Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China

Received: 27 October 2025     Accepted: 1 December 2025     Published: 24 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Focusing on mainland China, this paper builds an integrated framework for medical device innovation management and entrepreneurship aligned with NMPA/CMDE practice, DRG/DIP payment reforms, and volume-based procurement. We translate compliance requirements—such as device classification, clinical evaluation protocols, quality and risk management systems (including standards like YY/T 0316, YY/T 0664, and GB 9706), unique device identification (UDI), and post-market surveillance—into a comprehensive compliance-by-design operating model that emphasizes proactive risk mitigation and regulatory adherence. This framework incorporates stage-gate governance processes to manage development milestones, risk-adjusted valuation methods to assess financial viability, and portfolio optimization strategies to prioritize high-impact projects. Additionally, we align evidence generation with business objectives to facilitate hospital entry and tendering processes, ensuring that clinical data supports market access and reimbursement decisions. A detailed China-specific case study of a portable hemodynamic monitor illustrates how early engagement with regulatory bodies for scientific advice, real-world pilot studies, and results-based contracting can significantly enhance expected value projections and reduce time-to-access for patients. The paper concludes by exploring policy options to foster innovation, including the establishment of software as a medical device (SaMD) and artificial intelligence (AI) sandboxes for testing, broader acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decisions, and health technology assessment (HTA) capacity building to support evidence-informed policymaking and sustainable healthcare innovation.

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 13, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
Page(s) 190-193
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Medical Devices, NMPA, Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship, DRG/DIP, Portfolio Optimization

References
[1] 国务院. 医疗器械监督管理条例[Z]. 北京: 国务院, 2021: 1-50.
[2] 国家药品监督管理局医疗器械技术审评中心. 医疗器械临床评价技术指导原则[R]. 北京: CMDE, 2020: 1-60.
[3] 国家药品监督管理局. 创新医疗器械特别审查程序[Z]. 北京: NMPA, 2018: 1-20.
[4] 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械注册审查指导原则汇编[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2022: 1-200.
[5] 国家市场监督管理总局. GB 9706.1-2020 医用电气设备 第1部分: 基本安全和基本性能通用要求[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020: 1-150.
[6] 国家药品监督管理局. YY/T 0316-2016 医疗器械 风险管理对医疗器械的应用[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016: 1-60.
[7] 国家药品监督管理局. YY/T 0664-2008 医疗器械 软件生命周期过程[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008: 1-40.
[8] 国家市场监督管理总局. GB/T 16886.1-2011 医疗器械生物学评价 第1部分: 评价与试验[Z]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011: 1-70.
[9] 国家卫生健康委员会. 医院信息互联互通标准化成熟度测评方法(试行)[R]. 北京: 国家卫健委, 2019: 1-45.
[10] 国家医疗保障局. 按疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费国家试点工作方案[R]. 北京: 国家医保局, 2019: 1-30.
[11] 国家医疗保障局. 按病种分值(DIP)付费指导意见[R]. 北京: 国家医保局, 2021: 1-25.
[12] 博鳌乐城国际医疗旅游先行区管理局. 医疗器械真实世界研究实施方案(试行)[R]. 海口: 先行区管委会, 2020: 1-40.
[13] 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械唯一标识系统规则[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2019: 1-20.
[14] 中国卫生技术评估协作组. 医疗卫生技术评估通用指南(试行)[R]. 北京: 国家卫健委医政医管局, 2020: 1-60.
[15] 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械分类目录(2020 版)[Z]. 北京: NMPA, 2020: 1-120.
[16] 国家药品监督管理局. 医疗器械临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2016: 1-36.
[17] 国家组织高值医用耗材集中带量采购办公室. 集中带量采购工作规范(试行)[R]. 北京: 联采办, 2021: 1-35.
[18] 海南省药监局. 真实世界数据用于医疗器械临床评价技术指南(试行)[R]. 海口: 海南省药监局, 2021: 1-28.
[19] 国家卫生健康委员会. 公立医院高值医用耗材管理办法(试行)[R]. 北京: 国家卫健委, 2019: 1-22.
[20] 国家药品监督管理局信息中心. 医疗器械注册电子申报与数据标准规范[R]. 北京: NMPA, 2022: 1-48.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kaiwen, Z. (2025). Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China. Science Innovation, 13(6), 190-193. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kaiwen, Z. Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China. Sci. Innov. 2025, 13(6), 190-193. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kaiwen Z. Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China. Sci Innov. 2025;13(6):190-193. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.si.20251306.19,
      author = {Zhang Kaiwen},
      title = {Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China
    },
      journal = {Science Innovation},
      volume = {13},
      number = {6},
      pages = {190-193},
      doi = {10.11648/j.si.20251306.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20251306.19},
      abstract = {Focusing on mainland China, this paper builds an integrated framework for medical device innovation management and entrepreneurship aligned with NMPA/CMDE practice, DRG/DIP payment reforms, and volume-based procurement. We translate compliance requirements—such as device classification, clinical evaluation protocols, quality and risk management systems (including standards like YY/T 0316, YY/T 0664, and GB 9706), unique device identification (UDI), and post-market surveillance—into a comprehensive compliance-by-design operating model that emphasizes proactive risk mitigation and regulatory adherence. This framework incorporates stage-gate governance processes to manage development milestones, risk-adjusted valuation methods to assess financial viability, and portfolio optimization strategies to prioritize high-impact projects. Additionally, we align evidence generation with business objectives to facilitate hospital entry and tendering processes, ensuring that clinical data supports market access and reimbursement decisions. A detailed China-specific case study of a portable hemodynamic monitor illustrates how early engagement with regulatory bodies for scientific advice, real-world pilot studies, and results-based contracting can significantly enhance expected value projections and reduce time-to-access for patients. The paper concludes by exploring policy options to foster innovation, including the establishment of software as a medical device (SaMD) and artificial intelligence (AI) sandboxes for testing, broader acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decisions, and health technology assessment (HTA) capacity building to support evidence-informed policymaking and sustainable healthcare innovation.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Managing Medical Device Industry Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China
    
    AU  - Zhang Kaiwen
    Y1  - 2025/12/24
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
    T2  - Science Innovation
    JF  - Science Innovation
    JO  - Science Innovation
    SP  - 190
    EP  - 193
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-787X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.19
    AB  - Focusing on mainland China, this paper builds an integrated framework for medical device innovation management and entrepreneurship aligned with NMPA/CMDE practice, DRG/DIP payment reforms, and volume-based procurement. We translate compliance requirements—such as device classification, clinical evaluation protocols, quality and risk management systems (including standards like YY/T 0316, YY/T 0664, and GB 9706), unique device identification (UDI), and post-market surveillance—into a comprehensive compliance-by-design operating model that emphasizes proactive risk mitigation and regulatory adherence. This framework incorporates stage-gate governance processes to manage development milestones, risk-adjusted valuation methods to assess financial viability, and portfolio optimization strategies to prioritize high-impact projects. Additionally, we align evidence generation with business objectives to facilitate hospital entry and tendering processes, ensuring that clinical data supports market access and reimbursement decisions. A detailed China-specific case study of a portable hemodynamic monitor illustrates how early engagement with regulatory bodies for scientific advice, real-world pilot studies, and results-based contracting can significantly enhance expected value projections and reduce time-to-access for patients. The paper concludes by exploring policy options to foster innovation, including the establishment of software as a medical device (SaMD) and artificial intelligence (AI) sandboxes for testing, broader acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decisions, and health technology assessment (HTA) capacity building to support evidence-informed policymaking and sustainable healthcare innovation.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections