This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation of thermoacoustics (TA) wave propagation in the time domain using the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, with a comparative analysis against the k-space pseudospectral approach. The TA wave equation is modeled under the assumptions of homogeneous, lossless, and isotropic medium, incorporating a physically realistic source term. A Gaussian initial pressure distribution is employed as the primary excitation, and the resulting acoustic signals are recorded using point and multi-sensor configurations. The study systematically the influence of spatial grid resolution and the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) number on numerical stability and accuracy. It is observed that maintaining a constant CFL number ensures consistent wave propagation behavior across different grid resolutions, whereas variations in CFL lead to significant discrepancies in amplitude and phase of the propagated signals. In addition to Gausian sources, various realistic source geometries, including circular disk, Chebyshev polynomial-based, and asymmetric (rock-like) distributions, are investigated to analyze their impact on wavefield characteristics. The numerical results demonstrate strong agreement between the FDTD and k-space method in both time and frequency domains under stable conditions. However, deviations are observed at higher frequencies due to numerical dispersion effects, particularly in the FDTD scheme. Furthermore, it is shown that sharp discontinuities in binary image based sources introduce non-physical high-frequency components, resulting in spurious oscillations. This study highlights the importance of numerical parameter selection, particularly the CFL condition, and provides a detailed comparision of two widely used computational methods for TA wave simulation. The findings offer valuable insights into the role of source geometry and numerical schemes in accurately modeling acoustic wave propagation.
| Published in | American Journal of Modern Physics (Volume 15, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12 |
| Page(s) | 77-85 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Finite Difference, Isotropic Medium, Thermoacoustic, Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy Number
| [1] |
L. V. Wang, Photoacoustic Imaging and Spectroscopy. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.
https://www.routledge.com/Photoacoustic-Imaging-and-Spectroscopy/Wang/p/book/9781420059925 |
| [2] | P. Beard, “Biomedical photoacoustic imaging,” Interface Focus, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 602–631, 2011. |
| [3] | M. Xu and L. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 77, no. 4, p. 041101, 2006. |
| [4] | I. G. Calasso, W. Craig, and G. J. Diebold, “Photoacoustic point source,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 16, p. 3550, 2001. |
| [5] | A. A. Oraevsky and A. A. Karabutov, “Optoacoustic tomography for biomedical applications,” in Biomedical Photonics Handbook, 2002. |
| [6] | L. V. Wang and S. Hu, “Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6075, pp. 1458–1462, 2012. |
| [7] | B. E. Treeby and B. T. Cox, “k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 021314, 2010. |
| [8] | B. T. Cox, S. R. Arridge, and P. C. Beard, “k-space propagation models for acoustically heterogeneous media,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 3453–3464, 2007. |
| [9] | T. D. Mast et al., “A k-space method for large-scale models of wave propagation in tissue,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 341–354, 2001. |
| [10] | M. Tabei et al., “A k-space method for coupled first-order acoustic propagation equations,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2002. |
| [11] | R. J. LeVeque, Finite Difference Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2007. |
| [12] | D. R. Durran, Numerical Methods for Wave Equations in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. New York: Springer, 2010. |
| [13] | K. S. Yee, “Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 302–307, 1966. |
| [14] | A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Norwood: Artech House, 2005. |
| [15] | J. Virieux, “P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method,” Geophysics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 889–901, 1986. |
| [16] | B. Fornberg, A Practical Guide to Pseudospectral Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. |
| [17] | J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods. New York: Dover Publications, 2001. |
| [18] | B. E. Treeby, J. Jaros, A. P. Rendell, and B. T. Cox, “Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 4324–4336, 2012. |
| [19] | R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy, “Uber die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 32–74, 1928. |
| [20] | E. Sanmiguel-Rojas, J. Ortega-Casanova, C. del Pino, and R. Fernandez-Feria, “A Cartesian grid finite-difference method for 2D incompressible viscous flows in irregular geometries,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 302–318, 2005. |
APA Style
Mandal, U. (2026). Numerical Simulation of Time Domain Thermoacoustic Wave Equation Using the FDTD Method with Comparison to the k-Space Pseudospectral Approach. American Journal of Modern Physics, 15(3), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12
ACS Style
Mandal, U. Numerical Simulation of Time Domain Thermoacoustic Wave Equation Using the FDTD Method with Comparison to the k-Space Pseudospectral Approach. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2026, 15(3), 77-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12,
author = {Ujjal Mandal},
title = {Numerical Simulation of Time Domain Thermoacoustic Wave Equation Using the FDTD Method with Comparison to the k-Space Pseudospectral Approach
},
journal = {American Journal of Modern Physics},
volume = {15},
number = {3},
pages = {77-85},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.20261503.12},
abstract = {This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation of thermoacoustics (TA) wave propagation in the time domain using the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, with a comparative analysis against the k-space pseudospectral approach. The TA wave equation is modeled under the assumptions of homogeneous, lossless, and isotropic medium, incorporating a physically realistic source term. A Gaussian initial pressure distribution is employed as the primary excitation, and the resulting acoustic signals are recorded using point and multi-sensor configurations. The study systematically the influence of spatial grid resolution and the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) number on numerical stability and accuracy. It is observed that maintaining a constant CFL number ensures consistent wave propagation behavior across different grid resolutions, whereas variations in CFL lead to significant discrepancies in amplitude and phase of the propagated signals. In addition to Gausian sources, various realistic source geometries, including circular disk, Chebyshev polynomial-based, and asymmetric (rock-like) distributions, are investigated to analyze their impact on wavefield characteristics. The numerical results demonstrate strong agreement between the FDTD and k-space method in both time and frequency domains under stable conditions. However, deviations are observed at higher frequencies due to numerical dispersion effects, particularly in the FDTD scheme. Furthermore, it is shown that sharp discontinuities in binary image based sources introduce non-physical high-frequency components, resulting in spurious oscillations. This study highlights the importance of numerical parameter selection, particularly the CFL condition, and provides a detailed comparision of two widely used computational methods for TA wave simulation. The findings offer valuable insights into the role of source geometry and numerical schemes in accurately modeling acoustic wave propagation.
},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Numerical Simulation of Time Domain Thermoacoustic Wave Equation Using the FDTD Method with Comparison to the k-Space Pseudospectral Approach AU - Ujjal Mandal Y1 - 2026/05/07 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12 T2 - American Journal of Modern Physics JF - American Journal of Modern Physics JO - American Journal of Modern Physics SP - 77 EP - 85 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-8891 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20261503.12 AB - This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation of thermoacoustics (TA) wave propagation in the time domain using the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, with a comparative analysis against the k-space pseudospectral approach. The TA wave equation is modeled under the assumptions of homogeneous, lossless, and isotropic medium, incorporating a physically realistic source term. A Gaussian initial pressure distribution is employed as the primary excitation, and the resulting acoustic signals are recorded using point and multi-sensor configurations. The study systematically the influence of spatial grid resolution and the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) number on numerical stability and accuracy. It is observed that maintaining a constant CFL number ensures consistent wave propagation behavior across different grid resolutions, whereas variations in CFL lead to significant discrepancies in amplitude and phase of the propagated signals. In addition to Gausian sources, various realistic source geometries, including circular disk, Chebyshev polynomial-based, and asymmetric (rock-like) distributions, are investigated to analyze their impact on wavefield characteristics. The numerical results demonstrate strong agreement between the FDTD and k-space method in both time and frequency domains under stable conditions. However, deviations are observed at higher frequencies due to numerical dispersion effects, particularly in the FDTD scheme. Furthermore, it is shown that sharp discontinuities in binary image based sources introduce non-physical high-frequency components, resulting in spurious oscillations. This study highlights the importance of numerical parameter selection, particularly the CFL condition, and provides a detailed comparision of two widely used computational methods for TA wave simulation. The findings offer valuable insights into the role of source geometry and numerical schemes in accurately modeling acoustic wave propagation. VL - 15 IS - 3 ER -