This study examines the implementation of China's national "Double First-Class" initiative at the provincial level by analyzing local policy documents. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative content analysis and qualitative text analysis based on the classification of supply-oriented, environment-oriented, and demand-oriented policy instruments, to explore the policy tools and strategic narratives adopted by provincial governments. The results indicate that provincial governments mainly rely on supply-oriented tools, while the use of demand-oriented tools is significantly insufficient; provinces strategically adjust discipline investments according to local socio-economic characteristics and industrial demands, resulting in regional differences. The study concludes that although provincial responses are proactive and resource-intensive, their tendency toward homogenization and supply orientation raises concerns about systemic diversity, efficiency, and the sustainability of innovation ecosystems. It is recommended to further optimize policy tools to better balance the tension between national goals and local relevance, promoting the high-quality development of local universities.
| Published in | Higher Education Research (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.her.20251006.14 |
| Page(s) | 252-257 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
First-class Discipline, Provincial Policy, Textual Analysis, Policy Instruments, Higher Education, China
| [1] | People's Republic of China. (2015). Overall plan for promoting the construction of world-class universities and first-class disciplines. Gazette. |
| [2] | Mok, K. H., & Jiang, J. (2018). Massification of higher education and challenges for graduate employment and social mobility: East Asian experiences and sociological reflections. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 44-45. |
| [3] | Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (Eds.). (2019). Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition. Springer. |
| [4] | Li, M., & Zhang, H. (2019). "Double First-Class" construction and the value reconstruction of Chinese higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 40(3), 1-10. |
| [5] | Wang, S., & Liu, W. (2020). Research on the influence mechanism of performance-oriented resource allocation on university stratification. Educational Policy Studies, 15(2), 45-58. |
| [6] | Chen, X., & Zhao, L. (2021). The rise and reflection of academic capitalism in Chinese universities. University Education Science, 37(1), 23-35. |
| [7] | Huang, Y., & Zhou, J. (2022). Analysis of the dilemmas in "Double First-Class" construction from the perspective of disciplinary ecological diversity. China Higher Education Research, 28(4), 67-75. |
| [8] | Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. |
| [9] | Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Meso-level governance in Chinese higher education: The mediating role of provincial governments. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1567-1581. |
| [10] | Zhou, J., & Li, M. (2020). How provincial governments shape university behavior: Evidence from China's Double First-Class policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(3), 289-305. |
| [11] | Yang, R., & Wang, D. (2023). Regional policy differentiation and institutional adaptation: A comparative study of Chinese universities. Higher Education Policy, 36(2), 245-263. |
| [12] | Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2021). Regional policy responses to national initiatives: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(2), 205-225. |
| [13] | Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1985). Reindustrialization and Technology. Longman. |
| [14] | Zhou, J., & Lyu, Y. (2022). The use of policy instruments in China's higher education reform. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1234–1250. |
| [15] | Yang, R., & Wang, X. (2023). Regional coordination and disciplinary development. Chinese Journal of Education, 45(6), 88–95. |
| [16] | Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education. (2017). Action plan for first-class discipline construction. Zhejiang Higher Education Research, (5), 1–8. |
| [17] | Shanxi Provincial Government. (2018). Action plan for discipline construction serving industrial transformation. Shanxi Higher Education, 26(3), 10–17. |
| [18] | Li, J., & Yang, R. (2020). The Double First-Class Initiative. Higher Education Policy., 33(4), 543–562. |
| [19] | Liu, X., & Zhang, M. (2024). From resource input to systematic governance. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 45(1), 34–45. |
| [20] | Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Performance evaluation in China's discipline construction. Evaluation and Management of Higher Education, 22(2), 78–92. |
APA Style
Meng, F., Wu, R., Qu, X. (2025). A Textual Analysis of Provincial “First-class Discipline” Construction Policies in China. Higher Education Research, 10(6), 252-257. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.14
ACS Style
Meng, F.; Wu, R.; Qu, X. A Textual Analysis of Provincial “First-class Discipline” Construction Policies in China. High. Educ. Res. 2025, 10(6), 252-257. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20251006.14
@article{10.11648/j.her.20251006.14,
author = {Fanqin Meng and Ruoshi Wu and Xinjian Qu},
title = {A Textual Analysis of Provincial “First-class Discipline” Construction Policies in China},
journal = {Higher Education Research},
volume = {10},
number = {6},
pages = {252-257},
doi = {10.11648/j.her.20251006.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20251006.14},
abstract = {This study examines the implementation of China's national "Double First-Class" initiative at the provincial level by analyzing local policy documents. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative content analysis and qualitative text analysis based on the classification of supply-oriented, environment-oriented, and demand-oriented policy instruments, to explore the policy tools and strategic narratives adopted by provincial governments. The results indicate that provincial governments mainly rely on supply-oriented tools, while the use of demand-oriented tools is significantly insufficient; provinces strategically adjust discipline investments according to local socio-economic characteristics and industrial demands, resulting in regional differences. The study concludes that although provincial responses are proactive and resource-intensive, their tendency toward homogenization and supply orientation raises concerns about systemic diversity, efficiency, and the sustainability of innovation ecosystems. It is recommended to further optimize policy tools to better balance the tension between national goals and local relevance, promoting the high-quality development of local universities.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Textual Analysis of Provincial “First-class Discipline” Construction Policies in China AU - Fanqin Meng AU - Ruoshi Wu AU - Xinjian Qu Y1 - 2025/12/20 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.14 DO - 10.11648/j.her.20251006.14 T2 - Higher Education Research JF - Higher Education Research JO - Higher Education Research SP - 252 EP - 257 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-935X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.14 AB - This study examines the implementation of China's national "Double First-Class" initiative at the provincial level by analyzing local policy documents. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative content analysis and qualitative text analysis based on the classification of supply-oriented, environment-oriented, and demand-oriented policy instruments, to explore the policy tools and strategic narratives adopted by provincial governments. The results indicate that provincial governments mainly rely on supply-oriented tools, while the use of demand-oriented tools is significantly insufficient; provinces strategically adjust discipline investments according to local socio-economic characteristics and industrial demands, resulting in regional differences. The study concludes that although provincial responses are proactive and resource-intensive, their tendency toward homogenization and supply orientation raises concerns about systemic diversity, efficiency, and the sustainability of innovation ecosystems. It is recommended to further optimize policy tools to better balance the tension between national goals and local relevance, promoting the high-quality development of local universities. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -