Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) is a multi-purpose spice and medicinal crop with substantial nutritional, pharmaceutical, and industrial significance. Despite its potential, varietal adaptability remains poorly documented in diverse agro-ecologies of Southwestern Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted during the 2023-2024 main cropping season in the Buno Bedele Zone to identify adaptable and high-yielding fenugreek varieties. Five improved varieties were evaluated using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications across representative environments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the main effects of variety and environment significantly (P < 0.01) influenced phenological parameters, growth traits, and yield components. However, the variety-by-environment interaction was non-significant for all traits, indicating that the varieties exhibited a consistent performance across the study environments. The highest mean seed yield (1.43 t ha-1) was recorded from the Ebissa variety, which was statistically superior to other varieties, followed by Burka (1.20 t ha-1). In contrast, the lowest yield (0.79 t ha-1) was observed in the Hundaol variety. Based on their superior biological performance and consistent yield across environments, Ebissa and Burka are recommended for large-scale on-farm demonstration and subsequent promotion to smallholder farmers in the Buno Bedele Zone and similar agro-ecologies.
| Published in | Reports (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12 |
| Page(s) | 33-39 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Adaptability, Ebissa, Fenugreek, Seed Yield, Varietal Performance
Varieties | Releasing Year | Breeder/Source | Agro-ecology (m asl) | Specific Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ebissa | 2012 | SARC/IQQO | 1800-2600 | High yielding, widely adapted |
Burka | 2016 | SARC/IQQO | 1800-2600 | Late maturing, high yield |
Argane | 2021 | SARC/IQQO | 1800-2600 | Recent release, adaptable |
Hundaol | 2006 | SARC/IQQO | 1800-2600 | Early maturing |
Local Check | - | Farmer’s seed | 1800-2400 | Local landrace |
Source of Variation | DF | DTF | DTM | PH | NBPP | NPP | SY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Replication | 2 | 414.98ns | 210.0ns | 159.60ns | 8.84ns | 0.40ns | 22.98ns |
Variety (V) | 4 | 892.78** | 1535.0** | 342.60** | 156.44** | 154.18** | 220.33** |
Location (L) | 2 | 328.54** | 310.0** | 2.50ns | 165.67** | 93.10** | 207.52** |
Year (Y) | 1 | 2.50* | 722.50** | 122.50ns | 250.00** | 202.50** | 303.97** |
V × L | 8 | 0.01ns | 0.01ns | 0.01ns | 0.01** | 0.01ns | 0.04ns |
V × Y | 4 | 0.04ns | 0.01ns | 0.01ns | 0.17ns | 4.38ns | 0.05ns |
V × Y × L | 10 | 33.50** | 2.00ns | 30.50ns | 3.50ns | 1.50ns | 7.94ns |
Error | 58 | 7.59 | 20.34 | 43.53 | 5.74 | 4.51 | 3.81 |
Varieties | DTF (days) | DTM (days) | PH (cm) | NBPP (no.) | NPPP (no.) | NSPP (no.) | PM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burka | 77.67d | 112.67c | 29.00a | 8.83b | 10.67b | 10.26b | 30 MR |
Ebissa | 82.67c | 119.33b | 28.00a | 12.50a | 15.70a | 13.83a | 30 MR |
Argane | 91.00b | 131.00b | 20.67b | 7.17b | 11.33a | 11.33b | 30 MR |
Hundaol | 97.67a | 124.33b | 21.67b | 7.17b | 6.33c | 9.15b | 30 MR |
Local | 73.83d | 107.67c | 25.30a | 4.50c | 11.13a | 10.18b | 30 MR |
LSD (0.05) | 3.32 | 5.12 | 7.35 | 2.77 | 2.63 | 0.32 | |
CV (%) | 3.37 | 3.60 | 25.87 | 28.84 | 20.65 | 12.17 | |
P-Value | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
Varieties | Dabo Hana | Gechi | Chora | Over all Combined | YA (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 2024 | Combined | 2023 | 2024 | Combined | 2023 | 2024 | combined | |||
Burka | 0.89b | 1.32a | 1.14a | 1.1a | 1.34a | 1.22a | 1.28a | 1.22a | 1.25a | 1.2a | 41.18 |
Ebissa | 1.3a | 1.44a | 1.37a | 1.4a | 1.55a | 1.48a | 1.54a | 1.34a | 1.44a | 1.43a | 68.24 |
Argane | 0.64b | 0.87b | 0.76b | 0.93b | 1.16a | 1.05a | 0.67b | 1.1a | 0.89b | 0.9b | |
Hundaol | 0.58b | 0.78b | 0.68b | 0.73b | 0.82b | 0.78b | 0.71b | 1.13a | 0.92b | 0.79b | |
Local | 0.76b | 0.81b | 0.79b | 0.82b | 0.94b | 0.88b | 0.78b | 0.98b | 0.88b | 0.85b | |
LSD (0.05) | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.31 | |
CV (%) | 26.95 | 23.12 | 10.65 | 24.28 | 20.17 | 26.24 | 18.17 | 18.17 | 18.17 | 16.29 | |
P-Value | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
Parameters | DF | DM | PH | NBPP | NPPP | NSPP | SY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DF | 1 | ||||||
DM | 0.81** | 1 | |||||
PH | 0.02ns | 0.08ns | 1 | ||||
NBPP | 0.39* | 0.36* | 0.18** | 1 | |||
NPPP | 0.32* | 0.33* | 0.02ns | 0.71** | 1 | ||
NSPP | 0.43** | 0.53* | 0.54** | 0.68** | 0.81** | 1 | |
SY | 0.57** | 0.46* | 0.45** | 0.83** | 0.89** | 0.94** | 1 |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
BeARC | Bedele Agricultural Research Center |
IQQO | Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO) |
LSD | List Significance Difference |
| [1] | Fikreselassie, M., Zeleke, H. and Alemayehu, N. (2012) 'Genetic variability of Ethiopian fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) landraces', Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 4(3), pp. 39-48. |
| [2] | Getu, A. and Hirko, B. (2022) 'Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) cultivation and genetic diversity assessment in Ethiopia', Journal of Agronomy Technology and Engineering Management, 5(6), pp. 826-834. |
| [3] | Hilles, A. R. and Mahmood, S. (2021) 'Historical background, origin, distribution, and economic importance of fenugreek', in Fenugreek: Biology and applications. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 3-11. |
| [4] | Acharya, S. N., Acharya, K., Paul, S. and Basu, S. K. (2011) 'Antioxidant and antileukemic properties of selected fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes grown in western Canada', Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 91(1), pp. 99-105. |
| [5] | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2025) World food and agriculture statistical yearbook 2025. Rome: FAO. |
| [6] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency Ethiopia) (2022) Report on area and production of major crops. Agricultural sample survey. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [7] | Betelehiem, B. (2018) Genetic variation for yield and yield related traits of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes in North Shewa. M. Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. |
| [8] | MoA (Ministry of Agriculture) (2019) Plant Variety Release, Protection and Seed Quality Control Directorate: National Crop Variety Release Booklet, Issue No. 12. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ministry of Agriculture. |
| [9] | Mamatha, N. C., Tehlan, S. K., Srikanth, M., Ravikumar, T., Batra, V. K., Karthik Reddy, P. and Nalla, M. K. (2017) 'Mean performance of 150 fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes for yield and yield contributing traits', International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 5(3), pp. 1097-1102. |
| [10] | Nega, A., Munda, D. and Loha, G. (2025) 'Response of improved fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) varieties to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) and its performance evaluation under natural field conditions in Wolaita zone, South Ethiopia', 4(1), pp. 1-20. |
| [11] | Serbessa, A., Mohammed, H. and Kiflu, A. (2019) 'Growth and yield response of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes to phosphorus application at Adea District, Ethiopia', Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 10(2), pp. 29-39. |
| [12] | Sharanya, B. R., Naruka, I. S. and Rugi, M. (2021) 'Effect of plant geometry and varieties on seed yield of fenugreek', Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55(4), pp. 482-486. |
| [13] | Meena, M. L., Narolia, S. L., Atal, M. K. and Verma, N. (2017) 'Evaluation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes for horticultural traits', Chemical Science Review and Letters, 6(23), pp. 2014-2018. |
| [14] | Shakthi, P. N., Meena, K. C., Naruka, I. S., Haldar, A. and Soni, N. (2020) 'Performance of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes for yield and yield contributing traits', International Journal of Seed Spices, 10(1), pp. 11-15. |
| [15] | Bekele, D., Lulseged, T., Yadeta, D., Kifelew, H. and Getu, A. (2020) 'Release of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) variety Bishoftu', African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(12), pp. 1726-1729. |
| [16] | Roba, R., Mohammed, W., Ruelle, M., Tana, T. and Simion, T. (2022) 'Diversity of Ethiopian fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) accessions based on agromorphological traits', Advances in Agriculture, 2022(1), p. 4844828. |
| [17] | Kena, K. and Latera, A. (2025) 'Evaluation of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Varieties in Kellem Wollega Zone of Western Oromia', Advances in Applied Physiology, 10(1), pp. 1-7. |
APA Style
Abdeta, A., Tamiru, T. (2026). Yield Performance and Adaptability of Improved Fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum-graecum L.) Varieties in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Reports, 6(2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12
ACS Style
Abdeta, A.; Tamiru, T. Yield Performance and Adaptability of Improved Fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum-graecum L.) Varieties in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Reports. 2026, 6(2), 33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12
@article{10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12,
author = {Alemayehu Abdeta and Tolasa Tamiru},
title = {Yield Performance and Adaptability of Improved Fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum-graecum L.) Varieties in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia},
journal = {Reports},
volume = {6},
number = {2},
pages = {33-39},
doi = {10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.reports.20260602.12},
abstract = {Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) is a multi-purpose spice and medicinal crop with substantial nutritional, pharmaceutical, and industrial significance. Despite its potential, varietal adaptability remains poorly documented in diverse agro-ecologies of Southwestern Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted during the 2023-2024 main cropping season in the Buno Bedele Zone to identify adaptable and high-yielding fenugreek varieties. Five improved varieties were evaluated using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications across representative environments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the main effects of variety and environment significantly (P -1) was recorded from the Ebissa variety, which was statistically superior to other varieties, followed by Burka (1.20 t ha-1). In contrast, the lowest yield (0.79 t ha-1) was observed in the Hundaol variety. Based on their superior biological performance and consistent yield across environments, Ebissa and Burka are recommended for large-scale on-farm demonstration and subsequent promotion to smallholder farmers in the Buno Bedele Zone and similar agro-ecologies.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Yield Performance and Adaptability of Improved Fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum-graecum L.) Varieties in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia AU - Alemayehu Abdeta AU - Tolasa Tamiru Y1 - 2026/07/22 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12 DO - 10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12 T2 - Reports JF - Reports JO - Reports SP - 33 EP - 39 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7146 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20260602.12 AB - Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) is a multi-purpose spice and medicinal crop with substantial nutritional, pharmaceutical, and industrial significance. Despite its potential, varietal adaptability remains poorly documented in diverse agro-ecologies of Southwestern Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted during the 2023-2024 main cropping season in the Buno Bedele Zone to identify adaptable and high-yielding fenugreek varieties. Five improved varieties were evaluated using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications across representative environments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the main effects of variety and environment significantly (P -1) was recorded from the Ebissa variety, which was statistically superior to other varieties, followed by Burka (1.20 t ha-1). In contrast, the lowest yield (0.79 t ha-1) was observed in the Hundaol variety. Based on their superior biological performance and consistent yield across environments, Ebissa and Burka are recommended for large-scale on-farm demonstration and subsequent promotion to smallholder farmers in the Buno Bedele Zone and similar agro-ecologies. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -