.3

8.62

1.24

33.25

59.13

43.85

Bw1

80-105

10.63

5.03

0.02

0.042

2.32

6.55

3.2

7.94

1.54

31.95

60.2

41.3

Bw2

105-130

10.69

5.01

0.03

0.04

1.33

5.45

2.2

7.12

1.38

27.25

59.27

44.08

Bt1

130+

10.91

5.26

0.01

0.022

2.12

5.13

2.1

6.86

1.46

27.32

56.92

44.12

Pedon 10

Ap

0-15

10.2

1.21

0.11

1.28

9.27

7.42

1.85

9.5

2.17

38.28

54.70

45.37

A

15-37

10.12

1.12

0.11

1.01

8.4

7.33

1.75

9.3

2.14

38.11

53.84

45.32

A1

37-104

10.38

1.2

0.04

0.23

5.7

6.81

1.55

8.7

2.13

37.53

51.13

45.34

A2

104-164

10.41

2.21

0.023

0.055

6.3

6.74

1.5

8.12

2.11

35.53

51.98

43.96

Bw1

164+

10.65

2.24

0.02

0.05

3.28

6.65

1.43

7.68

2.15

35.17

50.92

42.88

Pedon 11

Ap

0-25

8.89

0.26

0.23

1.94

7.25

18.78

3.83

0.36

1.92

25.83

96.36

1.45

A

25-60

8.55

0.06

0.11

0.8

7.04

16.85

3.8

0.64

2.93

25.23

96.00

2.64

A1

60-110

7.74

0.1

0.04

0.65

6.74

16.65

2.62

0.59

3.06

26.54

86.36

2.57

Bw1

110+

7.64

0.11

0.02

0.23

6.54

13.74

2.82

0.55

3.12

22.12

91.45

2.72

Pedon 12

Ap

0-25

7.8

0.12

0.145

2.72

4.72

12.54

2.35

0.261

3.46

22.46

82.86

1.4

A

25-44

7.65

0.14

0.133

2.09

3.75

12.11

2.35

0.500

3.35

22.23

82.38

2.73

A1

44-55

7.63

0.15

0.072

1.28

3.24

10.13

1.58

0.935

1.34

20.45

69.1

6.685

A2

55-68

7.42

0.17

0.061

0.52

3.21

8.84

1.57

0.826

1.13

19.97

61.84

6.68

Bw1

68-90+

7.74

0.18

0.060

0.4

2.26

7.88

1.57

0.674

0.95

18.26

60.7

6.1

Pedon 13

AP

0-18

7.59

0.11

0.125

2.41

3.42

12.15

1.57

0.304

3.36

21.23

81.9

1.75

A

18-40

7.56

0.15

0.092

2.16

3.14

11.76

1.57

0.370

3.23

21.15

80.01

2.18

A1

40-60

7.55

0.17

0.081

1.64

1.54

10.44

2.35

0.391

2.41

20.01

77.95

2.5

Bw1

60+

7.50

0.24

0.072

1.52

2.94

9.41

2.35

0.761

2.24

19.75

74.74

5.15

Pedon 14

Ap

0-15

7.59

0.14

0.123

2.23

3.21

11.85

1.58

0.326

2.71

19.18

85.85

1.98

A

15-50

7.29

0.066

0.092

2.81

3.05

9.22

2.74

0.346

2.59

19.1

78.0

2.32

Bw1

50-100+

7.48

0.17

0.072

2.1

2.42

9.02

3.53

1.39

1.16

17.89

84.40

9.2

The overall slightly variation of the EC values for surface horizon of the soils ranged from 0.11 in pedon 13 to 3.55 mmh in pedon 9 at the shore of lake Abjeta; while subsurface EC ranged from 0.060 mmh in pedon 11 to 5.26 mmh in pedon 9 (Table 3). There was increasing trend of EC down the horizons in pedons 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13, whereas, in others pedons there was no increasing/decreasing trend.
2. Soil Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen and Available Phosphorus
The organic carbon content in the surface horizons of the soils ranged from 1.2% in pedon 9 to 2.85% in pedon 8, whereas in subsurface it ranged from 0.022% in pedon 9 (beyond 130+ cm at horizon 8) to 2.81 in pedon 14 (15-50 cm) (Table 3). The Organic carbon content of the soils of study area showed decreasing trend with soil depth in all soil horizons throughout Pedons of the study area except Pedon 5 and 14 which are inconsistency with soil depth. The OC content of the soils of the district were in the range of moderate at the surface except pedon 9 and 10 which are classified under low; whereas at the subsurface soil horizons it ranged from very low to moderate in the study area (Table 3 above). The total nitrogen in the surface horizons of the soils ranged from 0.08% in pedon 9 to 0.24% in pedon 8, whereas in the subsurface horizons it ranged from 0.01% in pedon 9 (130+ cm at the bottom of horizon) to 0.23% in the pedon 7 (35-75 cm) (Table 3). Generally, total N content of the soils was comparatively higher in the surface horizons and showed a decreasing trend with soil depth in most pedons of the study area excluding pedon 2, 3, 7 and 9. As per total N (%) content rating set by , the total N content of the soils is under medium range at surface of pedons except pedon 9 and 10 which found at low, while in the subsurface of pedons of district it was rating from very low to moderate.
The available phosphorus (Av.P) content of the soils in the surface horizons ranged from 3.21mgkg-1 in pedon 14 to 9.5mgkg-1 in pedon 2, while in the subsurface horizons it ranged from 1.32mgkg-1 in pedon 3 (72-118cm) to 8.95 mgKg-1 in pedon 2 (23-54cm) (Table 3). There was inconsistency trend of this parameter with soil depth in soil pedons 2, 3, 8, 9, 10 and 13 down the soil profiles of study area; the rest soil pedons had decreasing trend down the soil horizons. According to (Cotteine, 1980) available phosphorus in the study area ranged from very low to moderate. The higher available phosphorus content in surface horizon of all pedons as compared to the subsurface horizons could be attributed to the application of phosphorus containing fertilizers and animal manure to improve production as per information obtained from stakeholders, as well as relatively higher OC content. This is in agreement with the finding of who reported that the higher available phosphorus in the top soil layer of farmland which may be due to the application of animal manure, compost, household wastes like ashes and ammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizer for soil fertility management.
3. Exchangeable Cations, Cation Exchange Capacity and Percent Base Saturation
The exchangeable Ca content of the soils in surface horizons ranged from 7.42 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 10 to 21.8 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 4 and in subsurface horizons it ranged from 5.13 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 9 to 21.1 cmol(+) kg-1 soil (25-60 cm depth) in pedon 4. Exchangeable K ranged from 1.11 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 8 to 3.46 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 12 at the surface and at subsurface it ranged from 0.65 cmol(+) kg-1 in pedon 8 (150-180 cm depth at the bottom of profile) to 3.35 cmol(+) kg-1 in pedon 12. As per rating set by , the soils in the study area were in the range of moderate to very high in their exchangeable Ca and very high in their exchangeable K contents with some horizons fall under high rating (Table 3 above).
The exchangeable Na content of the soils ranged from 0.13 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 7 to 10.1 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 9 at the surface pedons and at subsurface horizons Na ranged from 0.252 cmol(+) kg-1 in pedon 2 to 9.92 cmol(+) kg-1 in pedon 9; while exchangeable Mg had the values at surface ranged from 1.56 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 3 to 4.82 cmol(+) kg-1 soil in pedon 7; at the subsurface horizons it ranged from 1.28 cmol(+) kg-1 in pedon 3 to 6.7 cmol(+) kg-1 in pedon 4.
The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soils of the study area in the surface horizons ranged from 19.14 cmol (+) kg-1 soil in pedon 2 to 38.88 cmol (+) kg-1 soil in pedon 9; while in subsurface horizons it ranged from 13.13 cmol (+) kg-1 soil in pedon 3 to 38.82 at pedon 9 (Table 3 above). The CEC of the soils of the study area were moderate to high in surface and subsurface horizons for all pedons.
The percent base saturation (PBS) in surface horizons varied from 54.70% in pedon 10 to 97.69% in pedon 3; while the subsurface PBS varied from 50.92% in pedon 10 to 96.00% in pedon 11; it was within the range of moderate to very high (Table 3) based on ratings set .
3.4. Soil Classification
The soils were classified based on both morphological and physicochemical properties of soils following the WRB for soil resources (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015). The identification of the diagnostic soil characteristics (diagnostic horizons, properties and materials) was performed based on the morphological profile description and physicochemical soil laboratory analysis data; and the presence or absence of specific diagnostic soil characteristics was employed to distinguish the reference soil groups (RSGs) as given in the employed classification system following the classification “Key” provided for the purpose.
Accordingly, some of the pedons had granular structured dark surface horizons of ≥25 cm in thickness that have moist color notation of 10YR (2/1, 4/3, 3/3, 3/1, 2/2) by pedon 4, 5, 7, 8 11 and 12 with the surface horizons of <25 cm in thickness that have color notation of 10YR 2/1, by pedons 1, 2 and 3, and 7.5YR2.5/2, 7.5YR3/1, 5YR3/1, 10YR3/3, 7.5YR2.5/2 by pedon 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14 respectively.
The organic carbon content of the surface horizons of the pedons ranged from 1.2% to 2.85% with percent base saturation values of greater than 50% or more throughout the profiles by 1M NH4OAc analysis method at PH7. Such morphological features indicate the existence of a chernic surface diagnostic horizon as a type of a mollic horizon.
Pedons 2, 4, 5, 8 and 10, 12, 13 and 14 had well drained effective soil depth of more than 150cm, whereas pedons, 6, 7 and 11 had soil depth of 90+, 110+ cm and similarly pedon 3, 2, 9 had soil depth of 118, 120 and 130 cm respectively. Moreover, all the pedon horizons below the upper most layer had base saturation of greater than 80% (hypereutric). Most of the pedons had cambic horizon with the textural classes of sandy loam with a munsell color of hue ≥2.5 moist and chroma ≥1 at moist with a clay content of ≥4%. Pedon 9 and 10 had a texture of sandy clay loam or finer, a clay increment downs the profile, an angular blocky structure at the surface horizons and prismatic structure for the subsurface horizons. The profile had exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) greater than 42 throughout the profile. Moreover, the color of the surface horizon ranged between brown and black. According to WRB (FAO, 2014) such characteristics are typically natric. It has a high content of exchangeable Na and in some cases, a relatively high content of exchangeable Mg. The soil is classified under Solonetz with Haplic and Arenic prefix and suffix qualifiers.
Pedon, 5, 12, 13 and 14 had a texture of sandy loam and loam a clay increment down the profile, an angular blocky structure at the surface horizons having between 25 and 150 cm of the soil surface a layer, ≥ 30 cm thick with Munsell colour hue redder than 7.5YR and a chroma of > 4, both moist also having a vertic horizon starting ≤ 100 cm from the soil surface. Accordingly, such characteristics are typically classified as Chromic Veritsols (haplic, hypereutric).
Pedon 1, 2, 3 and 4 has a relatively thick, dark-colored surface horizon with a high base saturation and the color notation of its soil material and its organic carbon content fulfill the diagnostic criteria of a mollic horizon. The clay content of the profiles gradually increased with depth without any distinct difference in clay content; and the color brightness of the horizons increased with depth. All the pedon layers were presumed to be a part of alleviated subsoil due to their markedly higher clay content that showed the presence of an argic (argillic) diagnostic subsurface horizon in the subsoil of the pedon. Based on the above information, the soil represented by the profile of pedon 1, 2, 3 and 4 is classified as Luvic Phaeozem (Clayic, and Hypereutric).
Pedon 6 had textural class of sandy loam or finer or loamy with Munsell colour hue ≥ 2.5 units redder, moist; or a Munsell colour chroma ≥ 1 unit higher, moist; or a clay content ≥ 4%. moist color notation of 10YR 3/2 by horizon 1 and a color notation of 10YR 3/1 with a combined thickness of ≥ 30 cm (in Cambisols ≥ 15 cm), of which ≥ 15 cm (in Cambisols ≥ 7.5cm) have andic properties with no argic properties. The soil is classified Vitric Andosols (vitric principal qualifier and Arenic/clayic supplementary qualifier.
Pedon 11 had organic carbon content of the surface horizons of the pedons ranged from 1.94% to 0.23% in sub surface horizon with percent base saturation values of greater than 50% or more throughout the profiles by 1M NH4OAc analysis method at pH7. Additionally, the occurrence of any form of secondary (pedogenic) carbonates could not be observed throughout the profile of all pedons. The pedons had granular structured dark surface horizons of ≥25 cm in thickness with moist color notation of 10YR 3/2 fulfilled mollic horizon and one or more layers with andic or vitric properties with a combined thickness of either ≥ 30 cm, within ≤ 100 cm of the soil surface and starting ≤ 25 cm from the soil surface with no argic properties. The soil is classified as Mollic Andosols (vitiric, clayic) qualifiers.
Pedon 7 and 8 had well drained effective soil depth with 110 and 180 cm respectively. The pedons had granular structured gradually changed to angular and sub angular blocky with dark surface horizons of ≥25 cm in thickness with moist color notation of 10YR 3/2. The Pedons had organic carbon content of the surface horizons of the pedons ranged from 2.05 to 0.42% at pedon 7 and 2.85 to 0.22% at pedon 8 in sub surface horizon with percent base saturation values of greater than 50% or more throughout the profiles by 1M NH4OAc analysis method at pH7 respectively fulfilled molllic horizon. Moreover, the pedons horizons below the uppermost layer had base saturation of greater than 80% (hypereutric). Most of the pedons had cambic horizon with the textural classes of sandy loam and clay loam with a munsell color of hue ≥2.5 moist and chroma ≥1 at moist with a clay content of ≥4%one or more layers with andic or vitric properties with a combined thickness of either ≥ 30cm. The soil is classified as mollic Andosols (vitiric, clayic) qualifiers.
Figure 3. Soil classification map of Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District.
4. Conclusion
The soil morphological characteristics (horizon, horizon boundary, depth, color, structure, texture, structure and consistence), Soil physical characteristics (Particle size distribution and soil textural class, bulk and particle densities and soil total porosity), and soil chemical characteristics (Soil pH, electrical conductivity, TN, OC, Av. P, Exchangeable Cations, Cation Exchange Capacity and Percent Base Saturation) and slope were described. The bulk density of soils in the surface horizons ranged from 0.95 to 1.18 g cm−3, in pedon 8 and 4 respectively and the corresponding values for the subsurface horizon ranged from 0.96 to 1.31 in pedon 9 and 11 respectively g cm−3. Total porosity of the soils in surface horizons ranged from 55.47% in pedon 4 to 64.15% in pedon 8; while in subsurface horizons it ranged from 50.56% in pedon 11 to 63.77% in pedon 9.
The OC content of the soils of the District were in the range of moderate at the surface except pedon 9 and 10 which are classified under low; whereas at the subsurface soil horizons it ranged from very low to moderate, total N content of the soils in the district is under medium range at surface of pedons except pedon 9 and 10 which found at low, while in the subsurface of pedons of District it was rating from very low to moderate. The available phosphorus (Av.P) content of the soils in the surface horizons ranged from very low to moderate.
5. Recommendations
Almost all of the studied soil properties varied from pedon to pedon most likely due to variation in slope gradient, elevation, parent material, and soil management practices. The soils of the study area were low in organic matter, available P and total nitrogen content in all the cultivated lands, which were identified as production constraints. Special emphasis should be given to soil OM management as it plays a major role in soil physical, chemical, and biological quality. Additionally, integrated soil fertility management should be implemented in the area to optimize and sustain crop production. It can also be recommended that increasing the level of organic matter through continuous application of manure, compost or by any other mechanism, should be integrated with the use of chemical fertilizers.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Oromia Agricultural Research Institute for financial support provided during whole activity. We also provide thanks to Batu Soil Research Center for providing necessary attention and follow up to conduct the research successfully.
Author Contributions
Bekele Abebe Ayalew: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Hussein Namu Kurse: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Reta Worku Megersa: Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Abdenna Deressa, Bikila Bote and Hirpha Legesse. 2013. Evaluation of soil cations in agricultural soils of east WollegaZone in Southwestern Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Resarch Journal, 2(1): 10-17.
[2] Alem Hagos Hailu. 2014. Characterization and Classification of Soils and Land Suitability Evaluation of Kabe Subwatershed in South Wollo Zone, Northeastern Ethiopia. An MSc Thesis submitted to the school of graduate studies of Haramaya University. Haramaya, Ethiopia. 35 p.
[3] Alemayehu Seyoum, Dorosh, P. and Sinafikeh Asrat. 2011. Crop production in Ethiopia: Regional patterns and trends. Development strategy and governance division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Ethiopia strategy support program II, working paper 0016. Ethiopia.
[4] Ashenafi Ali, Abayneh Esayas and Sheleme Beyene. 2010. Characterizing soils of DelboWegen watershed, Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia, for planning appropriate land management. Journal of Soil Science and Environment Management, 1(8): 184-189.
[5] Badege Bishaw. 2009. Deforestation and land degradation in the Ethiopian highlands: A strategy for physical recovery. Ethiopian e-journal for research and innovation foresight, 1(1): 5-8.
[6] Bationo, A., Hartemink, A., Lungu, O., Naimi, M., Okoth, P., Smaling, E. and Thiombiano, L. 2006. African Soils: Their productivity and profitability of fertilizer use. Background paper prepared for the African fertilizer summit, Abuja, Nigeria.
[7] EEPCo (Ethiopia Electric Power Corporation), 2013. Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Geothermal Sector Development Project For Aluto Geothermal Site Development.
[8] Esu, I. E (2005). Soil characterization and mapping for food security. A Keynote Address at the 29th annual conf. of SSSN held at University of Nigeria, Abeokuta, from 6th to 10th Dec. 2004.
[9] Eswaran, H. (1977). Soil Analysis for Soil Surveys. In: Soil Resource Inventories. A proceeding of workshop held at Cornell University, Ithaca, USA, pp 315-324.
[10] FAO (2006). Guidelines for Soil Description. Fourth Edition. 109 pp Fetter, C. W (1998). AppliedHydrogeology, Macmillan publishing co. New York.
[11] IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute). 2010. Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia. Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system.
[12] Jagdish P, Ray SK, Gajbhiye K. S. and Singh S. R. 2009. Soil of Selsura Research farm in Wardha District, Maharashtra and their suitability for crops. Agropedology, 19: 84-91.
[13] Kebede Tesfaye. 2010. Assessment of on-farm breeding practices and estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters for reproductive and survival traits in indigenous Arsi Bale goats. M. Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Dire Dewa, Ethiopia.
[14] Ogunwale, J. O, Aliyu, L. and Ojeniyi, S. O (Eds). Soil and water management forpoverty alleviation and sustainable Environment Proceedings of the 31st annual conf. of SSSN/ABUZaria Nig. Nov. 13th to 17th, 2006.
[15] Pulakeshi, H. B., Patil, P. L., Dasog, G. S. 2014. Characterization and classification of soil resources derived from chlorite schist in northern transition zone of Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 27(1): 14-21.
[16] Schoonover, J. E., Crim, J. F. 2015. An introduction to soil concepts and the role of soils in watershed management. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education 154(1): 21-47.
[17] Sommer, R., Bossio, D., Desta, L., Dimes, J., Kihara, J., Koala, S., Mango, N., Rodriguez, D., Thierfelder, C. and Winowiecki, L. 2013. Profitable and sustainable nutrient management systems for east and southern African smallholder farming systems Challenges and 15 opportunities. A synthesis of the eastern and southern Africa situation in terms of past experiences, present and future opportunities in promoting nutrients use in Africa.
[18] Tekalign Tadese. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Megersa, B. A., Kurse, H. N., Megersa, R. W. (2025). Characterization, Classification and Mapping of Soil Resources in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of East Shewa Zone, Oromia. Science Development, 6(3), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Megersa, B. A.; Kurse, H. N.; Megersa, R. W. Characterization, Classification and Mapping of Soil Resources in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of East Shewa Zone, Oromia. Sci. Dev. 2025, 6(3), 97-113. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Megersa BA, Kurse HN, Megersa RW. Characterization, Classification and Mapping of Soil Resources in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of East Shewa Zone, Oromia. Sci Dev. 2025;6(3):97-113. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17,
      author = {Bekele Abebe Megersa and Hussein Namu Kurse and Reta Worku Megersa},
      title = {Characterization, Classification and Mapping of Soil Resources in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of East Shewa Zone, Oromia
    },
      journal = {Science Development},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {97-113},
      doi = {10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scidev.20250603.17},
      abstract = {A study was undertaken in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of Oromia region, Ethiopia, to investigate the site, morphological and physico-chemical characteristics, classification and mapping of soils. Fourteen soil pedons at representative sites were described and 66 disturbed and undisturbed soil samples from identified horizons were taken for laboratory analysis. The data obtained showed that the soils varied from moderate to very deep, well drained, the surface soil color at (dry) varied from light gray (10YR 7/2) to very dark brown (7.5YR 2.5/2); at moist varied from brown (10YR4/3) to black (10YR2/1), while the subsurface color varied from white (10YR 8/1) to black (7.5YR 3/1,) at dry conditions and at moist condition the color varied from light gray (7.5YR 7/2) to black (7.5YR 2.5/1), the structure in the surface layers of the pedons 1, 2, 3, 6, 14 had weak fine granular and gradually in subsurface changed to Moderate fine sub angular blocky in the same pedons; Strong fine granular at surface changed to strong fine sub angular blocky in pedon 4; Strong fine angular blocky in pedon 5 and moderate medium granular in pedon 7 and 8 at surface and subsurface without gradual change. The values of the determined soil physical characteristics revealed that sand, silt, clay, bulk density and total porosity ranged from 34 to 81.78%, 9.22 to 48%, 5 to 28%, 0.95 to 1.31 g cm-3, 50.56 to 64.15% respectively. Moreover, the soils were neutral (pH 6.7 to 7.3) to strongly alkaline (pH >8.0), salt free (-1) except pedon 9 and 10 near to lake Abjeta. Soil organic matter content ranged from very low to moderate in and total N ranged very low to moderate, available phosphorus ranged from very low to low respectively. Soil exchangeable Ca2+ ranged from moderate to high (5.13 to 21.8 cmol(+) kg-1), high to very high in exchangeable K (0.65 to 3.46 cmol(+) kg-1), moderate to high in Mg (1.28 to 6.7 cmol(+) kg-1), low to very high in exchangeable Na (0.13 to 10.1 cmol(+) kg-1) and, moderate to high CEC (13.13 to 38.88% cmol(+) kg-1) and moderate to very high PBS (50.92 to 97.69%), respectively. Soil of the district was classified as chromic vertisols, Luvic phaeozems, vitric andosols, Solonetz and mollic andosols.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Characterization, Classification and Mapping of Soil Resources in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of East Shewa Zone, Oromia
    
    AU  - Bekele Abebe Megersa
    AU  - Hussein Namu Kurse
    AU  - Reta Worku Megersa
    Y1  - 2025/07/28
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17
    T2  - Science Development
    JF  - Science Development
    JO  - Science Development
    SP  - 97
    EP  - 113
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7154
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.17
    AB  - A study was undertaken in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District of Oromia region, Ethiopia, to investigate the site, morphological and physico-chemical characteristics, classification and mapping of soils. Fourteen soil pedons at representative sites were described and 66 disturbed and undisturbed soil samples from identified horizons were taken for laboratory analysis. The data obtained showed that the soils varied from moderate to very deep, well drained, the surface soil color at (dry) varied from light gray (10YR 7/2) to very dark brown (7.5YR 2.5/2); at moist varied from brown (10YR4/3) to black (10YR2/1), while the subsurface color varied from white (10YR 8/1) to black (7.5YR 3/1,) at dry conditions and at moist condition the color varied from light gray (7.5YR 7/2) to black (7.5YR 2.5/1), the structure in the surface layers of the pedons 1, 2, 3, 6, 14 had weak fine granular and gradually in subsurface changed to Moderate fine sub angular blocky in the same pedons; Strong fine granular at surface changed to strong fine sub angular blocky in pedon 4; Strong fine angular blocky in pedon 5 and moderate medium granular in pedon 7 and 8 at surface and subsurface without gradual change. The values of the determined soil physical characteristics revealed that sand, silt, clay, bulk density and total porosity ranged from 34 to 81.78%, 9.22 to 48%, 5 to 28%, 0.95 to 1.31 g cm-3, 50.56 to 64.15% respectively. Moreover, the soils were neutral (pH 6.7 to 7.3) to strongly alkaline (pH >8.0), salt free (-1) except pedon 9 and 10 near to lake Abjeta. Soil organic matter content ranged from very low to moderate in and total N ranged very low to moderate, available phosphorus ranged from very low to low respectively. Soil exchangeable Ca2+ ranged from moderate to high (5.13 to 21.8 cmol(+) kg-1), high to very high in exchangeable K (0.65 to 3.46 cmol(+) kg-1), moderate to high in Mg (1.28 to 6.7 cmol(+) kg-1), low to very high in exchangeable Na (0.13 to 10.1 cmol(+) kg-1) and, moderate to high CEC (13.13 to 38.88% cmol(+) kg-1) and moderate to very high PBS (50.92 to 97.69%), respectively. Soil of the district was classified as chromic vertisols, Luvic phaeozems, vitric andosols, Solonetz and mollic andosols.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Batu Soil Research Centre, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Batu Soil Research Centre, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Batu Soil Research Centre, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussions
    4. 4. Conclusion
    5. 5. Recommendations
    Show Full Outline
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information