| Peer-Reviewed

A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust in the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Three Nigerian Geopolitical Zones

Received: 14 December 2022    Accepted: 6 January 2023    Published: 13 January 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The issue of COVID-19 vaccination is an important step in the control of the COVID-19 infection in the community. There have been different adopted strategies in the control of the infection and the best public intervention has been getting vaccinated for now. The most likely solution to ending the current pandemic remains through achieving a better community reach, and the frank acceptance of the availed WHO-approved COVID-19 vaccine in communities. In this study, the reason for the COVID-19 vaccine uptake was evaluated across 3 geopolitical zones in Nigeria with differential political affiliation. This study utilized a qualitative sample collection methodology to qualify the prevalence of different views on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, access, and political trust. The data was gathered utilizing pre-tested in-depth interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed thematically through the transcripts obtained from the open-ended key informant interviews. The findings from the qualitative studies indicated that the fear of the side effects, apathy/lack of interest, scarce logistics, people’s opinion, and self-denial were more of the pertinent issue around the poor COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the respondents. Government needs to ensure that health interventions rolled are adequately accessible to the targeted people and should consider the community culture while rolling out health interventions.

Published in World Journal of Public Health (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11
Page(s) 1-7
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, Political Trust, Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Acceptance

References
[1] Paterson P, Meurice F, Stanberry LR, Glismann S, Rosenthal SL, Larson HJ. (2016): Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers. Vaccine. 2016 20; 34 (52): 6700–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.042.
[2] Nigeria Center for Disease Control (2021): Nigerian Weekly COVID-19 Update. (Accessed online on 30th November 2021).
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (2020).
[4] BBC News. (2021). Covid-19: Study showing Oxford vaccine slows virus spread 'superb' -Hancock. Retrieved 03. 02. 2021 from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55913913
[5] International Federation of Red Cross. (2021): COVID-19: Vaccines alone will not end pandemic, warns IFRC. Retrieved 11. 01. 2021 from https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/press-release/covid-19-vaccines-alone-will-not-end-pandemic-warns-ifrc/
[6] McDonnell, A. (2020): How many Britons are willing to take a coronavirus vaccine? YouGov. Retrieved 16. 10. 2020 from https://yougov.co.uk/topics/health/articles-reports/2020/11/16/how-many-britons-are-willing-take-coronavirus-vacc
[7] Center for Countering Digital Hate. (2020). The Anti-Vaxx Industry: How Big Tech powers and profits from vaccine misinformation. https://252f2edd-1c8b-49f5-9bb2-cb57bb47e4ba.filesusr.com/ugd/f4d9b9_6910f8ab94a241cfa088953dd5e60968.pdf Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR, Accessed online Nov 14, 2022).
[8] Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J. (2021): Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav 5, 337–348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
[9] Callaghan, T. et al. (2021).: Correlates and disparities of covid-19 vaccine hesitancy. Soc. Sci. Med. 272, 113638.
[10] Krebs E, Zang X, Enns B, Min JE, Behrends CN, Del Rio C, Dombrowski JC, Feaster DJ, Gebo KA, Golden M, Marshall BDL, Metsch LR, Schackman BR, Shoptaw S, Strathdee SA, Nosyk B; Localized Economic Modeling Study Group. The impact of localized implementation: determining the cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention and care interventions across six United States cities. AIDS. 2020 Mar 1; 34 (3): 447-458. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002455. PMID: 31794521; PMCID: PMC7046093.
[11] Casiday R, Cresswell T, Wilson D, Panter-Brick C. A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority. Vaccine. 2006; 12; 24 (2): 177–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.063
[12] SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (2014): Report of the SAGE working group on vaccine hesitancy. https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/1_Report_WORKING_GROUP_vaccine_hesitancy_final.pdf (Oct 1, 2014).
[13] Ozili, P. (2022), "COVID-19 in Africa: socio-economic impact, policy response and opportunities", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 42 No. 3/4, pp. 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2020-0171
[14] Marshall, 1. (1981). Making sense as a personal process. In: P. Reason & 1. Rowan (Eds.) Human enquiry. Chichester: Wiley.
[15] Jones, S. (1985). Depth interviewing. In: R. Walker (Ed.), Applied qualitative research. Hants: Gower.
[16] Harris LM, Chin NP, Fiscella K, Humiston S. Barrier to pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations in Black elderly communities: mistrust. J Nat Med Assoc. 2006 Oct; 98 (10): 1678.
[17] King C, Leask J. The impact of a vaccine scare on parental views, trust and information needs: a qualitative study in Sydney, Australia. BMC public health. 2017 Dec; 17 (1): 106. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4032-2.
[18] LY F., Zimet GD, Latkin CA, Joseph JG. Associations of trust and healthcare provider advice with HPV vaccine acceptance among African American parents. Vaccine. 2017; 1; 35 (5): 802–7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.045.
[19] Gollust, S. E., P. M. Lantz, and P. A. Ubel. 2009. The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health 99 (12): 2160–2167.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nwoke Emmanuel Chukwuebuka, Ebenezer Obi Daniel, Oladapo Michael Olagbegi, Paul Olaiya Abiodun, Ahmed Mamuda Bello, et al. (2023). A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust in the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Three Nigerian Geopolitical Zones. World Journal of Public Health, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nwoke Emmanuel Chukwuebuka; Ebenezer Obi Daniel; Oladapo Michael Olagbegi; Paul Olaiya Abiodun; Ahmed Mamuda Bello, et al. A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust in the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Three Nigerian Geopolitical Zones. World J. Public Health 2023, 8(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nwoke Emmanuel Chukwuebuka, Ebenezer Obi Daniel, Oladapo Michael Olagbegi, Paul Olaiya Abiodun, Ahmed Mamuda Bello, et al. A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust in the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Three Nigerian Geopolitical Zones. World J Public Health. 2023;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11,
      author = {Nwoke Emmanuel Chukwuebuka and Ebenezer Obi Daniel and Oladapo Michael Olagbegi and Paul Olaiya Abiodun and Ahmed Mamuda Bello and Michael Avwerhota and Michael Olabode Tomori and Friday Iyobosa Igbinovia and Adebanke Adetutu Ogun and Folake Abiola Abiodun and Stellamaris Moronkeji and Esther Brodrick-Shehu},
      title = {A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust in the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Three Nigerian Geopolitical Zones},
      journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {8},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-7},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20230801.11},
      abstract = {The issue of COVID-19 vaccination is an important step in the control of the COVID-19 infection in the community. There have been different adopted strategies in the control of the infection and the best public intervention has been getting vaccinated for now. The most likely solution to ending the current pandemic remains through achieving a better community reach, and the frank acceptance of the availed WHO-approved COVID-19 vaccine in communities. In this study, the reason for the COVID-19 vaccine uptake was evaluated across 3 geopolitical zones in Nigeria with differential political affiliation. This study utilized a qualitative sample collection methodology to qualify the prevalence of different views on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, access, and political trust. The data was gathered utilizing pre-tested in-depth interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed thematically through the transcripts obtained from the open-ended key informant interviews. The findings from the qualitative studies indicated that the fear of the side effects, apathy/lack of interest, scarce logistics, people’s opinion, and self-denial were more of the pertinent issue around the poor COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the respondents. Government needs to ensure that health interventions rolled are adequately accessible to the targeted people and should consider the community culture while rolling out health interventions.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust in the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Three Nigerian Geopolitical Zones
    AU  - Nwoke Emmanuel Chukwuebuka
    AU  - Ebenezer Obi Daniel
    AU  - Oladapo Michael Olagbegi
    AU  - Paul Olaiya Abiodun
    AU  - Ahmed Mamuda Bello
    AU  - Michael Avwerhota
    AU  - Michael Olabode Tomori
    AU  - Friday Iyobosa Igbinovia
    AU  - Adebanke Adetutu Ogun
    AU  - Folake Abiola Abiodun
    AU  - Stellamaris Moronkeji
    AU  - Esther Brodrick-Shehu
    Y1  - 2023/01/13
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11
    T2  - World Journal of Public Health
    JF  - World Journal of Public Health
    JO  - World Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 7
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-6059
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20230801.11
    AB  - The issue of COVID-19 vaccination is an important step in the control of the COVID-19 infection in the community. There have been different adopted strategies in the control of the infection and the best public intervention has been getting vaccinated for now. The most likely solution to ending the current pandemic remains through achieving a better community reach, and the frank acceptance of the availed WHO-approved COVID-19 vaccine in communities. In this study, the reason for the COVID-19 vaccine uptake was evaluated across 3 geopolitical zones in Nigeria with differential political affiliation. This study utilized a qualitative sample collection methodology to qualify the prevalence of different views on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, access, and political trust. The data was gathered utilizing pre-tested in-depth interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed thematically through the transcripts obtained from the open-ended key informant interviews. The findings from the qualitative studies indicated that the fear of the side effects, apathy/lack of interest, scarce logistics, people’s opinion, and self-denial were more of the pertinent issue around the poor COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the respondents. Government needs to ensure that health interventions rolled are adequately accessible to the targeted people and should consider the community culture while rolling out health interventions.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • Department of Public Health, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom

  • South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Western Cape, South Africa

  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • Department of Public Health, Atlantic International University, Hawaii, United States of American

  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • International Organization for Migration, Abuja, Nigeria

  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • Department of Public Health, Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana

  • Department of History, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria

  • Sections