Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance

Lin Huang; Lu Hu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance

Lin Huang, Lu Hu^*

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 13, Issue 6)

Received: 18 October 2025 Accepted: 8 December 2025 Published: 24 December 2025

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This case study of the "Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute," a social enterprise, focuses on analyzing its unique business model and comprehensive impact. Registered as a corporate entity, its core business model does not rely on traditional property management fees. Instead, it generates revenue by providing intellectual services such as fiduciary-based property management consulting, community governance training, and professional talent development, thereby achieving self-sustaining operations. In terms of impact assessment, its value is primarily reflected in two aspects: Regarding social impact, through knowledge empowerment and concept dissemination, it effectively enhances the negotiation and governance capabilities of community stakeholders, rebuilds trust between property management and residents, and directly promotes community harmony and stability. In terms of economic impact, by promoting the fiduciary governance model, it reduces transaction costs and conflicts within communities, thereby indirectly improving the efficiency of property services and the long-term value of assets. This case demonstrates that social enterprises can, through market-oriented service provision, simultaneously achieve significant social governance benefits and sustainable economic returns, offering an innovative systemic solution to the challenges of community governance.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 13, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
Page(s)	185-189
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Social Enterprise, Fiduciary Property Management, Community Governance, Fiduciary Governance

References

[1]	李宜恒. 依托信托制度发挥物业企业的社会职能 [J]. 现代营销, 2023, (31): 128-131.
[2]	金祎. 数字技术赋能城乡社区治理的困境突围与路径创新[J]. 决策与信息, 2025, (11): 65-70.
[3]	刘志阳, 褚夏冉, 邱振宇.数字化能力与商业模式创新互构如何驱动社会企业混合价值创造？——基于组态视角的分析[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 1-31.[2025-11-07].
[4]	张圣,张其伟.信托制物业模式拓展社区社会资本的实践路径及其内在机理 [J]. 学习与实践, 2024, (10): 101-111.
[5]	邢磊.社会企业参与公共文化服务供给的动力机制与实践探索——基于T企业的个案分析[J/OL].图书馆建设, 1-20[2025-11-07].
[6]	史佳桐.“信托制物业”小区：让每一分钱都花得明明白白[N].金融报,2025-09-17(003).
[7]	文萌川, 张强, 任雁, 等. 开展社区信义治理标准化工作的实践与思考——以成都市武侯区社区信义治理国家级标准化试点为例 [J]. 中国标准化, 2025, (17): 120-125.
[8]	原珂, 卫萌萌. 社区社会企业及其发展：基于S省C市的考察[J]. 行政管理改革, 2025, (10):78-87.
[9]	党朝峰, 苏杰德.“信托制”物业模式如何以“信”换心？[N].海南日报, 2025-08-14(A04).
[10]	王姗, 杨圆圆. 探索“信托制”破解小区治理难题[N]. 合肥晚报, 2025-06-06(A08).
[11]	熊征. 从冲突到共生: 社会工作调解与社区治理创新[J/OL].四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版),1-12[2025-11-07].
[12]	吴晓燕.信义治理何以可能：信托制物业的实践与阐释[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(03):76-85.
[13]	张玉蕾. 以信促治：成都市乡村集中居住区信义治理运行机制的探索与启示[J]. 社会与公益,2025,(06):150-153.
[14]	肖涵宇, 黄梓栗.信托制物业服务模式的源起、功能及其基本架构 [J]. 宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版), 2023, 43(06): 84-92.
[15]	吴新叶, 汪子策. 党务、业务与青年成长：城市高质量发展视野下党建引领路径探析——以上海市虹口区X社区党建引领青年推动社区治理为例 [J]. 青年学报, 2025, (05): 64-71.
[16]	吴晓燕. 信义治理何以可能：信托制物业的实践与阐释[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(03): 76-85.
[17]	高翔.社会工作与社会企业协同创新的实践探索——以S市A机构“绿色家园”社区回收项目为例[J]. 中国市场, 2025, (28): 21-24.
[18]	原珂, 卫萌萌. 社区社会企业及其发展：基于S省C市的考察[J]. 行政管理改革, 2025, (10): 78-87.
[19]	杨桓, 张耀莹. 信义治理：“第二个结合”视阈下改进城市基层治理的新理念[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 45(06): 96-105.
[20]	高仓健, 贝静红. 社会创业理论在中国的发展及其影响[J].江苏商论, 2025, (10): 111-117.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Huang, L., Hu, L. (2025). Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance. Science Innovation, 13(6), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Huang, L.; Hu, L. Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance. Sci. Innov. 2025, 13(6), 185-189. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Huang L, Hu L. Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance. Sci Innov. 2025;13(6):185-189. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20251306.18,
  author = {Lin Huang and Lu Hu},
  title = {Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance
},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {13},
  number = {6},
  pages = {185-189},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20251306.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20251306.18},
  abstract = {This case study of the "Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute," a social enterprise, focuses on analyzing its unique business model and comprehensive impact. Registered as a corporate entity, its core business model does not rely on traditional property management fees. Instead, it generates revenue by providing intellectual services such as fiduciary-based property management consulting, community governance training, and professional talent development, thereby achieving self-sustaining operations. In terms of impact assessment, its value is primarily reflected in two aspects: Regarding social impact, through knowledge empowerment and concept dissemination, it effectively enhances the negotiation and governance capabilities of community stakeholders, rebuilds trust between property management and residents, and directly promotes community harmony and stability. In terms of economic impact, by promoting the fiduciary governance model, it reduces transaction costs and conflicts within communities, thereby indirectly improving the efficiency of property services and the long-term value of assets. This case demonstrates that social enterprises can, through market-oriented service provision, simultaneously achieve significant social governance benefits and sustainable economic returns, offering an innovative systemic solution to the challenges of community governance.
},
 year = {2025}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance

AU  - Lin Huang
AU  - Lu Hu
Y1  - 2025/12/24
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 185
EP  - 189
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
AB  - This case study of the "Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute," a social enterprise, focuses on analyzing its unique business model and comprehensive impact. Registered as a corporate entity, its core business model does not rely on traditional property management fees. Instead, it generates revenue by providing intellectual services such as fiduciary-based property management consulting, community governance training, and professional talent development, thereby achieving self-sustaining operations. In terms of impact assessment, its value is primarily reflected in two aspects: Regarding social impact, through knowledge empowerment and concept dissemination, it effectively enhances the negotiation and governance capabilities of community stakeholders, rebuilds trust between property management and residents, and directly promotes community harmony and stability. In terms of economic impact, by promoting the fiduciary governance model, it reduces transaction costs and conflicts within communities, thereby indirectly improving the efficiency of property services and the long-term value of assets. This case demonstrates that social enterprises can, through market-oriented service provision, simultaneously achieve significant social governance benefits and sustainable economic returns, offering an innovative systemic solution to the challenges of community governance.

VL  - 13
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lin Huang

Entrepreneurship, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China
Lu Hu

Entrepreneurship, Shanghai Zhongqiao Vocational and Technical University, Shanghai, China

Contact Email

Download PDF

Submit an Article

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Huang, L., Hu, L. (2025). Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance. Science Innovation, 13(6), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Huang, L.; Hu, L. Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance. Sci. Innov. 2025, 13(6), 185-189. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Huang L, Hu L. Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance. Sci Innov. 2025;13(6):185-189. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20251306.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20251306.18,
  author = {Lin Huang and Lu Hu},
  title = {Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance
},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {13},
  number = {6},
  pages = {185-189},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20251306.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20251306.18},
  abstract = {This case study of the "Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute," a social enterprise, focuses on analyzing its unique business model and comprehensive impact. Registered as a corporate entity, its core business model does not rely on traditional property management fees. Instead, it generates revenue by providing intellectual services such as fiduciary-based property management consulting, community governance training, and professional talent development, thereby achieving self-sustaining operations. In terms of impact assessment, its value is primarily reflected in two aspects: Regarding social impact, through knowledge empowerment and concept dissemination, it effectively enhances the negotiation and governance capabilities of community stakeholders, rebuilds trust between property management and residents, and directly promotes community harmony and stability. In terms of economic impact, by promoting the fiduciary governance model, it reduces transaction costs and conflicts within communities, thereby indirectly improving the efficiency of property services and the long-term value of assets. This case demonstrates that social enterprises can, through market-oriented service provision, simultaneously achieve significant social governance benefits and sustainable economic returns, offering an innovative systemic solution to the challenges of community governance.
},
 year = {2025}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute: Cultivating Future Leaders in Fiduciary Governance

AU  - Lin Huang
AU  - Lu Hu
Y1  - 2025/12/24
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 185
EP  - 189
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20251306.18
AB  - This case study of the "Chengdu XinYi Governance Institute," a social enterprise, focuses on analyzing its unique business model and comprehensive impact. Registered as a corporate entity, its core business model does not rely on traditional property management fees. Instead, it generates revenue by providing intellectual services such as fiduciary-based property management consulting, community governance training, and professional talent development, thereby achieving self-sustaining operations. In terms of impact assessment, its value is primarily reflected in two aspects: Regarding social impact, through knowledge empowerment and concept dissemination, it effectively enhances the negotiation and governance capabilities of community stakeholders, rebuilds trust between property management and residents, and directly promotes community harmony and stability. In terms of economic impact, by promoting the fiduciary governance model, it reduces transaction costs and conflicts within communities, thereby indirectly improving the efficiency of property services and the long-term value of assets. This case demonstrates that social enterprises can, through market-oriented service provision, simultaneously achieve significant social governance benefits and sustainable economic returns, offering an innovative systemic solution to the challenges of community governance.

VL  - 13
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download