As a language teacher in post-secondary settings, I have noticed the increased gigification and automation of my work through precarious employment and delivery of pre-curated course modules. This made me question the uncritical adoption of technology within my field, which has come at the expense of teacher and student privacy. The commodification of language teaching has led to the packaging of courses, activities, services and promises in educational technologies in the form of apps, hardware, software, and innumerable websites marketed to students, teachers, and institutions. Although many edtech tools have facilitated language teaching, they have come with risks to our privacy, freedoms, and jobs. Many edtech tools collect information about us, breaching our privacy and surveilling how we interact in digital spaces. Drawing on literature from the education and other disciplines, I attempt to explain one potentially overlooked impact of edtech on language teaching. From a critical applied linguistics lens, this diminishes our control over our labour. Whoever has access to this information yields power over our labour where our digital interactions with our students are reduced to clicks and metrics, deprived of human interaction as we relinquish control over our labour. Information collected by edtech can also be used to automate aspects of teaching, deskill our profession, and reduce our agency. Thus, possibly contributing to the precarious employment landscape marring the field of English language teaching. This paper calls for a more critical evaluation of edtech in language education. This is also a call for more transparent practices in how edtech uses the information it collects about us, through policy changes and improved digital literacy in our field.
| Published in | Innovation Education (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19 |
| Page(s) | 60-67 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Deskilling, Language Teachers, ELT, Surveillance, Edtech, Deprofessionalization, CALL
| [1] | Hoback, C. (Director). (2013). Terms and conditions may apply (documentary). Cullen Hoback, Nitin Khanna, & John Ramos (Producers). |
| [2] | Orlowski-Yang, J. (Director). (2020). The social dilemma (docudrama). Exposure Labs & Argent Pictures. |
| [3] | Ding, A., & Bruce, I. (2017). The Wider Context of EAP: Neoliberalism, Globalisation, Social Movements and Higher Education. In A. Ding & I. Bruce (Eds.), The English for Academic Purposes Practitioner: Operating on the Edge of Academia (pp. 13-51). Springer International Publishing. |
| [4] | Page, D. (2018). Conspicuous practice: Self-surveillance and commodification in English education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 27(4), 375-390. |
| [5] | Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge. |
| [6] | Sun, X. (2022). Ten years later: Reexamining the TESOL Technology Standards for Language Teachers. TESOL Journal, 13(4), e684. |
| [7] | Wang, S., & Heffernan, N. (2010). Ethical issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Perceptions of teachers and learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 796-813. |
| [8] | Mirrlees, T., & Alvi, S. (2019). EdTech Inc.: Selling, automating and globalizing higher education in the digital age. Routledge. |
| [9] | Ingersoll, R. M. (2009). Who controls teachers' work?: Power and accountability in America's schools. Harvard University Press. |
| [10] | Corcoran, J. N., Williams, J., & Johnston, K. P. (2022). English for academic purposes in Canada: Results from an exploratory national survey. BC TEAL Journal, 55-84 Pages. |
| [11] | Corcoran, J. N., Johnston, K., & Williams, J. (2023). EAP Practitioners in Canada: Professional Dedication, Satisfaction, and Precarity. TESL Canada Journal, 40(2), 19-40. |
| [12] | Breshears, S. (2019). Precarious Work of English Language Teaching in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 36(2), 26-47. |
| [13] | Elshafei, M. (2022). Institutional exclusion and exploitation of language teachers. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York, 2, 112-121. |
| [14] | Haque, E., & Cray, E. (2007). Constraining teachers: Adult ESL settlement language training policy and implementation. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 634-642. |
| [15] | Kumaravadivelu, B. (2011). Language Teacher Education for a Global Society: A Modular Model for Knowing, Analyzing, Recognizing, Doing, and Seeing. Routledge. |
| [16] | Pennycook, A. (2021). Critical Applied Linguistics: A critical re-introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. |
| [17] | Archambault, S. (2021). Student privacy in the digital age. BYU Education & Law Journal, 2021(1). |
| [18] |
Checrallah, M., Sonnett, C., & Desgres, J. (2020). Evaluating cost, privacy, and data. In T. Trust (Ed.), Teaching with Digital Tools and Apps. EdTech Books.
https://edtechbooks.org/digitaltoolsapps/evaluatingcostprivacydata |
| [19] |
Kelly, G., Graham, J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2018). 2018 State of Edtech Privacy Report, Common Sense Privacy Evaluation Initiative. Common Sense.
https://www.commonsense.org/system/files/pdf/2018-06/cs-state-of-edtech-privacy-report.pdf |
| [20] | Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2019). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: Twenty-first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(3), 167-179. |
| [21] | Rehak, K. M. (2022). Privacy and data rights for adult English as a second language (ESL) students: In T. P. Fudge (Ed.), Advances in human and social aspects of technology (pp. 102-119). IGI Global. |
| [22] | EdSource Staff. (2022, April 21). Sacramento teacher who was fired after attending Jan. 6 Trump rally sues district. EdSource. |
| [23] |
French, C. (2023, October 27). Teacher fired for participating in pro-Hamas rally. REAL News Michigan.
https://realnewsmichiana.com/2023/10/27/teacher-fired-for-participating-in-pro-hamas-rally/ |
| [24] | TESL Ontario. (2021). Competency Framework for Adult ESL Teachers. |
| [25] |
Beetham, H., Collier, A., Czerniewicz, L., Lamb, B., Li, Y., Ross, J., Scott, A.-M., & Wilson, A. (2022). Surveillance practices, risks and responses in the post pandemic university. Digital Culture and Education, 14(1).
https://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-141-papers/beetham-2022 |
| [26] | Paris, B., Reynolds, R., & McGowan, C. (2022). Sins of omission: Critical informatics perspectives on privacy in e-learning systems in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(5), 708-725. |
| [27] | O’Neill, J. (2023). The degradation of teachers’ work, loss of teachable moments, demise of democracy and ascendancy of surveillance capitalism in schooling. Teachers’ Work, 20(2), Article 2. |
| [28] | Microsoft. (2025, January 17). What is Azure Lighthouse? Microsoft Learn. |
| [29] | Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107. |
| [30] | Canagarajah, S. (2020). Reconsidering material conditions in language politics: A revised agenda for resistance. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(3). |
| [31] | Yu, J., & Couldry, N. (2022). Education as a domain of natural data extraction: Analysing corporate discourses about education tracking. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 127-144. |
| [32] | Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Ishizaka, A., Gupta, M., & Shankar, A. (2022). Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1378-1393. |
| [33] | Kaine, S., & Josserand, E. (2019). The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 479-501. |
| [34] | Kouritzin, S. G., Ellis, T. F., Ghazani, A. Z., & Nakagawa, S. (2023). Gigification of English Language Instructor Work in Higher Education: Precarious Employment and Magic Time. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1518-1544. |
| [35] | Webb, P. T., Briscoe, F. M., & Mussman, M. P. (2009). Preparing teachers for the neoliberal panopticon. Educational Foundations, 23, 3-18. |
| [36] | Kumar, P. C., Vitak, J., Chetty, M., & Clegg, T. L. (2019). The platformization of the classroom: Teachers as surveillant consumers. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 145-152. |
| [37] | Martínez Guillem, S., & Briziarelli, M. (2020). Against gig academia: Connectivity, disembodiment, and struggle in online education. Communication Education, 69(3), 356-372. |
| [38] | Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press. |
| [39] | Cook, W. R. A., Luke, J., Valeo, A., & Barkaoui, K. (2021). Institutional Language Policy and ESL Teachers’ L2 Writing Assessment Practices. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 77(2), 93-109. |
| [40] | Litzenberg, J. (2020). “If I Don’t Do It, Somebody Else Will”: Covert Neoliberal Policy Discourses in the Decision‐Making Processes of an Intensive English Program. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 823-845. |
| [41] | Birnhack, M., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2021). Differential rights consciousness: Teachers’ perceptions of privacy in the surveillance school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103302-. |
APA Style
Elshafei, M. (2026). The Deskilling of Language Teachers via Surveillance and Automation: A Critical Narrative Review. Innovation Education, 1(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19
ACS Style
Elshafei, M. The Deskilling of Language Teachers via Surveillance and Automation: A Critical Narrative Review. Innov. Educ. 2026, 1(1), 60-67. doi: 10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19,
author = {Maryam Elshafei},
title = {The Deskilling of Language Teachers via Surveillance and Automation: A Critical Narrative Review},
journal = {Innovation Education},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {60-67},
doi = {10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.iedu.20260101.19},
abstract = {As a language teacher in post-secondary settings, I have noticed the increased gigification and automation of my work through precarious employment and delivery of pre-curated course modules. This made me question the uncritical adoption of technology within my field, which has come at the expense of teacher and student privacy. The commodification of language teaching has led to the packaging of courses, activities, services and promises in educational technologies in the form of apps, hardware, software, and innumerable websites marketed to students, teachers, and institutions. Although many edtech tools have facilitated language teaching, they have come with risks to our privacy, freedoms, and jobs. Many edtech tools collect information about us, breaching our privacy and surveilling how we interact in digital spaces. Drawing on literature from the education and other disciplines, I attempt to explain one potentially overlooked impact of edtech on language teaching. From a critical applied linguistics lens, this diminishes our control over our labour. Whoever has access to this information yields power over our labour where our digital interactions with our students are reduced to clicks and metrics, deprived of human interaction as we relinquish control over our labour. Information collected by edtech can also be used to automate aspects of teaching, deskill our profession, and reduce our agency. Thus, possibly contributing to the precarious employment landscape marring the field of English language teaching. This paper calls for a more critical evaluation of edtech in language education. This is also a call for more transparent practices in how edtech uses the information it collects about us, through policy changes and improved digital literacy in our field.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Deskilling of Language Teachers via Surveillance and Automation: A Critical Narrative Review AU - Maryam Elshafei Y1 - 2026/02/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19 DO - 10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19 T2 - Innovation Education JF - Innovation Education JO - Innovation Education SP - 60 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iedu.20260101.19 AB - As a language teacher in post-secondary settings, I have noticed the increased gigification and automation of my work through precarious employment and delivery of pre-curated course modules. This made me question the uncritical adoption of technology within my field, which has come at the expense of teacher and student privacy. The commodification of language teaching has led to the packaging of courses, activities, services and promises in educational technologies in the form of apps, hardware, software, and innumerable websites marketed to students, teachers, and institutions. Although many edtech tools have facilitated language teaching, they have come with risks to our privacy, freedoms, and jobs. Many edtech tools collect information about us, breaching our privacy and surveilling how we interact in digital spaces. Drawing on literature from the education and other disciplines, I attempt to explain one potentially overlooked impact of edtech on language teaching. From a critical applied linguistics lens, this diminishes our control over our labour. Whoever has access to this information yields power over our labour where our digital interactions with our students are reduced to clicks and metrics, deprived of human interaction as we relinquish control over our labour. Information collected by edtech can also be used to automate aspects of teaching, deskill our profession, and reduce our agency. Thus, possibly contributing to the precarious employment landscape marring the field of English language teaching. This paper calls for a more critical evaluation of edtech in language education. This is also a call for more transparent practices in how edtech uses the information it collects about us, through policy changes and improved digital literacy in our field. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -
Linguistics & Applied Linguistics, York University, Toronto, Canada
Information