As climate change is not just a climate-related problem, social inequality is not only a problem of poor people. This essay explains why a structural social inequality, also in the distribution of power, is one of the main causes of the current polycrisis and inhibits a transformation of our society towards sustainability. Nevertheless, the institutional debate on “sustainable development” in the frame given by the United Nations and governmental organizations continues to suffer from a social blindness, because it is still ideologically trapped in the dominant development model of modernization. While modernization is an expression of a separation thinking and consider privileges and disadvantages as independent from each other, sustainability (in a broader meaning) is an expression of an interconnected thinking. It stands for a good life not at the expense of others: Global South, peripheries, lower classes, future generations, and nature. What our society celebrates as “economic growth” is mostly based on an incomplete invoice in which externalized costs are hidden. At prosperity islands’ visible and invisible borders, structures of social inequality act like a “sorting machine” that sets who experiences development as progress and who as a recession; who benefits from it and who pays the price. Because on a limited planet each growing order causes a growing disorder elsewhere (according to the laws of thermodynamics), the current environmental crisis cannot be overcome without changing the structures and relations within the society. A sustainable transformation requires a fair redistribution of wealth, opportunities, and power – it means also a “democratization of democracy” in the Western countries. This essay is largely based on discourse analysis, literature and Internet research.
| Published in | Journal of Political Science and International Relations (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11 |
| Page(s) | 99-110 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sustainability, Social Inequality, Environmental Justice, Modernization, Resilience, Democracy, Social Change, Good Life
| [1] | Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University Press. doi: 10.7312/rosa14834. |
| [2] | Böhme, G.; Stehr, N. (1986). Knowledge Society. Dordrecht. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4724-5 |
| [3] | Commoner, B. (1971). The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. New York. |
| [4] | Lessenich, S. (2017). Neben uns die Sintflut. Die Externalisierungsgesellschaft und ihr Preis. Munich. |
| [5] | Mau, S. (2021). Sortiermaschinen. Die Neuerfindung der Grenzen im 21. Jahrhundert. Munich. |
| [6] | Oxfam International (2017). Just 8 men own same wealth as half the world. Press releases 16th. January 2017. https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [7] | Schwägerl, C. (2017). Die Anthropozän-Idee. In: Rat für nachhaltige Entwicklung (ed.), Deutscher Nachhaltigkeitsalmanach. Berlin. Pp. 123-131. |
| [8] | Brocchi, D. (2019). Nachhaltigkeit und soziale Ungleichheit. Wiesbaden. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25633-3 |
| [9] | WBGU (2011). World in Transition – A Social Contract for Sustainability. Flagship Report. Berlin. https://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2011/pdf/wbgu_jg2011_en.pdf (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [10] | Merkel, W. (1999). Systemtransformation. Opladen. |
| [11] | Eblinghaus, H.; Stickler, A. (1996). Nachhaltigkeit und Macht. Frankfurt/Main. |
| [12] | Rostow, W. W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge. |
| [13] | Latouche, S. (1996). The Westernization of the World: Significance, Scope and Limits of the Drive Towards Global Uniformity. Cambridge. |
| [14] | Berghahn. V. R. (2010). The Debate on ‘Americanization’ among Economic and Cultural Historians. Cold War History Vol. 10/2010. Pp. 107-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682740903388566 |
| [15] | Morra, G. (1992). Il quarto uomo. Rome. |
| [16] | Sachs, W. (2010). Introduction. In: idem (ed.), The Development Dictionary. London. Pp. xv-xx. |
| [17] | Magnaghi, A. (2000). Il progetto locale. Torino. |
| [18] | Gronemeyer, M. (2010). Helping. In: The Development Dictionary, ed. W. Sachs. London. Pp. 55-73. |
| [19] | Dussel, E. (1976). History and the Theology of Liberation: A Latin American Perspective. New York. |
| [20] | Meadows, D. H; Meadows, D. L.; Randers, J.; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth; A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York. |
| [21] | Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation (1975). What Now? Another Development. Uppsala. |
| [22] | Cf. Laclau, E.; Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London. |
| [23] | United Nations (1992). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed Dec. 1, 2023). |
| [24] | SPD, Die Grünen, FDP (2021). Mehr Fortschritt wagen. Bündnis für Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit. Government program 2021–2025. Berlin. |
| [25] | Paech, N. (2006). Wirtschaften ohne Wachstumszwang. Ökologisches Wirtschaften-Fachzeitschrift 21 (3), pp. 30-33. |
| [26] | Own translation of: ICC–Deutschland (1990): Charta für eine langfristig tragfähige Entwicklung – Grundsätze des Umweltmanagements. Berlin. https://www.iccgermany.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ICC_Charta_1990.pdf (accessed Dec. 1, 2023). |
| [27] | Own translation of: Selke, S. (2022). Gerecht werden. Zukunftsdesign zwischen Panikattacke und Poesie der Hoffnung. In: Schrader Foundation (ed.), Balancen. Darmstadt. P. 31. |
| [28] | Own translation: Federal Ministry of Agriculture (2019). Klöckner: „Afrika braucht afrikanische Lösungen – Deutschland hilft mit Wissenstransfer.“ Press release 21.1.2019. https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2019/017-igw-afrika.html (accessed Nov. 8, 2023). |
| [29] | WCED (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. P. 29. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [30] | Federal Ministry fror Economic Cooperation and Development Germany (BMZ) (2023). SDG 10: Weniger Ungleichheiten. https://www.bmz.de/de/agenda-2030/sdg-10 (accessed Nov. 21, 2023). |
| [31] | Hradil, S. (2001). Soziale Ungleichheit in Deutschland. Opladen. |
| [32] | Bourdieu, P.; Wacquant Loic J. D. (1996). Reflexive Anthropologie. Frankfurt/Main. |
| [33] | Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research Vol. 6 No. 3 (1969). Pp. 167–191. https://www.jstor.org/stable/422690 (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [34] | Weber, M. (1985). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen. |
| [35] | Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca (NY). |
| [36] | Graber, D. (2012). Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn. |
| [37] | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford (NY). |
| [38] | Harari, Y. N. (2019). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London. |
| [39] | Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge (Massachusetts). |
| [40] | Tödtmann, C. (2018). Vorstandsgehälter – 5,8 Millionen Euro für einen Dax-Chef – im Schnitt. WirtschaftsWoche 12.7.2018. |
| [41] | Cf. Hofstede, G.; Hofstede, J. (2009). Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Munich. |
| [42] | Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge (UK). |
| [43] | Motesharrei, S.; Rivas, J.; Kalnay, E. (2014). Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): Modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies. Ecological Economics 101 5/2014. Pp. 90–102. |
| [44] | Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston. |
| [45] | Horkheimer, M. (1947). Eclipse of Reason. Oxford. |
| [46] | Vallet, É. (2021). State of Border Walls in a Globalized World. In: A. Bisonette, É. Vallet (Hrsg.), Borders and Border Walls. New York. |
| [47] | Schlosser, S. (2018). Gated Communities in Deutschland. In: SWR2 27.3.2018. https://www.swr.de/swr2/wissen/gated-communities-in-deutschland-100.html (accessed Jul. 1, 2023). |
| [48] | Own translation of: Schulz, B. (2011). Bundeskanzleramt: Die Trutzburg im Regierungsviertel. Tagesspiegel 2.5.2011. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/die-trutzburg-im-regierungsviertel-7025974.html (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [49] | Report in the Tagblatt St. Gallen of 13 January 2023 on the preparations for the World Economic Forum: „During the World Economic Forum [...] Davos becomes a high-security wing [...]. Davos is becoming a fortress again.“ |
| [50] | Oxfam International (2023). Climate Equality: A planet for the 99%. Oxford. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621551/cr-climate-equality-201123-en-summ.pdf (accessed Nov. 21, 2023). |
| [51] | Gilens, M.; Page, B. (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12/2014, pp. 564–581. |
| [52] | Schäfer, A. (2013). Die Akademikerrepublik: Kein Platz für Arbeiter und Geringgebildete im Bundestag? Gesellschaftsforschung 2013 (2). Pp. 8–13. |
| [53] | Lemmenmeier, A. (2003). Kein Bargeld, kein Benzin, kein Strom in Nigeria. SRF 5.2.2023. https://www.srf.ch/news/international/infrastruktur-unter-druck-kein-bargeld-kein-benzin-kein-strom-in-nigeria (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [54] | Hirsch, F. (2005). Social Limits to Growth. London. |
| [55] | Scharpf, F. (1999). Regieren in Europa. Frankfurt/Main. P. 16. |
| [56] | Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/Main. P. 122. |
| [57] | Butterwegge, C. (2020). Die zerrissene Republik. Weinheim. |
| [58] | Neate, R. (2023). Virgin Galactic completes first commercial flight into space. The Guardian 29 Jun. 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jun/29/virgin-galactic-rocket-plane-commercial-space-flight (accessed Nov. 30, 2023). |
| [59] | Own translation of: Hösle, V. (1991). Philosophie der ökologischen Krise. Munich. P. 32. |
| [60] | Latour, B. (2015). Das Parlament der Dinge. Frankfurt. |
| [61] | Cf. Galtung, J. (1995). On the social Costs of Modernization. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for social Development (UNRISD). |
| [62] | Brand, U.; Wissen, M. (2017). Imperiale Lebensweise. Munich. |
| [63] | Bregman, R. (2020). Humankind: A Hopeful History. London. |
| [64] | Nerfin, M. (1987). Neither Prince nor Merchant: Citizen. An Introduction to the Third System. Development Dialogue 1987 (1). Pp. 171-195. |
| [65] | Cf. Allport, G. (1979). The Nature of Prejudice. New York. |
| [66] | Cf. Leggewie, C.; Welzer, H. (2009). Das Ende der Welt, wie wir sie kannten. Frankfurt. |
| [67] | Vester, F. (2007). The Art of interconnected thinking: Tools and concepts for a new approach to tackling complexity. Berlin. |
| [68] | Elias, N. (1994). The Civilizing Process. Oxford. |
| [69] | Barber, B. (2004). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley. |
| [70] | Paech, N. (2012). Befreiung vom Überfluss. Munich. |
| [71] | Tarozzi, A. (1990). Visioni di uno sviluppo diverso. Turin. |
| [72] | Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. Cambridge. |
| [73] | Friedrichs, J. (2007). Gesellschaftliche Krisen. Scholten, H. (Hg.), Die Wahrnehmung von Krisenphänomenen. Cologne. Pp. 13-26. |
APA Style
Brocchi, D. (2023). Unequal into the Collapse: Why There Can Be No Sustainability Without Social Justice. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 6(4), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11
ACS Style
Brocchi, D. Unequal into the Collapse: Why There Can Be No Sustainability Without Social Justice. J. Polit. Sci. Int. Relat. 2023, 6(4), 99-110. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11
AMA Style
Brocchi D. Unequal into the Collapse: Why There Can Be No Sustainability Without Social Justice. J Polit Sci Int Relat. 2023;6(4):99-110. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11,
author = {Davide Brocchi},
title = {Unequal into the Collapse: Why There Can Be No Sustainability Without Social Justice},
journal = {Journal of Political Science and International Relations},
volume = {6},
number = {4},
pages = {99-110},
doi = {10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jpsir.20230604.11},
abstract = {As climate change is not just a climate-related problem, social inequality is not only a problem of poor people. This essay explains why a structural social inequality, also in the distribution of power, is one of the main causes of the current polycrisis and inhibits a transformation of our society towards sustainability. Nevertheless, the institutional debate on “sustainable development” in the frame given by the United Nations and governmental organizations continues to suffer from a social blindness, because it is still ideologically trapped in the dominant development model of modernization. While modernization is an expression of a separation thinking and consider privileges and disadvantages as independent from each other, sustainability (in a broader meaning) is an expression of an interconnected thinking. It stands for a good life not at the expense of others: Global South, peripheries, lower classes, future generations, and nature. What our society celebrates as “economic growth” is mostly based on an incomplete invoice in which externalized costs are hidden. At prosperity islands’ visible and invisible borders, structures of social inequality act like a “sorting machine” that sets who experiences development as progress and who as a recession; who benefits from it and who pays the price. Because on a limited planet each growing order causes a growing disorder elsewhere (according to the laws of thermodynamics), the current environmental crisis cannot be overcome without changing the structures and relations within the society. A sustainable transformation requires a fair redistribution of wealth, opportunities, and power – it means also a “democratization of democracy” in the Western countries. This essay is largely based on discourse analysis, literature and Internet research.
},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Unequal into the Collapse: Why There Can Be No Sustainability Without Social Justice AU - Davide Brocchi Y1 - 2023/12/11 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11 T2 - Journal of Political Science and International Relations JF - Journal of Political Science and International Relations JO - Journal of Political Science and International Relations SP - 99 EP - 110 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2785 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20230604.11 AB - As climate change is not just a climate-related problem, social inequality is not only a problem of poor people. This essay explains why a structural social inequality, also in the distribution of power, is one of the main causes of the current polycrisis and inhibits a transformation of our society towards sustainability. Nevertheless, the institutional debate on “sustainable development” in the frame given by the United Nations and governmental organizations continues to suffer from a social blindness, because it is still ideologically trapped in the dominant development model of modernization. While modernization is an expression of a separation thinking and consider privileges and disadvantages as independent from each other, sustainability (in a broader meaning) is an expression of an interconnected thinking. It stands for a good life not at the expense of others: Global South, peripheries, lower classes, future generations, and nature. What our society celebrates as “economic growth” is mostly based on an incomplete invoice in which externalized costs are hidden. At prosperity islands’ visible and invisible borders, structures of social inequality act like a “sorting machine” that sets who experiences development as progress and who as a recession; who benefits from it and who pays the price. Because on a limited planet each growing order causes a growing disorder elsewhere (according to the laws of thermodynamics), the current environmental crisis cannot be overcome without changing the structures and relations within the society. A sustainable transformation requires a fair redistribution of wealth, opportunities, and power – it means also a “democratization of democracy” in the Western countries. This essay is largely based on discourse analysis, literature and Internet research. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -
Independent Researcher, Cologne, Germany
Information