This study evaluated the processing methods and inclusion levels of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) on the reproductive performance of laying hens during early laying phase (19–52 weeks). A total of 160 Shika Brown layers were assigned to seven dietary treatments in a 2×3+1 factorial arrangement consisting two processing methods (raw sundried and boiled sundried), three inclusion levels (25%, 50% and 75%) and a control (0%) in a completely randomized design. Parameters measured included age at first egg, body weight at first lay, first egg weight, egg mass, egg production rate, mortality and survivability. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and means separated at P<0.05. Result revealed significant interaction effects were observed for most reproductive parameters. Birds fed 50% boiled cocoyam had the highest body weight at first lay (1.65 kg), egg mass (285.65 g) and egg production (5.45 eggs/day), with lowest mortality (0.005%). In contrast, higher raw inclusion delayed sexual maturity and reduced egg production performance. The improved performance observed in boiled cocoyam diets is attributed to the reduction of antinutritional factors and enhanced nutrient utilization, which supports optimal endocrine function and ovarian activity. It can be concluded that inclusion of boiled cocoyam at 50% optimized reproductive performance of laying hens during early lay and can serve as viable alternative energy source in poultry diets.
| Published in | International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11 |
| Page(s) | 65-71 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cocoyam, Reproductive Performance, Sexual Maturity, Ovarian Activity, Laying Hens
Inclusion levels (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ingredients | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 |
Cocoyam | 0.00 | 12.50 | 25.00 | 37.50 |
Maize | 50.00 | 37.50 | 25.00 | 12.50 |
Fish meal | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
Soybean meal | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 |
De-oiled rice bran | 11.20 | 10.70 | 10.20 | 9.70 |
Bone meal | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Limestone | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 |
Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
Methionine | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Vit. Min. premix | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Palm oil | 1.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.50 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Selenium addition at 0.5mgSe/kg diet | ||||
Calculated Analysis | ||||
Crude protein (%) | 16.63 | 16.40 | 16.17 | 15.94 |
Energy (kcal/kg) | 2608.27 | 2617.31 | 2626.35 | 2635.40 |
Lysine (%) | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.05 |
Methionine (%) | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 |
Calcium (%) | 3.88 | 3.85 | 3.85 | 3.85 |
Phosphorus (%) | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.87 |
Selenium(mg/kg) | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.09 |
Processing method | Level of cocoyam (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Control | Raw | Boiled | SEM | P value | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | SEM | P val |
Age at first (weeks) | 20.05b | 19.98a | 19.97a | 0.006 | 0.0001 | 20.03b | 19.58a | 20.18c | 20.18c | 0.004 | 0.0001 |
Bird wt at L (kg) | 1.55a | 1.47b | 1.55a | 0.002 | 0.0001 | 1.55b | 1.50b | 1.60a | 1.43d | 0.002 | 0.0001 |
Wt first egg (g) | 49.25a | 41.17c | 43.33b | 0.077 | 0.0001 | 47.19a | 40.44c | 44.44b | 43.94b | 0.072 | 0.0001 |
Egg mass (g) | 271.70a | 248.59b | 269.11a | 2.348 | 0.0001 | 294.78a | 245.18c | 262.64b | 245.65c | 2.346 | 0.0022 |
No. of E L/(eggs/d) | 5.16a | 4.72b | 5.11a | 0.040 | 0.0001 | 5.60a | 4.67b | 4.99b | 4.64c | 0.040 | 0.0027 |
HDP (%) | 65.55 | 64.55 | 65.55 | 0.376 | 0.602 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 0.377 | 1.0000 |
HHP (%) | 59.08 | 58.08 | 59.08 | 0.331 | 1.0000 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 0.332 | 1.0000 |
Mortality (%) | 0.70b | 1.83a | 0.69b | 0.051 | 0.0001 | 0.42d | 1.53b | 1.39c | 2.15a | 0.054 | 0.0001 |
Number of Birds | 9.30a | 8.17b | 9.31a | 0.012 | 0.0001 | 9.58a | 8.47c | 8.61b | 7.85d | 0.011 | 0.0001 |
a,b,c,dMeans within the rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05) Cntrol= control; Pval= probability value; SEM= standard error of mean; d= day; b= bird; HDP= hen day production; HHP= hen house production; No. of EL/d= number of egg laid/day; Bird wt at L = weight at first egg lay; Wt first egg (g)= weight of first egg; Age at first= age at first egg laying | |||||||||||
Processing | Control | Raw cocoyam | Boiled cocoyam | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 50 | 75 | SEM | P val |
Age at first (week) | 20.05c | 19.35a | 20.30d | 20.30d | 19.80b | 20.05c | 20.05c | 0.004 | 0.0001 |
Bird wt at L (kg) | 1.55b | 1.50c | 1.55b | 1.35d | 1.50c | 1.65a | 1.50c | 0.001 | 0.0001 |
Wt first egg (g) | 49.25a | 41.00e | 39.00f | 45.00b | 42.50d | 43.50c | 44.50bc | 0.072 | 0.0001 |
Egg mass (g) | 271.70b | 233.01e | 255.01c | 257.75c | 272.74b | 285.65a | 248.94d | 2.341 | 0.0005 |
No. of E L/(eggs/d) | 5.17b | 4.52d | 4.82c | 4.81c | 5.10b | 5.45a | 4.77c | 0.040 | 0.0040 |
HDP (%) | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 65.55 | 0.377 | 1.0000 |
HHP (%) | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 59.08 | 0.332 | 1.0000 |
Mortality (%) | 0.70e | 1.61c | 1.89b | 2.00a | 0.59e | 0.005f | 1.44d | 0.055 | 0.0001 |
No. of Birds | 9.30b | 8.39c | 8.11d | 8.00d | 9.41b | 9.95a | 8.56bc | 0.010 | 0.0001 |
a,b,c,d,e,fMeans within the rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05) Pval= probability value; SEM= standard error of mean; d= day; b= bird; HDP= hen day production; HHP= hen house production; No. of EL/d= number of egg laid/day; Bird wt at L= weight at first egg lay; Wt first egg (g)= weight of first egg; Age at first= age at first egg laying | |||||||||
HPG | Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Gonadal axis |
GnRH | Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone |
FSH | Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
LH | Luteinizing Hormone |
HHD | Hen-Day Production |
HHP | Hen-House Production |
SEM | Standard Error of Mean |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
GLM | General Linear Model |
RS | Raw Sundried |
BS | Boiled Sundried |
| [1] |
Abdulrashid, M. and Agwunobi, L. N. (2012). Tannia (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) Cocoyam as a dietary substitute for maize in broiler chicken. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(5), 167-171.
https://gjournals.org/GJAS/archive/sept-2012/abdulrashid-and-agwunobi.html |
| [2] | Adejoro, F. A., Ijadunola, T. I., Odetola, O. M. and Omoniyi, B. A. (2013). Effect of sun-dried, soaked and cooked wild cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) meal on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Livestock Research for Rural Development 25(6): 7pp. |
| [3] |
Akinmutimi, A.H. (2004). Evaluation of sword bean as alternative feed resource for broiler chicken. PhD Thesis, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture. Umudike, Nigeria.
https://www.scrip.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2993314 |
| [4] | Bedecarrats, G.Y., Baxter, M. and Sparling, B. (2009). An updated model to describe the neuroendocrine control of reproduction in chickens. Reproduction, 138: 1–11. |
| [5] | Crawford, R.D. (1990). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier Science Publishers. |
| [6] | Du, Y., Liu, L., He, Y., Dou, T. and Jia, J. (2020). Endocrine and genetic mechanisms regulating egg-laying performance in chickens. Poultry Science, 99: 5891–5902. |
| [7] | Epafras, J. (2019). Antinutrients effect of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) meal on the performance broiler chickens. Journal of Poultry Nutrition and Research, 8(3): 112-119. |
| [8] | Etches, R.J. (1996). Reproduction in Poultry. CAB International. |
| [9] | Johnson, A.L. (2015). Ovarian follicle selection and granulosa cell differentiation. Poultry Science, 94: 781–785. |
| [10] | Okonkwo, V. N. (2020). Performance of laying hens fed graded levels of dried yellow cocoyam corm meal (Xanthosomasagittifolium) as partial replacement for maize. Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 18(1): 27-39 |
| [11] | Olajide, R., Akinsoyinu, A. O., Ogunlade, J. T., Afolabi, K. D. and Adene, I.C. (2010). Egg quality, serum biochemistry and haematological parameters of laying hens fed fermented wild cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) corm as partial substitute for maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science; 1: 121-136. |
| [12] | Onu, P. N. and Madubuike. F. N. (2006). Effect of raw and cooked wild cocoyam (Caladium bicolor) on the performance of broiler chicks. Agricultural tropical and subtropical. 39(4): 268 – 273. |
| [13] | SAS (2009). SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. |
| [14] | Uchegbu, M.C., Omede, A. A., Chiedozie, J. C., Nwaodu, C. H. and Ezeokeke, C. T. (2010). Performance of Finisher Broilers fed varying levels of raw and sun-dried Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) corm meals. Report and Opinion, 2(8): 22-25. |
APA Style
Hassan, A. A., Iyeghe-Erakpotobor, G. T., Abdulrashid, M., Hassan, A. M., Bukar, A. I., et al. (2026). Reproductive Performance of Laying Hens Fed Processed Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) Diets: Influence of Processing Method and Inclusion Level During Early Lay. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 10(3), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11
ACS Style
Hassan, A. A.; Iyeghe-Erakpotobor, G. T.; Abdulrashid, M.; Hassan, A. M.; Bukar, A. I., et al. Reproductive Performance of Laying Hens Fed Processed Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) Diets: Influence of Processing Method and Inclusion Level During Early Lay. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2026, 10(3), 65-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11
AMA Style
Hassan AA, Iyeghe-Erakpotobor GT, Abdulrashid M, Hassan AM, Bukar AI, et al. Reproductive Performance of Laying Hens Fed Processed Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) Diets: Influence of Processing Method and Inclusion Level During Early Lay. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2026;10(3):65-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11,
author = {Abdulmumin Alhassan Hassan and Grace Takpejewho Iyeghe-Erakpotobor and Mohammed Abdulrashid and Alhassan Musa Hassan and Abba Ibrahim Bukar and Oluremi Martha Daudu and Fauziyya Mahmoud Tahir and Ibrahim Adamu Usman},
title = {Reproductive Performance of Laying Hens Fed Processed Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) Diets: Influence of Processing Method and Inclusion Level During Early Lay},
journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {65-71},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20261003.11},
abstract = {This study evaluated the processing methods and inclusion levels of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) on the reproductive performance of laying hens during early laying phase (19–52 weeks). A total of 160 Shika Brown layers were assigned to seven dietary treatments in a 2×3+1 factorial arrangement consisting two processing methods (raw sundried and boiled sundried), three inclusion levels (25%, 50% and 75%) and a control (0%) in a completely randomized design. Parameters measured included age at first egg, body weight at first lay, first egg weight, egg mass, egg production rate, mortality and survivability. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and means separated at P<0.05. Result revealed significant interaction effects were observed for most reproductive parameters. Birds fed 50% boiled cocoyam had the highest body weight at first lay (1.65 kg), egg mass (285.65 g) and egg production (5.45 eggs/day), with lowest mortality (0.005%). In contrast, higher raw inclusion delayed sexual maturity and reduced egg production performance. The improved performance observed in boiled cocoyam diets is attributed to the reduction of antinutritional factors and enhanced nutrient utilization, which supports optimal endocrine function and ovarian activity. It can be concluded that inclusion of boiled cocoyam at 50% optimized reproductive performance of laying hens during early lay and can serve as viable alternative energy source in poultry diets.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Reproductive Performance of Laying Hens Fed Processed Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) Diets: Influence of Processing Method and Inclusion Level During Early Lay AU - Abdulmumin Alhassan Hassan AU - Grace Takpejewho Iyeghe-Erakpotobor AU - Mohammed Abdulrashid AU - Alhassan Musa Hassan AU - Abba Ibrahim Bukar AU - Oluremi Martha Daudu AU - Fauziyya Mahmoud Tahir AU - Ibrahim Adamu Usman Y1 - 2026/07/08 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11 T2 - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JF - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JO - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology SP - 65 EP - 71 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1312 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261003.11 AB - This study evaluated the processing methods and inclusion levels of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) on the reproductive performance of laying hens during early laying phase (19–52 weeks). A total of 160 Shika Brown layers were assigned to seven dietary treatments in a 2×3+1 factorial arrangement consisting two processing methods (raw sundried and boiled sundried), three inclusion levels (25%, 50% and 75%) and a control (0%) in a completely randomized design. Parameters measured included age at first egg, body weight at first lay, first egg weight, egg mass, egg production rate, mortality and survivability. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and means separated at P<0.05. Result revealed significant interaction effects were observed for most reproductive parameters. Birds fed 50% boiled cocoyam had the highest body weight at first lay (1.65 kg), egg mass (285.65 g) and egg production (5.45 eggs/day), with lowest mortality (0.005%). In contrast, higher raw inclusion delayed sexual maturity and reduced egg production performance. The improved performance observed in boiled cocoyam diets is attributed to the reduction of antinutritional factors and enhanced nutrient utilization, which supports optimal endocrine function and ovarian activity. It can be concluded that inclusion of boiled cocoyam at 50% optimized reproductive performance of laying hens during early lay and can serve as viable alternative energy source in poultry diets. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -