Focusing on mainland China, this paper builds an integrated framework for medical device innovation management and entrepreneurship aligned with NMPA/CMDE practice, DRG/DIP payment reforms, and volume-based procurement. We translate compliance requirements—such as device classification, clinical evaluation protocols, quality and risk management systems (including standards like YY/T 0316, YY/T 0664, and GB 9706), unique device identification (UDI), and post-market surveillance—into a comprehensive compliance-by-design operating model that emphasizes proactive risk mitigation and regulatory adherence. This framework incorporates stage-gate governance processes to manage development milestones, risk-adjusted valuation methods to assess financial viability, and portfolio optimization strategies to prioritize high-impact projects. Additionally, we align evidence generation with business objectives to facilitate hospital entry and tendering processes, ensuring that clinical data supports market access and reimbursement decisions. A detailed China-specific case study of a portable hemodynamic monitor illustrates how early engagement with regulatory bodies for scientific advice, real-world pilot studies, and results-based contracting can significantly enhance expected value projections and reduce time-to-access for patients. The paper concludes by exploring policy options to foster innovation, including the establishment of software as a medical device (SaMD) and artificial intelligence (AI) sandboxes for testing, broader acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decisions, and health technology assessment (HTA) capacity building to support evidence-informed policymaking and sustainable healthcare innovation.
| Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 13, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19 |
| Page(s) | 190-193 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Medical Devices, NMPA, Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship, DRG/DIP, Portfolio Optimization
| [1] | 国务院. 医疗器械监督管理条例[Z]. 北京: 国务院, 2021: 1-50. |
| [2] | 国家药品监督管理局医疗器械技术审评中心. 医疗器械临床评价技术指导原则[R]. 北京: CMDE, 2020: 1-60. |
| [3] | 国家药品监督管理局. 创新医疗器械特别审查程序[Z]. 北京: NMPA, 2018: 1-20. |
| [4] | 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械注册审查指导原则汇编[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2022: 1-200. |
| [5] | 国家市场监督管理总局. GB 9706.1-2020 医用电气设备 第1部分: 基本安全和基本性能通用要求[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020: 1-150. |
| [6] | 国家药品监督管理局. YY/T 0316-2016 医疗器械 风险管理对医疗器械的应用[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016: 1-60. |
| [7] | 国家药品监督管理局. YY/T 0664-2008 医疗器械 软件生命周期过程[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008: 1-40. |
| [8] | 国家市场监督管理总局. GB/T 16886.1-2011 医疗器械生物学评价 第1部分: 评价与试验[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011: 1-70. |
| [9] | 国家卫生健康委员会. 医院信息互联互通标准化成熟度测评方法(试行)[R]. 北京: 国家卫健委, 2019: 1-45. |
| [10] | 国家医疗保障局. 按疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费国家试点工作方案[R]. 北京: 国家医保局, 2019: 1-30. |
| [11] | 国家医疗保障局. 按病种分值(DIP)付费指导意见[R]. 北京: 国家医保局, 2021: 1-25. |
| [12] | 博鳌乐城国际医疗旅游先行区管理局. 医疗器械真实世界研究实施方案(试行)[R]. 海口: 先行区管委会, 2020: 1-40. |
| [13] | 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械唯一标识系统规则[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2019: 1-20. |
| [14] | 中国卫生技术评估协作组. 医疗卫生技术评估通用指南(试行)[R]. 北京: 国家卫健委医政医管局, 2020: 1-60. |
| [15] | 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械分类目录(2020 版)[Z]. 北京: NMPA, 2020: 1-120. |
| [16] | 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2016: 1-36. |
| [17] | 国家组织高值医用耗材集中带量采购办公室. 集中带量采购工作规范(试行)[R]. 北京: 联采办, 2021: 1-35. |
| [18] | 海南省药监局. 真实世界数据用于医疗器械临床评价技术指南(试行)[R]. 海口: 海南省药监局, 2021: 1-28. |
| [19] | 国家卫生健康委员会. 公立医院高值医用耗材管理办法(试行)[R]. 北京: 国家卫健委, 2019: 1-22. |
| [20] | 国家药品监督管理局信息中心. 医疗器械注册电子申报与数据标准规范[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2022: 1-48. |
APA Style
Kaiwen, Z. (2025). Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China. Science Innovation, 13(6), 190-193. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
ACS Style
Kaiwen, Z. Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China. Sci. Innov. 2025, 13(6), 190-193. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
AMA Style
Kaiwen Z. Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China. Sci Innov. 2025;13(6):190-193. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
@article{10.11648/j.si.20251306.19,
author = {Zhang Kaiwen},
title = {Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China
},
journal = {Science Innovation},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
pages = {190-193},
doi = {10.11648/j.si.20251306.19},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20251306.19},
abstract = {Focusing on mainland China, this paper builds an integrated framework for medical device innovation management and entrepreneurship aligned with NMPA/CMDE practice, DRG/DIP payment reforms, and volume-based procurement. We translate compliance requirements—such as device classification, clinical evaluation protocols, quality and risk management systems (including standards like YY/T 0316, YY/T 0664, and GB 9706), unique device identification (UDI), and post-market surveillance—into a comprehensive compliance-by-design operating model that emphasizes proactive risk mitigation and regulatory adherence. This framework incorporates stage-gate governance processes to manage development milestones, risk-adjusted valuation methods to assess financial viability, and portfolio optimization strategies to prioritize high-impact projects. Additionally, we align evidence generation with business objectives to facilitate hospital entry and tendering processes, ensuring that clinical data supports market access and reimbursement decisions. A detailed China-specific case study of a portable hemodynamic monitor illustrates how early engagement with regulatory bodies for scientific advice, real-world pilot studies, and results-based contracting can significantly enhance expected value projections and reduce time-to-access for patients. The paper concludes by exploring policy options to foster innovation, including the establishment of software as a medical device (SaMD) and artificial intelligence (AI) sandboxes for testing, broader acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decisions, and health technology assessment (HTA) capacity building to support evidence-informed policymaking and sustainable healthcare innovation.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China AU - Zhang Kaiwen Y1 - 2025/12/24 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 190 EP - 193 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19 AB - Focusing on mainland China, this paper builds an integrated framework for medical device innovation management and entrepreneurship aligned with NMPA/CMDE practice, DRG/DIP payment reforms, and volume-based procurement. We translate compliance requirements—such as device classification, clinical evaluation protocols, quality and risk management systems (including standards like YY/T 0316, YY/T 0664, and GB 9706), unique device identification (UDI), and post-market surveillance—into a comprehensive compliance-by-design operating model that emphasizes proactive risk mitigation and regulatory adherence. This framework incorporates stage-gate governance processes to manage development milestones, risk-adjusted valuation methods to assess financial viability, and portfolio optimization strategies to prioritize high-impact projects. Additionally, we align evidence generation with business objectives to facilitate hospital entry and tendering processes, ensuring that clinical data supports market access and reimbursement decisions. A detailed China-specific case study of a portable hemodynamic monitor illustrates how early engagement with regulatory bodies for scientific advice, real-world pilot studies, and results-based contracting can significantly enhance expected value projections and reduce time-to-access for patients. The paper concludes by exploring policy options to foster innovation, including the establishment of software as a medical device (SaMD) and artificial intelligence (AI) sandboxes for testing, broader acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decisions, and health technology assessment (HTA) capacity building to support evidence-informed policymaking and sustainable healthcare innovation. VL - 13 IS - 6 ER -